- Williams vs Ethicon – Order of Dismissal w/o Prejudice
- Ruth vs Ethicon – Order of Dismissal w/o Prejudice
- Tucker vs Ethicon – Order of Dismissal w/o Prejudice
- Rex vs Ethicon – Order of Dismissal w/o Prejudice
- Scott vs Ethicon – Order of Dismissal w/o Prejudice
- Stocker vs Ethicon – Order of Dismissal w/o Prejudice
- 2:8-1-Motions 2:8-1, Contents; Form of Brief and Appendix., Every motion shall be accompanied by a brief, conforming either to the requirements of R. 2:6-2(a) (formal brief) or (b) (letter brief), and by an appendix and shall be in the form and reproduced as provided by R. 2:6-10. The brief shall explain clearly the nature of the action, the relief the moving party seeks and why the moving party is entitled thereto. It may, for purposes of clarity, summarize pleadings and other undisputed papers or records which do not accompany the brief. The appendix shall include the judgment or order and the opinion or statement of findings and conclusions below and, where essential, the transcript of the testimony, depositions or other discovery, pleadings or other portions of the record, including the portions thereof upon which the movant should reasonably assume the opposing party will rely. If the transcript cannot be obtained in time for the motion, an affidavit may be filed in lieu thereof giving the substance of such testimony. If the motion is opposed, the opposing party shall file an answering brief setting forth with equal explicitness the grounds of opposition, annexing an appendix containing copies of any papers relied on which are not in the moving party's appendix. On motion for leave to appeal the brief shall include argument on the merits of the issues sought to be appealed. If no opposing brief is filed the court may consider the motion unopposed. Without leave of the court, which may be applied for ex parte, supporting and answering briefs shall not exceed 25 pages, exclusive of tables of contents, table of citations and appendix. , Time for Filing and Service; Copies; Argument., The moving party shall serve 2 copies of the moving papers on all other parties. In the Appellate Division, the original and 4 copies of the papers shall be filed with the Clerk of that court. In the Supreme Court, the original and 8 copies of the papers shall be filed with the Clerk of that court. Within 10 days after the service of the movant's papers, the opposing party shall serve and file the same number of papers in opposition. No other papers shall be filed by either party without leave of court. Motions shall not be argued unless the court directs oral argument. , Disposition., Unless the court otherwise directs, all motions in the Appellate Division shall be decided by a single judge except that motions for bail, stay of any order or judgment, summary disposition, and leave to appeal shall be decided by a panel of at least two judges. Insofar as practicable, motions for reconsideration and motions for counsel fees for work performed in the Appellate Division shall be decided by the judges who decided the original matter. , Order and Notice., Unless the court otherwise directs, upon determination of the motion the court or the clerk acting under its direction shall forthwith enter an order granting or denying the motion in accordance with the determination of the court and shall mail true copies thereof to counsel. , Fees., If the motion is the first paper filed in the appellate court by the moving party it shall be accompanied by the fee required by N.J.S.A. 22A:2. Note: Source-R.R. 1:7-10(b), 1:11-1, 1:11-2(a) (b), 1:11-3, 2:11-1, 2:11-2, 2:11-3,4:61-1(c). Paragraph (a) amended, paragraph (c) adopted and former paragraph (c) redesignated (d) July 24, 1978 to be effective September 11, 1978; paragraph (b) amended and paragraph (e) adopted July 16, 1981 to be effective September 14, 1981; paragraph (c) and (d) amended November 1, 1985 to be effective January 2, 1986; paragraph (a) amended July 14, 1992 to be effective September 1, 1992; paragraph (c) amended July 12, 2002 to be effective September 3, 2002. Part 2
- Boen vs Ethicon – Order of Dismissal w/o Prejudice
- Jackson vs Ethicon – Order of Dismissal w/o Prejudice
- Legette vs Ethicon – Order of Dismissal w/o Prejudice
- Paul vs Ethicon – Order of Dismissal w/o Prejudice
- Dirscherl vs Ethicon – Order of Dismissal w/o Prejudice
- Carta vs Ethicon – Order of Dismissal w/o Prejudice
- Fink vs Ethicon – Order of Dismissal w/o Prejudice
- Pagano vs Ethicon – Order Dismissing Complaint w/Prejudice
- Lobdell vs Ethicon – Consent Order of Dismissal w/o Prejudice
- JUDAOC-26-04 Bid Amendment 1 Question and Answer
- Afflalo vs Ethicon – Order of Dismissal w/o Prejudice
- 2:7-2-Assignment of Counsel on Appeal 2:7-2, Indictable Offenses., All persons convicted of an indictable offense who are not represented by the Office of the Public Defender and who desire to appeal, and who assert they are indigent, shall complete and file, without fee, with the court in which they were convicted, the appropriate form prescribed by the Administrative Director of the Courts, which shall be made available to them by the court in which they were convicted. They shall thereupon be referred to the Office of the Public Defender, which shall represent them on such appeal or review and on such subsequent post-conviction proceedings or appeal therein as would warrant the assignment of counsel. , Non-indictable Offenses., All persons convicted of a non-indictable offense who desire to appeal their conviction and who assert they are indigent, shall complete and file, without fee, with the trial court, the appropriate form prescribed by the Administrative Director of the Courts, which shall be made available to them by the court in which they were convicted. If the court is satisfied that they are indigent, it shall assign counsel to represent them on the appeal (i) if the sentence imposed constitutes a consequence of magnitude as set forth in the "Guidelines for Determining a Consequence of Magnitude" in Appendix 2 to Part VII of the Rules of Court, or (ii) if the persons are constitutionally or otherwise entitled by law to counsel. If the sentence imposed does not constitute a consequence of magnitude, the court hearing the appeal may, in its discretion, determine whether to assign counsel for purposes of the appeal, irrespective of whether counsel was previously assigned in the case. , Review of Status as Prisoner., All persons seeking review of administrative proceedings concerning their status as prisoners and who assert they are indigent and are not represented by counsel shall file without fee with the Clerk of the Appellate Division a notice of appeal and a verified petition as required by R. 2:7-1. If they also request appointment of counsel, their verified petition shall include a detailed statement of the grounds upon which such request is made, including a statement of the facts and the issues giving rise to the appeal. If the Court is satisfied that they are indigent and constitutionally or otherwise entitled by law to counsel, it shall, as appropriate, either refer the matter to the Office of the Public Defender or assign other counsel to represent them on the appeal. , Responsibility of Counsel Assigned by the Trial Court for Non-Indictable Offenses., Assigned counsel representing a defendant in a non-indictable prosecution shall file an appeal for a defendant who elects to exercise the right to appeal. An attorney filing a notice of appeal shall be deemed the attorney of record for the appeal unless the attorney files with the notice of appeal a motion to be relieved as counsel and for the assignment of counsel on appeal. Note: R.R. 1:2-7(b), 1:12-9(b) (d). Paragraph (c) adopted November 1, 1985 to be effective January 2, 1986; paragraph (a) amended, paragraph (b) caption and text amended, paragraph (c) adopted and former paragraph (c) redesignated paragraph (d) November 5, 1986 to be effective January 1, 1987; paragraphs (b) and (d) amended July 10, 1998 to be effective September 1, 1998; paragraphs (b) and (d) amended July 12, 2002 to be effective September 3, 2002; paragraph (d) amended June 15, 2007 to be effective September 1, 2007; paragraph (d) caption and text amended July 16, 2009 to be effective September 1, 2009; paragraph (b) amended July 22, 2014 to be effective September 1, 2014; paragraph (d) amended August 5, 2022 to be effective September 1, 2022. Part 2
- Atlas vs Ethicon – Order of Dismissal w/o Prejudice