-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … and without costs to either party. Dismissed. … a1672-23.pdf … A-1672-23 – FRANCINE BOCCIA VS. NGOC PHAM, ET AL. …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … by employing pseudonyms, to protect their privacy and the confidentiality of these proceedings. R. 1:38-3(d)(9). 3 … and the appeal is dismissed without prejudice. … a3285-22.pdf … A-3285-22 – A.S. VS. D.S. (FV-02-0989-18, BERGEN …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION 2 A-3169-23 In this interlocutory appeal, we consider the propriety of a bench warrant issued by the Law … proceedings. The court reasoned it 4 A-3169-23 was not empowered to enforce a probationary or custodial sentence if … remanded in part. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a3169-23.pdf … A-3169-23 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JESUS E. …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … of harassment. After making specific findings of fact and conclusions of law, the first trial judge denied Sydney an … June 19, 2023 order granting the FRO. Reversed. … a3681-22.pdf … A-3681-22 – S.L. VS. D.D. (FV-08-1390-23 AND …
-
njcourts.gov
… It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor … on Buck v. Henry, 207 N.J. 377 (2011), the trial judge concluded alternatively that plaintiffs complied with the … in multiple specialty areas. Accordingly, the tr … a_43_23.pdf … A-43-23 Earneka Wiggins v. Hackensack Meridian Health …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … John A. Boppert, on the brief). PER CURIAM This appeal concerns whether reasonable limitations may be placed upon … decision. Affirmed in part and vacated in part. … a1151-23.pdf … A-1151-23 – IN THE MATTERS OF WATCHUNG HILLS REGIONAL …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … from a February 22, 2024 order denying his motion to reconsider the default FRO. For the reasons that follow, we … of the new trial. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a2241-23.pdf … A-2241-23 – J.T.A. VS. J.A. (FV-02-1814-24, BERGEN …
-
njcourts.gov
… Docket No. L-1706-22. Kurt W. Perhach (Elm Ridge Legal Consulting) argued the cause for appellant. NOT FOR … APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a1764-22.pdf … A-1764-22 – MARGARET SUDHAKAR VS. NEW JERSEY STATE …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … status for "seriously" and "persistently" violating special conditions of his parole pursuant to N.J.S.A. … capriciously or unreasonably. Affirmed. … a2738-22.pdf … A-2738-22 – DANIEL WATKINS VS. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … in July 2013. Plaintiff testified defendant became confrontational during a traffic stop and refused to remain … in this opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a0350-23.pdf … A-0350-23 – JEFFREY TODD, ET AL. VS. WILLIAM J. …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … now been told that Dr. Scilaris has surgeries and patient appointments scheduled this week, and a vacation scheduled for … May 14, 2021, and May 28, 2021 orders. Affirmed. … a2024-21.pdf … A-2024-21 – BEOM HYO LEE VS. BRUCE R. LAWRENCE …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … with prejudice and without costs. Dismissed. … a0821-22.pdf … A-0821-22 – DARON REALTY, LLC VS. ZEE CO. APPAREL …
-
njcourts.gov
… the brief). 1 We use the parties' initials to protect the confidentiality of the alleged victim of domestic violence. … numerous times. Nobody would help me. I went to [Services Empowering Rights of Victims ("SERV")]. Nobody would help me, … and remanded. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a0425-23.pdf … A-0425-23 – Y.H. VS. Y.P. (FV-04-3755-23, CAMDEN …
-
njcourts.gov
… REALTY, LLC, SAME DAY PROCEDURES, LLC, MID-STATE ANESTHESIA CONSULTANTS, LLC, NORTH JERSEY PERIOPERATIVE CONSULTANTS, PA, INTERVENTIONAL NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT … this opinion. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a1575-23.pdf … A-1575-23 – ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY, ET …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … dismissing her complaint with prejudice, and denying reconsideration. After several discovery period extensions, … this opinion. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a0738-22.pdf … A-0738-22 – CHEVAIS BROOKS VS. NEWPORT CENTRE MALL-NJ, …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the trial court's denial of his application for post-conviction relief ("PCR") and for an evidentiary hearing on … to require an evidentiary hearing. Affirmed. … a2996-22.pdf … A-2996-22 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. KENNETH D. THOMAS …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … In this dispute between neighbors, the court, after conducting a bench trial, entered a judgment dismissing with … counterclaim. Accordingly, we affirm. Affirmed. … a0709-22.pdf … A-0709-22 – LES PANEK, ET AL. VS. JOSEPH ZECCA, ET AL. …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … with prejudice and without costs. Dismissed. … a1424-22.pdf … A-1424-22 – IN THE MATTER OF THE GOOMER LIVING TRUST …
-
njcourts.gov
… December 26, 2024 Before Judges Currier and Torregrossa-O'Connor. On appeal from the Board of Review, Department of … APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … capricious, or unreasonable. Affirmed. … a2987-22.pdf … A-2987-22 – ROCHELL D. COSGRIFF VS. BOARD OF REVIEW, …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … 13, 2021 order denying their motion to recuse the court- appointed Special Adjudicator Stephen M. Orlofsky.1 We affirm … that they worked with their accountants in det … a1749-22.pdf … A-1749-22 – JARWICK DEVELOPMENTS, INC., ET AL. VS. …