Find Supreme Court appeal cases here. The most recent cases are listed first. You can also use the search tool to find a specific case.
APPEALS ADDED IN THE NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT LISTED NEWEST TO OLDEST
The following statements of issues on appeal are prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. They have been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of brevity, some issues may not have been summarized.
Beginning on July 16, 2010, each appeal summary posted on this website includes its "posted" date, which is necessary for calculating certain due dates for filing briefs and motions under revised Rule 1:13-9, "Amicus Curiae."
In addition, website addresses cited in the Court's opinions may change or disappear over time. An attempt has been made to capture the material cited in an opinion and to provide links to those sources, when available.
|
A-21-12 State v. Sean Bell (070736) May a defendant apply for admission into the pretrial intervention program after being tried and found guilty of only a third-degree offense?
Watch the
|
|
A-20-12 State v. James W. Robinson (070556) May a criminal defendant be sentenced to two extended term sentences, one mandatory and one discretionary, consistent with the prohibition against multiple extended terms, N.J.S.A. 2C:44-5a(2), and State v. Pennington, 154 N.J. 344 (1998)?
Watch the
|
|
A-19-12 State v. Terry Cornelius Jones (070733) Was defendant entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his petition for post-conviction relief on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim?
Watch the
|
|
A-18-12 State v. Reinaldo Fuentes (070729) Did the trial court err in finding and weighing the aggravating factors in imposing defendant's sentence?
Watch the
|
|
A-17-12 Manahawkin Convalescent v. Frances O'Neill (071033) Does the "learned professional" exception preclude application of the Consumer Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 to -20, to a nursing home?
Watch the
|
|
A-16-12 Martin O'Boyle v. Borough of Longport (070999) Are the documents requested from the Borough protected from access under the Open Public Records Act because they are protected by the attorney work-product privilege and common interest doctrine?
Watch the
|
|
A-15-12 State v. Byseem T. Coles (070653) Did defendant's aunt have the authority to consent to a search of defendant's bedroom in her home, for which defendant was paying rent; and did the failure of the police to ask defendant, who was in custody nearby, for his consent, render the ensuing search unlawful and the seized evidence subject to suppression?
Watch the
|
|
Did the appellant demonstrate that the State intentionally disregarded the March 8, 2012 judgment of the Appellate Division (which is now on appeal to the Supreme Court as A-127-11), thereby warranting the granting of relief in aid of litigant's rights pursuant to Rule 1:10-3?
Watch the
|
|
A-13-12 Judy Komlodi v. Ann Picciano (071301) Under the circumstances of this case, did the trial court err in instructing the jury to consider whether the patient's drug addiction and alcohol abuse were pre-existing conditions that proximately caused the injuries she suffered when she orally ingested pain medication contained in patches prescribed for external application to the skin?
Watch the
|
|
A-11-12 In the Matter of the Commitment of J.B. (070469) Where defendant was found not guilty by reason of insanity and was institutionally confined under State v. Krol, 68 N.J. 236 (1975), and the initial trial judge orally provided for a max-out date on the record but did not include such a date in the commitment order, did the Appellate Division err in affirming a subsequent trial judge's order that provide for a different max-out date?
Watch the
|
|
A-10-12 In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of R.F. SVP 490-08 (070552) In this State action seeking the civil commitment under the Sexually Violent Predator Act, N.J.S.A. 30:4-27.24 to -27.38, did the Appellate Division err in concluding the trial court abused its discretion in determining the State had not met its burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that R.F. suffers from a psychiatric condition that renders him likely to commit a sexually violent act?
Watch the
|
|
A-8-12 State v. Kelvin Williams (071306) Do the circumstances of this case, including defendant's statement that he had a bomb and the fact that his hooded sweatshirt could have concealed a bomb, support a finding of armed robbery by simulation or did the trial court err in denying the motion for acquittal?
Watch the
|
|
A-5-12 State v. Bryden R. Williams (070388) Did the admission of the testimony by the pathologist who did not perform the autopsy violate defendant's right of confrontation?
Watch the
|
|
A-134-11 State v. Dwayne Slaughter (070372) Is defendant entitled to a new trial because his right to confrontation was violated when the trial court found a witness had feigned a memory loss and permitted the State to use her prior statement without requiring her to testify and be cross-examined in front of the jury?
Watch the
|
|
A-129-11 State v. Reginald Roach (068874) Was defendant's right to confrontation violated when the State's DNA expert testified to results obtained by another forensic scientist who did not testify at trial?
Watch the
|
|
A-125-11 Robert Dublirer v. 2000 Linwood Avenue Owners, Inc. (069154) Does this co-op's rule prohibiting solicitation and distribution of written information in the building violate article I, paragraph 6 of the New Jersey Constitution?
Watch the
|
|
A-121/122/123/135-11 State v. Perini Corp (070558) When does the ten-year statute of repose, N.J.S.A. 2A:2014-1.1, begin to run with respect to the alleged deficient design and construction of a hot water system built as part of the multi-phased construction of a prison facility?
|
|
|
A-118-11 State v. Ra-King J. Allen, Sr (069823) Under the circumstances of this case, was it proper for the police officer to conduct a warrantless search of items in the trunk of a car that was in the process of being impounded?
Watch the
|
|
A-116-11 Division of Youth & Family Services v. R.G. and J.G (069970) Under the circumstances of this case involving an incarcerated parent, did DYFS establish all four prongs of the best-interests test under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-2015.1a by clear and convincing evidence, as required to terminate J.G.'s parental rights?
Watch the
|