- State v. Howard Jones A-112-13 Supreme Jan. 20, 2016 Oral Argument A-112-13 A-112-13 Close
- State v. Thomas Shannon A-111-13 Supreme Aug. 19, 2015 Oral Argument A-111-13 A-111-13 Close
- Anthony C. Major v. Julie Maguire A-110-13 Supreme Jan. 12, 2016 Oral Argument A-110-13 A-110-13 Close
- Department of Children and Families v. E.D.-O. A-109-13 Supreme Aug. 20, 2015 Oral Argument A-109-13 A-109-13 Close
- State v. R.P. A-108-13 Supreme Dec. 14, 2015 Oral Argument A-108-13 A-108-13 Close
- State v. Eugene C. Baum A-107-13 Supreme Feb. 8, 2016 Oral Argument A-107-13 A-107-13 Close
- State v. William Roseman and Lori Lewin A-105/106-13 Supreme June 18, 2015 Oral Argument A-105/106-13 A-105/106-13 Close
- Thomas DeMarco v. Sean Robert Stoddard, D.PM. A-104-13 Supreme Dec. 1, 2015 Oral Argument A-104-13 A-104-13 Close
- IMO the Revocation of the Access of Block #613, Lots #4 & 5, Township of Toms River A-102-13 Supreme Jan. 14, 2016 Oral Argument A-102-13 A-102-13 Close
- DCPP VS. B.J.S., R.S. AND E.J.C., IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF A.J.C. AND D.M.S. (FG-14-0018-19, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) A-3323-20 Appellate Oct. 31, 2022
- LILIA ORELLANA VS. ELIEZER ZAKLIKOVSKY, ET AL. (DEPARTMENT OF LABOR) A-0780-21 Appellate Oct. 31, 2022
- SF III Kinderkamack, LLC v Borough of Oradell 005860-2021 Tax Oct. 24, 2022 Summary 005860-2021 Tax Court: SF III Kinderkamack, LLC v Borough of Oradell; Docket Nos. 005860-2021, opinion by Orsen, J.T.C., decided October 21, 2022. For proposed Intervenor – Paul Tannenbaum (Zipp & Tannenbaum, LLC, attorneys); for plaintiff – Michael Ash (Carlin, Ward, Ash & Heiart, LLC, attorneys); and for defendant – Alan Spiniello (Alan Spiniello Law Offices, attorneys). Held: Intervenor, Dabby Bergen Medi Pro, LLC, Sianes Bergen Medi Pro, LLC, YB 690 Kinder, LLC, and Yazam Investments, LLC collectively, sought to be joined as a party to the 2021 property tax appeal filed by plaintiff, SF III Kinderkamack, LLC. Intervenor asserted that the court rules pertaining to the transfer of interest, intervention and joinder were applicable; and standing existed to participate in the case as the new owner of the property. Defendant, Borough of Oradell, opposed the motion and maintained that Intervenor did not have standing because it was not the property owner as of the property tax appeal filing deadline, its claim was not within the statute of limitations and the requirements of the applicable court rules were not met. The court determined that Intervenor met the standards to join due to the transfer of interest of the property per the court rules. Moreover, the court found that Intervenor had standing in its fact-sensitive analysis through multiple factors including the review of its financial interest in the property and responsibility to pay taxes. Intervenor was also not barred by the statute of limitations as no new relief was sought. Accordingly, the court granted Intervenor’s motion to join the case as a party. Close
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ANDRE D. WESLEY (18-05-1066, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) A-3204-18 Appellate Nov. 1, 2022
- WENDY CIRINO VS. THOMAS CIRINO (FM-16-0280-04, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-1596-20 Appellate Nov. 1, 2022
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DANIEL M. FURESZ (17-10-1245, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) A-1786-20 Appellate Nov. 1, 2022
- CITY OF ENGLEWOOD VS. FRED PULICE, ET AL. (L-5202-20, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-1930-20 Appellate Nov. 1, 2022
- JOHN FITZPATRICK AND COLLEEN FITZPATRICK VS. ORADELL ANIMAL HOSPITAL, INC., ET AL. (L-2936-16, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-3442-20 Appellate Nov. 1, 2022
- N.Z. VS. F.Q. (FV-12-0492-22, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) A-0791-21 Appellate Nov. 1, 2022
- MATTHEW GORDNER VS. LICCARDI FORD, ET AL. (L-1572-21, SOMERSET COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-1927-21 Appellate Nov. 1, 2022
- DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES VS. B.C. (NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) A-2312-20 Appellate Nov. 2, 2022