-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … that a corrections officer, whose identity she could not confirm, conspired with seven other IPs to fabricate a … us to disturb the agency's findings. Affirmed. … a0564-23.pdf … A-0564-23 – TIANLE LI VS. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF …
-
njcourts.gov
… court awarded $6,077.50 in attorney's fees to the court- appointed guardian for his incapacitated grandmother, now … APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … of the motion for reconsideration. Affirmed. … a0986-23.pdf … A-0986-23 – IN THE MATTER OF L.H. (P-000101-23, …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … that res judicata precluded Cole from submitting a second application before the Board. After careful review, we … an alternative basis to deny Cole's application. … a3436-22.pdf … A-3436-22 – JANET COLE VS. CITY OF ESTELL MANOR …
-
njcourts.gov
… DC-008108-17. Jarvis McCloud, appellant pro se. Yolanda Ciccone, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent … APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a1215-23.pdf … A-1215-23 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ONE 2004 INFINITY …
-
njcourts.gov
… July 2, 2025 Before Judges Paganelli and Torregrossa-O'Connor. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law … fees or his right to a "no-cost forum" because it "empowered" the arbitrator to award fees. Lastly, defendant … and fully considering these claims. Affirmed. … a3045-23.pdf … A-3045-23 – JELAN JONES, ETC. VS. TRD TRUCKING, INC. …
-
njcourts.gov
… to protect the privacy of the litigants and preserve the confidentiality of certain records because we discuss the … APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … this opinion. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a3410-22.pdf … A-3410-22 – K.F. VS. W.F. (FM-03-0683-17, BURLINGTON …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the head and spine, and an emergency room visit. The court conducted oral argument on the motion on April 19, 2023. … and remanded. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a2918-22.pdf … A-2918-22 – S.K.S. VS. A.M. (L-3073-21, BERGEN COUNTY …
-
njcourts.gov
… of title, and tortious interference with prospective economic advantage. Id. at ¶1. Moerae did not assert these … Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 249 (1986)). The trial judge must consider "whether the competent evidential materials … the Entire Controversy Doctrine, is granted. … MRS_L_371_22.pdf … Moerae Matrix, Inc. v. McCarter & English, LLP - …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … Because the FM judge failed to make any findings of fact or conclusions of law regarding the predicate act of domestic … different judge. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a2531-22.pdf … A-2531-22 – E.S.W. VS. D.A.P. (FV-20-0498-23, UNION …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … limited. R. 1:36-3. 2 A-2566-22 Defendant appeals from two convictions of disorderly contempt of a domestic violence … 2 Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). … a2566-22.pdf … A-2566-22 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. F.B.I. …
-
njcourts.gov
… Allen Satz and his former wife, a Family Part judge appointed defendant Joseph Siragusa, M.D., to NOT FOR … APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a3412-21.pdf … A-3412-21 – ALLEN SATZ VS. JOSEPH SIRAGUSA (L-2165-22, …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … Palombi—later advised plaintiff she should have contacted a manager and not confronted the customer. Three … a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a1056-22.pdf … A-1056-22 – HELLANA PHARR VS. LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC., …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … 1:38-3(d)(3) and (9). 3 A-0271-21 I. The remand judge appointed Dr. David Brandwein to conduct a psychological … in making the fee award to plaintiff. Affirmed. … a0271-21.pdf … A-0271-21 – P.V.P. VS. F.J.C. (FM-13-0449-09, MONMOUTH …
-
njcourts.gov
… Jersey State Board of Chiropractic Examiners, Division of Consumer Affairs, Department of Law and Public Safety. … APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … N.J. Super. 589, 598 (App. Div. 2014). Affirmed. … a4023-21.pdf … A-4023-21 – IN THE MATTER OF THE SUSPENSION OR …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … order of the Law Division denying his petition for post-conviction relief (PCR) without an evidentiary hearing. We … hearing. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a0602-22.pdf … A-0602-22 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DYRELLE VENABLE …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … 2C:25-17 to -35, after a trial. On appeal, defendant contends the evidence does not support the court's finding … We reverse and vacate the March 15, 2023 FRO. … a2337-22.pdf … A-2337-22 – F.K. VS. C.B. (FV-04-1986-23, CAMDEN …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … reason identified under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief Economic Security (CARES) Act," 15 U.S.C. §§ 9001 to 9141. In … 43:21- 16(d) (2017) (amended July 13, 2023). … a2976-22.pdf … A-2976-22 – MAIA FINKEL VS. BOARD OF REVIEW, ET AL. …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … October 26, 2022 hearing, 5 Dogwood and defendants were in "constant communications to seek the removal of defendants' … to remove all items from the premises. Affirmed. … a3526-22.pdf … A-3526-22 – BOILING SPRINGS SAVINGS BANK VS. KMTJ, …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3795-22 IN RE THE MATTER CONCERNING THE STATE GRAND JURY. __________________________ … APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … denied respondent's motion to seal the opinion. … a3795-22.pdf … A-3795-22 – IN RE THE MATTER OF CONCERNING THE STATE …
-
njcourts.gov
… NO. A-3156-22 ABDELFATTAH MHREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING, INC., Defendant-Respondent. … APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a3156-22.pdf … A-3156-22 – ABDELFATTAH MHREZ VS. CONVERGENT …