Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.

Search

  • Business Disputes, Start End Issue - Any - Additional Insured Arbitration Attorney Fees Auto Breach of Contract Breach of Duty of Loyalty Breach of Fiduciary Duty Breach of Warranty Business Judgment Rule Buyout Cancellation CEPA Civil Conspiracy Collateral Source Rule Commercial General Liability Commercial Litigation Computer/Software Related Issues Condominium Act Conflict of Interest Conflict/Choice of Law Construction Consumer Fraud Contract Interpretation Conversion Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Covenants (Restrictive, not to Compete/Solicit) Custodial/Statutory Receiver Damages Discovery Issues/Motions Dissolution Economic Loss Doctrine Employment Contract Employment Status Environmental Experts Fair Dealing Foreclosure Forum Issues Fraud Fraudulent Inducement Indemnification Insurance Jurisdictional Issues LAD Lemon Law Merger Negligent Misrepresentation Patents Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Piercing the Corporate Veil Private Employment Agency Act Products Liability Professional Negligence/Malpractice Promissory Estoppel Quantum Meruit Quasi-Contract Racketeering Racketeering Real Estate Real Estate Reformation Rescission Sealing of Court Records Securities Shareholder Issues Specific Performance Statute of Limitations Statute of Repose Statutory Interpretation Subpoenas Subrogation Successor Liability Suspicious Activity Report Privilege Tortious Interference Trade Secrets Trademark UCC Unfair Competition Unjust Enrichment Valuation Waiver WARN Act Witnesses Workers Compensation Wrongful Termination All Search Apply Filters C-5-20 - Hassan v. Theophile, Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   March 31, 2023, Business Opinion Issue Types, Breach of Contract Fraudulent Inducement Negligent Misrepresentation Real Estate, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Mega, P.J.Ch., Referenced Opinion ID, C-5-20 UNN-C-95-20 - Platkin v. Kizito, Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   Aug. 17, 2022, Business Opinion Issue Types, Securities Fraud, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Mega, P.J.Ch., Referenced Opinion ID, UNN-C-95-20 BER-L-1643-21 - Extech Building v. E&N Construction, Inc. - Motion to Dismiss, Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   Dec. 1, 2021, Business Opinion Issue Types, Breach of Contract Fraud, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Robert C. Wilson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER-L-1643-21 C-148-19 - Millburn Mall Holding, LLC v. Walgreens Eastern Co., Inc., Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   June 10, 2020, Business Opinion Issue Types, Breach of Contract Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Mega, P.J.Ch., Referenced Opinion ID, C-148-19 BER-L-7752-17 - MEL Realty LLC v. Bayonne Oval, LLC et. al., Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   April 26, 2019, Business Opinion Issue Types, Civil Conspiracy Fraudulent Inducement Negligent Misrepresentation Real Estate, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Wilson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER-L-7752-17 BER L-4341-17 - Booth Movers Ltd v. Sleepable Sofas, Ltd., et als., Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   Feb. 6, 2019, Business Opinion Issue Types, Breach of Contract Consumer Fraud Conversion Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Discovery Issues/Motions Indemnification Successor Liability Unjust Enrichment, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Wilson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER L-4341-17 A-0241-17T1 - RICHARD W. TULLY, JR. VS. PETER MIRZ (L-5951-16, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE), Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   Nov. 28, 2018, Business Opinion Issue Types, Breach of Contract Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Shareholder Issues, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Geiger, J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-0241-17T1 A-0275-17T4 - METRO COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., ET AL. VS. NANCY VAN ISTENDAL (C-000036-16, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE), Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   Nov. 19, 2018, Business Opinion Issue Types, Employment Status Shareholder Issues, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Firko, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned to Appellate Division), Referenced Opinion ID, A-0275-17T4 C-28-16 - Magnolia Beef Company v. Hrissikos, et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   June 7, 2018, Business Opinion Issue Types, Civil Conspiracy Commercial Litigation Fraud Breach of Contract, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Dupuis, P.J.Ch., Referenced Opinion ID, C-28-16 C-104-16 - Marzetta, et al. v. Tassev, et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   March 14, 2018, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation Jurisdictional Issues Rescission, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Natali, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, C-104-16 UNN-C-108-13 - Parker v. Parker, Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   Dec. 22, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Shareholder Issues Commercial Litigation Breach of Contract Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Commercial Litigation Unjust Enrichment, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Judge Dupuis, P.J.Ch., Referenced Opinion ID, UNN-C-108-13 C-151-15 - Pearson v. DMH2, Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   Aug. 16, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Covenants (Restrictive, not to Compete/Solicit), Publication Status, Published, Judge, Moore, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, C-151-15 BER-L-5000-12 - APR LLC v. John Lomans, Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   Jan. 27, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Covenants (Restrictive, not to Compete/Solicit), Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Robert C. Wilson, J.S.C.,, Referenced Opinion ID, BER-L-5000-12 A-3777-17T3 - Samsung Electronic America, Inc. v. Westpark Electronics, Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   Dec. 4, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Unfair Competition Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-3777-17T3 A-3172-13T4 - Swarna Allam et al. v. Deepak Verma et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   Oct. 22, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-3172-13T4 A-93-13 - Kaye v. Rosefielde, Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   Sept. 22, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Breach of Duty of Loyalty, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Referenced Opinion ID, A-93-13 HUD-L-3796-11 - Tullett Prebon PLC v. BGC Partners, Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   March 31, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Unfair Competition Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Referenced Opinion ID, HUD-L-3796-11 A-1899-13 - Spencer Savings Bank SLA v. McGrover et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   March 5, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Unfair Competition Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-1899-13 A-6019-12 - Karl Jones v. Belwood Aromatics, Inc., Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   Nov. 26, 2014, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-6019-12 A-1340-13 - Gateway Care Center v. John Sung, Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   Nov. 6, 2014, Business Opinion Issue Types, Unfair Competition Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-1340-13 Pagination 1 Go to page 2 2 Go to next page > Next page Showing 1 to 20 of 35 items
  • Business Governance, Start End Issue - Any - Additional Insured Arbitration Attorney Fees Auto Breach of Contract Breach of Duty of Loyalty Breach of Fiduciary Duty Breach of Warranty Business Judgment Rule Buyout Cancellation CEPA Civil Conspiracy Collateral Source Rule Commercial General Liability Commercial Litigation Computer/Software Related Issues Condominium Act Conflict of Interest Conflict/Choice of Law Construction Consumer Fraud Contract Interpretation Conversion Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Covenants (Restrictive, not to Compete/Solicit) Custodial/Statutory Receiver Damages Discovery Issues/Motions Dissolution Economic Loss Doctrine Employment Contract Employment Status Environmental Experts Fair Dealing Foreclosure Forum Issues Fraud Fraudulent Inducement Indemnification Insurance Jurisdictional Issues LAD Lemon Law Merger Negligent Misrepresentation Patents Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Piercing the Corporate Veil Private Employment Agency Act Products Liability Professional Negligence/Malpractice Promissory Estoppel Quantum Meruit Quasi-Contract Racketeering Racketeering Real Estate Real Estate Reformation Rescission Sealing of Court Records Securities Shareholder Issues Specific Performance Statute of Limitations Statute of Repose Statutory Interpretation Subpoenas Subrogation Successor Liability Suspicious Activity Report Privilege Tortious Interference Trade Secrets Trademark UCC Unfair Competition Unjust Enrichment Valuation Waiver WARN Act Witnesses Workers Compensation Wrongful Termination All Search Apply Filters A-0922-16T3 - JERRY ALLOCO, ET AL. VS. OCEAN BEACH AND BAY CLUB, ET AL. (C-000015-14, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE), Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Aug. 22, 2018, Business Opinion Issue Types, Business Judgment Rule, Publication Status, Published, Judge, ; Leone, J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-0922-16T3 A-1362-14T3 - Sally A. Roberts, DO v. Anson Moise, M.D. et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Feb. 8, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-1362-14T3 A-2650-13T3 - Patricia Wisniewski v. Francis Walsh, Jr., Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Dec. 24, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Buyout Valuation Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-2650-13T3 A-0781-14T2 - Richard Ross v. Paul La Regina and Body Shop Fitness, LLC, Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Dec. 17, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Buyout Valuation Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-0781-14T2 A-3836-12 - Seidman v. Spencer Savings Bank S.L.A., Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   April 30, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-3836-12 ESX-C-122-13 - Coty US LLC v. 680 S. 17th Street LLC, Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Feb. 26, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Custodial/Statutory Receiver Environmental Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Katz, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, ESX-C-122-13 A-6220-12 - Toni Castro v. Angelo Giacchi, Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Dec. 5, 2014, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-6220-12 A-3933-12 - Joseph P. Virzi et al. v. Air Cargo Global Corp. et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   June 6, 2014, Business Opinion Issue Types, Dissolution, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-3933-12 A-3459-12 - Robert Passero v. The North Jersey Country Club, Inc., Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   June 4, 2014, Business Opinion Issue Types, Business Judgment Rule Contract Interpretation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-3459-12 A-1119-12 - The Holder Group, Inc. v. John Bierman, Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   May 23, 2014, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-1119-12 A-2013-12 - New Jersey Realty Concepts v. John Mavroudis, Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   March 14, 2014, Business Opinion Issue Types, Custodial/Statutory Receiver, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Leone, J.S.C., t/a, Referenced Opinion ID, A-2013-12 A-4198-11 - Surgem, LLC et al. v. Achievmed, Inc., et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Oct. 16, 2013, Business Opinion Issue Types, Valuation Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Lihotz, J.A.D, Referenced Opinion ID, A-4198-11 A-0310-11 - Fayed v. Melendez, et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Aug. 7, 2013, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-0310-11 A-2921-11 - 701 Penham Avenue Associates, Inc v. J. Fanok Holdings, LLC, et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Feb. 28, 2013, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-2921-11 A-5924-09 - Mizrack, et al. v. Fairmount Chemical Co., Inc., et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Jan. 25, 2013, Business Opinion Issue Types, Shareholder Issues Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-5924-09 A-5427-10 - Warshauer Electric Supply Company v. Munroe Electric, et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Jan. 10, 2013, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-5427-10 A-4028-10 - Antonucci, M.D. v. Morris County Cardiology Consultants, P.A., et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Jan. 10, 2013, Business Opinion Issue Types, Shareholder Issues Commercial Litigation Buyout, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-4028-10 A-2628-09 - All Saints University of Medicine Aruba, et al. v. Chilana, et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Dec. 24, 2012, Business Opinion Issue Types, Dissolution Shareholder Issues Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-2628-09 A-3161-11 - Gatta v. Gatta, et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Oct. 26, 2012, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation Arbitration, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-3161-11 A-5741-10 - Acquaviva v. Estate of Frank DiMisa, et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Oct. 18, 2012, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-5741-10 Pagination 1 Go to page 2 2 Go to page 3 3 Go to next page > Next page Showing 1 to 20 of 43 items
  • Contract Disputes, Start End Issue - Any - Additional Insured Arbitration Attorney Fees Auto Breach of Contract Breach of Duty of Loyalty Breach of Fiduciary Duty Breach of Warranty Business Judgment Rule Buyout Cancellation CEPA Civil Conspiracy Collateral Source Rule Commercial General Liability Commercial Litigation Computer/Software Related Issues Condominium Act Conflict of Interest Conflict/Choice of Law Construction Consumer Fraud Contract Interpretation Conversion Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Covenants (Restrictive, not to Compete/Solicit) Custodial/Statutory Receiver Damages Discovery Issues/Motions Dissolution Economic Loss Doctrine Employment Contract Employment Status Environmental Experts Fair Dealing Foreclosure Forum Issues Fraud Fraudulent Inducement Indemnification Insurance Jurisdictional Issues LAD Lemon Law Merger Negligent Misrepresentation Patents Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Piercing the Corporate Veil Private Employment Agency Act Products Liability Professional Negligence/Malpractice Promissory Estoppel Quantum Meruit Quasi-Contract Racketeering Racketeering Real Estate Real Estate Reformation Rescission Sealing of Court Records Securities Shareholder Issues Specific Performance Statute of Limitations Statute of Repose Statutory Interpretation Subpoenas Subrogation Successor Liability Suspicious Activity Report Privilege Tortious Interference Trade Secrets Trademark UCC Unfair Competition Unjust Enrichment Valuation Waiver WARN Act Witnesses Workers Compensation Wrongful Termination All Search Apply Filters BER-L-6794-16 - Comprehensive Neurosurgical, P.C. v. The Valley Hospital, Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Nov. 15, 2018, Business Opinion Issue Types, Breach of Contract Tortious Interference, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Robert C. Wilson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER-L-6794-16 ESX-L-1882-18 - The Becker Organization LLC v. Sharp Office Holdings, LLC, et al., Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Sept. 21, 2018, Business Opinion Issue Types, Breach of Contract Statutory Interpretation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Lynott, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, ESX-L-1882-18 BER-L-7441-13 - Village Square Madison Avenue LLC v. TD Bank, Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Feb. 5, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Robert C. Wilson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER-L-7441-13 A-4693-13 - Best Bergen Homes, Inc. v. Franklin Nunez et al., Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Feb. 4, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-4693-13 BER-L-2387-1 - Stonewall of Saddle River, L.P. v. Northeast Linen Supply Corp., Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Feb. 3, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Robert C. Wilson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER-L-2387-1 A-0991-14T2 - Joseph Grayzel, M.D. v. Boston Scientific Corp., Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Jan. 11, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-0991-14T2 A-1090-14T1 - Cortlandt Street Associates v. Elementis Specialties, Inc., Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Dec. 23, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-1090-14T1 A-0668-14T2 - Trend Investments, LLC v. Mirza Baig., Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Dec. 22, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-0668-14T2 A-2119-14T4 - Charles Bressman v. J&J Specialized, LLC., Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Dec. 4, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-2119-14T4 A-0249-14T4 - Court Plaza Associates v. Wausau Tile, Inc., Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Dec. 4, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-0249-14T4 A-4137-13T2 - John Barbero v. Alexy John et al., Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Dec. 2, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-4137-13T2 A-2355-12T3 - Sherry Clemente v. New Jersey Transit et al., Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Nov. 12, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Indemnification, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-2355-12T3 HUD-L-5225-13 - East Newark Towne Center LLC v. Borough of East Newark, Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Oct. 29, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Sarkisian, J.S.C.,, Referenced Opinion ID, HUD-L-5225-13 A-0884-13T2 - Princeton Amoco, Inc. v. Princeton Shopping Center Company, Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Aug. 26, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-0884-13T2 A-2198-13T2 - Margate Towers, Inc. v. Jim Plamantouras, Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Aug. 13, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-2198-13T2 A-0235-12T2 - National Fireproofing and Insulation Company v. Skanska USA Building, Inc., Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Aug. 11, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-0235-12T2 BER-C-117-15 - Zeytinia Xanadu LLC v. Triple Five Group, Ltd. et al., Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Aug. 3, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, BER-C-117-15 A-2266-13T1 - Trico Development Associates L.P. v. O.C.E.A.N., Inc., Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   July 30, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Cancellation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-2266-13T1 A-1972-13T1 - Waters & Bugbee, Inc. v. B.W. Electrical Services, L.L.C.,, Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   July 22, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Breach of Contract, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-1972-13T1 A-4430 - Larry Bennett Stucco & Construction v. Sheldon Himber,, Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   July 10, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-4430 Pagination 1 Go to page 2 2 Go to page 3 3 Go to last page 6 Last page Go to next page > Next page Showing 1 to 20 of 120 items
  • Employment Disputes, Start End Issue - Any - Additional Insured Arbitration Attorney Fees Auto Breach of Contract Breach of Duty of Loyalty Breach of Fiduciary Duty Breach of Warranty Business Judgment Rule Buyout Cancellation CEPA Civil Conspiracy Collateral Source Rule Commercial General Liability Commercial Litigation Computer/Software Related Issues Condominium Act Conflict of Interest Conflict/Choice of Law Construction Consumer Fraud Contract Interpretation Conversion Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Covenants (Restrictive, not to Compete/Solicit) Custodial/Statutory Receiver Damages Discovery Issues/Motions Dissolution Economic Loss Doctrine Employment Contract Employment Status Environmental Experts Fair Dealing Foreclosure Forum Issues Fraud Fraudulent Inducement Indemnification Insurance Jurisdictional Issues LAD Lemon Law Merger Negligent Misrepresentation Patents Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Piercing the Corporate Veil Private Employment Agency Act Products Liability Professional Negligence/Malpractice Promissory Estoppel Quantum Meruit Quasi-Contract Racketeering Racketeering Real Estate Real Estate Reformation Rescission Sealing of Court Records Securities Shareholder Issues Specific Performance Statute of Limitations Statute of Repose Statutory Interpretation Subpoenas Subrogation Successor Liability Suspicious Activity Report Privilege Tortious Interference Trade Secrets Trademark UCC Unfair Competition Unjust Enrichment Valuation Waiver WARN Act Witnesses Workers Compensation Wrongful Termination All Search Apply Filters A-20-16 - Philip Vitale v. Schering-Plough Corporation (078294) (Middlesex County and Statewide), Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Dec. 11, 2017, Business Opinion Issue Types, Employment Contract Workers Compensation, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Patterson, J., Referenced Opinion ID, A-20-16 A-0354-15T1 - JEFFREY SAUTER VS. COLTS NECK VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY NO. 2 (L-2637-13, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE), Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Sept. 13, 2017, Business Opinion Issue Types, CEPA, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Accurso, Referenced Opinion ID, A-0354-15T1 A-67-15 - Maryanne Grande v. Saint Clare’s Health System (076606) (Morris County and Statewide), Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   July 12, 2017, Business Opinion Issue Types, LAD, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Referenced Opinion ID, A-67-15 A-1726-14T4 - GINA MARIE MILLER VS. SHORE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, ET AL., Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Nov. 28, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, CEPA, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-1726-14T4 A-1270-15T2 - Antony Carchia vs. Director Kenneth C. Green, et al.,, Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Oct. 6, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, CEPA, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-1270-15T2 A-38-14 - Salvatore Puglia v. Elk Pipeline, Inc., Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Aug. 16, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, CEPA, Publication Status, Published, Judge, LaVecchia, J., J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, A-38-14 A-3200-13T1 - Kirk Lory v. Concord Equity Group Advisors, LLC, Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Feb. 11, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Employment Contract, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-3200-13T1 A-1111-14T2 - Samantha Ishage v. PNC Bank Corp. et al., Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Feb. 8, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, CEPA, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-1111-14T2 A-2830-14T2 - Grant W. Morgan v. Raymours Furniture Company, Inc., Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Jan. 7, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Employment Contract, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Fisher, P.J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-2830-14T2 A-3694-13T4 - Stratus Technology Services, Inc. v. Alexandra Paciello, Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Nov. 17, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Employment Contract, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Sumners, Jr., J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-3694-13T4 BER-L-703-15 - Mark Sheridan v. Mondelez Global LLC., Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Oct. 13, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, CEPA, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Polifroni, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER-L-703-15 A-0359-14T4 - Rhonda Hobson v. MSO Issac Tremmel, et al., Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Sept. 30, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, LAD, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-0359-14T4 A-0686-13T1 - Maryanna Grande, R.N. v. Saint Clares Health System., Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Aug. 28, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, LAD, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-0686-13T1 A-4644-13T2 - Ama Armah et al. v. Education Affiliates, Inc. et al., Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Aug. 26, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, CEPA, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-4644-13T2 A-0069-14T1 - Gary Tilton v. Nathanial Goodall et al., Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Aug. 25, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Employment Status, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-0069-14T1 A-3480-12T2 - Steven DAgostino v. Musical Heritage Society, Jeffrey Nissim, and Steven Cilento., Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Aug. 20, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Breach of Contract Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Employment Contract LAD Tortious Interference Wrongful Termination, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-3480-12T2 A-1688-13T1 - Deborah Stroli, R.N. Bergen Community Blood Services, Inc., Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Aug. 4, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Employment Contract, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-1688-13T1 A-2314-13T1 - Anita Jones v. Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, et al., Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Aug. 3, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, LAD, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-2314-13T1 A-5259-13T2 - Paul Jaworski et al. v. Ernst & Young US LLP, Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   July 26, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Arbitration, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, St. John, J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-5259-13T2 A-65/66-13 - Joel S. Lippman, M.D. v. Ethicon, Inc, Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   July 15, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, CEPA, Publication Status, Published, Judge, LaVecchia, J., J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, A-65/66-13 Pagination 1 Go to page 2 2 Go to page 3 3 Go to last page 4 Last page Go to next page > Next page Showing 1 to 20 of 80 items
  • Insurance Coverage, Start End Issue - Any - Additional Insured Arbitration Attorney Fees Auto Breach of Contract Breach of Duty of Loyalty Breach of Fiduciary Duty Breach of Warranty Business Judgment Rule Buyout Cancellation CEPA Civil Conspiracy Collateral Source Rule Commercial General Liability Commercial Litigation Computer/Software Related Issues Condominium Act Conflict of Interest Conflict/Choice of Law Construction Consumer Fraud Contract Interpretation Conversion Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Covenants (Restrictive, not to Compete/Solicit) Custodial/Statutory Receiver Damages Discovery Issues/Motions Dissolution Economic Loss Doctrine Employment Contract Employment Status Environmental Experts Fair Dealing Foreclosure Forum Issues Fraud Fraudulent Inducement Indemnification Insurance Jurisdictional Issues LAD Lemon Law Merger Negligent Misrepresentation Patents Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Piercing the Corporate Veil Private Employment Agency Act Products Liability Professional Negligence/Malpractice Promissory Estoppel Quantum Meruit Quasi-Contract Racketeering Racketeering Real Estate Real Estate Reformation Rescission Sealing of Court Records Securities Shareholder Issues Specific Performance Statute of Limitations Statute of Repose Statutory Interpretation Subpoenas Subrogation Successor Liability Suspicious Activity Report Privilege Tortious Interference Trade Secrets Trademark UCC Unfair Competition Unjust Enrichment Valuation Waiver WARN Act Witnesses Workers Compensation Wrongful Termination All Search Apply Filters A-5624-17T3 - LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. VS. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING, CO., ET AL. (L-3377-17, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE), Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   May 23, 2019, Business Opinion Issue Types, Arbitration Personal Injury Protection (PIP), Publication Status, Published, Judge, Gilson, J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-5624-17T3 OCN-L-2960-14 - Doerfler v. Chubb Insurance Co, Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   April 17, 2019, Business Opinion Issue Types, Contract Interpretation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Wellerson, P.J. Civ., Referenced Opinion ID, OCN-L-2960-14 A-3551-17T1 - HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY VS. MEGA SECURITY CORPORATION, ET AL. (L-0378-17, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE), Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   April 8, 2019, Business Opinion Issue Types, Contract Interpretation Indemnification, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-3551-17T1 L-3684-14 - Atlantic Casualty Ins. Co. v. Remtek Services, Inc., et al., Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   Jan. 28, 2019, Business Opinion Issue Types, Conflict/Choice of Law Fraud, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Lynott, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, L-3684-14 A-5526-15T1/A-0033-16T1 - THERESA WEAR, ET AL. VS. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY WOODBURY MEDICAL CENTER ASSOCIATES, LLP VS. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY (L-1583-13, GLOUCESTER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)(CONSOLIDATED), Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   July 20, 2018, Business Opinion Issue Types, Contract Interpretation Indemnification, Publication Status, Published, Judge, ; Manahan, J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-5526-15T1/A-0033-16T1 A-21-16 - Continental Insurance Company v. Honeywell International, Inc. (078152) (Morris County and Statewide), Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   June 27, 2018, Business Opinion Issue Types, Conflict/Choice of Law, Publication Status, Published, Judge, LaVecchia, J., Referenced Opinion ID, A-21-16 A-3434-14T1 - MICHAEL ABBOUD VS. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA(L-680-14, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE), Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   June 21, 2017, Business Opinion Issue Types, Contract Interpretation Indemnification, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Ostrer,Leone and Vernoia., Referenced Opinion ID, A-3434-14T1 A-5503-14T4, A-0727-15T2 - Haines v. Taft, et al.; Little vs. Nishimura (Consolidated), Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   June 1, 2017, Business Opinion Issue Types, Personal Injury Protection (PIP), Publication Status, Published, Judge, O’Connor, J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-5503-14T4, A-0727-15T2 A-1911-15T3 - KATHLEEN LEGGETTE VS. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCECOMPANY (GEICO), ET AL.(L-1585-14, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE), Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   May 30, 2017, Business Opinion Issue Types, Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Auto, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Lihotz, P.J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-1911-15T3 A-2109-15T3 - RSI BANK VS. THE PROVIDENT MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY VS. DR. GEORGE LIKAKIS, Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   Feb. 23, 2017, Business Opinion Issue Types, Indemnification, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-2109-15T3 A-0846-15T3 - S.M. ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. VS. TORCON, INC., ET AL. TORCON, INC. VS. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, ET AL., Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   Oct. 19, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Contract Interpretation Indemnification, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-0846-15T3 A-1649-14T1 - Glenn Foerster, et al. vs. Meckel Enterprises, LLC, et al., Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   Oct. 12, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Contract Interpretation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Espinosa, J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-1649-14T1 A-4287-14T4 - Mauricio Mendoza vs. Jack DiPiazza, et al., Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   Oct. 11, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Employment Status Workers Compensation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Higbee, J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-4287-14T4 L-3752-14 - Avalon Bay Communities, Inc. v. Utica Insurance, et al., Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   Aug. 5, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Additional Insured Contract Interpretation Indemnification, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Stephanie A. Mitterhoff, Referenced Opinion ID, L-3752-14 A-3436-13 - NEW JERSEY-AMERICAN WATER CO INC. v. WATCHUNG SQUARE ASSOCIATES, LLC, Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   July 15, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial General Liability Breach of Contract Contract Interpretation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-3436-13 A-5589-13 - Phibro v. National Union opinion, Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   July 14, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Contract Interpretation, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Referenced Opinion ID, A-5589-13 L-3753-15 - Mid-Century Insurance Company v. John Freeman and New Jersey Indemnity, et al., Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   May 16, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Subrogation Collateral Source Rule, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Arnold L. Natali, Jr., J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, L-3753-15 A-2472-14 - NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION v. STAR INSURANCE COMPANY and MEADOWBROOK, INC, Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   March 8, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Indemnification Additional Insured Breach of Contract Contract Interpretation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-2472-14 A-2355-12 - SHERRY CLEMENTE individually and as Administratrix of the ESTATE OF ANTHONY CLEMENTE v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT, et.al., Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   Dec. 12, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Auto Commercial General Liability Breach of Contract Contract Interpretation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-2355-12 A-1523-12 - HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIAM BURNETT, et. al., Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   July 21, 2014, Business Opinion Issue Types, Workers Compensation Contract Interpretation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-1523-12 Pagination 1 Go to page 2 2 Go to next page > Next page Showing 1 to 20 of 21 items
  • Intellectual Property and Technology, Start End Issue - Any - Additional Insured Arbitration Attorney Fees Auto Breach of Contract Breach of Duty of Loyalty Breach of Fiduciary Duty Breach of Warranty Business Judgment Rule Buyout Cancellation CEPA Civil Conspiracy Collateral Source Rule Commercial General Liability Commercial Litigation Computer/Software Related Issues Condominium Act Conflict of Interest Conflict/Choice of Law Construction Consumer Fraud Contract Interpretation Conversion Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Covenants (Restrictive, not to Compete/Solicit) Custodial/Statutory Receiver Damages Discovery Issues/Motions Dissolution Economic Loss Doctrine Employment Contract Employment Status Environmental Experts Fair Dealing Foreclosure Forum Issues Fraud Fraudulent Inducement Indemnification Insurance Jurisdictional Issues LAD Lemon Law Merger Negligent Misrepresentation Patents Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Piercing the Corporate Veil Private Employment Agency Act Products Liability Professional Negligence/Malpractice Promissory Estoppel Quantum Meruit Quasi-Contract Racketeering Racketeering Real Estate Real Estate Reformation Rescission Sealing of Court Records Securities Shareholder Issues Specific Performance Statute of Limitations Statute of Repose Statutory Interpretation Subpoenas Subrogation Successor Liability Suspicious Activity Report Privilege Tortious Interference Trade Secrets Trademark UCC Unfair Competition Unjust Enrichment Valuation Waiver WARN Act Witnesses Workers Compensation Wrongful Termination All Search Apply Filters BER-C-29-16 - Kristin Deer, Inc. dba K-DEER, Inc. v. Kate Cornish Booth, Business Opinion Category, Intellectual Property and Technology, Decided Date,   July 28, 2017, Business Opinion Issue Types, Trade Secrets Computer/Software Related Issues Breach of Contract Fraud Unjust Enrichment Quantum Meruit, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Wilson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER-C-29-16 BER-L-7542-15 - Silla Jewelry v. Sunico, et al., Business Opinion Category, Intellectual Property and Technology, Decided Date,   Feb. 1, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Trademark, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Robert C. Wilson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER-L-7542-15 A-1978-13T3 - Hackensack University Medical Center v. Beyond Organic Spa, Inc.,, Business Opinion Category, Intellectual Property and Technology, Decided Date,   Sept. 4, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Trademark, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-1978-13T3 SOM-C-12013-15 - Life Cell Corp. v. Tela Bio, Inc., Business Opinion Category, Intellectual Property and Technology, Decided Date,   May 12, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Trade Secrets, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Coleman, P.J. Ch, Referenced Opinion ID, SOM-C-12013-15 BER-L-5446-14 - Samsung Electronics America Inc. v. Westpark Electronics, LLC, Business Opinion Category, Intellectual Property and Technology, Decided Date,   Feb. 26, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Trade Secrets, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Wilson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER-L-5446-14 BER-C-268-12 - SCS Healthcare Marketing, LLC v. Allergan USA, Inc., et al., Business Opinion Category, Intellectual Property and Technology, Decided Date,   Dec. 7, 2012, Business Opinion Issue Types, Trade Secrets, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Carroll, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER-C-268-12 A-3845-10 - Apotex Inc., et al. v. Sanofi-Aventis, et al., Business Opinion Category, Intellectual Property and Technology, Decided Date,   Nov. 15, 2012, Business Opinion Issue Types, Patents, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-3845-10
  • Miscellaneous Actions, Start End Issue - Any - Additional Insured Arbitration Attorney Fees Auto Breach of Contract Breach of Duty of Loyalty Breach of Fiduciary Duty Breach of Warranty Business Judgment Rule Buyout Cancellation CEPA Civil Conspiracy Collateral Source Rule Commercial General Liability Commercial Litigation Computer/Software Related Issues Condominium Act Conflict of Interest Conflict/Choice of Law Construction Consumer Fraud Contract Interpretation Conversion Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Covenants (Restrictive, not to Compete/Solicit) Custodial/Statutory Receiver Damages Discovery Issues/Motions Dissolution Economic Loss Doctrine Employment Contract Employment Status Environmental Experts Fair Dealing Foreclosure Forum Issues Fraud Fraudulent Inducement Indemnification Insurance Jurisdictional Issues LAD Lemon Law Merger Negligent Misrepresentation Patents Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Piercing the Corporate Veil Private Employment Agency Act Products Liability Professional Negligence/Malpractice Promissory Estoppel Quantum Meruit Quasi-Contract Racketeering Racketeering Real Estate Real Estate Reformation Rescission Sealing of Court Records Securities Shareholder Issues Specific Performance Statute of Limitations Statute of Repose Statutory Interpretation Subpoenas Subrogation Successor Liability Suspicious Activity Report Privilege Tortious Interference Trade Secrets Trademark UCC Unfair Competition Unjust Enrichment Valuation Waiver WARN Act Witnesses Workers Compensation Wrongful Termination All Search Apply Filters DOCKET NO. BER-L-8246-19 - Navigator’s Specialty Ins. Co v. Blade Contracting, Inc., et al., Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   June 10, 2020, Business Opinion Issue Types, Arbitration, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Wilson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, DOCKET NO. BER-L-8246-19 BER-L-2262-18 - Samuel S. Raia, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Cohnreznick LLP, et al., Defendants., Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Sept. 23, 2019, Business Opinion Issue Types, Arbitration, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Wilson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER-L-2262-18 BER-L-6325-18 - Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha, et. al., Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   March 29, 2019, Business Opinion Issue Types, Conflict/Choice of Law Jurisdictional Issues Statute of Limitations, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Wilson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER-L-6325-18 BER L-3443-17 - Brereton, et al. v. Malone, et al., Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   March 5, 2019, Business Opinion Issue Types, Business Judgment Rule Statute of Limitations, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Wilson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER L-3443-17 BER L-4477-18 - Vela Townhomes Condominium Association v. Rosen Partners, LLC, Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Jan. 23, 2019, Business Opinion Issue Types, Construction Statute of Repose Statute of Limitations, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Wilson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER L-4477-18 A-3027-17T4 - AMY SKUSE VS. PFIZER, INC., ET ALS. (L-2374-17, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE), Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Jan. 16, 2019, Business Opinion Issue Types, Arbitration, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Sabatino, P.J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-3027-17T4 A-0711-17T3 - OASIS THERAPEUTIC LIFE CENTERS, INC. VS. PETER G. WADE, ET AL. (L-1287-17, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE), Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Dec. 10, 2018, Business Opinion Issue Types, LAD, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Fisher, P.J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-0711-17T3 L-1508-14 - Babulal, et al. v. Dynamic Metals Processing, Inc., et al., Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Aug. 22, 2018, Business Opinion Issue Types, Products Liability Successor Liability, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, ; Vignuolo, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, L-1508-14 A-9-17 - Josh Willner v. Vertical Reality, Inc. (079626) (Monmouth County and Statewide), Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Aug. 15, 2018, Business Opinion Issue Types, Attorney Fees Products Liability, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Referenced Opinion ID, A-9-17 A-101/102/103/104-15 - The Palisades at Fort Lee Condominium Association, Inc. v. 100 Old Palisades, LLC, Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Sept. 14, 2017, Business Opinion Issue Types, Construction Statute of Limitations Statute of Repose, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Albin, J., Referenced Opinion ID, A-101/102/103/104-15 A-1400-14T1 - ANDRE DE GARMEAUX, ET AL. VS. DNV CONCEPTS, INC. T/A THE BRIGHT ACRE, ET AL., Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Dec. 20, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Consumer Fraud, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Manahan, J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-1400-14T1 A-2001-14T1 - Jade Apparel, Inc., et al. vs. United Assurance, Inc., et al., Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Oct. 13, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Arbitration, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Sumners , Jr., J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-2001-14T1 A-0850-14T3 - Midland Funding LLC A/P/O Webbank vs. Roberta Bordeaux, Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Sept. 29, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Arbitration, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Fuentes, P.J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-0850-14T3 A-5135-13T3 - Rajiv Hazaray et al. v. The Estates at Bordens Crossing, LLC, Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Feb. 4, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Consumer Fraud, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-5135-13T3 A-2448-14T2 - John S. Patterson v. Ladenburg Thalmann & Co., Inc, Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Feb. 4, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Arbitration, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-2448-14T2 A-4292-13T3 - The Palisades at Fort Lee Condominium Association, Inc. v. 100 Old Palisade, LLC et al., Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Feb. 1, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Construction Statute of Limitations Statute of Repose, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-4292-13T3 A-1157-14T1 - Barry M. Epstein, Esq. and Barbara G. Quackenbos v. Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Jan. 22, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Arbitration, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-1157-14T1 A-0749-14T4 - Tahisha Roach and Emilia Jackson v. BM Motoring LLC, Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Jan. 20, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Arbitration, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-0749-14T4 A-4726-13T3 - New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. Navillus Group, et al., Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Jan. 14, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Environmental, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Nugent, J.A.D, Referenced Opinion ID, A-4726-13T3 A-1281-14T1 - TJR Construction Co. Inc. et al. v. Selective Insurance Company of America, Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Jan. 14, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Forum Issues, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-1281-14T1 Pagination 1 Go to page 2 2 Go to page 3 3 Go to last page 14 Last page Go to next page > Next page Showing 1 to 20 of 262 items
  • Millville Municipal Court Report, Body Millville Municipal Court Report Report of Investigation into Millville Municipal Court Allegations, Supreme Court Orders, Appx 1. , Notice and Order – Continuation of Remote Court Proceedings; Public Access; Sentencing April 20, 2020 Supreme Court Order (consent required for certain matters to proceed virtually), Appx 2.,   Notice and Order – COVID-19 – Second Omnibus Order on Court Operations and Legal Practice – More Operations To Be Conducted Remotely; Limited Discovery Extensions and Tolling Periods April 24, 2020 Supreme Court Second COVID-19 Omnibus Order (resumption of Municipal Court sessions in virtual format), Appx 3, . Notice and Order – COVID-19 – When Matters Can Proceed Remotely Feb. 22, 2021 Supreme Court Order (refinement of consent requirement for matters to proceed virtually), Appx 4., Notice and Order – Future of Court Operations – Continuation of Both In-Person and Virtual Court Events Nov. 18, 2021 Supreme Court Order (Future of Court Operations), Appx 5., Notice and Order - The Future of Court Operations - Updates to In-Person and Virtual Court Events Oct. 27, 2022 Supreme Court Order (Future of Court Operations 2.0), Court Session Transcripts, Appx 6, .  Jason November 7, 2022 Nov. 7, 2022, Appx 7.,   Jason December 05, 2022 Dec. 5, 2022, Interview Transcripts, Appx 8.,   Interview Transcripts-Benjamin Telsey Hon. Benjamin Telsey, Assignment Judge, Vicinage 15, Appx 9. , Interview Transcripts - Jason Witcher Hon. Jason D. Witcher , Municipal Court Judge, Certifications & Signed Statements, Appx 10.,   Ashley Angel, Clerk 1, Millville Municipal Court Ashley Angel, Clerk 1, Millville Municipal Court, Appx 11.,  Amber Gandy (1), Keyboarding Clerk, Millville Municipal Court    Amber Gandy (1), Keyboarding Clerk, Millville Municipal Court Amber Gandy (1), Keyboarding Clerk, Millville Municipal Court , Appx 12., Amber Gandy (2), Keyboarding Clerk, Millville Municipal Court  Amber Gandy (2), Keyboarding Clerk, Millville Municipal Court , Appx 13.,   Hon. Teri Giordano, Municipal Court Judge Hon. Teri Giordano, Municipal Court Judge, Appx 14., Kimberly Hamlyn, Certified Municipal Court Administrator, Millville Municipal Court Kimberly Hamlyn, Certified Municipal Court Administrator, Millville Municipal Court, Appx 15., Marie Keith, Certified Municipal Court Administrator, Bridgeton Municipal Court Marie Keith, Certified Municipal Court Administrator, Bridgeton Municipal Court, Appx 16., Thomas North, Municipal Court Presiding Judge Hon. Thomas North, Municipal Court Presiding Judge, Appx 17., Amber Oliver, Deputy Municipal Court Administrator, Millville Municipal Court Amber Oliver, Deputy Municipal Court Administrator, Millville Municipal Court, Appx 18., Itzel Torres Velazquez, Bilingual Clerk 2, Millville Municipal Court Itzel Torres Velazquez, Bilingual Clerk 2, Millville Municipal Court, Appx 19., Ashley Wolk, Vicinage 15 Municipal Division Manager Ashley Wolk, Vicinage 15 Municipal Division Manager, Appx 20., Luz M. Esteban Zamora, Bilingual Clerk 2, Millville Municipal Court Luz M. Esteban Zamora, Bilingual Clerk 2, Millville Municipal Court, Court Session Data & Analysis, Appx 21., Analysis of December 5, 2022 Millville Municipal Court Session Analysis of Dec.5, 2022 Millville Municipal Court Session, Appx 22. , Analysis of October 5 – December 14, 2022 Court Dockets Analysis of Oct. 5 – Dec. 14, 2022 Court Dockets, Appx 23., Combined Docket Summary Docket Summaries Oct.5 – Dec. 14, 2022 (combined), Appx 24., Court Calendars - Municipal Millville Municipal Court Dockets Oct. 5 – Dec. 14, 2022 (combined), Judiciary Resources, Appx 25.,  Judiciary Language Access Plan, Directive #11-22  Judiciary Language Access Plan, Directive #10-22 (September 2022), Appx 26., Municipal Court Opening Statement - Millville Municipal Court Opening Statement (updated February 2023), Appx 27.,  Court-Issued Municipal Court Notices (updated February 2023) Municipal Court, Notice, Millville, Appx 28, .  1983 Municipal Court Procedures, Chapter IX 1983 Municipal Court Procedures, Chapter IX, Appx 29.,   PowerPoint Presentation on Supreme Court’s Oct. 27, 2022 Order PowerPoint Presentation on Supreme Court’s Oct. 27, 2022 Order
  • Intensive Supervision Program Directory - Administrative and Regional Offices, Name Address Contact ISP-Central Office Campbell, Ajisa Assistant Program Director, ISP Administrative Office of the Courts 171 Jersey Street PO Box 974 Trenton, New Jersey 08625 Phone: 609-815-3810 ISP-Central Office Kurtz, Cara Program Director, ISP Administrative Office of the Courts 171 Jersey Street PO Box 974 Trenton, New Jersey 08625 Phone: 609-815-3810 ISP-Central Region Office Wilson, Brian ISP Central Chief, Intensive Supervision Program Ocean ISP-Ocean 1510 Hooper Ave Toms River, New Jersey 08754 Phone: 732-864-8708 ISP-Central Region Office Butler, Rebecca ISP Central Assistant Chief, Intensive Supervision Program Middlesex ISP-Middlesex 928 Livingston Avenue North Brunswick, New Jersey 08902 Phone: 732-509-8022 ISP-Northern Regional Office Beyah, Sabrina ISP Northern Assistant Chief, Intensive Supervision Program Passaic ISP-Passaic 22 Mill Street Floor 1 Paterson, New Jersey 07501 Phone: 973-873-9090 ISP-Northern Regional Office Gandulla, Carlos ISP Central Chief, Intensive Supervision Program Passaic ISP-Passaic 22 Mill Street Floor 1 Paterson, New Jersey 07501 Phone: 973-873-9090 ISP-Southern Region Office Quinn, Gregory ISP Southern Assistant Chief, Intensive Supervision Program Camden ISP-Camden 4 Executive Campus, 771 Cuthbert Boulevard Floor 2 Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08002 Phone: 856-756-3440 Showing 1 to 7 of 7 items
  • Become a Law Clerk, Apply to become a law clerk in the New Jersey Courts for challenging work, skill-building, new connections, and impactful public service with various benefits including paid leave and student loan forgiveness. Group Image, A clerkship means busy days, challenging work, and new connections that can drive your career forward., Why clerk for the New Jersey Courts? Build skills & relationships Collaborate on real cases Experience legal leadership No residency requirement Paid time off Pension and benefits Student loan forgiveness Impactful public service Apply Online Submit Your Application Find a Judge Locate Judicial Profiles Recommendations Upload Letters, Application Season Starts in June!, Students generally apply at the end of their 2L year for clerkships that start the August after graduation. New lawyers with four years of experience or less also are encouraged to apply. Read the self-registration guide ., Supreme Court Clerkships, The New Jersey Supreme Court is the state’s highest appellate court. Arguments are heard at the R.J. Hughes Justice Complex in Trenton, but the justices and their clerks work in chambers around the state. The court has issued ground-breaking case law in many areas, including individual rights, education, housing, product liability, family law, and criminal procedure., Positions:, 21, Tasks:, Perform legal research; write memoranda; help draft court opinions., Skills Required:, Legal research and writing. Law clerk typing on the computer, Appellate Division Clerkships, The Appellate Division of Superior Court is an intermediate appellate court. Appellate chambers are located throughout the state, and arguments are heard by panels of two or three judges in courtrooms in Trenton, Morristown, Newark, and Atlantic City. Each of the 32 appellate judges has two law clerks. Applicants who have or will have clerked in the trial court are eligible to be considered for a successive appellate clerkship., Positions:, 64, Tasks:, Perform legal research; write memoranda; edit published and unpublished opinion drafts; triage emergent matters at times; prepare summer research memos., Skills Required:, Legal research, legal writing, familiarity with Blue Book style. “I believe my clerkship significantly helped me develop skills that will benefit me as a first-year practicing attorney. I had a wonderful experience, learned a tremendous amount, and feel more confident going into my next position. My familiarity with the judiciary and more specifically, the Appellate Division, has been very useful. I've made connections with people I intend to keep moving forward in my career.”, Assignment Judge Clerkships, Assignment judges oversee the Superior Court in each vicinage. Assignment judges are required to hear certain types of cases for their vicinage. They also will hear other cases, depending on the needs of the vicinage and their own professional background. Researching the AJ’s previous assignments can be a helpful indicator of what types of tasks their law clerk will support., Positions:, 30, Tasks:, Legal research and writing; help draft opinions and orders; moderate remote proceedings; communicate frequently with attorneys, self-represented litigants, and court staff; manage adjournments requests, with the judge’s input; handle emergent applications., Skills Required:, Legal research, organization, communication. “I really think this clerkship opened doors for my career that would not else be available.  Great firms reached out specifically to the clerks to interview them.”, Family Division Clerkships, The family division handles some of the most complex cases in Superior Court. Judges resolve disputes involving children, youth, spouses, and domestic partners. As such, family division law clerks can gain experience on a wide range of legal issues and casework. Cases include adoption, abuse and neglect, child placement review, dissolution, non-dissolution, kinship and legal guardianship, juvenile delinquency, domestic violence, and Sexual Assault Survivor Protection Act.There are no jury trials in the Family Division. Many cases involve self-represented litigants who need frequent contact with law clerks. Clerks work directly with judges, lawyers, and litigants. Their efforts will have a direct impact on the lives of families in New Jersey., Positions:, 120, Tasks:, Legal research and writing; help draft opinions and orders; moderate remote proceedings; communicate frequently with attorneys, self-represented litigants, and court staff; manage adjournments requests, with the judge’s input; handle emergent applications., Skills Required:, Legal research, legal writing, mediation training or coursework. “I found the position very helpful in preparing for the legal world. The clerkship provided me with the experience of what it would be like practicing in the legal field, an experience that law school does not provide.”, Criminal Division Clerkships, The Criminal Division trial judges are responsible for managing cases in which a person has been charged with committing one or more criminal offenses, for example, murder, assault, robbery, or drug distribution. Certain judges also preside over Recovery Court Program cases, which serves offenders who are likely to benefit from treatment and do not pose a risk to public safety. Some judges have additional tasks assigned, such as expungements, applications for post-conviction relief, Megan’s Law cases, gun permit appeals, and wiretap applications. Most judges also conduct pre-trial detention and release revocation hearings., Positions:, 120, Tasks:, Conduct legal research; assist with drafting jury instructions and legal opinions; draft court orders as well as sentencing and other memoranda; manage motion calendar; perform case management functions; assist and occasionally conduct remote proceedings; communicate with attorneys and court staff., Skills Required:, Legal research and writing; organization; communication. “Clerking in the trial level, the majority of which was in criminal, gave me invaluable insight into the practice of law that I was not exposed to in law school or in any internships that I have had.”, Civil Division Clerkships, The civil division, which includes both the civil part and the special civil part, resolves disputes involving monetary compensation for a harm that the defendant has cause the plaintiff. Civil cases encompass a wide array of subject matters and range in complexity from two-party cases to class action and multi-county adjudication impacting many individuals. Examples of civil cases include auto accidents, medical and legal malpractice claims, product liability and toxic torts, civil rights actions, employment and other discrimination suits, civil commitments, election law cases, environmental litigation, land use, zoning and planning, and landlord-tenant disputes., Positions:, 110, Tasks:, Prepare bench memoranda for civil motions and for motional in limine; Review pre-trial memoranda and prepare voir dire and points for charge for civil trials; perform legal research; draft court orders; prepare legal correspondence; manage motion calendar; assist with drafting legal opinions; assist with case management functions; communicate with attorneys, self-represented litigants, court staff; bar associations and legal services, and the public., Skills Required:, Legal research and writing, organization, communication. “The clerkship is a fantastic experience. The clerkship is the perfect time to meet judges and attorneys. It's the time to build a relationship and learn how each judge likes to run their courtroom. It's also the time to ask any question about the process or any law that you may have. I think that some people who don't know must about clerkships aren't aware of the relationships and mentor you get with your judge and the rest of court staff who you would be seeing regularly if you choose to practice in that area. I would recommend a clerkship to anyone.”, General Equity (Chancery) Clerkships, General equity and probate part resolves cases that primarily involving non-monetary relief, such as protection of trade secrets, enforcing non-compete agreements, foreclosure, and appointing guardians for incapacitated individuals, and probate., Positions:, 20, Tasks:, Conduct legal research; review case documents to prepare bench memoranda; draft orders; proofread judges’ orders and opinions; interact with attorneys and self-represented litigants; attend court events and settlement conferences; assist with emergent temporary restraining order applications., Skills Required:, Legal research and writing; organization; communication. “I enjoyed the Chancery Division, General Equity cases. The work was very substantive. I also think it was a pleasure working with the entire court staff, who were all really helpful.”, Tax Court Clerkships, The court hears appeals on local property taxes and Division of Taxation decisions on gross income, sales and business taxes, and homestead rebates. This small court focused exclusively on these issues and have contributed to the development of a consistent, uniform body of law for taxpayers and tax administrators to follow. It has also helped promote the development of a qualified and informed state and local tax bar. Chambers are located in Newark and Trenton. Some Tax Court judges are also assigned to certain Superior Courts and their chambers are the county courthouse., Positions:, 12, Tasks:, Review and process motions; perform legal research; draft case management orders and other legal documents; manage motion calendar; help moderate remote court proceedings; communicate directly with attorneys, litigants, court users, and staff., Skills Required:, Legal research, organization, communication. “My experience with the Tax Court has been excellent. The judges that are a part of the judiciary are of the highest quality that I have experienced so far, and the integrity of the judges has provided me with an example of the type of court I would like to practice in.”, Kickstart your legal career with hands-on experience — apply today!, Apply Now
  • Article V. Privileges, N.J.R.E. 500. General Rule Privileges as they now exist or may be modified by law shall be unaffected by the adoption of these rules. For convenience in reference certain existing provisions of law relating to privileges are enumerated in Article V.  , NOTE, : Adopted September 15, 1992 to be effective July 1, 1993., N.J.R.E. 501. Privilege of Accused, N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-17 provides: (1) Every person has in any criminal action in which he is an accused a right not to be called as a witness and not to testify. (2) The spouse or one partner in a civil union couple of the accused in a criminal action shall not testify in such action except to prove the fact of marriage or civil union unless (a) such spouse or partner consents, or (b) the accused is charged with an offense against the spouse or partner, a child of the accused or of the spouse or partner, or a child to whom the accused or the spouse or partner stands in the place of a parent, or (c) such spouse or partner is the complainant. (3) An accused in a criminal action has no privilege to refuse when ordered by the judge, to submit his body to examination or to do any act in the presence of the judge or the trier of the fact, except to refuse to testify.  , NOTE, : Adopted September 15, 1992 to be effective July 1, 1993; section 2A:84A-17 amended by the Legislature, L. 1992, c. 142, § 1, eff. Nov. 17, 1992; L. 2006, c. 103, § 90, eff. Feb. 19, 2007., N.J.R.E. 502. Definition of Incrimination, N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-18 provides: Within the meaning of this article, a matter will incriminate (a) if it constitutes an element of a crime against this State, or another State or the United States, or (b) is a circumstance which with other circumstances would be a basis for a reasonable inference of the commission of such a crime, or (c) is a clue to the discovery of a matter which is within clauses (a) or (b) above; provided, a matter will not be held to incriminate if it clearly appears that the witness has no reasonable cause to apprehend a criminal prosecution. In determining whether a matter is incriminating under clauses (a), (b) or(c) and whether a criminal prosecution is to be apprehended, other matters in evidence, or disclosed in argument, the implications of the question, the setting in which it is asked, the applicable statute of limitations and all other factors, shall be taken into consideration.  , NOTE, : Adopted September 15, 1992 to be effective July 1, 1993., N.J.R.E. 503. Self-Incrimination, N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-19 provides: Subject to Rule 37 [Rule 530], every natural person has a right to refuse to disclose in an action or to a police officer or other official any matter that will incriminate him or expose him to a penalty or a forfeiture of his estate, except that under this rule: (a) no person has the privilege to refuse to submit to examination for the purpose of discovering or recording his corporal features and other identifying characteristics or his physical or mental condition; (b) no person has the privilege to refuse to obey an order made by a court to produce for use as evidence or otherwise a document, chattel or other thing under his control if some other person or a corporation or other association has a superior right to the possession of the thing ordered to be produced; (c) no person has a privilege to refuse to disclose any matter which the statutes or regulations governing his office, activity, occupation, profession or calling, or governing the corporation or association of which he is an officer, agent or employee, require him to record or report or disclose except to the extent that such statutes or regulations provide that the matter to be recorded, reported or disclosed shall be privileged or confidential; (d) subject to the same limitations on evidence affecting credibility as apply to any other witness, the accused in a criminal action or a party in a civil action who voluntarily testifies in the action upon the merits does not have the privilege to refuse to disclose in that action, any matter relevant to any issue therein.  , NOTE, : Adopted September 15, 1992 to be effective July 1, 1993., N.J.R.E. 504. Lawyer-Client Privilege, N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-20 provides:, (1) General rule., Subject to Rule 37 [Rule 530] and except as otherwise provided by paragraph 2 of this rule communications between lawyer and his client in the course of that relationship and in professional confidence, are privileged, and a client has a privilege (a) to refuse to disclose any such communication, and (b) to prevent his lawyer from disclosing it, and (c) to prevent any other witness from disclosing such communication if it came to the knowledge of such witness (i) in the course of its transmittal between the client and the lawyer, or (ii) in a manner not reasonably to be anticipated, or (iii) as a result of a breach of the lawyer-client relationship, or (iv) in the course of a recognized confidential or privileged communication between the client and such witness. The privilege shall be claimed by the lawyer unless otherwise instructed by the client or his representative; the privilege may be claimed by the client in person, or if the client is incapacitated or deceased, by his guardian or personal representative. Where a corporation or association is the client having the privilege and it has been dissolved, the privilege may be claimed by its successors, assigns or trustees in dissolution., (2) Exceptions., Such privilege shall not extend (a) to a communication in the course of legal service sought or obtained in aid of the commission of a crime or a fraud, or (b) to a communication relevant to an issue between parties all of whom claim through the client, regardless of whether the respective claims are by testate or intestate succession or by inter vivos transaction, or (c) to a communication relevant to an issue of breach of duty by the lawyer to his client, or by the client to his lawyer. Where 2 or more persons have employed a lawyer to act for them in common, none of them can assert such privilege as against the others as to communications with respect to that matter., (3) Definitions., As used in this rule (a) "client" means a person or corporation or other association that, directly or through an authorized representative, consults a lawyer or the lawyer's representative for the purpose of retaining the lawyer or securing legal service or advice from him in his professional capacity; and includes a person who is incapacitated whose guardian so consults the lawyer or the lawyer's representative in behalf of the person who is incapacitated, (b) "lawyer" means a person authorized, or reasonably believed by the client to be authorized to practice law in any State or nation the law of which recognizes a privilege against disclosure of confidential communications between client and lawyer. A communication made in the course of a relationship between lawyer and client shall be presumed to have been made in professional confidence unless knowingly made within the hearing of some person whose presence nullified the privilege.  , NOTE, : Adopted September 15, 1992 to be effective July 1, 1993; amended 2013, c. 103, § 16, eff. Aug. 7, 2013., N.J.R.E. 505. Psychologist Privilege, N.J.S.A. 45:14B-28 provides: The confidential relations and communications between and among a licensed practicing psychologist and individuals, couples, families or groups in the course of the practice of psychology are placed on the same basis as those provided between attorney and client, and nothing in this act shall be construed to require any such privileged communications to be disclosed by any such person. There is no privilege under this section for any communication: (a) upon an issue of the client's condition in an action to commit the client or otherwise place the client under the control of another or others because of alleged incapacity, or in an action in which the client seeks to establish his competence or in an action to recover damages on account of conduct of the client which constitutes a crime; or (b) upon an issue as to the validity of a document as a will of the client; or (c) upon an issue between parties claiming by testate or intestate succession from a deceased client.  , NOTE, : Adopted September 15, 1992 to be effective July 1, 1993; section 45:14B-28 amended by the Legislature, L. 1994, c. 134, § 11, eff. Oct. 31, 1994; 1997, c. 379, § 11, eff. Jan 19, 1998., N.J.R.E. 506. Patient and Physician Privilege, (a) N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-22.1 provides: As used in this act, (a) "patient" means a person who, for the sole purpose of securing preventive, palliative, or curative treatment, or a diagnosis preliminary to such treatment, of the patient’s physical or mental condition, consults a physician, or submits to an examination by a physician; (b) "physician" means a person authorized or reasonably believed by the patient to be authorized, to practice medicine in the State or jurisdiction in which the consultation or examination takes place; (c) "holder of the privilege" means the patient while alive and not under the guardianship of the guardian of the person of a patient who is incapacitated, or the personal representative of a deceased patient; (d) "confidential communication between physician and patient" means such information transmitted between physician and patient, including information obtained by an examination of the patient, as is transmitted in confidence and by a means which, so far as the patient is aware, discloses the information to no third persons other than those reasonably necessary for the transmission of the information or the accomplishment of the purpose for which it is transmitted. (b) N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-22.2 provides: Except as otherwise provided in this act, a person, whether or not a party, has a privilege in a civil action or in a prosecution for a crime or violation of the disorderly persons law or for an act of juvenile delinquency to refuse to disclose, and to prevent a witness from disclosing, a communication, if he claims the privilege and the judge finds that (a) the communication was a confidential communication between patient and physician, and (b) the patient or the physician reasonably believed the communication to be necessary or helpful to enable the physician to make a diagnosis of the condition of the patient or to prescribe or render treatment therefore, and (c) the witness (i) is the holder of the privilege or (ii) at the time of the communication was the physician or a person to whom disclosure was made because reasonably necessary for the transmission of the communication or for the accomplishment of the purpose for which it was transmitted or (iii) is any other person who obtained knowledge or possession of the communication as the result of an intentional breach of the physician's duty of nondisclosure by the physician or his agent or servant and (d) the claimant is the holder of the privilege or a person authorized to claim the privilege for him. (c) N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-22.3 provides: There is no privilege under this act as to any relevant communication between the patient and his physician (a) upon an issue of the patient's condition in an action to commit him or otherwise place him under the control of another or others because of alleged incapacity, or in an action in which the patient seeks to establish his competence or in an action to recover damages on account of conduct of the patient which constitutes a criminal offense other than a misdemeanor, or (b) upon an issue as to the validity of a document as a will of the patient, or (c) upon an issue between parties claiming by testate or intestate succession from a deceased patient. (d) N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-22.4 provides: There is no privilege under this act in an action in which the condition of the patient is an element or factor of the claim or defense of the patient or of any party claiming through or under the patient or claiming as a beneficiary of the patient through a contract to which the patient is or was a party or under which the patient is or was insured. (e) N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-22.5 provides: There is no privilege under this act as to information which the physician or the patient is required to report to a public official or as to information required to be recorded in a public office, unless the statute requiring the report or record specifically provides that the information shall not be disclosed. (f) N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-22.6 provides: No person has a privilege under this act if the judge finds that sufficient evidence, aside from the communication, has been introduced to warrant a finding that the services of the physician were sought or obtained to enable or aid anyone to commit or to plan to commit a crime or a tort, or to escape detection or apprehension after the commission of a crime or a tort. (g) N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-22.7 provides: A privilege under this act as to a communication is terminated if the judge finds that any person while a holder of the privilege has caused the physician or any agent or servant of the physician to testify in any action to any matter of which the physician or his agent or servant gained knowledge through the communication.  , NOTE, : Adopted September 15, 1992 to be effective July 1, 1993; section 2A:84A-22.3 amended by the Legislature, L. 1997, c. 379, § 10, eff. Jan. 19, 1998; amended 2013, c. 103, § 18, eff. Aug. 7, 2013., N.J.R.E. 507. Utilization Review Committees of Certified Hospital or Extended Care Facility; Exceptions, (a) N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-22.8 provides: Information and data secured by and in the possession of utilization review committees established by any certified hospital or extended care facility in the performance of their duties shall not be revealed or disclosed in any manner or under any circumstances by any member of such committee except to: (a) a patient's attending physician, (b) the chief administrative officer of the hospital or extended care facility which it serves, (c) the medical executive committee, or comparable enforcement unit, of such hospital or extended care facility, (d)representatives of, including intermediaries or carriers for, government agencies in the performance of their duties, under the provisions of Federal and State law, or (e) any hospital service corporation, medical service corporation or insurance company with which said patient has pertinent coverage under a contract, policy or certificate, the terms of which authorize the carrier to request and be given such information and data. (b) N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-22.9 provides: No member of a utilization review committee may be held liable for damages or otherwise prejudiced in any manner by reason of recommendations or findings made by said committee or for furnishing information or data obtained in the course of his duties as a member of a committee to the persons and officials mentioned in section 1 [2A:84A-22.8] hereof.  , NOTE, : Adopted September 15, 1992 to be effective July 1, 1993., N.J.R.E. 508. Newsperson's Privilege, (a) N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-21 provides: Subject to Rule 37 [Rule 530], a person engaged on, engaged in, connected with, or employed by news media for the purpose of gathering, procuring, transmitting, compiling, editing or disseminating news for the general public or on whose behalf news is so gathered, procured, transmitted, compiled, edited or disseminated has a privilege to refuse to disclose, in any legal or quasilegal proceeding or before any investigative body, including, but not limited to, any court, grand jury, petit jury, administrative agency, the Legislature or legislative committee, or elsewhere: a. The source, author, means, agency or person from or through whom any information was procured, obtained, supplied, furnished, gathered, transmitted, compiled, edited, disseminated, or delivered; and b. Any news or information obtained in the course of pursuing his professional activities whether or not it is disseminated. The provisions of this rule insofar as it relates to radio or television stations shall not apply unless the radio or television station maintains and keeps open for inspection, for a period of at least 1 year from the date of an actual broadcast or telecast, an exact recording, transcription, kinescopic film or certified written transcript of the actual broadcast or telecast. (b) N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-21a provides: Unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context of this act, as used in this act: a. "News media" means newspapers, magazines, press associations, news agencies, wire services, radio, television or other similar printed, photographic, mechanical or electronic means of disseminating news to the general public. b. "News" means any written, oral or pictorial information gathered, procured, transmitted, compiled, edited or disseminated by, or on behalf of any person engaged in, engaged on, connected with or employed by a news media and so procured or obtained while such required relationship is in effect. c. "Newspaper" means a paper that is printed and distributed ordinarily not less frequently than once a week and that contains news, articles of opinion, editorials, features, advertising, or other matter regarded as of current interest, has a paid circulation and has been entered at a United States post office as second class matter. d. "Magazine" means a publication containing news which is published and distributed periodically, has a paid circulation and has been entered at a United States post office as second class matter. e. "News agency" means a commercial organization that collects and supplies news to subscribing newspapers, magazines, periodicals and news broadcasters. f. "Press association" means an association of newspapers or magazines formed to gather and distribute news to its members. g. "Wire service" means a news agency that sends out syndicated news copy by wire to subscribing newspapers, magazines, periodicals or news broadcasters. h. "In the course of pursuing his professional activities" means any situation, including a social gathering, in which a reporter obtains information for the purpose of disseminating it to the public, but does not include any situation in which a reporter intentionally conceals from the source the fact that he is a reporter, and does not include any situation in which a reporter is an eyewitness to, or participant in, any act involving physical violence or property damage. (c) N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-21.1 provides: Where a newsperson is required to disclose information pursuant to a subpoena issued by or on behalf of a defendant in a criminal proceeding, not including proceedings before administrative or investigative bodies, grand juries, or legislative committees or commissions, the provisions and procedures in this act are applicable to the claim and exercise of the newsperson's privilege under Rule 27 (C. 2A:84A-21). (d) N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-21.2 provides: Proceedings pursuant to this act shall take place before the trial, except that the court may allow a motion to institute proceedings pursuant to this act to be made during trial if the court determines that the evidence sought is newly discovered and could not have been discovered earlier through the exercise of due diligence. (e) N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-21.3 provides: a. To sustain a claim of the newsperson's privilege under Rule 27 [Rule 508(a)] the claimant shall make a prima facie showing that he is engaged in, connected with or employed by a news media for the purpose of gathering, procuring, transmitting, compiling, editing or disseminating news for the general public or on whose behalf news is so gathered, procured, transmitted, compiled, edited or disseminated, and that the subpoenaed materials were obtained in the course of pursuing his professional activities. b. To overcome a finding by the court that the claimant has made a prima facie showing under a. above, the party seeking enforcement of the subpoena shall show by clear and convincing evidence that the privilege has been waived under Rule 37 [Rule 530] (C. 2A:84A-29) or by a preponderance of the evidence that there is a reasonable probability that the subpoenaed materials are relevant, material and necessary to the defense, that they could not be secured from any less intrusive source, that the value of the material sought as it bears upon the issue of guilt or innocence outweighs the privilege against disclosure, and that the request is not overbroad, oppressive, or unreasonably burdensome which may be overcome by evidence that all or part of the information sought is irrelevant, immaterial, unnecessary to the defense, or that it can be secured from another source. Publication shall constitute a waiver only as to the specific materials published. c. The determinations to be made by the court pursuant to this section shall be made only after a hearing in which the party claiming the privilege and the party seeking enforcement of the subpoena shall have a full opportunity to present evidence and argument with respect to each of the materials or items sought to be subpoenaed. (f) N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-21.4 provides: Upon a finding by the court that there has been a waiver as to any of the materials sought or that any of the materials sought meet the criteria set forth in subsection 3.b. [C.2A:84A-21.3(b)], the court shall order the production of such materials, and such materials only, for in camera inspection and determination as to its probable admissibility in the trial. The party claiming the privilege and the party seeking enforcement of the subpoena shall be entitled to a hearing in connection with the in camera inspection of such materials by the court, during which hearing each party shall have a full opportunity to be heard. If the court, after its in camera review of the materials, determines that such materials are admissible according to the standards set forth in subsection 3.b., the court shall direct production of such materials, and such materials only. (g) N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-21.5 provides: After any hearing conducted by the court pursuant to section 3 or 4 [C.2A:84A-21.3 or 2A:84A-21.4] hereof, the court shall make specific findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect to its rulings, which findings shall be in writing or set forth on the record. (h) N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-21.6 provides: An interlocutory appeal taken from a decision to uphold or quash a subpoena shall act as a stay of all penalties which may have been imposed for failure to comply with the court's order. The record on appeal shall be kept under seal until such time as appeals are exhausted. In the event that all material or any part thereof is found to be privileged, the record as to that privileged material shall remain permanently sealed. Any subpoenaed materials which shall, upon exhaustion and determination of such appeals, be found to be privileged, shall be returned to the party claiming the privilege. (i) N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-21.7 provides: Where proceedings are instituted hereunder by one of several co-defendants in a criminal trial, notice shall be provided to all of the co- defendants. Any co-defendant shall have the right to intervene if the co-defendant can demonstrate, pursuant to section 3 [C.2A:84A-21.3], that the materials sought by the issuance of the subpoena bear upon his guilt or innocence. Where such intervention is sought by a co-defendant, that co-defendant shall be required, prior to being permitted to participate in any in camera proceeding, to make that showing required of a defendant in section 3. (j) N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-21.8 provides: If the court finds no reasonable basis for requesting the information has been shown, costs, including counsel fee, may be assessed against the party seeking enforcement of the subpoena. Where an application for costs or counsel fee is made, the judge shall set forth his reasons for awarding or denying same.  , NOTE, : Adopted September 15, 1992 to be effective July 1, 1993., N.J.R.E. 509. Marital Privilege -- Confidential Communications, N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-22 provides: (1) Except as otherwise provided in this section, no person shall disclose any communication made in confidence between such person and his or her spouse or civil union partner. (2) There is no privilege: (a) if both spouses or partners consent to the disclosure; (b) if the communication is relevant to an issue in an action between the spouses or partners; (c) in a criminal action or proceeding in which either spouse or partner consents to the disclosure; (d) in a criminal action or proceeding coming within section 17 of P.L. 1960, c. 52 (C.2A:84-17); or (e) in a criminal action or proceeding if the communication relates to an ongoing or future crime or fraud in which the spouses or partners were or are joint participants at the time of the communication. (3) When a spouse or partner is incapacitated or deceased, consent to the disclosure may be given for such spouse or partner by the guardian, executor, or administrator. The requirement for consent shall not terminate with divorce, dissolution of civil union or separation. A communication between spouses or partners while living separate and apart under a divorce from bed and board or legal separation from a partner in a civil union shall not be a privileged communication.  , NOTE, : Adopted September 15, 1992 to be effective July 1, 1993; section 2A:84A-22 amended by the Legislature, L. 1992, c. 142, § 2, effective Nov. 17, 1992; amended by the Legislature, L. 2015, c. 138, adopted Dec. 8, 2015, effective Nov. 9, 2015, with conforming amendment to the rule adopted Dec. 8, 2015 to be effective retroactive to Nov. 9, 2015., N.J.R.E. 510. Marriage Counselor Privilege, N.J.S.A. 45:8B-29 provides: A communication between a marriage and family therapist and the person or persons in therapy shall be confidential and its secrecy preserved. This privilege shall not be subject to waiver, except where the marriage and family therapist is a party defendant to a civil, criminal or disciplinary action arising from the therapy, in which case, the waiver shall be limited to that action.  , NOTE, : Adopted September 15, 1992 to be effective July 1, 1993; section 45:8B-29 amended by the Legislature, L. 1995, c. 366, § 16, eff. Jan. 5, 1996., N.J.R.E. 511. Priest-Penitent Privilege, N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-23 provides: Any communication made in confidence to a cleric in the cleric's professional character, or as a spiritual advisor in the course of the discipline or practice of the religious body to which the cleric belongs or of the religion which the cleric professes, shall be privileged. Privileged communications shall include confessions and other communications made in confidence between and among the cleric and individuals, couples, families or groups in the exercise of the cleric's professional or spiritual counseling role. As used in this section, "cleric" means a priest, rabbi, minister or other person or practitioner authorized to perform similar functions of any religion. The privilege accorded to communications under this rule shall belong to both the cleric and the person or persons making the communication and shall be subject to waiver only under the following circumstances: (1) Both the person or persons making the communication and the cleric consent to the waiver of the privilege; or (2) The privileged communication pertains to a future criminal act, in which case, the cleric alone may, but is not required to, waive the privilege.  , NOTE, : Adopted September 15, 1992 to be effective July 1, 1993; section 2A:84A-23 amended by the Legislature, L. 1994, c. 123, § 1, eff. Oct. 26, 1994., N.J.R.E. 512. Religious Belief, N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-24 provides: Every person has a privilege to refuse to disclose his theological opinion or religious belief unless his adherence or nonadherence to such an opinion or belief is material to an issue in the action other than that of his credibility as a witness.  , NOTE, : Adopted September 15, 1992 to be effective July 1, 1993., N.J.R.E. 513. Political Vote, N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-25 provides: Every person has a privilege to refuse to disclose the tenor of his vote at a political election unless the judge finds that the vote was cast illegally.  , NOTE, : Adopted September 15, 1992 to be effective July 1, 1993., N.J.R.E. 514. Trade Secret, N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-26 provides: The owner of a trade secret has a privilege, which may be claimed by him or his agent or employee, to refuse to disclose the secret and to prevent other persons from disclosing it if the judge finds that the allowance of the privilege will not tend to conceal fraud or otherwise work injustice.  , NOTE, : Adopted September 15, 1992 to be effective July 1, 1993., N.J.R.E. 515. Official Information, N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-27 provides: No person shall disclose official information of this State or of the United States (a) if disclosure is forbidden by or pursuant to any Act of Congress or of this State, or (b) if the judge finds that disclosure of the information in the action will be harmful to the interests of the public.  , NOTE, : Adopted September 15, 1992 to be effective July 1, 1993., N.J.R.E. 516. Identity of Informer, N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-28 provides: A witness has a privilege to refuse to disclose the identity of a person who has furnished information purporting to disclose a violation of a provision of the laws of this State or of the United States to a representative of the State or the United States or a governmental division thereof, charged with the duty of enforcing that provision, and evidence thereof is inadmissible, unless the judge finds that (a) the identity of the person furnishing the information has already been otherwise disclosed or (b) disclosure of his identity is essential to assure a fair determination of the issues.  , NOTE, : Adopted September 15, 1992 to be effective July 1, 1993., N.J.R.E. 517. Victim Counselor Privilege, (a) N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-22.13 provides:  The Legislature finds and declares that: a. The emotional and psychological injuries that are inflicted on victims of violence are often more serious than the physical injuries suffered; b. Counseling is often a successful treatment to ease the real and profound psychological trauma experienced by these victims and their families; c. In the counseling process, victims of violence openly discuss their emotional reactions to the crime. These reactions are often highly intertwined with their personal histories and psychological profile; d. Counseling of violence and victims is most successful when the victims are assured their thoughts and feelings will remain confidential and will not be disclosed without their permission; and e. Confidentiality should be accorded all victims of violence who require counseling whether or not they are able to afford the services of private psychiatrists or psychologists. Therefore, it is the public policy of this State to extend a testimonial privilege encompassing the contents of communications with a victim counselor and to render immune from discovery or legal process the records of these communications maintained by the counselor. (b) N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-22.14 provides: As used in this act: a. "Act of violence" means the commission or attempt to commit any of the offenses set forth in subsection b. of section 11 of P.L.1971, c.317 (C.52:4B-11). b. "Confidential communication" means any information exchanged between a victim and a victim counselor in private or in the presence of a third party who is necessary to facilitate communication or further the counseling process and which is disclosed in the course of the counselor's treatment of the victim for any emotional or psychological condition resulting from an act of violence. It includes any advice, report or working paper given or made in the course of the consultation and all information received by the victim counselor in the course of that relationship. c. "Victim" means a person who consults a counselor for the purpose of securing advice, counseling or assistance concerning a mental, physical or emotional condition caused by an act of violence. d. "Victim counseling center" means any office, institution, or center offering assistance to victims and their families through crisis intervention, medical and legal accompaniment and follow-up counseling. e. "Victim counselor" means a person engaged in any office, institution or center defined as a victim counseling center by this act, who has undergone 40 hours of training and is under the control of a direct services supervisor of the center and who has a primary function of rendering advice, counseling or assisting victims of acts of violence. "Victim counselor" includes a rape care advocate as defined in Section 4 of P.L.2001, c.81 (C.52:4B-52). (c) N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-22.15 provides: Subject to Rule 37 [Rule 530] of the Rules of Evidence, a victim counselor has a privilege not to be examined as a witness in any civil or criminal proceeding with regard to any confidential communication. The privilege shall be claimed by the counselor unless otherwise instructed by prior written consent of the victim. When a victim is incapacitated or deceased consent to disclosure may be given by the guardian, executor or administrator except when the guardian, executor or administrator is the defendant or has a relationship with the victim such that he has an interest in the outcome of the proceeding. The privilege may be knowingly waived by a juvenile. In any instance where the juvenile is, in the opinion of the judge, incapable of knowing consent, the parent or guardian of the juvenile may waive the privilege on behalf of the juvenile, provided that the parent or guardian is not the defendant and does not have a relationship with the defendant such that he has an interest in the outcome of the proceeding. A victim counselor or a victim cannot be compelled to provide testimony in any civil or criminal proceeding that would identify the name, address, location, or telephone number of a domestic violence shelter or any other facility that provided temporary emergency shelter to the victim of the offense or transaction that is the subject of the proceeding unless the facility is a party to the proceeding. (d) N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-22.16 provides: Nothing in this act shall be deemed to prevent the disclosure to a defendant in a criminal action of statements or information given by a victim to a county victim-witness coordinator, where the disclosure of the statements or information is required by the Constitution of this State or of the United States.  , NOTE, : Adopted September 15, 1992 to be effective July 1, 1993; section 2A:84A-22.14 amended by the Legislature, L. 2001, c. 81, § 1, eff. May 4, 2001; amended 2013, c. 103, § 19, eff. Aug. 7, 2013., N.J.R.E. 518. Social Worker Privilege, N.J.S.A. 45:15BB-13 provides: A social worker licensed or certified pursuant to the provisions of this act shall not be required to disclose any confidential information that the social worker may have acquired from a client or patient while performing social work services for that client or patient unless: a. Disclosure is required by other State law; b. Failure to disclose the information presents a clear and present danger to the health or safety of an individual; c. The social worker is a party defendant to a civil, criminal or disciplinary action arising from the social work services provided, in which case a waiver of the privilege accorded by this section shall be limited to that action; d. The patient or client is a defendant in a criminal proceeding and the use of the privilege would violate the defendant's right to a compulsory process or the right to present testimony and witnesses on that person's behalf; or e. A patient or client agrees to waive the privilege accorded by this section, and, in circumstances where more than one person in a family is receiving social work services, each such member agrees to the waiver. Absent a waiver from each family member, a social worker shall not disclose any information received from any family member.  , NOTE, : Adopted September 15, 1998 to be effective July 1, 1999., N.J.R.E. 519. Mediator Privilege, (a) N.J.S. 2A:23C-4 provides: a. Except as otherwise provided in section 6 of P.L. 2004, c. 157 (N.J.S. 2A:23C- 6), a mediation communication is privileged as provided in subsection b. of this section and shall not be subject to discovery or admissible in evidence in a proceeding unless waived or precluded as provided by section 5 of P.L. 2004, c. 157 (N.J.S. 2A:23C-5). b. In a proceeding, the following privileges shall apply: (1) a mediation party may refuse to disclose, and may prevent any other person from disclosing, a mediation communication. (2) a mediator may refuse to disclose a mediation communication, and may prevent any other person from disclosing a mediation communication of the mediator. (3) a nonparty participant may refuse to disclose, and may prevent any other person from disclosing, a mediation communication of the nonparty participant. c. Evidence or information that is otherwise admissible or subject to discovery shall not become inadmissible or protected from discovery solely by reason of its disclosure or use in a mediation. (b) N.J.S. 2A:23C-5 provides: a. A privilege under section 4 of P.L. 2004, c. 157 (N.J.S. 2A:23C-4) may be waived in a record or orally during a proceeding if it is expressly waived by all parties to the mediation and: (1) in the case of the privilege of a mediator, it is expressly waived by the mediator; and (2) in the case of the privilege of a nonparty participant, it is expressly waived by the nonparty participant. b. A person who discloses or makes a representation about a mediation communication that prejudices another person in a proceeding is precluded from asserting a privilege under section 4 of P.L. 2004, c. 157 (N.J.S. 2A:23C-4), but only to the extent necessary for the person prejudiced to respond to the representation or disclosure. c. A person who intentionally uses a mediation to plan, attempt to commit or commit a crime, or to conceal an ongoing crime or ongoing criminal activity is precluded from asserting a privilege under section 4 of P.L. 2004, c. 157 (N.J.S. 2A:23C-4). (c) N.J.S. 2A:23C-6 provides: a. There is no privilege under section 4 of P.L. 2004, c. 157 (N.J.S. 2A:23C-4) for a mediation communication that is: (1) in an agreement evidenced by a record signed by all parties to the agreement; (2) made during a session of a mediation that is open, or is required by law to be open, to the public; (3) a threat or statement of a plan to inflict bodily injury or commit a crime; (4) intentionally used to plan a crime, attempt to commit a crime, or to conceal an ongoing crime or ongoing criminal activity; (5) sought or offered to prove or disprove a claim or complaint filed against a mediator arising out of a mediation; (6) except as otherwise provided in subsection c., sought or offered to prove or disprove a claim or complaint of professional misconduct or malpractice filed against a mediation party, nonparty participant, or representative of a party based on conduct occurring during a mediation; or (7) sought or offered to prove or disprove child abuse or neglect in a proceeding in which the Division of Youth and Family Services in the Department of Human Services is a party, unless the Division of Youth and Family Services participates in the mediation. b. There is no privilege under section 4 of P.L. 2004, c. 157 (N.J.S. 2A:23C-4) if a court, administrative agency, or arbitrator finds, after a hearing in camera, that the party seeking discovery or the proponent of the evidence has shown that the evidence is not otherwise available, that there is a need for the evidence that substantially outweighs the interest in protecting confidentiality, and that the mediation communication is sought or offered in: (1) a court proceeding involving a crime as defined in the 'New Jersey Code of Criminal Justice," N.J.S. 2C:1-1 et seq.; or (2) except as otherwise provided in subsection c., a proceeding to prove a claim to rescind or reform or a defense to avoid liability on a contract arising out of the mediation. c. A mediator may not be compelled to provide evidence of a mediation communication referred to in paragraph (6) of subsection a. or paragraph (2) of subsection b. d. If a mediation communication is not privileged under subsection a. or b., only the portion of the communication necessary for the application of the exception from nondisclosure may be admitted. Admission of evidence under subsection a. or b. does not render the evidence, or any other mediation communication, discoverable or admissible for any other purpose. (d) N.J.S. 2A:23C-7 provides: a. Except as required in subsection b., a mediator may not make a report, assessment, evaluation, recommendation, finding, or other oral or written communication regarding a mediation to a court, administrative agency, or other authority that may make a ruling on the dispute that is the subject of the mediation. b. A mediator may disclose: (1) whether the mediation occurred or has terminated, whether a settlement was reached, and attendance; or (2) a mediation communication as permitted under section 6 of P.L. 2004, c. 157 (N.J.S. 2A:23C-6). c. A communication made in violation of subsection a. may not be considered by a court, administrative agency, or arbitrator. (e) N.J.S. 2A:23C-8 provides: Unless made during a session of a mediation which is open, or is required by law to be open, to the public, mediation communications are confidential to the extent agreed by the parties or provided by other law or rule of this State.  , NOTE, : Adopted September 17, 2007 to be effective July 1, 2008., N.J.R.E. 520 to 529, [Reserved], N.J.R.E. 530. Waiver of Privilege by Contract or Previous Disclosure; Limitations, (a) Except as provided herein with respect to the attorney-client privilege or work- product doctrine, a person waives his right or privilege to refuse to disclose or to prevent another from disclosing a specified matter if he or any other person while the holder thereof has (1) contracted with anyone not to claim the right or privilege or, (2) without coercion and with knowledge of his right or privilege, made disclosure of any part of the privileged matter or consented to such a disclosure made by anyone. (b) Except as provided herein with respect to the attorney-client privilege or work- product doctrine, a disclosure which is itself privileged or otherwise protected by the common law, statutes or rules of court of this State, or by lawful contract, shall not constitute a waiver under this section. The failure of a witness to claim a right or privilege with respect to one question shall not operate as a waiver with respect to any other question., (c) Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product; Limitations on Waiver., The following provisions apply, in the circumstances set out, to disclosure of a communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work-product protection., (1) Disclosure Made in a State Proceeding or to a State Office or Agency; Scope of a Waiver., When the disclosure is made in a state proceeding or to a state office or agency and waives the attorney-client privilege or work-product protection, the waiver extends to an undisclosed communication in a state proceeding only if: (A) the waiver is intentional; (B) the disclosed and undisclosed communications or information concern the same subject matter; and (C) they ought in fairness to be considered together., (2) Inadvertent Disclosure., When made in a state proceeding or to a state office or agency, the disclosure does not operate as a waiver in a state proceeding if: (A) the disclosure is inadvertent; (B) the holder of the privilege or protection took reasonable steps to prevent disclosure; and (C) the holder promptly took reasonable steps to rectify the error., (3) Disclosure Made in Another Forum., When the disclosure is made in another state or in a federal proceeding, the disclosure does not operate as a waiver in the New Jersey proceeding if the disclosure: (A) would not be a waiver under this rule if it had been made in a New Jersey proceeding; or (B) is not a waiver under the law of the forum where the disclosure occurred., (4) Controlling Effect of a Court Order., A court may order that the privilege or protection is not waived by disclosure connected with the litigation pending before the court, in which event the disclosure is also not a waiver in any other federal or state proceeding. The existence of such an agreement between the parties shall not limit a party’s right to conduct a review of documents, electronically stored information or other information for relevance, responsiveness or segregation of privileged or protected information before production., (5) Controlling Effect of a Party Agreement., An agreement on the effect of a disclosure in a state proceeding is binding only on the parties to the agreement, unless it is incorporated into a court order. (6) Definitions. In this rule: (A) “attorney-client privilege” means the protection afforded under New Jersey Rule of Evidence 504; and (B) “work-product protection” means the protection that applicable law provides for tangible material (or its intangible equivalent) prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial.  , NOTE, : Adopted September 15, 1992 to be effective July 1, 1993; text amended and paragraphs (a) and (b) redesignated, and new paragraph (c) adopted September 16, 2019 to be effective July 1, 2020., N.J.R.E. 531. Admissibility of Disclosure Wrongfully Compelled, N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-30 provides: Evidence of a statement or other disclosure is inadmissible against the holder of the privilege if the disclosure was wrongfully made or erroneously required.  , NOTE, : Adopted September 15, 1992 to be effective July 1, 1993., N.J.R.E. 532. Reference to Exercise of Privileges, N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-31 provides: If a privilege is exercised not to testify or to prevent another from testifying, either in the action or with respect to particular matters, or to refuse to disclose or to prevent another from disclosing any matter, the judge and counsel may not comment thereon, no presumption shall arise with respect to the exercise of the privilege, and the trier of fact may not draw any adverse inference therefrom. In those jury cases wherein the right to exercise a privilege, as herein provided, may be misunderstood and unfavorable inferences drawn by the trier of the fact, or be impaired in the particular case, the court, at the request of the party exercising the privilege, may instruct the jury in support of such privilege.  , NOTE, : Adopted September 15, 1992 to be effective July 1, 1993., N.J.R.E. 533. Effect of Error in Overruling Claim of Privilege, N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-32 provides: (1) A party may predicate error on a ruling disallowing a claim of privilege only if he is the holder of the privilege. (2) If a witness refuses to answer a question, under color of a privilege claimed pursuant to Rules 23 through 38 [Rules 501 through 531], after the judge has ordered the witness to answer, and a contempt proceeding is brought against the witness, the court hearing the same shall order it dismissed if it appears that the order directing the witness to answer was erroneous.  , NOTE, : Adopted September 15, 1992 to be effective July 1, 1993., N.J.R.E. 534. Mental Health Service Provider – Patient Privilege, (a) Definitions., In this rule: (1) “Confidential communications” means such information transmitted between a mental-health service provider and patient in the course of treatment of, or related to, that individual’s condition of mental or emotional health, including information obtained by an examination of the patient, that is transmitted in confidence, and is not intended to be disclosed to third persons, other than: (i) those present to further the interest of the patient in the diagnosis or treatment; (ii) those reasonably necessary for the transmission of the information, including the entity through which the mental-health service provider practices; and (iii) persons who are participating in the diagnosis or treatment of the patient under the direction of a mental-health service provider, including authorized members of the patient’s family, the patient’s guardian, the patient’s conservator, and/or the patient’s personal representative. (2) "Diagnosis or treatment" shall include consultation, screening, interview, examination, assessment, evaluation, diagnosis or treatment. (3) “Mental-health service provider” means a person authorized or reasonably believed by the patient to be authorized to engage in the diagnosis or treatment of a mental or emotional condition, and is specifically intended to include: (i) Psychologists, consistent with the definition under N.J.R.E. 505 and N.J.S.A. 45:14B-2(a), ‘licensed practicing psychologist,’ and N.J.S.A. 45:14B-6(a)(1), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), and (g), governing persons engaged in authorized activities of certain unlicensed practicing psychologists; (ii) Physicians, including psychiatrists, consistent with the definition under N.J.R.E. 506 and N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-22.1(b); (iii) Marriage and family therapists, consistent with the definition under N.J.R.E. 510 and N.J.S.A. 45:8B-2(a), "licensed marriage and family therapist," and N.J.S.A. 45:8B-6, governing unlicensed persons who may engage in specified activities related to, consisting of marriage and family therapy; (iv) Social workers, consistent with the definition under N.J.R.E. 518 and N.J.S.A. 45:15BB-3, and including social work interns and certified school social worker as defined in N.J.S.A. 45:15BB-5(b) and (c); (v) Alcohol and drug counselors, consistent with the definitions under N.J.S.A. 45:2D-3 and N.J.A.C. 13:34C-4.5 (licensed and certified Alcohol and drug counselors); (vi) Nurses, consistent with the definition under N.J.S.A. 45:11-23; (vii) Professional counselors, associate counselors or rehabilitation counselors consistent with the definition under N.J.S.A. 45:8B-40, -41, -41.1 8, and persons authorized to provide counseling pursuant to N.J.S.A. 45:8B-48(b), (c), (d); (viii) Psychoanalysts, consistent with the definition under N.J.S.A. 45:14BB-3; (ix) Midwives, consistent with the definition under N.J.S.A. 45:10-1 (x) Physician assistants, consistent with the definition under N.J.S.A. 45:9-27.15; and (xi) Pharmacists, consistent with the definition under N.J.S.A. 45:14-41. (4) “Patient” means an individual, who undergoes diagnosis or treatment with or by a mental-health service provider for the purpose of diagnosis or treatment related to that patient’s condition of mental or emotional health, including addiction to legal or illegal substances, whether referred to as client, person in therapy, or some other equivalent term in the context of the relationship., (b) General Rule of Privilege., A patient has a privilege to refuse to disclose in a proceeding, and to prevent any other person from disclosing confidential communications, as defined in subsection (a)(1)., (c) Who May Claim the Privilege., The privilege under this rule may be claimed by the patient, the patient’s guardian or conservator, the personal representative of a deceased patient, or if authorized by the patient, a member or members of the patient’s family. The person who was the mental-health service provider at the time of the communication is presumed to have authority to claim the privilege, but only on behalf of the patient or deceased patient. The mental-health service provider shall claim the privilege unless otherwise instructed by the patient or, as applicable, members of the patient’s family, the patient’s guardian or conservator, or the personal representative of a deceased patient., (d) Violent Crime Victim; Other Communications., (1) Violent Crime Victim., Any confidential communication between any of the mental health service providers listed in this rule and a victim of violent crime, as defined in N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-22.14c, shall be evaluated under the provisions of the “Victim Counselor Privilege” contained in N.J.R.E. 517, and not under the provisions set forth herein. Nothing in this act shall be construed to dilute or alter the scope of the Victim Counselor Privilege., (2) Other Communications., Nothing in this rule shall be construed to limit or otherwise affect any privileges that may apply to communications outside the scope of confidential communications as defined in subsection (a)(1) above., (e) Exceptions., There is no privilege under this rule for a communication: (1) Relevant to an issue of the patient's condition in a proceeding to commit the patient or otherwise place the patient under the control of another or others because of alleged incapacity; (2) Relevant to an issue in a proceeding in which the patient seeks to establish his competence, or in a criminal matter where the defendant's competence to stand trial is put at issue; (3) Relevant to an issue in a proceeding to recover damages on account of conduct of the patient which constitutes a crime; (4) Upon an issue as to the validity of a will of the patient; (5) Relevant to an issue in a proceeding between parties claiming by testate or intestate succession from a deceased patient; (6) Made in the course of any investigation or examination, whether ordered by the court or compelled pursuant to Court Rule, of the physical, mental, or emotional condition of the patient, whether a party or a witness, with respect to the particular purpose for which the examination is ordered, unless the court orders otherwise, and provided that a copy of the order is served upon the patient prior to the communication, indicating among other things that such communications may not be privileged in subsequent commitment proceedings; (7) Relevant to an issue in a proceeding in which the condition of the patient is an element or factor of the claim or defense of the patient or of any party claiming through or under the patient or claiming as a beneficiary of the patient through a contract to which the patient is or was a party or under which the patient is or was insured; (8) If the court finds that any person, while a holder of the privilege, has caused the mental-health service provider to testify in any proceeding to any matter of which the mental-health service provider gained knowledge through the communication; (9) In the course of mental health services sought or obtained in aid of the commission of a crime or fraud, provided that this exception is subject to the protections found in N.J.R.E. 501 and N.J.R.E. 509 and is not intended to modify or limit them; (10) Relevant to an issue in a proceeding against the mental-health service provider, arising from the mental-health services provided, in which case the waiver shall be limited to that proceeding. (11) Relevant to a proceeding concerning an application to purchase, own, sell, transfer, possess or carry a firearm, including but not limited to applications pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:58-3, or 2C:58-4, or a proceeding concerning the return of a firearm pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:25-21(d)(3)., (f) Disclosure Pursuant to Statutory Duty to Report to a Public Official or Office., Nothing in this rule shall prevent a court from compelling disclosure of a statement by a mental-health service provider, patient or other third party to a public official when such statement is made in compliance with a statutory duty to report to a public official, or information required to be recorded in a public office that was in fact recorded in a public office, including but not limited to reports of child or elder abuse or neglect or the abuse or neglect of disabled or incompetent persons, unless the statute requiring the report of record specifically provides that the statement or information shall not be disclosed., (g) Disclosure Where Waiver or Where Exercise of Privilege Would Violate a Constitutional Right., Nothing in this rule shall prevent a court from compelling disclosure where: (1) the patient has expressly or implicitly waived the privilege or authorized disclosure; or (2) exercise of the privilege would violate a constitutional right.  , NOTE, : Adopted September 15, 2015 to be effective July 1, 2016.
  • Attorney Forms and Fees (CLE), Required forms for CLE credits., *Announcement -, Applications for Waivers and Applications for Extension of Time should be completed inside the Attorney Registration Attorney Registration system. Use the “Continuing Legal Education” tile to find this information. The Application for a Waiver or Extension Quick Reference Guide provides step-by-step instructions for requesting waivers and extensions., Forms, Accreditation of an Individual Course Attorney Application for Individual Course Accreditation Use this form to request accreditation for an individual course. Compliance Reporting Form for Current Year Noncompliance Compliance Reporting Form for Current Year Noncompliance Use this form to report compliance following the expiration of the grace period.  Compliance Reporting Form for Reinstatement from the CLE Ineligible List Reinstatement Compliance Reporting Form Use this form to request reinstatement from the CLE Ineligible List., Attorney Fees, Extension of Time or Waiver Application Filing Fee $ 25 Noncompliance Level I (To be paid when coming into compliance and reporting within the grace period) $ 50 Noncompliance Level II Additional charge if noncompliant or compliant after grace period ends. Total cost is $100) $ 50 Reinstatement from Administrative Ineligibility $100, Rules and Regulations, *Announcement - Amendments to the BCLE Regulations, effective January 1, 2024, Read Rule 1:42 Continuing Legal Education Court Rule 1:42 (Continuing Legal Education) . Read the Board on Continuing Legal Education Regulations Board on Continuing Legal Education Regulations  approved by the New Jersey Supreme Court., Contact Us, Mailing Address:, Supreme Court Board on Continuing Legal Education, P.O. Box 965 Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0965 Street Address:, Supreme Court Board on Continuing Legal Education, Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex 25 Market Street Floor 8- North Wing Trenton, New Jersey 08625 Phone:: 609-815-2930 SCTCLE.mailbox@njcourts.gov
  • Article XI. Miscellaneous Rules, N.J.R.E. 1101. Applicability of Rules [Not Adopted], N.J.R.E. 1102. Amendment of Rules, [Not Adopted], N.J.R.E. 1103. Title, The title of these rules is the New Jersey Rules of Evidence and they may be cited as N.J.R.E., NOTE, : Adopted September 15, 1992 to be effective July 1, 1993.
  • Legal Service Plan, Legal service plans are governed by Rule of Professional Conduct 7.3(e)(4). That Rule permits a “bona fide organization” to “recommend[], furnish[,] or pay[]” for legal services to its “members or beneficiaries” under certain conditions. If the organization is for profit, the legal services cannot be rendered by lawyers “employed, directed, supervised or selected by it . . . .” RPC 7.3(e)(4)(i). The participating lawyers must be separate and apart from the bona fide organization and cannot be affiliated or associated with it. RPC 7.3(e)(4)(ii) and (iii). The member or beneficiary must be recognized as the client of the lawyer, not of the organization. RPC 7.3(e)(4)(iv). The member or beneficiary must be entitled to select counsel other than that furnished, selected, or approved by the organization for the matter (though the switch in counsel may be at the member’s or beneficiary’s own expense). RPC 7.3(e)(4)(v). Participating lawyers must not have any cause to know that the organization is in violation of applicable laws, rules, or legal requirements. RPC 7.4(e)(4)(vi). Lastly, the organization must register its plan with the Supreme Court (Administrative Office of the Courts, Professional Services), and renew its registration on an annual basis. RPC 7.4(e)(4)(vii).   Forms Legal Resources Legal Services Plan - Non-Union Legal Service Plan - Non-Union Legal Service Plan - Union Legal Service Plan - Union Legal Services Table Plan Legal Services Plans Table  
  • eCourts Appellate, Attorneys in good standing can use the eCourts Appellate system to file their cases. Body, Attorney Login, Attorney Login Payment can be made with an Judiciary Account Charge System (JACS) attorney JACS account or with a credit card. The system is available around the clock, but credit card payments cannot be accepted from 11:30 p.m. to midnight. Documents are filed on the same day they are received, unless they are filed after 11:59 p.m. In those cases, the documents will be filed on the following business day. Note: Credit card service is unavailable from 11:30 p.m. until midnight each day. Filings must be submitted prior to 11:30 p.m. to receive the same date of filing.  Do not use eCourts to file documents intended for the Court's Eyes Only., Contact Information, For technical support, call   609-815-2950 ext. 52590 or email  appellateT7.mailbox@njcourts.gov . Assistance is available weekdays from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. For pretrial detention appeal procedural assistance, call 609-815-2950 ext. 52580 or email appellatepda.mailbox@njcourts.gov . Assistance is available weekdays from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. For Emergent matters, contact the , Appellate, Division emergent clerks between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at 609-815-2950 and when prompted, press 1. Refer to the  Application for Permission to File Emergent Motion with Instructions emergent application guidelines ;for emergent matters, Online Tools and Resources, There are several resources available to help you file your appeal. The  Build-a-Brief Creator (dynamic PDF - right click link, select Save As Link…, then open the downloaded file in Reader) Build-a-Brief Creator  is available for attorneys and self-represented litigants for assistance in creating a letter brief. For reference, see the Build-a-Brief Sample (Letter Brief Sample) Letter Brief Sample or Appellate Formal Brief Sample Formal Brief Sample . Review the Appellate Division Checklist for Brief (PDF) Appellate Division Checklist for Preparation of Brief .   Use the Civil Appeals Manual , Criminal Appeals Manual or the State Agency Appeals Filing Tips  for filing assistance with eCourts Appellate. Use the eCourts Appellate eFiling Checklist eCourts Appellate eFiling Checklist to ensure all steps have been completed.  The following are notices to bar regarding the Appellate tag - Notices to the Bar appellate court and Ecourts Appellate - Notices to the Bar tag eCourts Appellate ., Fees  , Appellate Court Filing Fees , Filling, Fees, Notice of Appeal/Cross Appeal  $250 Motion for Leave to Appeal (MLA) $50 Post Judgment Motion $50 **No fees will be charged for users filing as Indigents (subject to review and approval by the courts). Fees will be charged once case is reviewed and accepted by the court.    Credit Card Service Fees, Filing Fee, Service Fee, $50 $1.50 $250 $7.50 Transcript Delivery Fees, Delivery Type, Original per page, Copy per page , Standard (30 Days)  $5.73 $0.95 Expedited (7-10 Days)  $8.60 $1.43  Daily (Overnight)   $11.46 $1.90 , Tips, . Keep these things in mind when using eCourts: Make sure your email account accepts emails from eCourts so that court notices are not blocked or filtered into a spam folder. You must maintain the accuracy of your firm information. Firm information is updated under the Attorney Registration and Payment section of the portal home page. Email addresses for eFiling notification can be added in eCourts Appellate. You must maintain the security of your account. Change your Password password immediately if a co-worker who shares your login leaves the firm. Follow the standard paper process for serving individuals within the case that have not entered a confirmed eCourts email address or for self-represented litigants, as they cannot be served electronically. Sign documents electronically using this format: s/[Firstname Lastname], Pretrial Detention Appeals, Consult the following resources if you are appealing pretrial detention: Follow these instructions to start the appeal process. You must file a  Pretrial Detention Appeal (PDA) – Expedited Information Form Pretrial Detention Appeal Expedited Information Form with your Notice of Appeal. Follow these instructions for completing the form and Instructions to Upload PDA Expedited Information form template these instructions for submitting the form . Prosecutors should use the Pretrial Detention Appeal (PDA) – State’s Response State’s Response Form when responding to the appeal. , Frequently Asked Questions, Can the public see my filings in eCourts Appellate? Only attorneys listed as counsel for the parties can view all documents within the case via eCourts Appellate.  I am not receiving emails from the Clerk’s Office. What is wrong? Emails from the Clerk's Office are sent to the email address(es) entered in eCourts Appellate. Note: all eCourts filing applications use the same email addresses. You should check the settings of your email account and/or special software you may be using to protect your account from spam (e.g., anti-virus software) so that your computer does not identify email from the Clerk's Office as "junk" or "spam" mail. If your computer’s Internet and email accounts are functioning properly, please contact the Appellate eFiling team at  609-815-2950 ext. 52590 or  appellateT7.mailbox@njcourts.gov How do I file a new transcript request or amended request in eCourts Appellate? If you need to order transcripts after the case initiating documents have been filed or submit an amended transcript request form: From My Case List click the Edit button and select "I am adding Documents" option from the Edit Case popup. On the List of Documents page, click Add Document button. From the Category drop down menu select Appellate Documents. From Document Type drop down menu select Transcript Order Form. , IF, you are filing an amended Transcript Request, check the Amended Document box. Complete Transcript Request Form Verification page and submit your filing. When will the case I filed in eCourts Appellate be docketed? Normally the submission will be reviewed within a few days however that review is based upon the date and time of submission. Can JEDS be used to file documents in the Appellate Division? No. Self-represented litigants should refer to the appeals section on the Self-Help webpage. All attorneys must electronically file documents through eCourts Appellate. How do I file a document electronically in eCourts Appellate? Manuals with filing instructions are available on the eCourts Appellate webpage and on the Welcome page once you are logged in to eCourts Appellate. What does the (p2e) symbol mean after the case title? The P2E feature allows the Appellate Division to create an electronic version of cases filed by self-represented litigants that are currently required to submit documents in paper. For cases received on or after 02/01/2021, an electronic version will be created and accessible from My Case List. These case types will be denoted by the (, p2e, ) symbol appearing after the case title on My Case List. After the electronic version is created, a system generated email notification will be sent to all counsel entered at case initiation. Can I save my information in eCourts Appellate and finish it later? Yes. eCourts Appellate saves your information each time you click the Continue/Save button. When returning to your case list and editing the draft, you will return to the last section you worked. , Draft filings are saved for 180 days., I cannot submit or upload my document to eCourts Appellate. Where do I get help? Most often you will receive an error message explaining why you cannot file your document over the internet. If instructions are provided, follow them. If it does not correct the problem, please contact the Appellate eCourts team at  609-815-2950 ext. 52590 or  appellateT7.mailbox@njcourts.gov What should I do if I need to file a corrected document in eCourts Appellate? eCourts Appellate allows you to mark the electronic document as “Amended” by checking the Amended Document box on the Add Document page. This feature will alert the Clerk’s Office that a correction has been submitted to the previous document. Do I need to file an original and four copies in eCourts Appellate? No. Case initiating documents like the Notice of Appeal and Case Information Statement only need to be electronically filed. Transcripts and briefs will require the submission of three additional copies for the panel reviewing the case; you will be advised by your case manager when to submit paper copies. If initially both parties are self-represented litigants, and both obtain counsel, will counsel be able to file a substitution in a p2e case? Yes. Cases in which both the appellant and respondent are self-represented litigants will be converted into P2E cases. If one of the parties retains counsel after a P2E case has been created, the attorney would file a substitution of attorney within the case in eCourts Appellate. See FAQ How do I file a substitution of attorney on Appellate eFiling? How do I file a substitution of attorney for instructions. What are my User ID and Password for eCourts Appellate? The New Jersey Judiciary uses a single sign on process for most of its applications. For attorneys, this is their Attorney Bar ID and password. This is the same login information used to complete the Annual Registration. Is the Appellate eCourts system secure? The Judiciary does regular scans on its electronic systems to ensure security of the information stored therein. Additionally, access to the single sign on portal requires two factor authentication. Is filing in eCourts Appellate mandatory? Yes.  As of January 1, 2018, NJ licensed attorneys must file all Appellate Division appeals and other documents in appellate matters electronically through eCourts Appellate.  See the October 17, 2017, Notice to the Bar.  How are transcripts filed in eCourts Appellate? Transcripts that are ordered for appeal purposes, are filed through the Clerk’s office. The transcripts will be upload to the eCourts Appellate system after being filed. The case manager will notify when to submit 3 filed stamped copies. Transcripts in the attorney’s possession are uploaded by the attorney of record. From My Case List click the Edit button next to the appropriate case. Select “I am adding Documents” option from the Edit Case popup. On the List of Documents page click Add Document button. From the Category drop down menu select Transcript. From the Document Type drop down menu select the applicable transcript type. Complete the required fields, upload a copy of the transcript, and submit your filing. How do I get a filed stamped copy from eCourts Appellate? You will receive a notification when your document has been accepted for filing. You will also be able to print the “Filed” copy from the Docket Information list accessible via the appellate docket number hyperlink on My Case List. What documents can be filed in eCourts Appellate? Most documents can be eFiled, either through upload (must be in .pdf format with OCR and no larger than 28MB) or system generated (i.e., Notices of Appeal, Case Information Statements, Notices of Motion and Transcript Request forms). There are a few exceptions. Video and media files must be mailed, and a letter uploaded to eCourts Appellate indicating the significance of the documents mailed. Sealed documents for the court's viewing only cannot be eFiled and must be submitted in paper form. Can self-represented litigants file electronically in eCourts Appellate after the p2e case is created? No, at this time self-represented litigants will still need to file all documents by mail or email. What are the deadlines for eCourts Appellate? Electronic versions of documents are filed within the same deadlines as paper documents., Filing Dates:, Follow the NJ Court Rules and any scheduling order that is entered. Filing a document electronically does not alter or extend any filing deadline., Filing Times:, A document that is received electronically, it is considered to have been filed on the same day it is received unless it is filed after 11:59pm, then that document will be filed the following business day. Note: If paying the filing fee by credit card, the credit card payment service is unavailable from 11:30 pm until midnight daily. All filings must be submitted prior to 11:30 pm to receive the same date of filing. How do I convert my Word or WordPerfect document into a text searchable PDF format on eCourts Appellate? There are numerous tools available for converting your documents into text-searchable PDF. You may want to discuss with your Information Technology (IT) department. How do I file a joint appeal in eCourts Appellate? If you are filing a joint appeal, you will add the additional party and their attorney. Once the case is accepted a notice will be sent to the parties. The joint appellant will need to upload a letter of acceptance indicating that they agree to file a joint brief. My filing is still appearing in draft form in eCourts Appellate; how do I complete the submission? If a filing is still appearing in draft status, it is because you did not click continue all the way to the submission page. Your document is not considered submitted until you receive the transaction ID number. If all parties in the appeal have obtained counsel, why is the case still marked as P2E? Because the case originated in paper on or after 2/1/2021, it will remain classified as P2E case type throughout the duration of the appeal. How do I register for the eCourts Appellate program? There is no registration process to gain access to eCourts Appellate. All NJ Attorneys in good standing automatically have access. Are there public sites available for eCourts Appellate?, On-Site Access, is available in the courthouses at designated locations. Check with the Courthouse Ombudsman. Access to confidential, sealed, or restricted documents maintained in the case management system are not viewable. Are there different rules for documents filed electronically vs. documents filed in paper format? Yes. Please refer to the rule relaxations on the Judiciary website under eCourts Appellate - Notices to the Bar tag Notices to the Bar. How are briefs filed in eCourts Appellate? From My Case List click the Edit button next to the appropriate case. Select “I am adding Documents” option from the Edit Case popup. On the List of Documents page click Add Document button. From the Category drop down menu select Brief. From the Document Type drop down menu select the applicable document type. If filing an Appendix, the filer is required to enter the volume number. Upload the document and submit your filing. How do I prove that my document was filed in eCourts Appellate? Informally, you can produce the email from eCourts Appellate which will state the name of the documents that were filed and the date and time of the filing. You may also download the filed-stamped copy of the endorsement page through eCourts Appellate or purchase a copy from the Clerk’s Office. Can I eFile more than one document in the same case at one time? Yes. Except in the case of a substitution of attorney outside of your firm as that will have to be accepted by the Clerk's office before you will have access to the electronic file. Do I have to serve a self-represented party in paper for a P2E case types? Yes. NJ licensed attorneys in good standing are required to submit filings in P2E case types electronically and provide paper copies to the self-represented litigant unless all parties have agreed upon electronic service; acknowledgement of the same would be done by filing a letter or via communication with the case manager. What are the filing fees for eCourts Appellate? See the Fees section on the eCourts Appellate webpage. Why is converting documents into PDF format necessary when eFiling? PDF documents are "read only" documents that cannot be easily altered. How do I file a substitution of attorney in eCourts Appellate? In eCourts Appellate a substitution of attorney can be filed by either the withdrawing attorney OR the substituting attorney. If the substitution is within the same firm, supporting documentation does not have to be uploaded. Filed by withdrawing attorney From My Case List click the Edit button next to the case being substituted. Select the "Substitution of Attorney" option from the Edit Case popup. On the Update Party page, search for the new attorney. Upload supporting documentation on the Documents page., Reminder, : Supporting documentation is not required if the substitution is within the same firm. The change will be effective after the substitution has been accepted by the Clerk's office, at which time designation of counsel can be filed if your case requires same. If the substitution is within the same firm, the change will be effective immediately, after , it has been submitted in eCourts Appellate. Filed by substituting attorney Select Case Lookup from the menu on the right. Search for the case. Check the box next to docket number listed and select the Substitution of Attorney option on the edit case popup. On the List of Parties page click the Edit button of the party you are modifying. The information of the attorney to be substituted will appear. Upload supporting documentation on the List of Documents page if required. Supporting documentation is not required if the substitution is within the same firm. The change will be effective after the substitution has been accepted by the Clerk's office, at which time designation of counsel can be filed if your case requires same. If the substitution is within the same firm, the change will be effective immediately, after , it has been submitted in eCourts Appellate. When is my document considered filed in eCourts Appellate? If your document is accepted by the Clerk’s Office, it will be filed as of the date it was received. I am in receipt of a document from the self-represented litigant and it does not appear in eCourts Appellate? Contact the case manager, the document may be pending review and has not been uploaded into the case. Where can I get help if I forgot my username and/or password for eCourts Appellate? Refer to the instructions on the login screen. If additional assistance is required, contact the Judiciary Help Desk at  609-421-6100 . Whom do I contact if I am having problems with eCourts Appellate? For technical assistance with the eCourts Appellate system, contact the eCourts Appellate team at  609-815-2950 ext. 52590 or  appellateT7.mailbox@njcourts.gov .  For assistance logging into the Judiciary's Single Sign On portal with your Attorney Bar ID and password, contact the , Help Desk,   1-800-343-7002 . Does filing in eCourts Appellate affect service of my documents? Yes. eCourts Appellate will automatically serve your adversary electronically, if they are an attorney and have a valid eCourts email on file. Any self-represented litigants involved in the case must be served by paper. eCourts Appellate also serves the trial court judges, division managers, and state agency when applicable. How do I serve parties not entered in a case in eCourts Appellate? When a filer is required to serve parties not participating in a case, a proof of service must be uploaded indicating that the non-participating party was served. This upload would be required in the following examples: a motion to be relieved as counsel, where the client isn’t in the eCourts Appellate appeal, a motion to release co-defendant’s pre-sentence reports, or where the trial counsel for the other defendant must be served. What if I uploaded or submitted the wrong document in eCourts Appellate? Once a document has been submitted it becomes a part of the record. A motion is required to remove a document once it is electronically received.  Filers should contact their case manager. Do I still need to file an original with an original signature when eFiling? No. Documents submitted through eCourts Appellate are deemed to be original. What date will the court use as the filing date for a new P2E case or documents submitted by the self-represented litigant? The filing date will be the date the documents were received by the Clerk's Office. Can filing fees be paid online in eCourts Appellate? When applicable, filing fees must be paid online to submit your filing.  Fees can be paid by either a JACS (Judiciary Account Charge System) account or by credit card (Visa, Master Card, AMEX, or Discover). Services fees are applied to credit card payments. Note : The credit card payment service is unavailable from 11:30 pm until midnight daily. All filings must be submitted prior to 11:30 pm to receive the same date of filing. I am having a problem with my printer and cannot print the eCourts Appellate documents. Check with your Information Technology (IT) department.  How do I add/edit attorneys, designated or co-counsel in eCourts Appellate? From My Case List click the Edit button next to the appropriate case. Select "I am adding/editing attorneys, designated or co-counsel information in the current case" option from the Edit Case popup. On the Update Party page, click the + sign, search for attorney and select attorney role. Upload supporting documentation on the List of Documents page if required. Supporting documentation is not required if the substitution is within the same firm. Submit filing. The change will be effective after it has been accepted by the Clerk's office. If the added counsel is within the same firm, the change will be effective immediately, after , it has been submitted in eCourts Appellate. How will I know if my document is accepted or rejected in eCourts Appellate? The Clerk's office will review your documents to determine if they comply with the court rules. You will receive a notification outlining any deficiency. Will I be able to find the Criminal P2E case documents in the eCourts case jacket? No. Documents filed by any party or the court in a criminal P2E case will not appear in the eCourts (trial) case jacket. How do I change or update my eCourts Appellate contact information? Firm/office information is updated through the Attorney Registration and Payment section on the New Jersey Courts – Portal Home Page.  To update your email address(s) for court notifications, after logging in to eCourts Appellate, select Update Email from the menu on the left of the Welcome page. How do I make my documents OCR recognizable (optical character recognition or text searchable) PDF format? There are numerous tools available for converting your documents into text-searchable PDF. If you have created the word document, you can convert it very easily as OCR-PDF by saving it as “Save as type = PDF (*.pdf). If you are scanning your document to generate the PDF, refer to your scanner's user manual or contact the manufacturer to see if your scanner is equipped with the OCR functionality. If you are not familiar with OCR, please consult your local IT support department to verify the OCR settings for your scanner’s properties. You can research downloadable OCR software on the internet or use Adobe to convert the document or visit an office supply store to see if they provide the service that can assist you. Are the electronic documents considered the court record? Yes. The filed stamped documents stored on the system are the court record. What is the maximum file size allowed for each document in eCourts Appellate? Each document submitted should not exceed 28 MB. What date is my document filed in eCourts Appellate? The document will be filed as of the date it was received if it is submitted prior to 11:59 pm. How do I sign my documents in eCourts Appellate? S/attorney name or original signature on an uploaded document is acceptable. Are the old paper cases converted to the P2E case type? No. Paper cases received prior to 02/01/2021 will not be available in eCourts Appellate. Filings for these paper cases should continue to be submitted in paper.
  • AOC Contact Directory, Name Address Contact Administrative Director Blee, Michael J. Acting Administrative Director Administrative Office of the Courts Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex 25 Market Street Trenton, New Jersey 08625 Phone: 609-815-2900 ext. 55003 Administrative Director Bonville, Steven Chief of Staff Administrative Office of the Courts Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex 25 Market Street Trenton, New Jersey 08625 Phone: 609-815-2900 ext. 55005 Administrative Director Nadler, Meryl Counsel to the Administrative Director Administrative Office of the Courts Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex 25 Market Street Trenton, New Jersey 08625 Phone: 609-815-2900 ext. 52400 Fax: 609-376-3035 Administrative Director Hopson, Tonya Chief, Equal Employment Opportunity / Affirmative Action Officer Administrative Office of the Courts Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex 25 Market Street Trenton, New Jersey 08625 Phone: 609-815-2915 Administrative Director LewisKnightly, Christine Chief, Judicial Education & Performance Administrative Office of the Courts Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex 25 Market Street Trenton, New Jersey 08625 Phone: 609-815-2900 ext. 54951 Fax: 609-292-8233 Communications and Community Relations McAleer, Peter Director, Communications and Community Relations Administrative Office of the Courts Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex PO Box 037 Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0037 Phone: 609-815-2910 Fax: 609-394-0182 Communications and Community Relations Mathis, Mike Manager, Publications and Automated Forms and Translations Administrative Office of the Courts Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex 25 Market Street Trenton, New Jersey 08625 Phone: 609-815-2900 ext. 52352 Communications and Community Relations Ravenelle, Vannessa Chief, Litigant Services and Outreach Administrative Office of the Courts Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex 25 Market Street Trenton, New Jersey 08625 Phone: 609-815-2900 ext. 52363 Communications and Community Relations Burke, Lisa Diversity, Inclusion, and Community Engagement Program Officer Administrative Office of the Courts Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex 25 Market Street Trenton, New Jersey 08625 Phone: 609-815-2900 ext. 52364 Communications and Community Relations Spoto, MaryAnn Manager, Communications Administrative Office of the Courts Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex 25 Market Street Trenton, New Jersey 08625 Phone: 609-815-2900 ext. 52350 Information Technology Kattalai, Laks Chief Information Officer Administrative Office of the Courts Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex PO Box 984 Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0984 Phone: 609-815-2900 ext. 38343 Fax: 609-633-8114 Management and Administrative Services McManus, Todd Director, Management and Administrative Services Administrative Office of the Courts Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex PO Box 985 Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0985 Phone: 609-815-2728 Management and Administrative Services Frage, Valerie Assistant Director, Finance Administrative Office of the Courts Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex PO Box 985 Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0985 Phone: 609-815-2908 Management and Administrative Services Morris, Jennifer Assistant Director, Support Services Administrative Office of the Courts Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex PO Box 985 Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0985 Phone: 609-815-2900 ext. 58021 Management and Administrative Services Berliner-Gold, Rhonda Chief, Human Resources Labor and Employee Relations Section Administrative Office of the Courts Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex PO Box 966 Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0966 Phone: 609-815-2900 ext. 54804 Management and Administrative Services Konathappally, Jack Chief, Human Resources Placement and Classification Section Administrative Office of the Courts Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex PO Box 966 Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0966 Phone: 609-815-2900 ext. 54802 Management and Administrative Services Vaingankar, Anita Chief, Payroll and Benefits Administrative Office of the Courts Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex PO Box 966 Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0966 Phone: 609-815-2900 ext. 54836 Management and Administrative Services Juillet, Melodia Human Resources, Law Clerk Services Administrative Office of the Courts Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex PO Box 989 Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0989 Phone: 609-815-2900 ext. 54814 Probation Services Ashbridge, Larry Director, Probation Division Administrative Office of the Courts Office of Probation Services 171 Jersey Street Bldg 6 & 7 Trenton, New Jersey 08611 Phone: 609-815-3810 ext. 16305 Fax: 609-777-3100 Probation Services Kurtz, Cara Program Director, (ISP) Administrative Office of the Courts Office of Probation Services PO Box 987 Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0987 Phone: 609-815-3810 Fax: 609-777-3100 Pagination 1 Go to page 2 2 Go to next page > Next page Showing 1 to 20 of 38 items
  • Recovery Court Judges and Coordinators Contact List, For Information about Juvenile or Family Recovery Courts, Contact Family Division,   Name Address Contact Administrative Office of the Courts Ashbridge, Larry Director Administrative Office of the Courts Office of Probation Services 171 Jersey Street Bldg 6 & 7 Trenton, New Jersey 08611 Phone: 609-815-3810 ext. 16305 Fax: 609-777-3100 Administrative Office of the Courts Williamson, Cornell Statewide Recovery Court Manager, Recovery Court Unit Administrative Office of the Courts Office of Probation Services 171 Jersey Street Bldg 6 & 7 Trenton, New Jersey 08611 Phone: 609-815-3810 ext. 55316 Fax: 609-777-3100 Administrative Office of the Courts Talbot, Erin Assistant Recovery Court Manager Administrative Office of the Courts Office of Probation Services 171 Jersey Street Bldg 6 & 7 Trenton, New Jersey 08611 Phone: 609-815-3810 ext. 55323 Fax: 609-777-3100 Administrative Office of the Courts Affsa, Emil Statewide TASC Coordinator Administrative Office of the Courts Office of Probation Services 171 Jersey Street Bldg 6 & 7 Trenton, New Jersey 08611 Phone: 609-815-3810 ext. 55303 Fax: 609-777-3100 Administrative Office of the Courts Cavanaugh, Jayne Statewide TASC Coordinator Administrative Office of the Courts Office of Probation Services 171 Jersey Street Bldg 6 & 7 Trenton, New Jersey 08611 Phone: 609-815-3810 ext. 55306 Fax: 609-777-3100 Administrative Office of the Courts Thomson, Kathleen Statewide TASC Coordinator Administrative Office of the Courts 171 Jersey Street - Building 6 171 Jersey Street - Building 6 Trenton, New Jersey 08625 Phone: 609-815-3810 ext. 16359 Atlantic Wertzberger, Jason Criminal Division Manager - Atlantic Atlantic Atlantic County Criminal Courts Complex 4997 Unami Blvd. Mays Landing, New Jersey 08330 Phone: 609-402-0100 ext. 47286 Fax: 609-909-8190 Atlantic Golas, Evridiki Recovery Court Coordinator Atlantic Atlantic County Criminal Courts Complex 4997 Unami Blvd. Mays Landing, New Jersey 08330 Phone: 609-402-0100 ext. 47383 Fax: 609-826-7048 Atlantic/Cape May Wilson, Jeffrey R. Judge - Atlantic/Cape May Atlantic/Cape May Atlantic County Criminal Courts Complex 4997 Unami Blvd. Mays Landing, New Jersey 08330 Phone: 609-402-0100 ext. 47888 Fax: 609-909-8066 Bergen Steinhart, Mitchell I. Judge Bergen Bergen County Justice Center 10 Main Street Suite/Room 503 Hackensack, New Jersey 07601 Phone: 201-221-0700 ext. 25294 Fax: 201-371-1129 Bergen Darcy, Leslie Criminal Division Manager Bergen Bergen County Justice Center 10 Main Street Suite/Room 124 Hackensack, New Jersey 07601 Phone: 201-221-0700 ext. 25007 Fax: 201-371-1108 Bergen Hernandez, William Recovery Court Coordinator Bergen Bergen County Justice Center 10 Main Street Suite/Room 213 Hackensack, New Jersey 07601 Phone: 201-221-0700 ext. 25012 Fax: 201-221-0646 Burlington Tarantino, Mark P. Judge Burlington Burlington County Court Facility 49 Rancocas Road Floor 7 Mount Holly, New Jersey 08060 Phone: 609-288-9500 ext. 38807 Fax: 609-826-7078 Burlington DeNise, Shannon Criminal Division Manager Burlington Burlington County Court Facility 49 Rancocas Road Floor 1 Mount Holly, New Jersey 08060 Phone: 609-288-9500 ext. 38081 Fax: 609-288-9469 Burlington Tomlin, Arthur Recovery Court Coordinator Burlington Burlington County Court Facility 49 Rancocas Road Floor 3 Mount Holly, New Jersey 08060 Phone: 609-288-9500 ext. 38666 Fax: 609-288-9469 Camden Dominguez, Francisco Judge Camden Camden County Hall of Justice 101 South 5th Street Floor 3 Camden, New Jersey 08103 Phone: 856-650-9100 ext. 43690 Fax: 856-379-2288 Camden Wiesemann, Mary Criminal Division Manager Camden Camden County Hall of Justice 101 South 5th Street Camden, New Jersey 08103 Phone: 856-650-9100 ext. 43597 Fax: 856-379-2257 Camden Andujar, Armando Recovery Court Coordinator Camden Camden County Hall of Justice 101 South 5th Street Camden, New Jersey 08103 Phone: 856-650-9100 ext. 43668 Fax: 856-379-2288 Cape May Phillips, Sherry Recovery Court Coordinator - Cape May Cape May Cape May County Courthouse 9 North Main Street Cape May Courthouse, New Jersey 08210 Phone: 609-402-0100 ext. 47444 Fax: 609-346-9976 Cumberland Todd, Demetrica L. Judge, Cumberland Cumberland Cumberland County Courthouse 60 West Broad Street Bridgeton, New Jersey 08302 Phone: 856-878-5050 ext. 15462 Fax: 856-451-6214 Pagination 1 Go to page 2 2 Go to page 3 3 Go to next page > Next page Showing 1 to 20 of 55 items
  • TASC Contact List, Name Address Contact Administrative Office of the Courts Ashbridge, Larry Director Administrative Office of the Courts Office of Probation Services 171 Jersey Street Bldg 6 & 7 Trenton, New Jersey 08611 Phone: 609-815-3810 ext. 16305 Administrative Office of the Courts Talbot, Erin Statewide Assistant Recovery Court Manager Administrative Office of the Courts Office of Probation Services 171 Jersey Street Bldg 6 & 7 Trenton, New Jersey 08611 Phone: 609-815-3810 ext. 55323 Administrative Office of the Courts Williamson, Cornell Statewide Recovery Court Manager, Recovery Court Unit Administrative Office of the Courts Office of Probation Services 171 Jersey Street Bldg 6 & 7 Trenton, New Jersey 08611 Phone: 609-815-3810 ext. 55316 Administrative Office of the Courts Affsa, Emil Statewide TASC Coordinator, LPC, LCADC, CCS Administrative Office of the Courts Office of Probation Services 171 Jersey Street Bldg 6 & 7 Trenton, New Jersey 08611 Phone: 609-815-3810 ext. 55303 Administrative Office of the Courts Cavanaugh, Jayne Statewide TASC Coordinator, LCADC, LCS Administrative Office of the Courts Office of Probation Services 171 Jersey Street Bldg 6 & 7 Trenton, New Jersey 08611 Phone: 609-815-3810 ext. 55306 Administrative Office of the Courts Thomson, Kathleen Statewide TASC Coordinator Administrative Office of the Courts Office of Probation Services 171 Jersey Street Bldg 6 & 7 Trenton, New Jersey 08611 Phone: 609-815-3810 ext. 16359 Atlantic Wertzberger, Jason Criminal Division Manager - Atlantic/Cape May Atlantic Atlantic County Criminal Courts Complex 4997 Unami Blvd. Mays Landing, New Jersey 08330 Phone: 609-402-0100 ext. 47286 Atlantic Hampton, John LCADC, Substance Abuse Evaluator (Adult Recovery Court) Atlantic Atlantic County Criminal Courts Complex 4997 Unami Blvd. Mays Landing, New Jersey 08330 Phone: 609-402-0100 ext. 47458 Atlantic Langley, Stephanie LPC, LCADC (Adult Recovery Court) Atlantic Atlantic County Criminal Courts Complex 4997 Unami Blvd. Mays Landing, New Jersey 08330 Phone: 609-402-0100 ext. 47813 Atlantic Owens, Jennifer LCADC, LPC, Substance Abuse Evaluator (Criminal Division) Atlantic Atlantic County Criminal Courts Complex 4997 Unami Blvd. Mays Landing, New Jersey 08330 Phone: 609-402-0100 ext. 47394 Atlantic Vandunk, Brenda CADC, Substance Abuse Evaluator (Criminal Division) Atlantic Atlantic County Criminal Courts Complex 4997 Unami Blvd. Mays Landing, New Jersey 08330 Phone: 609-402-0100 ext. 47427 Bergen Schilt, Concetta LCADC, LAC Bergen Bergen County Justice Center 10 Main Street Hackensack, New Jersey 07601 Phone: 201-221-0700 ext. 25043 Bergen Darcy, Leslie Criminal Division Manager Bergen Bergen County Justice Center 10 Main Street Suite/Room 124 Hackensack, New Jersey 07601 Phone: 201-221-0700 ext. 25007 Bergen Dinallo, Liana Family Division Manager Bergen Bergen County Justice Center 10 Main Street Hackensack, New Jersey 07601 Phone: 201-221-0700 ext. 25195 Bergen Capozzi, Albert CADC, Substance Abuse Evaluator (Adult Recovery Court) Bergen Bergen County Justice Center 10 Main Street Hackensack, New Jersey 07601 Phone: 201-221-0700 ext. 25041 Bergen Carter, Aaron LCADC, LSW, CCS, Substance Abuse Evaluator (Criminal Division) Bergen Bergen County Justice Center 10 Main Street Hackensack, New Jersey 07601 Phone: 201-221-0700 ext. 25042 Burlington DeNise, Shannon Criminal Division Manager Burlington Burlington County Court Facility 49 Rancocas Road Mount Holly, New Jersey 08060 Phone: 609-288-9500 ext. 38227 Burlington Nissen, Leif Family Division Manager Burlington Burlington County Court Facility 49 Rancocas Road Mount Holly, New Jersey 08060 Phone: 609-288-9500 ext. 38831 Burlington Bellan, John CADC, Substance Abuse Evaluator (Adult Recovery Court) Burlington Burlington County Court Facility 49 Rancocas Road Mount Holly, New Jersey 08060 Phone: 609-288-9500 ext. 38572 Burlington Flowers, Bridget LCADC, LSW, Substance Abuse Evaluator (Criminal Division) Burlington Burlington County Court Facility 49 Rancocas Road Mount Holly, New Jersey 08060 Phone: 609-288-9500 ext. 38227 Pagination 1 Go to page 2 2 Go to page 3 3 Go to last page 4 Last page Go to next page > Next page Showing 1 to 20 of 77 items
  • Benefits, Working for the NJ Judiciary offers the benefits of being a state employee. The following resources showcase available benefits., Competitive Salaries, NJ Judiciary offers competitive salaries for law clerks.  The law clerk salaries for the 2025-2026 Court Term are: Supreme Court: $79,456 Superior Court Appellate Division: $72,540 Superior Court Assignment Judge: $66,508 Superior Court Chancery Division (General Equity): $66,508 Superior Court Law Division (Civil, Criminal and Family): $61,256 Tax Court: $61,256, Health Insurance Offering, All full-time state employees and judges are eligible for the State Health Benefits Program. The program includes options for health, dental, and prescription coverage. Visit the Treasury Department website Treasury Department website to discover the plans available., Public Employees' Retirement System, Full-time state employees are enrolled in the Public Employees’ Retirement System, with a few exceptions. Visit the Treasury Department's Division of Pensions and Benefits page Division of Pensions and Benefits page for more information., Federal Student Loan Forgiveness, Full-time state employees of 10 years or more can Student Loan Forgiveness apply for student loan forgiveness . The program only applies to direct federal student loans. It is part of the William D. For Federal Direct Loan Program., Deferred Compensation Plan, Working for the state empowers you to plan for your future on your terms. Full-time state employees can join the New Jersey State Employee Deferred Compensation Plan New Jersey State Employee Deferred Compensation Plan . It provides broad flexibility in contribution amounts and asset allocation. The plan offers options for both pre-tax contributions and Roth after-tax contributions., Supplemental Investments, In addition to the standard pension plan, state employees can invest even more into retirement. The Supplemental Annuity Collective Trust of New Jersey (SACT) allows you to defer income. The trust is a conservative stock market investment. Discover more information on the volunteer program Discover more information on the volunteer program., Tax Savings Programs, State employees can take advantage of two important tax savings plans. The Tax$ave plan lets you set aside pre-tax dollars to pay certain medical, dental, and dependent care costs. The Commuter Tax$ave plan lets you set aside pre-tax dollars to pay for mass transit and commuter parking expenses. You will not have to pay federal taxes on these funds. Tax Savings Plan Discover how to enroll in these plans ., College Savings Plan, Full-time state employees are eligible to join the College Savings Plan NJBest 529 College Savings Plan . A 529 plan allows your contributions to grow free from federal income tax. The plan is only eligible for post-secondary education.
  • Assignment Judges and Trial Court Administrators, Name Address Contact Atlantic/Cape May Sheppard, M. Susan Assignment Judge Atlantic/Cape May Atlantic County Civil Courts Building 1201 Bacharach Blvd. Atlantic City, New Jersey 08401 Phone: 609-402-0100 ext. 47250 Atlantic/Cape May Houck, Jill Trial Court Administrator Atlantic/Cape May Atlantic County Civil Courts Building 1201 Bacharach Blvd. Atlantic City, New Jersey 08401 Phone: 609-402-0100 ext. 47210 Bergen Novey Catuogno, Carol V. Assignment Judge Bergen Bergen County Justice Center 10 Main Street Hackensack, New Jersey 07601 Phone: 201-221-0700 ext. 25271 Bergen Walsh-Wood, Kerri Lynn Trial Court Administrator Bergen Bergen County Justice Center 10 Main Street Hackensack, New Jersey 07601 Phone: 201-221-0700 ext. 25102 Burlington Cook, Terrence R. Assignment Judge Burlington Burlington County Court Facility 49 Rancocas Road Floor 6 Mount Holly, New Jersey 08060 Phone: 609-288-9500 ext. 38800 Burlington Rivera, Alba R. Trial Court Administrator Burlington Burlington County Court Facility 49 Rancocas Road Mount Holly, New Jersey 08060 Phone: 609-288-9500 ext. 38001 Burlington VACANT Civil Judge Burlington Burlington County Court Facility 49 Rancocas Road Floor 6 Mount Holly, New Jersey 08060 Phone: 609-288-9500 ext. 38800 Camden Silverman Katz, Deborah Assignment Judge Camden Camden County Hall of Justice 101 South 5th Street Camden, New Jersey 08103 Phone: 856-650-9100 ext. 43030 Camden Lore, Colleen P. Trial Court Administrator Camden Camden County Hall of Justice 101 South 5th Street Camden, New Jersey 08103 Phone: 856-650-9100 ext. 43030 Cumberland/Gloucester/Salem Telsey, Benjamin C. Assignment Judge Cumberland/Gloucester/Salem Gloucester County Justice Complex 70 Hunter Street Woodbury, New Jersey 08096 Phone: 856-878-5050 ext. 15156 Cumberland/Gloucester/Salem Corter, Jason Trial Court Administrator Cumberland/Gloucester/Salem Gloucester County Justice Complex 70 Hunter Street Woodbury, New Jersey 08096 Phone: 856-878-5050 ext. 15156 Essex Venable, Sheila A. Assignment Judge Essex Essex County Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Justice Building 495 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd. Newark, New Jersey 07102 Phone: 973-776-9280 Essex Wingren III, Edward D. Trial Court Administrator Essex Essex County Veterans Courthouse 50 West Market Street Floor 5 Newark, New Jersey 07102 Phone: 973-776-9300 ext. 55700 Hudson Katz, David B. Assignment Judge Hudson Hudson County Administration Bldg 595 Newark Avenue Suite/Room 908, Floor 9 Jersey City, New Jersey 07306 Phone: 201-748-4400 ext. 60717 Hudson Galligan, Kimberly Trial Court Administrator Hudson Hudson County Administration Bldg 595 Newark Avenue Jersey City, New Jersey 07306 Phone: 201-748-4400 ext. 66606 Mercer Lougy, Robert T. Assignment Judge Mercer Mercer County Criminal Courthouse 400 South Warren Street Trenton, New Jersey 08650-0068 Phone: 609-571-4200 Mercer VACANT Trial Court Administrator Mercer Mercer County Criminal Courthouse 400 South Warren Street Trenton, New Jersey 08650-0068 Phone: 609-571-4200 Mercer Coleman, Richelle A. Trial Court Administrator Mercer Mercer County Criminal Courthouse 400 South Warren Street Trenton, New Jersey 08650-0068 Phone: 609-571-4200 ext. 74910 Middlesex Toto, Michael A. Assignment Judge Middlesex Middlesex County Courthouse 56 Paterson Street New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903-0964 Phone: 732-645-4300 ext. 88019 Middlesex Lambard, Greg Trial Court Administrator Middlesex Middlesex County Courthouse 56 Paterson Street New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903-0964 Phone: 732-645-4300 ext. 88019 Pagination 1 Go to page 2 2 Go to next page > Next page Showing 1 to 20 of 32 items