-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … a protective order; and a December 4, 2023 order denying reconsideration of the October 19, 2023 order. We affirm all … a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a1503-23.pdf … A-1503-23 – LAW OFFICE OF EUGENE D. ROTH, ET AL. VS. …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … law, plaintiff failed to establish defendant had actual or constructive notice of the hazardous condition. We reverse … not have been granted. 6 A-3572-22 Reversed. … a3572-22.pdf … A-3572-22 – JAMIE STERLACCI VS. WAWA FOOD MARKEY …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … spent at the pool ordered four "buckets" of beer, each containing five beers. When Coxe attempted to close his tab, … an unjust result ." R. 2:10-2. Affirmed. … a1279-22.pdf … A-1279-22 – JOHN H. COXE, JR. VS. CAESARS …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … denying their motion to amend an unverified complaint. We conclude an unverified complaint found to be a nullity … whether a new action would be timely. Affirmed. … a2990-22.pdf … A-2990-22 – AFRICAN AMERICAN DATA AND RESEARCH …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … the day of the murder and was intoxicated. Following the appointment of PCR counsel, a supplemental petition was filed … warrant discussion. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). Affirmed. … a3107-21.pdf … A-3107-21 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. KARLA L. FREEMAN …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … cases is limited. R. 1:36-3. 2 A-2558-22 In this dispute concerning legal fees, defendant Caje Qesja appeals from an … a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a2558-22.pdf … A-2558-22 – ARTHUR E. BALSAMO, ESQ., VS. CAJE QESJA …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … Project works to detect fraud, waste, abuse, and misconduct in law enforcement agencies. The Project’s mission … written opinion. R. 2:11- 3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a3065-22.pdf … A-3065-22 – NJ CRIMINAL INTERDICTION LLC VS. KEVIN …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … from the November 18, 2022 order denying his motion for reconsideration of the October 7, 2022 order dismissing his … to disturb the trial judge's decision. Affirmed. … a1143-22.pdf … A-1143-22 – CHRISTIAN GONZALES VS. WILFREDO …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … 19, 2023 order compelling arbitration of their individual contractual and statutory claims against defendants Vincent … a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a3995-22.pdf … A-3995-22 – PETER AND NITA ROSE, ETC. VS. SHORE CUSTOM …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the vehicle as "[m]ore business" than personal. He did not consider the vehicle a "family car." Hanus used the vehicle … remaining claims. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a2343-23.pdf … A-2343-23 – MICHAEL HANUS, ET AL. VS. AUDI OF AMERICA, …
-
njcourts.gov
… the cause for respondent State of New Jersey (Yolanda Ciccone, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney; Joseph … by SUMNERS, C.J.A.D. In this appeal, we are asked to reconsider our decision in State in the Interest of K.B., 304 … and thus did not abuse its discretion. Affirmed. … a0134-22.pdf … A-0134-22 – STATE IN THE INTEREST OF M.P. …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … is dismissed with prejudice and without costs. … a3819-22.pdf … A-3819-22 – ROBERT SIPKO VS. KOGER INC, ET AL. …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … with prejudice and without costs. Dismissed. … a3558-22.pdf … A-3558-22 – MODWASH, LLC, ET AL. VS. CITY OF VINELAND …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, attorneys; William F. O'Connor, Jr., of counsel and on the brief; Kathleen N. … a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a0345-23.pdf … A-0345-23 – VINCENT ROGGIO VS. MCELROY, DEUTSCH, …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0699-23 WEDGEWOOD GARDENS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., in its individual capacity, … APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a0699-23.pdf … A-0699-23 – WEDGEWOOD GARDENS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … Jose Rodriguez appeals from an October 21, 2022 judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of … date of this opinion. We retain jurisdiction. … a0845-22.pdf … A-0845-22 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JOSE E. RODRIGUEZ …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … January 29, 2025 Before Judges Marczyk and Torregrossa-O'Connor. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … prejudice and without costs to either party. … a3909-22.pdf … A-3909-22 – 65 WILLOWBROOK LLC VS. WILLOWBROOK SUITES …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … or decree." See also Mt. Hope Dev. Assocs. v. Mt. Hope Waterpower Project, L.P., 154 N.J. 141, 148-52 (1998) (The Court … Exch., 399 N.J. Super. at 48. Dismissed. … a1380-23.pdf … A-1380-23 – MICHAEL GALATI VS. USAA INSURANCE COMPANY …
-
njcourts.gov
… attorney for appellant. The Law Offices of Andrew J. Economos, LLC, attorney for respondent (Andrew J. Economos, of counsel and on the brief). PER CURIAM NOT FOR … filed. Reversed. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a0436-22.pdf … A-0436-22 – NITISH B. JOY VS. JUJU B. JOY …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … heavy traffic. Both parties described the weather and road conditions as wet because of heavy rain and the traffic as … plaintiffs' motion for a new trial. Affirmed. … a3387-22.pdf … A-3387-22 – IGOR SIVAK, ET AL. VS. RYAN CHRZANOWSKI, …