- VLADIMIR S. BOZIC, M.D. VS. ORTHOPEDIC EMERGENCY SERVICES SPRINGDALE, L.L.C., ET AL. (L-2758-22, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-2217-22 Appellate July 1, 2024
- KINGSLEY AISEWOMHION VS. RAHUL GOEL (L-1211-21, L-716-21, DC-6683-21, L-3288-21, AND DC-16729-21, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-2550-22 Appellate July 1, 2024
- BONNIE MARIE COTTRELL, ET AL. VS. NATHAN HOLTZBERG, M.D., ET AL. (L-5557-16, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED) A-2577-22/A-3261-22 Appellate July 1, 2024
- STONE WOOL 22, LLC VS. NIGEL STREATER, ET AL. (F-005869-21, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-2613-22 Appellate July 1, 2024
- D.A.V. VS. M.N. (FV-20-1938-23, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) A-0088-23 Appellate July 1, 2024
- IMO Registrant R.H.: IMO Registrant T.L. (088232) (Gloucester County and Statewide) A-20/21-23 Supreme July 1, 2024 Oral Argument A-20/21-23 A-20/21-23 Audio for A-20/21-23 Close Summary A-20/21-23 Based on the plain language the Legislature used in crafting N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2(f), the requirement to remain offense-free for fifteen years applies to juveniles who are prosecuted as adults and convicted of a listed sex offense, or released from a correctional facility, but not to those who are adjudicated delinquent in the family court. Consistent with the law’s text, however, all registrants including juveniles must satisfy the second requirement -- the public safety requirement -- to be eligible to terminate their obligations under Megan’s Law. Here, the offense-free prong does not apply to R.H. and T.L. because they were adjudicated delinquent, and not convicted, of a sex offense. The Court therefore remands each matter to the appropriate trial court to determine whether there is clear and convincing evidence that R.H. and T.L. satisfy the public safety prong. Close
- IMO Registrant J.A. (088405) (Monmouth County and Statewide) A-19-23 Supreme July 1, 2024 Oral Argument A-19-23 A-19-23-Part 1 Audio for A-19-23-Part 1 A-19-23-Part 2 Audio for A-19-23-Part 2 Close Summary A-19-23 Because J.A. was adjudicated delinquent and not convicted of a sex offense, he is required to satisfy the public safety prong of subsection (f), not the offense-free prong. See In re Registrant R.H., ___ N.J. ___, ___ (2024) (slip op. at 3). Based on the reasoning of R.H. and the trial court’s finding that J.A. does not pose a safety threat, he is eligible for termination of his Megan’s Law obligations under subsection (f). The Court does not reach arguments about the constitutionality of N.J.S.A.2C:7-2(f) as applied to juveniles. Close
- MICHAEL INGRASSELINO, ET AL. VS. MICHAEL FOLIGNO, ET AL. (L-1051-19, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-3959-21 Appellate July 2, 2024
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ISMAEL LORENZO (20-02-0155, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-0155-22 Appellate July 2, 2024
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. J.C-M. (21-06-1438, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-0676-22 Appellate July 2, 2024
- ATLANTIC PIER CO., INC. VS. BOROUGH OF BAY HEAD PLANNING BOARD (L-2918-21, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-0899-22 Appellate July 2, 2024
- TG ACQUISITIONS, LLC VS. BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD, ET AL. (L-0684-22, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-0989-22 Appellate July 2, 2024
- IN THE MATTER OF MINA EKLADIOUS, JERSEY CITY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY (NEW JERSEY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION) A-2588-22 Appellate July 2, 2024
- DON TIGER VS. NEW JERSEY RACING COMMISSION (NEW JERSEY RACING COMMISSION) A-2653-22 Appellate July 2, 2024
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. FRANK MCVEY (21-10-0317, SOMERSET COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-3152-22 Appellate July 2, 2024
- GENSROAD ISHMAEL LLC VS. KIRK WALLACE, ET AL. (LT-001634-23, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-3948-22 Appellate July 2, 2024
- RONALD COSCIA VS. CHW GROUP, INC. (DC-004585-23, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-0677-23 Appellate July 2, 2024
- In the Matter of Registrant R.S. (088761) (Camden County and Statewide) A-23-23 Supreme July 2, 2024 Oral Argument A-23-23 A-23-23 Audio for A-23-23 Close Summary A-23-23 Under N.J.S.A. 2C:7-13(b)(2), a Megan’s Law registrant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing if the registrant demonstrates that there exists a genuine issue of material fact about whether the registrant’s conduct is characterized by a pattern of repetitive and compulsive behavior. The State may rely on an earlier psychological report that had been prepared pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:47-3, but the independent findings by a Megan’s Law judge as to compulsivity and repetitiveness must be based on clear and convincing evidence. Close
- Landcor Holdings, L.P. v. Evesham Mortgage BUR-L-1619-20 Trial July 1, 2024
- DONALD D. MCDERMID, ET AL. VS. 3M COMPANY, ET AL. (L-2403-15, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-1030-20 Appellate July 3, 2024