Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.

Search

  • Brewer vs Ethicon – Order of Dismissal w/o Prejudice
  • 2:6-4-Contents of Respondent's Brief; Statement in Lieu of Brief; Responsibility to File 2:6-4, Contents., Except as otherwise provided by R. 2:9-11 (sentencing appeals), the respondent's brief shall conform either to the requirements of R. 2:6-2(a) (formal brief) or (b) (letter brief), insofar as applicable, except that a counterstatement of facts need be included only if the respondent disagrees with such statements in the appellant's brief.  , Consequences of Failure to File., Except as otherwise provided by R. 2:9-11 (sentencing appeals) and paragraphs (c) and (d) of this rule, if a respondent fails to file a brief conforming to the requirements of these rules, the court may consider the appeal unopposed and deny the respondent permission to oppose the appeal orally or may make such other order, including an imposition of sanctions, as may be appropriate.  , Statement in Lieu of Brief., A statement in lieu of brief may be filed if the appeal is from a quasi-judicial decision of a named respondent which represents to the court that the general public interest does not require its adversarial participation in the appeal and that the parties directly affected by its decision have adequately presented, or may be expected to so present, the issues.  , Filing Responsibility of Public Agencies., In all appeals, where a respondent is the State, a political subdivision thereof, a public or quasi-public body, or a public officer appearing in an official capacity, such respondent shall file a brief or, if paragraph (c) is applicable, a statement in lieu of brief.  , Appellant/Cross Respondent's Brief., On a cross appeal, the brief of the appellant/cross respondent answering the points raised in support of the cross appeal shall also include a reply brief, if any is deemed necessary. Note: Source-R.R. 1:7-4(a)(1)(2)(4)(5)(7)(b); text deleted and paragraphs (a) (b) (c) and (d) adopted July 29, 1977 to be effective September 6, 1977; paragraph (a) amended July 24, 1978 to be effective September 11, 1978; paragraphs (a)(b)(c) and (d) amended November 2, 1987 to be effective January 1, 1988; paragraph (e) adopted July 14, 1992 to be effective September 1, 1992; paragraphs (b) and (d) amended July 13, 1994 to be effective September 1, 1994. Part 2
  • 2:9-8-Temporary Relief in Emergent Matters 2:9-8 When necessary, temporary relief, stays, and emergency orders may be granted, with or without notice, by a single Justice of the Supreme Court or by a single judge of the Appellate Division to remain in effect until the court acts on the application. A request to the Supreme Court for emergent relief from an order or emergent application disposition of the Appellate Division may be made by contacting the Supreme Court Clerk’s office, which will handle intake and referral of the matter to a single Justice on a rotating basis or to the full Court, as appropriate. Note: Source – R.R. 1:1-5A, 2:4-3 (fourth sentence), 4:88-12(a) (second sentence), 4:88-12(b); amended January 22, 1974, effective immediately; amended July 29, 1977 to be effective September 6, 1977; amended July 19, 2012 to be effective September 4, 2012; amended August 5, 2022 to be effective September 1, 2022. Part 2
  • 2:9-9-Sanctions for Non-Compliance with Rules 2:9-9 Failure properly to prosecute or defend an appeal or proceedings for certification shall be ground for such action as the appellate court deems appropriate, including, but not limited to, dismissal of the appeal or petition, imposition of costs or attorney's fees or such other penalty as may be assessed personally against the attorney. Note: Source – R.R. 1:4-1 (second sentence), 1:4-2(a) (b), 1:7-2 (seventh sentence), 1:19-6(a) (second sentence). Amended July 24, 1978 to be effective September 11, 1978. Part 2
  • 2:9-11-Sentencing Appeals 2:9-11 In a criminal, quasi-criminal or juvenile action in the Appellate Division in which the only issue on appeal is whether the court imposed a proper sentence, briefs shall not be filed without leave of court and the matter shall be placed on a sentencing calendar for consideration by the court following oral argument, which shall be recorded verbatim. The appellate court at its discretion may direct the removal of any case from the sentencing calendar. Note: Adopted November 2, 1987 to be effective January 1, 1988; amended January 19, 1989 to be effective February 1, 1989. Part 2
  • 2:9-10-Effect of Appeal by the State 2:9-10 An appeal by the State pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:44-1(f)(2) shall not stay the entry of final judgment for purposes of an appeal or cross-appeal by the defendant. Note: Adopted September 10, 1979 to be effective immediately; amended July 28, 2004 to be effective September 1, 2004; amended July 31, 2020 to be effective September 1, 2020. Part 2
  • Aug. 7 -
  • Aug. 7 -
  • eCourts - Civil Search Full Volume Release Notes
  • eCourts - Civil Search Release Notes
  • REAGAN BRANCH VS. ALPEREN S. ORTA OF PIO CARS, LLC (DC-006712-23, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-2245-23 Appellate July 8, 2025
  • a2245-23.pdf
  • M.Z. VS. L.Z. (FV-16-1991-24, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) A-3846-23 Appellate Aug. 8, 2025
  • STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. QUAMEER L. HENCE (15-02-0451, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) A-0911-23 Appellate Aug. 8, 2025
  • 31 Club, Inc. v. Dir., Div. of Taxation 011518-2017 Tax Aug. 8, 2025
  • STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. LESTER A. GARCIA (19-12-2023, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) A-1917-22 Appellate Aug. 8, 2025
  • SHED WORLD VS. JIM FUNICELLI (DC-004906-23, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-3137-23 Appellate Aug. 8, 2025
  • SONIA COLON, ET AL. VS. DELAWARE RIVER PORT AUTHORITY, ET AL. (L-4463-19, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-3375-22 Appellate Aug. 8, 2025
  • a3846-23.pdf
  • a0911-23.pdf