- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. RAHEEM T. MILLER (21-08-2318, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-1587-22 Appellate May 28, 2024
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. BRYANT LAMBERT (17-03-0355, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-1929-22 Appellate May 28, 2024
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JUSTIN N. SAAVEDRA (18-06-0096, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-2094-22 Appellate May 28, 2024
- AC OCEAN WALK, LLC., ET AL. VS. BLUE OCEAN WATERS, LLC., ET AL. (C-000006-21, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-2312-22 Appellate May 28, 2024 Summary A-2312-22, , In this interlocutory appeal, defendants Blue Ocean Waters, LLC and its members Piyush Viradia and Jiten Parikh seek to vacate two orders of the Chancery court. First, its January 18, 2023 order granting partial summary judgment to plaintiff AC Ocean Walk, LLC to judicially dissociate Blue Ocean Waters and dissolve the parties' partnership agreement under the Uniform Partnership Act (UPA), N.J.S.A. 42:1A-1 to -56. Second, its March 13, 2023 order denying defendants' motion for reconsideration and amending the partial summary judgment order to reflect that the partnership had dissolved on October 10, 2020. We affirm the January 18, 2023 order granting judicial dissociation and dissolution of the parties' partnership agreement. Defendants' failure to respond to AC Ocean Walk's September 30, 2020 notice of breach of the agreement is a clear indication that judicial dissociation was appropriate under N.J.S.A. 42:1A-31(e) as "it [was] not reasonably practicable to carry on the business in partnership with the partner." Although no case law in our State has interpreted the "not reasonably practicable" standard for judicial dissociation of a partner, our conclusion is supported by the interpretation of like statutes in other jurisdictions. We, however, reverse the March 13, 2023 order by amending the effective date of the dissociation and dissolution to coincide with the date of January 18, 2023 order. Based on the record before us and the plain language of N.J.S.A. 42:1a-39(e)(3), judicial dissolution occurs when there "is a judicial determination that . . . it is not otherwise reasonably practicable to carry on the partnership business in conformity with the partnership agreement." Again, in the absence of our State's case law defining the effective date of dissociation and dissolution under N.J.S.A. 42:1A-39(e)(3), our conclusion is supported by the interpretation of like statutes in other jurisdictions. Close
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. AZMAR B. BEY (22-02-0147, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-2723-22 Appellate May 28, 2024
- A.C. VS. A.J.R. (FV-02-2119-23, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) A-2981-22 Appellate May 28, 2024
- THE PLATT LAW GROUP, P.C. VS. JAMES TRICOLLI AND JACQUELYN TRICOLLI (DC-001313-23, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-3275-22 Appellate May 28, 2024
- S.G., II VS. K.G. (FV-08-1760-23, GLOUCESTER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) A-3398-22 Appellate May 28, 2024
- THOMAS ALETTA VS. BERGEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE (BCPO), ET AL. (L-7873-15, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-0631-21 Appellate May 29, 2024
- SECAUCUS INVESTORS, LLC, ET AL. VS. HARMONY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY, INC., ET AL. (C-000275-21, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-2396-21 Appellate May 29, 2024
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. WILSON A. PENA (17-09-0465, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) A-3981-21 Appellate May 29, 2024
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ANGEL CONSEPCION (21-01-0063, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-0003-22 Appellate May 29, 2024
- PATRICK CALABRIA II VS. JASON RITCHWOOD (LT-006962-20, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-0819-22 Appellate May 29, 2024
- DCPP VS. E.A.K., ET AL., IN THE MATTER OF M.S-K., ET AL. (FN-04-0099-22 AND FN-04-0135-22, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) (CONSOLIDATED) A-1110-22/A-1111-22 Appellate May 29, 2024
- LEGACY MORTGAGE ASSET TRUST 2019-RPL3 VS. MOORISH SCIENCE TEMPLE OF AMERICA, ET AL. (F-003059-21, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-1485-22 Appellate May 29, 2024
- BOROUGH OF SEASIDE PARK VS. SHREE JYOTI, LLC (L-2155-22, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-1915-22 Appellate May 29, 2024
- IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL COMMITMENT OF K.W. (SVP-559-10, CUMBERLAND COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) A-3003-22 Appellate May 29, 2024
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JUSTIN GARCIA (17-01-0055, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-1270-23 Appellate May 29, 2024
- New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency v. J.C. and K.C. (088071) (Bergen County and Statewide) A-8-23 Supreme May 29, 2024 Oral Argument A-8-23 A-8-23 Audio for A-8-23 Close Summary A-8-23 The family court does not have the authority under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-12 to dismiss a Title 30 action -- and with it, a parent’s appointed counsel -- but continue restraints on a parent’s conduct. If the family court finds that it is in the best interests of the child to continue the restraints on a parent’s conduct, it must keep the case open to facilitate judicial oversight of the Division’s continued involvement, while safeguarding a parent’s right to counsel. Close
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JAMES JOHNSON (15-06-1409, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-0431-21 Appellate May 30, 2024