- LUIS CANALES-FLORES VS. JOHN TOLERICO, ET AL. (L-1137-13, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-1656-21 Appellate May 2, 2023
- RICHARD HONE VS. NEVEN TADROS (L-9485-21, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-2508-21 Appellate May 2, 2023
- IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL COMMITMENT OF T.H. (SVP-368-04, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) A-3197-21 Appellate May 2, 2023
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. PAULA MORENO-FUENTES (19-06-0717, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) A-0595-22 Appellate May 2, 2023
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JAMIL RAGSDALE (13-01-0032, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-2206-19 Appellate May 3, 2023
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. KHIRY J. WALKER (12-12-1117, CUMBERLAND COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-4364-19 Appellate May 3, 2023
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. RAMON D. RUIZ-PEREZ (13-01-0043, CAPE MAY COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-1803-20 Appellate May 3, 2023
- IN THE MATTER OF REGISTRANT R.H., ET AL. (ML-19-08-0084 AND ML-08-04-0076, GLOUCESTER AND CAMDEN COUNTIES AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) (CONSOLIDATED) A-3543-20/A-0203-22 Appellate May 3, 2023 Summary A-3543-20/A-0203-22 Registrants filed motions to terminate their Megan's Law registration requirement under N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2(f), arguing the fifteen-year offense-free requirement on juveniles adjudicated delinquent of qualifying Megan's Law offenses did not apply. The court affirmed the denial of registrants' motions to terminate their Megan's Law obligations because both juveniles were age fifteen or older at the time of their sexual offenses and N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2(f) applies to every person required to register under Megan's Law, including juveniles. Close
- KASEEM ALI-X VS. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS) A-0079-21 Appellate May 3, 2023
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. MICHAEL ROWEK (21-016, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-2507-21 Appellate May 3, 2023
- IN THE MATTER OF THE REVOCATION OF M.L.'S FIREARMS PURCHASER IDENTIFICATION CARD, ETC. (GPR-0016-20, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-2663-21 Appellate May 3, 2023
- In the Matter of the Estate of Harriet Cohen, Deceased P-218-22 Trial May 1, 2023
- Christopher Gill v Director, Division of Taxation 004035-2021 - Christopher Gill v Director, Division of Taxation Tax May 2, 2023 Summary 004035-2021 - Christopher Gill v Director, Division of Taxation STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS, RESPONSIBLE PERSON LIABILITY FOR GROSS INCOME TAX-ER AND SALES AND USE TAX. Tax Court: Gill v. Director, Division of Taxation, Docket No.004035-2021, opinion by Fiamingo, J.T.C., decided May 1, 2023. For plaintiff - Maria L. Dooner; for defendant Lindsey R. Curewitz (Matthew Platkin, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney). HELD: Plaintiff moved to apply the limitations period for assessment of tax to imposition of responsible person liability for gross income tax withholding under N.J.S.A. 54A:9-6(f) and (g) and for sales and use tax under N.J.S.A. 54:32B-2(w). Director opposed and moved to uphold notification of responsible person status issued beyond limitation periods of the Gross Income Tax Act and Sales and Use Tax Act. The court ruled that the notification of responsible person for purposes of imposing the penalty assessed by N.J.S.A. 54A:9-6(f) and/or (g) for gross income tax employer withholding required by N.J.S.A. 54A:7-1 et seq. was subject to the limitations period applicable to assessment of gross income tax. The court ruled that no limitations period applied to the notification of responsible person liability for Sales and Use Tax, as such tax by statute was assessed against the responsible person upon the filing of the return by the seller. 21 pages Close
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. FRANK GONZALEZ (10-08-1254, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) A-2116-20 Appellate May 4, 2023
- IN THE MATTER OF THE CANNABIS REGULATORY COMMISSION'S DISQUALIFICATION, ET AL. (CANNABIS REGULATORY COMMISSION) A-0569-21/A-1751-21/A-1752-21/A-1753-21/A-1754-21/A-1763-21/A-1810-21/A-1811-21 Appellate May 4, 2023
- SANDRA LOPEZ VS. VICTOR LOPEZ (FM-20-1030-17, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-0955-21 Appellate May 4, 2023
- MICHAEL TZOUMAS VS. KATHY TZOUMAS (FM-02-2665-12, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-1277-21 Appellate May 4, 2023
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ANGEL VASQUEZ-MERINO (20-12-0494, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) A-2269-21 Appellate May 4, 2023
- THE UNITED HOUSE OF PRAYER, ETC. VS. CITY OF CAMDEN (TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY) A-3260-21 Appellate May 4, 2023
- State v. Anthony Miranda (086773) (Monmouth County & Statewide) A-67-21 Supreme May 3, 2023 Oral Argument A-67-21 A-67-21 Audio for A-67-21 Close Summary A-67-21 N.D. had apparent authority to consent to the officer’s search of the storage trailer. However, the exigent-circumstances exception to the warrant requirement does not justify the officer’s search of the black bag or his seizure of the weapons in that bag, and the denial of defendant’s motion to suppress constituted error. Close