-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … his substantive due process rights when it issued stop construction orders and notices of penalty based on alleged … Telebright Corp., 424 N.J. Super. at 393. … a3461-21.pdf … A-3461-21 – BOROUGH OF HIGHLAND PARK VS. MITCHELL S. …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … alleging Equinox, through its Agreement, violated the Consumer Fraud Act ("CFA"), the Health Club Services Act … in my office. Clerk of the Appellate Division … a0079-24.pdf … A-0079-24 – KIM KONDAK VS. EQUINOX HOLDINGS, INC. …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … 21, 2022 order, issued following a "fact-finding hearing,"2 concluding she "abused or neglected" her children. Because … without supervision. 15 A-2392-22 Affirmed. … a2392-22.pdf … A-2392-22 – DCPP VS. F.J. AND M.D., ET AL. …
-
njcourts.gov
… January 13, 2025, AM-000216-24, M-002248-24 … a_41_24.pdf … A-41-24 State v. Tybear Miles (090275) …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … but no "definite diagnosis because it [was] hard to pinpoint which disability [Kim had]." She further reported Kim … proceedings. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a0276-24.pdf … A-0276-24 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. R.F.P., ET AL. …
-
njcourts.gov
… unanswered questions, the court will treat this matter as a contested case and allow for discovery. I Paul Shwahla died … motions before other judges didn’t bring the matter to a conclusion and prompted this court’s determination 1 Laura … separately under Docket No. MON-C-56-19. … mon_p_449_24.pdf … MON-P-449-24 - IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF PAUL …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … legal principles, we affirm. Plaintiff resides on Second Street in Hoboken. Defendant 201 Park owns property … subject to an applicable exception. Affirmed. … a2771-23.pdf … A-2771-23 – MICHAEL F. EVERS VS. ANN HOLTZMAN, ET AL. …
-
njcourts.gov
… 21, 2025 Before Judges Currier, Marczyk, and Torregrossa- O'Connor. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law … filed by Dr. Russonella. Later that month, State Farm appointed counsel to defend Dr. Hole.3 The letter also … … a2522-22.pdf … A-2522-22 – STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY VS. …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … G.S. had displayed signs of opioid ingestion, including pinpoint pupils and decreased respiratory effort and … a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a1274-23.pdf … A-1274-23 – DCPP VS. E.S. AND A.B., IN THE MATTER OF …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … discretion in the trial court's application of the entire controversy doctrine. I. In Moss v. State, (Moss I), No. … a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a1891-23.pdf … A-1891-23 – ROBERT MOSS VS. SHAWN M. LATOURETTE, ETC. …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … Pasquale Gazzillo, filed a derivative claim for loss of consortium. 3 A-3332-23 thick. She also stated the liquid … on the mode-of-operation doctrine. Affirmed. … a3332-23.pdf … A-3332-23 – HELENE GAZZILLO, ET AL. VS. MARSHALLS OF …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … re-open and extend discovery; and June 23, 2023, denying reconsideration of the April orders.1 Because we conclude the … of defendant's representatives. Affirmed. … a3494-22.pdf … A-3494-22 – EDWIN LOPEZ VS. CITY OF PLAINFIELD …
-
njcourts.gov
… Part, Ocean County, Docket No. FM-15-0928-23. Michael Confusione argued the cause for appellant (Hegge & … satisfied plaintiff's proofs, at best, demonstrated disappointment in discovering he did not marry a person … of action for annulment. 16 A-3448-23 Affirmed. … a3448-23.pdf … A-3448-23 – NEEL H. PATEL VS. BHOOMIKA PATEL …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … claims. Because the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are insufficient to permit appellate … Reversed and remanded. We retain jurisdiction. … a3347-23.pdf … A-3347-23 – ELIZABETH MURRAY VS. RUTGERS CANCER …
-
njcourts.gov
… v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and MONARCH BOILER CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Respondents. … proof of his visits with his orthopedist, including appointments on January 22, 2021, and April 23, 2021, and his … of the obligation to pay the refund. Reversed. … a1212-23.pdf … A-1212-23 – RICHARD H. LAMBDON VS. BOARD OF REVIEW, ET …
-
njcourts.gov
… CENTER, REED GLADEY, ANN KENYON, GLENN FERGUSON, ELIZABETH CONNOLLY, and VALERIE MIELKE, Defendants-Respondents. … Kathleen E. Dohn argued the cause for respondents (Brown & Connery, LLP, attorneys; Kathleen E. Dohn and Therese M. … plaintiff's motion to disqualify B&C. Affirmed. … a0108-24.pdf … A-0108-24 – PENELOPE MAUER VS. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ET …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … entItem%3A633N-68G1-F2TK-21HW-00000-00&pdrfcid=hnpara_3&pdpinpoint=hnpara_3&crid=de9281d4-8568-4c33-b6a7-f97664f86cf1 4 … alter our analysis or conclusion. Affirmed. … a3979-23.pdf … A-3979-23 – BLANCA ANAELY VILLEDA-GRANADOS, ET AL. VS. …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … 18A:12-21 to -34. To the extent Fable's appeal can be construed as a challenge to the penalty imposed by the COE, … and (E). Affirmed in part; dismissed in part. … a0273-23.pdf … A-0273-23 – JOSEPH ARGENZIANO, ETC. VS. KATHLEEN …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … 5:3-5(c) factors. I. This matter comes before us for a second time. The chronology is set forth in this court's … remanded in part. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a1869-23.pdf … A-1869-23 – LAURA DILAURA VS. EDWARD DILAURA, SR. …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … to the Law Division to set forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Rule 1:7-4 after considering … to which the trial court was confined on remand. … a0308-24.pdf … A-0308-24 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. FAUSTO RAMIRO …