- The Supreme Court is requesting comments on the attached proposed amendments to Rule 1:21-2 (“Appearances Pro Hac Vice ”) as developed by the New Jersey Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection (LFCP) in collaboration with its Board of Trustees. The proposed amendments are intended to reinforce the existing rule to clarify that attorneys who are administratively ineligible to practice in the State for failure to pay their annual Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection assessment, shall not be permitted to appear pro hac vice . This shall include any attorney whose license was revoked pursuant to R . 1:28-2(c). The LFCP was prompted to propose this amendment after two attorneys whose licenses were revoked pursuant to R . 1:28-2(c) obtained Orders granting pro hac vice admission. Please send any comments in writing by Friday, March 13, 2026 , to: Hon. Michael J. Blee, Acting Administrative Director Comments on Proposed Rule 1:21-2 Amendments Hughes Justice Complex; P.O. Box 037 Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0037 Comments may also be submitted by email to Comments.Mailbox@njcourts.gov . The Supreme Court will not consider comments submitted anonymously. Thus, those submitting comments by mail should include their name and address and those submitting comments by email should include their name and email address. Comments submitted in response to this notice are subject to public disclosure. Document Date: Feb. 9, 2026 Publish Date: Feb. 9, 2026 Download Notice
- File Notice - Proposed Amendments to Rule 1-21-2 - Appearances Pro Hac Vice - Comments Requested by March 13, 2026
- Attorney Certification in support of rule 1:21-11 pro bono hours: landlord tenant
- Attorney Certification in support of hours performed in adult guardianship matters
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. AMALIA MIRASOLA (11-02-0201, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) A-0885-21 Appellate June 1, 2023
- SHANNON LAZROVITCH VS. LRM REALTY ASSOCIATES, LLC, ET AL. (C-000081-20, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-1402-21 Appellate June 1, 2023
- BARBARA LEE VS. KEPNER-TREGOE, INC., ETC. (L-3154-20, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-2130-21 Appellate June 1, 2023
- DELMY MIGUEZ VS. SHOPRITE OF KEARNY, LLC (L-2146-19, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-3270-21 Appellate June 1, 2023
- DCPP VS. K.W. AND J.W., IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF W.W. (FG-02-0030-22, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) A-3537-21 Appellate June 1, 2023
- DCPP VS. Z.T., S.K., A.T., AND G.B., IN THE MATTER OF Z.T., A.B., G.T., AND I.T. (FN-15-0049-18, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) A-3026-21 Appellate June 1, 2023
- IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION BY HORIZON HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., ETC. (NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND INSURANCE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) A-1121-22 Appellate May 31, 2023
- JANTZEN, GIUSEPPIN NINA & MATTHEW D. V GREEN TOWNSHIP 008224-2022, 0082269-2022 Tax May 31, 2023 Summary 008224-2022, 0082269-2022 ADDED ASSESSMENT APPEALS (N.J.S.A. 54:4-63.11) – CASE TRACK REASSIGNMENT (R. 8:6-7) Tax Court: Jantzen, Giuseppin Nina & Matthew D. v. Green Township; Docket Nos. 008224-2022 & 008229-2022, opinion by Bianco, J.T.C., decided May 30, 2023. For plaintiff – Kevin S. Englert (The Englert Law Firm, L.L.C.; attorney); for defendant – Robert B. McBriar (Schenck, Price, Smith & King, L.L.P.; attorney). Plaintiff Taxpayers moved to change the small claims track designation assigned by the Tax Court Management Office for both above-referenced docket numbers, to the standard track to secure more comprehensive discovery. Defendant Township cross-moved for summary judgment to dismiss the added assessment appeal under docket number 008224-2022 as untimely pursuant to N.J.S.A. 54:4-63.11. The court denied Defendant’s cross-motion to dismiss the added assessment appeal finding that the Township did not establish that the Tax Collector mailed notice of the 2021 added assessment to the Taxpayers, nor did the Taxpayers have constructive notice of the added assessment, and, Taxpayers were further denied a hearing before the Sussex County Board of Taxation. The court granted Plaintiffs’ motion the change the track designation in both matters finding that the change is necessary for Plaintiffs to pursue their claims against Defendant. (26 Pages) Close
- CITY OF UNION CITY, ETC. VS. CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS, ET AL. (C-000013-19, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-3742-19 Appellate June 2, 2023
- CHRISTOPHER GLEMSER VS. YARON HELMER, ET AL. (L-1516-18, GLOUCESTER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-3741-20 Appellate June 2, 2023
- VINCENT K. LOUGHLIN VS. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL. (L-2030-21, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-0293-21 Appellate June 2, 2023
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. WILLIAM GARCIA DE JESUS (17-02-0224, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-0349-21 Appellate June 2, 2023
- VALLATA GARDENS, LLC VS. BOROUGH OF LAVALLETTE, ET AL. (L-0630-19, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-0485-21 Appellate June 2, 2023
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. CHRISTOPHER DIANTONIO, ET AL. (21-08-0645, CAPE MAY COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-1987-21 Appellate June 2, 2023
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ALTARIQ J. WAGNER (18-11-3616, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) A-2017-21 Appellate June 2, 2023
- S. E. F. VS. K.D.L. (FD-15-0064-22, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) A-2824-21 Appellate June 2, 2023