-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … for utilities. The notice required Goodmann to make an appointment with the management office to sign a lease. On … a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a1880-23.pdf … A-1880-23 – COVENTRY PLACE OWNER LLC VS. ADAM GOODMANN …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the bag." 4 A-3537-23 going to call the police." Defendant contacted the police and they arrived at the home, but … reason to disturb that determination. Affirmed. … a3537-23.pdf … A-3537-23 – D.S. VS. J.S. (FV-03-2076-24, BURLINGTON …
-
njcourts.gov
… on the brief). PER CURIAM 1 We use initials to protect the confidentiality of the parties. R. 1:38-3(c)(12). NOT FOR … APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … and without costs to either party. Dismissed. … a3724-23.pdf … A-3724-23 – A.P. VS. P.P. (FV-09-0133-24, HUDSON …
-
njcourts.gov
… We use initials for the parties and children to protect the confidentiality of these proceedings. R. 1:38-3(d)(13). NOT … sixth grade. In July 2023, the parties attended a medical appointment with the children's pediatrician, Dr. Darren Saks, … BCDOH's medical exemption decision. Affirmed. … a1963-24.pdf … A-1963-24 – A.A. VS. L.A. (FM-02-1770-22, BERGEN …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … eligibility term (FET). We affirm. In 1989, appellant was convicted by a jury of murder and sentenced to a term of … a written decision. R. 2:11- 3(e)(2). Affirmed. … a2036-23.pdf … A-2036-23 – JUAN ROSADO VS. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … description of defendant's behavior on July 30, 2022, was consistent with defendant's conduct during the FRO trial. … a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a2717-23.pdf … A-2717-23 – V.R.R. VS. A.A. (FV-11-1467-24, MERCER …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … both N.J.S.A. 4:22-17(c)(3) and 4:22-24(a)(2) were unconstitutionally vague. 1 The complaint-summons incorrectly … in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). Affirmed. … a0689-24.pdf … A-0689-24 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DAYANA ABREAU …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … to recover an aggregate claimed sum of $5,294.75. This sum consisted of $1,771.75 for the unpaid fees, $157 in filing … a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a3795-23.pdf … A-3795-23 – THE LAW OFFICE OF RAJEH A. SAADEH, LLC VS. …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … identify the parties by initials and pseudonyms to protect confidential information in the record. R. 1:38-3(d)(12). 3 … this opinion. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a2972-22.pdf … A-2972-22 – DCPP VS. L.E.F., ET AL., IN THE MATTER OF …
-
njcourts.gov
… 1 Because this opinion discusses complainant's medical condition, initials are used in place of complainant's full name consistent with N.J.A.C. 13:4-10.2(f). NOT FOR PUBLICATION … arbitrary, capricious or unreasonable. Affirmed. … a3896-22.pdf … A-3896-22 – P.F. VS. EQUITY RESIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT, …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … to perform renovations to the premises per "approved construction plans/site plan," and would receive discounts … issue properly before us on appeal. Affirmed. … a2768-23.pdf … A-2768-23 – YOUSSEF INC., ET AL. VS. QUDAH MANAGEMENT, …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … Enforcement Act (UCCJEA), N.J.S.A. 2A:34-53 to -95. Having considered the record in this unopposed appeal, we reverse … and remanded. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a1744-24.pdf … A-1744-24 – T.G. VS. E.M.G. (FM-09-1792-23, HUDSON …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … that’s what he thought he had to say in order to get this appointment so that he could get the evaluation. And a concern … was in the public interest. Affirmed. … a1410-23.pdf … A-1410-23 – IN THE MATTER OF THE EXPUNGEMENT OF THE …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the appropriate forum for resolving disputes. Because we conclude the trial court's order compelling arbitration was … this opinion. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a0293-24.pdf … A-0293-24 – DEBATE COACHING ACADEMY LLC, ETC. VS. …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … had been a tenant at her landlord's forty-six- unit rent-controlled apartment building in West New York since 2008. … Auto. Grp., Inc., 234 N.J. at 157. Affirmed. … a0796-22.pdf … A-0796-22 – NESLIHAN CAKIROGLU VS. 6305 BOULEVARD EAST …
-
njcourts.gov
… indicate Accusation No. 19-07-1048 but the judgment of conviction reflects Accusation No. 19-11-1048. NOT FOR … APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … and remanded. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a1783-23.pdf … A-1783-23 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. GERALD W. TRAYNOR …
-
njcourts.gov
… Court, 26 Jul 2024, 088145 This matter having been duly considered and the Court having determined that … this 23rd day of July, 2024. REME COURT 2 … a_54_22.pdf … A-54-22 Rise Against Hate v. Cherry Hill Township …
-
njcourts.gov
… 2018 . CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT A- 00044 7 -15 … a_10_17.pdf … A-10-17 State v. Marina L. Bartlom (079330) …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … other cases is limited . R. 1:36-3. 2 A-0800-24 incurred in connection with the entry of default judgment against … … a0800-24.pdf … A-0800-24 – THE LAW OFFICE OF RAJEH A. SAADEH, LLC VS. …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … at the January 11, 2022 meeting were not properly appointed. Plaintiff sought temporary, preliminary, and … of the motion. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a3534-22.pdf … A-3534-22 – MICHAEL S. RUBIN VS. BOROUGH OF CALDWELL, …