Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.

Search

  • Frequently Asked Questions - Annual Attorney Registration and Payment, I am an attorney, admitted in New Jersey and I am employed as an in-house counsel with my primary office in New Jersey. I do not engage in private practice. Am I required to do pro bono cases? Yes. The Supreme Court has determined that attorneys who are in-house counsel with offices in New Jersey and who are in good standing are eligible to receive pro bono assignments, because their work constitutes practicing law. Why are New Jersey attorneys required to represent indigent defendants for free when assigned those cases by the court? In Madden v. Delran, 126 N.J. 591 (1992) Madden v. Delran , 126 N.J. 591 (1992) , the Supreme Court reaffirmed the bar's duty to represent indigent defendants without pay where the Legislature has made no provision for the Public Defender to represent defendants who are entitled to counsel. The Court recognized that it was placing a burden on the bar that should be more generally shared by the public at large. The Court said: "We realize it is the bar that is bearing the burden . . . . We trust the bar understands the strong policy considerations that have persuaded us. As has so often been the case, it is the bar that makes the system work, often without compensation." 126 N.J. at 614. What must I do if I want to engage in the private practice of law in New Jersey? In order to engage in private practice in New Jersey, you must pay the annual assessment; complete the attorney annual registration statement and keep the data current throughout the year; fulfill the requirements of  1:21-6-Recordkeeping; Sharing of Fees; Examination of Records R. 1:21-6, including trust and business accounts in an approved New Jersey financial institution; keep trust accounts IOLTA-compliant ( 1:28A-Interest On Lawyers Trust Accounts (IOLTA) Fund R.1:28A ) ; and maintain required levels of malpractice insurance under Court Rules if practicing in a P.A., P.C., L.L.P., or L.L.C. Where can I find information about Mandatory Licensing of In-House Counsel pursuant to Rule 1:27-2? Rule 1:27-2 - Limited License; In-House Counsel Rule 1:27-2 .  Please visit the Board of Bar Examiners' website at NJ Board of Bar Examiners www.njbarexams.org or call them at 609-815-2911 609-815-2911 .   Can an attorney with bona fide offices in both NJ and PA donate legal services to a domestic violence prevention program in Philadelphia and use that volunteer work to claim exemption from the New Jersey pro bono requirement? No. Under exemption code 88, an attorney may claim an exemption if he or she can certify that he or she has performed at least twenty-five (25) hours of pro bono services for domestic violence service providers. However, the volunteer work must be done in New Jersey in order to claim the exemption. What if the assigned attorney has no previous experience in the type of case he or she is assigned? The Supreme Court addressed this issue in Madden v. Delran, 126 NJ 591 (1992) Madden v. Delran, 126 N.J. at 607-08. It recognized that frequently attorneys who have no experience in the substantive area of the law involved in the pro bono case will be called upon. As the Court said: "Real estate attorneys, corporate counsel, experts in commercial leases, all have been assigned to represent indigent defendants charged with simple assault, driving while intoxicated; all were required not only to learn how to defend those cases but to find out where the courthouse is." 126 N.J. at 607. If, however, the trial judge is convinced that the assigned counsel will provide ineffective assistance of counsel, the judge should direct the assigned counsel to obtain a substitute. 126 N.J. at 608. I don't practice law in New Jersey and I don't want to pay the fees. I want to be placed in inactive status on the attorney registration. What are my options? There is no "inactive status" in New Jersey. Please review the exemptions from payment. If you do not meet the standards to claim a payment exemption, and do not pay the required fees, you will be declared ineligible and not in good standing in New Jersey. Alternatively, you may formally resign from the New Jersey Bar as noted in the answer to " How do I resign without prejudice from the New Jersey Bar? How do I resign without prejudice from the New Jersey Bar? " on this page. Does the military exemption from paying into the Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection include other government service, such as foreign service? No. Military exemption is expressly limited to "full-time active duty with the Armed Forces, AmeriCorps, or Peace Corps." What do I do if I have forgotten my User ID to the attorney registration website? Click the "Request User ID" link on the login screen and follow the instructions on that page. I am an attorney who maintains a bona fide law office in New Jersey. However, I have not represented a private client out of that office for more than a year. Am I required to do pro bono cases? Yes. The Supreme Court has determined that any attorney who maintains a bona fide law office in New Jersey, regardless of the amount of activity out of that office, is eligible to receive assignments. How are attorneys chosen for pro bono assignment? Pro bono cases are assigned from a computer list each county maintains of all the attorneys eligible for pro bono assignment in that county. Cases are assigned strictly in order of the list. At the top of the list are attorneys who have had no pro bono assignments, in alphabetical order. Am I exempt from payment because I practice out of state? No. You cannot claim an exemption from payment solely by virtue of being out of state. My license has been administratively revoked. How can I get my license reinstated? Follow these instructions for requesting reinstatement requesting reinstatement and submitting a petition to the Supreme Court petition to the Supreme Court . What browsers does the attorney registration site currently support? The Attorney Online Billing System currently supports the latest versions of Microsoft Edge and Google Chrome. I am completely retired from the practice of law. Am I required to do pro bono cases? No, you are exempt from mandatory pro bono. You should request exemption code 86 on the annual pro bono questionnaire that is part of the online annual attorney registration. Although my firm has an office in New Jersey, I practice only in another state. How do I answer the attorney registration question about whether or not I engage in the practice of New Jersey law? You should answer "No." If you should practice at all in New Jersey during the year, you have an obligation to return to the website and answer this question "Yes" and then complete the questions about your practice and attorney accounts that will follow regarding your practice and bank accounts. What happens if I neither pay the required fee nor receive either of the exemptions from payment (retired or military)? Your name will be entered on a Supreme Court Order declaring you ineligible to practice law in New Jersey. Although this is not a disciplinary action akin to suspension or disbarment, ineligible attorneys are considered not in good standing in New Jersey and may neither practice nor be admitted pro hac vice. By Court  Rules 1:28-2 Rules 1:28-2  and  Rule 1:20-1(d) 1:20-1(d) , you would be required to pay a $50 fee to be removed from one year's ineligible list or a $100 fee for removal from two or more years' ineligible lists, in addition to the regular and late fees required for each year. Why am I not receiving my activation email to complete the attorney registration process? Check to make sure that your activation email is not getting categorized as "Spam" or "Junk Mail" by your email client. It is advised that you add NJCourts.Mailbox@njcourts.gov  to your allowed senders list within your email client. The activation email can be requested again by clicking the "Request Activation Email" on the login screen. I am an attorney with a bona fide office in another state, but will occasionally appear in the Federal court system in New Jersey. I have no cases in the New Jersey State courts. Am I eligible for an exemption under exemption code 90? Yes. Practicing in a Federal court in New Jersey does not count as practicing in New Jersey, since Federal courts are a separate jurisdiction. How many hours of pro bono service a year must an attorney provide? Attorneys are not required to do a certain number of hours per year. Rather, attorneys are required to complete an assigned pro bono case, no matter how many hours that may require. Further, there is no requirement that an attorney complete a certain number of pro bono cases a year. Attorneys are called upon whenever their name reaches the top of the list. For example, depending on the county, an attorney may be required to complete two cases a year or one case every two years. Must I continue to respond to the annual billing even though I've been granted one of the inactive exemptions from payment for attorney registration (retired or military)? Yes. All attorneys are required to file an annual registration, even those who have been granted an exemption from payment. This keeps the Court informed about your current status and provides attorneys an opportunity to make changes and/or remit payment if they no longer qualify for the exemption, respond to other portions of the registration, and update their mailing or email addresses. Please access the Annual Attorney Registration and Payment Online Registration and Payment Center to respond. You have an ongoing duty to immediately inform the Fund if you no longer qualify for the exemption previously granted (such as no longer in military or if you come out of retired status), and to keep your address current with the Fund. You can access the Annual Attorney Registration and Payment Online Registration and Payment Center to activate your license or to update your mailing or email address. How do I petition the Supreme Court? Instructions for petitioning the Supreme Court are available from the Board of Bar Examiners .  Why am I getting an error that says "Error: JavaScript needs to be enabled in order for your browser to maintain a session." on the attorney registration website? Javascript must be enabled in order to maintain your login session and for you to use the site. Follow the instructions specific to your browser to enable Javascript at https://enable-javascript.com. I recently lost my job with a law firm and have not yet found another law job. Am I required to do pro bono cases? No, while you are not practicing law you are exempt from mandatory pro bono. You should request exemption code 86 on the annual pro bono questionnaire that is part of the online annual attorney registration. When you obtain new legal employment, you are required to update your online attorney registration. The information that is printed in the attorney registration portion no longer applies because I am no longer engaged in the private practice of law in New Jersey. What must I do? Answer the question on the attorney registration portion "No." This will remove your practice information from active records. How do I officially change my name? Attorneys who change their names after admission to practice must file a name change affidavit with the Supreme Court through its  Board of Bar Examiners Board of Bar Examiners. I cannot find an answer to my security question for the attorney registration website. How do I contact you? If you cannot find an answer, please contact [email]  and we will be happy to assist you. I am an attorney who occasionally works for a local law firm. I am not formally affiliated with that firm, but only work on an as needed basis. Am I eligible to claim an exemption from pro bono? No. The Supreme Court has determined that attorneys who work on a per diem basis are eligible to receive pro bono assignments. However, the Court has further determined that an assignment should only be made during a time that these attorneys are actively practicing law in New Jersey. Must all New Jersey attorneys complete pro bono assignments? No, certain attorneys, such as most full-time government attorneys, are exempt from mandatory pro bono service. Each year, the director of the Administrative Office of the Courts issues a list of all the categories of attorneys who are exempt. To be exempt, the attorney must request the exemption on the annual pro bono questionnaire which is part of the online annual attorney registration., If an attorney fails to request an exemption on the pro bono questionnaire, he or she will be assigned a case when his or her name rises to the top of the list., How do I activate my license if I no longer qualify for the exemption from payment previously granted? Go to our Online Registration and Payment Center Online Registration and Payment Cente r to update your registration information and pay the current year's fee. Am I exempt from payment by virtue of being prohibited from private practice? No. Exemptions from payment are narrowly defined; all conditions must be met. Lawyers who cannot claim the retired exemption from payment include, but are not limited to, judges, prosecutors, public defenders, and other government lawyers. Why am I getting an error that says "HPDIA0200W Login failed. The User ID or Password is invalid." when logging in to the attorney registration website? You are receiving this message because either your User ID or Password is invalid. If you are logging in for the first time, please check to make sure your User ID is your Attorney ID and you are using the temporary password provided on your billing card. If you have already logged in and completed your registration, please make sure you are using your new password to login. If you completed the registration process but did not click the activation link within the activation email, please click the link and then try logging in again. If you completed the registration process but did not receive an activation email and click the activation link to complete your registration, please follow these instructions in " Why am I not receiving my activation email to complete the attorney registration process? Why am I not receiving my activation email to complete the attorney registration process? " Note: Please make sure you did not save the temporary password in the password field. Internet Explorer may have prompted you to save the password the first time you logged in. Make sure you clear out any saved password and re-type your new password. I am an attorney, admitted in New Jersey, but I practice law and have a bono fide office in another state. My firm does not have an office in New Jersey. Am I required to do pro bono cases? No, you are exempt from mandatory pro bono. You should request exemption code 90 on the annual pro bono questionnaire that is part of the online annual attorney registration. If the information submitted on my registration form changes before the next billing cycle, what must I do? Within 30 days, return to the Annual Attorney Registration and Payment Online Registration and Payment Center and update any changes. How do I resign without prejudice from the New Jersey Bar? First, please review Court 1:20-22-Resignation Without Prejudice Rule I :20-22 . In particular, note that you cannot resign if any disciplinary or criminal proceedings are pending in any jurisdiction to which you are admitted or if you are not in good standing. If you qualify, and if you comply with the notice requirements set forth in the form, you may complete the Resignation without Prejudice from the Bar of the State of New Jersey Resignation Without Prejudice  form and mail it to: Resignation Without Prejudice Unit, Office of Attorney Ethics, Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex P.O. Box 963 Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0963 Please allow approximately four weeks for processing. Final notification of approval will be received from the, Supreme Court Clerk's Office, If your resignation is accepted by the Supreme Court, it will terminate your membership in the bar. To be readmitted, you will have to retake the New Jersey Bar Examination, unless you meet the requirements of  1:24-4-Application for Admission by Motion R.1:24-4  to be admitted by motion. Attorney Registration & Payment Center Instructions/Tutorial Annual Attorney Registration and Payment Attorney Registration Instructions 2022 Instructions CPF Payment Instructions I am an attorney who practices law by being placed by a temporary employment agency in law firms or corporations. Am I eligible to claim an exemption from pro bono? No. The Supreme Court has determined that attorneys who practice law through temporary employment agencies are eligible to receive pro bono assignments. However, the Court has further determined that an assignment should only be made during a time that these attorneys are actively practicing law in New Jersey. What types of cases are assigned as pro bono cases? Most mandatory pro bono cases fall within three categories: violation of domestic violence restraining orders; municipal appeals; and parole revocation hearings. How does an attorney update their mailing address with the bar? In accordance with Payment to the Fund; Enforcement Rule 1:28-2 , you must keep your mailing address current with the NJ Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection during the year. Please note that your mailing address is not confidential. Go to the Annual Attorney Registration and Payment Online Registration and Payment Center to update your address. Am I exempt from payment by virtue of being exempt from pro bono counsel assignment? No. Exemptions from payment are unrelated to exemptions from  pro bono counsel assignment pro bono counsel assignment pro bono counsel assignment. . What do I do if I have forgotten my password to the attorney registration website? Click the "Reset Password" link on the login screen and follow the instructions on that page.
  • Top News, Don’t Be Fooled By Scams Chief Justice Stuart Rabner’s State of the Judiciary address Supreme Court Committee on Mental Health and Wellness Employment Opportunities For Probation And Child Support Clients Investigation of Millville Municipal Court Allegations Virtual Museum Judiciary Cybersecurity Update Landlord Tenant Services and Resources Marijuana Record Expungement
  • File a Fee Dispute, Learn what to do if you want to dispute the fee charged by your attorney. , On This Page, Body, Fee Arbitration Program, The Fee Arbitration Program helps clients resolve disputes with their attorneys about the legal fees they were charged.  The program helps avoid the need to go to court. There are 17 committees throughout the state made up of volunteers.  The volunteers consist of both attorneys and non-attorneys.  They are appointed by the Supreme Court. The committees hold hearings to decide if a charged fee is reasonable.  The confidential hearings are fair and inexpensive and are quicker than going to court., If the bill seems unreasonable, talk to the attorney first., Try discussing your bill with your attorney, it may help explain the details. Some reasons your bill may be high: Your case might have been more complicated than what was expected. Your case might have taken more time than what was initially expected.  Either reason would explain why the initial estimate was less than the actual bill. But by talking to your attorney, they might agree the bill should be adjusted, and may offer a payment plan. , The attorney must inform you of your right to seek fee arbitration., The attorney must provide the name, address, and phone number of the District Fee Secretaries District Fee Secretary .   Request for Fee Arbitration Form Fee Arbitration Request Form must be filed within 30 days.  If not, you will lose the right to file a Fee Arbitration. , How to File for Fee Arbitration, Send the form to the Secretary from the county where the attorney has a law office.  Include five copies of the form and copies of any other relevant documents. A $50 filing fee, must, be included with the submission.  The Fee Arbitration Request will, not, be processed until the $50 filing fee is paid.  The check or money order, must, be made payable to “Disciplinary Oversight Committee.” If you cannot afford the $50 fee, you can submit a Fee Waiver Request Form.  A copy of this form, must, be submitted with your Fee Arbitration Request.  To request a fee waiver form, call the Fee Arbitration Unit at the , Office of Attorney Ethics,  at  609-403-7800    ext. 34120.  Copy of this completed form must be submitted, with, your Fee Arbitration Request., The district fee secretary will review the case., The district secretary will decide whether to accept a fee arbitration. Fee arbitration is not available: If the fee is more than $100,000. If the client fails to file within 30-days of receiving a notice from the attorney. If more than six years have passed since the last attorney’s services were rendered, regardless of whether the client has received a proper 30-day notice from the attorney to file Fee Arbitration. If the fee has been determined by a court. If the fee dispute raises substantial legal questions. If other parties have an interest in the fee amount., Attorney Response, The attorney will be given a copy of the Fee Arbitration Request.  The attorney is required to respond with an Attorney Fee Response Form Attorney Response Form .  If no response is given, then the attorney will not be allowed to participate in the hearing.  , Settlement Prior to Hearing, Fee disputes can be settled without a hearing.  If a dispute is settled before the hearing, the attorney can file a Stipulation of Settlement with the district fee secretary. , Fee Arbitration Hearing, After review and acceptance of your case, the secretary will schedule a hearing.  The client and the attorney must be given at least ten days’ advance notice of the hearing date.   If the amount in question is, less,  than $3,000, the hearing MAY be before one member of the District Fee Committee. If the amount in question is, more,  than $3,000, the hearing will be before a panel of members from the district fee committee.  A panel typically includes one public member and two attorneys. Fee hearings are private, and they are, not, recorded.  If an Request and Interpreter Interpreter  or an ADA Accommodation ADA Accommodation  are required at any of the stages of the fee dispute process, please call  609-403-7800  ext. 34120. Please make this request as early as possible so we may address the request or accommodation., Fee Arbitration Hearing Decision, If the hearing decides a client is due a refund, then the refund must be paid within 30 days of the hearing decision. The only exception is if the matter has been appealed by either the client or the attorney. If the attorney fails to refund the amount within 30 days, the client can call the Office of Attorney Ethics Fee Arbitration Unit at  609-403-7800  ext. 34120.  The client can request the , OAE,  to file a motion to have the attorney suspended from practicing law until they comply with the Fee Decision., Fee Arbitration Appeals, Fee arbitration decisions can only be appealed in the following circumstances: The fee committee did not follow procedure or there was substantial unfairness during the process. The fee committee commits actual fraud. The fee committee makes gross and obvious mistakes of the law and court rules. Any fee committee member who decided the matter has a conflict of interest in the case. An appeal must meet on of the above conditions to be filed. The appeal must be filed within 21 days of the written decision. The appeal must be filed with the Disciplinary Review Board. To appeal, complete the Fee Arbitration Notice of Appeal Form Fee Arbitration Notice of Appeal Form and mail to: Disciplinary Review Board Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex P.O. Box 962 Trenton, NJ  08625 Fee arbitration proceedings are confidential. Do not discuss the fee dispute with anyone.  There are two exceptions for discussing your matter: With members of the fee arbitration process; or If you consult an attorney about the case.
  • Attorney Resources, On This Page, Body, Contact Address, Office of Attorney Ethics, Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex P.O. Box 963 Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0963 609-403-7800 oae.mbx@njcourts.gov Johanna Barba Jones , Director 609-403-7800, Ethics Compliance Hotline, Ethics Hotline Number: 609-815-2924 609-815-2924 .  Please leave a voicemail message and your call will be returned. The Ethics Hotline is, for Attorneys only, and is for research assistance on legal ethics and advertising issues pertaining to, their own, prospective conduct, . The hotline does not provide advice or opinions, and it does not discuss substantive law. The call is confidential, but callers must provide their names and certify that they are New Jersey lawyers; the inquiry is for their own, prospective conduct, and they are not currently the subject of a disciplinary grievance or proceeding. The hotline does not accept anonymous calls. The hotline does not address calls from lawyers who seek guidance, advice, or opinion about whether another lawyer’s conduct violates the ethics rules. See Court Rule Rules of Court R. 1:19-9 for more information., Attorney Registration, Annual Attorney Registration and Payment Annual Attorney Registration Annual Attorney Registration and Payment Pro Hac Vice Admission Requirements in NJ Annual Attorney Registration and Payment In-House Counsel Admission Requirements in NJ Annual Attorney Registration and Payment Multi-Jurisdictional Practice Admission Requirements in NJ Annual Attorney Registration and Payment Foreign In-House Counsel Admission Requirements in NJ  , Private Practice in NJ, To engage in private practice in New Jersey, you must: Complete the Attorney Registration Statement and Pay the Annual Attorney Registration and Payment Annual Assessment Fulfill the requirements of R:21-6 R. 1:21-6 , including maintaining Trust and Business accounts at an Approved Trust Account Banks Approved Trust Bank Keep IOLTA-Compliant Trust Accounts R,1:28A R. 1:28A Maintain liability insurance, and file a certificate of insurance with the Clerk of the Supreme Court if practicing specifically as a PC (R. 1:21-1A), or LLC (R. 1:21-1B), or LLP (R. 1:21-1C) If not practicing as a PC, LLC, or LLP but maintain liability insurance, file a certificate of insurance with the Clerk of the Supreme Court (R. 1:21-1D – hyperlink to Individuals or Partnerships Engaged in the Private Practice of Law; Reporting of Professional Liability Insurance | NJ Courts), New Jersey Rules of Court, Attorneys should be familiar with, ALL, applicable rules, statutes, and regulations in any area of law they practice. That also includes their responsibilities regarding the rules and regulations of the practice of law which primarily include: , Discipline of Members of Bar (R. 1:20), New Jersey Fee Arbitration Rules (R. 1:20A), New Jersey Recordkeeping Rule (R. 1:21-6), New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct, File a Complaint Against a Judge, If your complaint deals with a Superior Court, Tax Court, Surrogate’s Court, or Municipal Court Judge, contact: , Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct, By Phone: , 609-815-2900 ext. 51910, By Fax: , Fax: 609-376-3092, By Email: , AOC-ACJCInfo.MBX@njcourts.gov, By Mail:, Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct, Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex P.O. Box 037 Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0037, Lawyers Assistance Program, The New Jersey Lawyers Assistance Program is the free and confidential resource assisting all NJ Lawyers, Judges, Law Students, and Law Graduates achieve and maintain personal and professional well-being. For Assistance reach out to NJLAP at 800-246-5527 For details about the NJ Lawyers Assistance Program from the New Jersey Lawyers Assistance Program NJ Court Rules ., 2024 Manual for New Jersey Attorney Trustees, The Office of Attorney Ethics has updated its 2024 Manual for New Jersey Attorney Trustees manual for Attorney Trustees appointed in New Jersey to close out an attorney’s practice due to the attorney’s death, disbarment, abandonment of their practice or other reasons., Legal Service Plans, Legal Service Plan Forms and resources for bona fide organizations providing legal services to members according to the Rules of Court.
  • Random Audit Program, The Random Audit Compliance Program conducts periodic audits of law firms that engage in the private practice of law in the state. The purpose of the program is to ensure that law firms maintain required records of clients' funds and attorneys' fees as described in the Rules of Court and the Rules of Professional Conduct., On This Page, Body, The Random Audit Program has three goals., Education. The central purpose of the program is to educate New Jersey attorneys on the proper method of compliance with the record-keeping and ethical responsibilities under Court 1:21-6-Recordkeeping; Sharing of Fees; Examination of Records Rule 1:21-6 and RPC 1:15 - Safekeeping Property Rule of Professional Conduct 1.15. Deterrence. Just knowing that there is an active auditing program is an incentive to keep good records and to avoid temptation to misuse trust funds. Detection of misappropriation. The random selection process does occasionally uncover some lawyer theft. Those cases are investigated and prosecuted and, very often, result in automatic disbarment for the knowing misappropriation of clients’ funds., Attorneys must comply with the New Jersey Rules of Court and Rules of Professional Conduct., There is no excuse for attorneys not to know and follow these rules, along with the case law and advisory opinions that interpret them. They also must follow generally accepted accounting practice in managing their trust accounts. The Random Audit Compliance Program provides an Outline of Recordkeeping Requirements under RPC 1.15 and R.1:21-6 Outline of Recordkeeping Requirements under RPC 1.15 and R.1:21-6 for reference., The selection and audit process, The random selection process is done by a computer program. Every law firm, regardless of size, has an equal chance of being selected for an audit. The attorney or law firm will receive at least 10 days’ notice of the date of the audit. Usually, only one auditor is assigned to a matter. Occasionally, two or more auditors are assigned if a large firm or other complicating feature is involved. The attorney should be present for the audit. If the attorney is not available, a responsible person knowledgeable about the books and records must be available. The auditor will conduct an initial interview to obtain detailed information about the firm’s recordkeeping procedures. The auditor also reviews the firms’ trust and business account books and records to determine compliance with the rule requirements. Finally, the auditor will verify that all funds entrusted to the attorney have been safeguarded in the attorney's trust account. The auditor will provide a copy of a completed Records Deficiency Checklist. The checklist includes descriptions of the most common recordkeeping deficiencies. The auditor also will discuss with the attorney or with the responsible person in charge of the attorney’s books the actions required to correct and deficiencies., Shortly after the audit, the attorney will be formally advised by correspondence of the results., If no problems are discovered during the audit, a closing letter is sent to the attorney. If minor deficiencies were discovered, a deficiency letter describing shortcomings that require corrective action is sent to the attorney. The attorney has 45 days to respond with information about the corrective action that has been taken. If the response is acceptable, the matter is closed. If the attorney does not respond, the matter may be referred to the Office of Attorney Ethics for disciplinary action. If major deficiencies, such as misappropriation of clients’ funds, are discovered during the audit process, the matter immediately is referred to the Office of Attorney Ethics for disciplinary action., Summary of RPC 1.15, Rules of Court-Safekeeping Property RPC 1.15  ("Safekeeping Property") imposes upon all New Jersey attorneys the duty to safeguard the funds and property of clients coming into their possession in the practice of law. These assets must be kept separate from the attorney's personal and business assets, and not be used for any purpose whatsoever, other than as directed by the client. The attorney is specifically obligated to notify a client promptly when client funds and property are received; to provide the client with appropriate accountings; and to disburse promptly to the client all funds and property to which the client is entitled. Non-cash property, such as bonds and securities, should be clearly identified as client property and secured in the attorney's safe or safe deposit box. Finally, RPC 1.15 imposes upon the attorney the duty to comply with the recordkeeping provisions of R.1:21-6., Summary of R. 1:21-6, Two bank accounts are required., All attorneys who engage in the private practice of law in New Jersey are required to maintain at least two bank accounts: an attorney trust account and an attorney business account. In addition,  Rules of Court-Recordkeeping; Sharing of Fees; Examination of Records R.1:21-6  clearly defines the type of accounting records attorneys are required to keep, and imposes the requirement that these records must be fully reconciled with one another at least monthly., Trust accounts hold client funds., An attorney trust account is a special bank account, usually a checking account, into which must be placed all funds which are entrusted to the attorney's care while the attorney is acting in a legal representative capacity on behalf of a client., Trust accounts cannot be used for other purposes, . An attorney trust account should , not,  , be used for funds which an attorney receives while acting in any special fiduciary capacity, such as executor, guardian, receiver or trustee; these funds are to be placed into separate fiduciary accounts., Trust accounts can be used temporarily to hold funds due to the attorney., Funds that are entrusted to the attorney's care that belong partly to a client and partly to an attorney, presently or potentially, must also be deposited into the attorney trust account. The attorney's portion may be withdrawn when due, unless the client disputes the withdrawal after receiving proper notice of the attorney's bill. In that event, the disputed portion must remain in the trust account until the dispute with the client is resolved., All accounts must be in banks approved by the NJ Supreme Court, .. An attorney may have one or more accounts, depending on need. They must be maintained in a financial institution located in New Jersey and approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey, which annually publishes a list of such Approved Trust Banks approved institutions . In order to be approved, a financial institution must agree to notify the Office of Attorney Ethics whenever an attorney's trust account check is presented against insufficient funds. A financial institution is defined as being a national or state chartered bank; a savings bank; savings and loan association; or a credit union., Trust accounts must be clearly labeled, . Attorney trust accounts must include the prominent designation, Attorney Trust Account. The checks and deposit slips for the account must be imprinted with that title., Cash withdrawals cannot be made from trust accounts., Withdrawals from an attorney trust account must be made to named payees, and not to cash. Only attorneys admitted to practice in New Jersey are permitted to sign attorney trust account checks., Money used to cover service fees can be deposited in trust accounts, . An attorney may deposit a minimal amount of personal funds into the attorney trust account to pay service charges and other fees incurred in connection with the account. The limit suggested by the Random Audit Program is $250. These funds must be recorded on a ledger and all service charges properly reflected there., Earned legal fees must be withdrawn promptly so as not to commingle funds, . No other personal funds of the attorney may be deposited into the trust account because it would constitute active commingling of personal funds with trust funds. Moreover, earned legal fees must be withdrawn promptly from the trust account when due. Aggregating large sums of earned legal fees for extended periods of time constitutes passive commingling. Both active and passive commingling are unethical practices., Attorneys cannot receive the interest on trust accounts, . Attorney trust accounts may be interest-bearing, but the attorney may , never , be the recipient of interest earned on the portion of funds belonging to clients or other persons being held in the trust account. All interest or other income earned on an attorney trust account belongs to the clients or persons whose money generated the interest, or to the IOLTA Fund., IOLTA Fund., Under Rule 1:28A -  Interest On Lawyers Trust Accounts (IOLTA) Fund Court Rule 1:28A , all practicing New Jersey attorneys must register with the Interest on Lawyer Trust Account (IOLTA) Fund and, if the circumstances of that rule apply to them, they must establish an IOLTA attorney trust account. The IOLTA Fund collects the interest on these accounts statewide, and the revenue is used to fund civil legal services and legal programs to improve the administration of justice. Further information may be obtained from: IOLTA Fund of the Bar of New Jersey New Jersey Law Center One Constitution Square New Brunswick, NJ 08901-1500 732-247-8222. 732-247-8222, Attorneys must have a business account, . All legal fees received by an attorney for professional services that have been rendered must be placed into an attorney business account. The business account is also traditionally used to pay the operating expenses of a law office. Attorneys may maintain more than one business account. The checks and deposit slips on these accounts must include the designation of either "Attorney Business Account,” or "Attorney Professional Account,” or Attorney Office Account.” In contrast to a trust account, a non-attorney (for example, a secretary) may be a signatory for a business account., Fee retainers and advanced costs can be held in either type of account, .  If an explicit understanding has been reached with a client that a fee retainer for legal services, or advanced costs for court fees and litigation expenses, are to be placed into an attorney trust account until such time as the fee is earned or the cost is incurred, then that is where these funds must be deposited. Otherwise, these funds may be maintained in either a trust account or a business account. An attorney has an ethical obligation to refund unearned legal fees or unspent advanced costs to a client whenever the attorney completes or withdraws from representation, or the attorney is discharged by the client., Basic trust and account records are required., A basic trust accounting system consists of a trust account checkbook, a trust receipts journal, a trust disbursements journal, and a trust ledger book containing the individual ledger accounts for recording each financial transaction affecting that client's funds. Each individual client ledger account should be maintained as a separate page in the attorney's trust ledger book. At a minimum, each ledger account should reflect the date, source, and a description of each item of deposit, as well as the date, payee, and purpose of each withdrawal. While no specific accounting system is required, all financial records must be kept in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice. Manual and computerized systems are both acceptable., Accounts must be maintained daily., All source documents such as duplicate deposit slips, bank statements, canceled checks, and check stubs must be preserved for seven years. An attorney should also preserve copies of records from client files that are necessary for a full understanding of the lawyer's financial transactions with a client., A running balance must be maintained at all times for all ledgers and checkbooks.  T, he balances in the trust ledger book must be reconciled, at least monthly, with the balances in the trust receipts and disbursement journals, the trust account checkbook, and the bank statements. Records of these monthly reconciliations must be maintained for seven years., Other records also must be maintained for seven years., This includes: client retainer and fee agreements statements to clients showing disbursements of funds bills rendered to clients records showing payments to other attorneys or non-employees for services rendered. In the event of a dissolution of a law firm, appropriate arrangements must be made for the maintenance of the firm's records, whether by a former partner or the successor law firm., Consequences for non-compliance are serious. , The knowing misuse of trust funds by an attorney will almost invariably result in disbarment. Major recordkeeping deficiencies, or negligent misuse of trust funds resulting from the failure of an attorney to properly maintain trust account books and records, will result in the imposition of discipline.
  • Attorney Ethics and Discipline, Landing Information - Attorney Ethics and Discipline The attorney discipline system plays a critical role in maintaining public trust and confidence the legal profession., How do I ..., Find annual disciplinary reports? Volunteer for a committee? File an Ethics Complaint File a Fee Arbitration Request for a Certificate of Ethical Conduct (Statement of Discipline) Public Hearing List File an Ethics Grievance Download the form and instructions for filing a grievance. Certificates and Forms Find forms and instructions for Resignation | Retirement | Certificate of Ethical Conduct | Certificate of Good Standing Random Audit Program The random audit program helps ensure attorneys follow Court Rules regarding client funds and attorney fees. District Ethics and Fee Committees Contact the secretary in your district to file a grievance or a fee arbitration request. Find a Discipline Case Find hearing and case information as well as quarterly and annual discipline reports Disciplinary Review Board The Board provides appellate-level review of all disciplinary cases. File a Fee Dispute Download the form and instructions for filing a fee dispute. Attorney Resources Contact information, FAQs, and other helpful resources for attorneys. Approved Trust Account Banks Find the list of banks approved for holding attorney trust account.
  • Rules of Court, Note: Includes amendments effective on or before Sept. 1, 2025.,   Section Search for Reset, Your search did not return any results. Please try the search suggestions below., Tips for searching: Check the spelling of your search. Try a different search. Try using more general words in your search. Alternatively, you can try using the menus to find what you’re looking for.  
  • Motion Day Schedule 2024-2025, SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, It is ORDERED that for the court year commencing July 1, 2024 and ending June 30, 2025, motions in all trial courts (including the Tax Court) shall be heard on Fridays or as otherwise provided by a judge pursuant to 1:6-2- Form of Motion; Hearing Rule 1 :6-2(b), except that motions to be argued in the Law Division of Superior Court shall be heard on the following days: Friday July 5, 2024  Friday July 19, 2024  Friday August 2, 2024  Friday August 16, 2024  Friday August 30, 2024  Friday September 13, 2024 Friday September 27, 2024 Friday October 11, 2024  Friday October 25, 2024  Friday November 8, 2024  Friday November 22, 2024  Friday December 6, 2024 Friday December 20, 2024 Friday January 3, 2025  Friday January 17, 2025  Friday January 31, 2025  Friday February 14, 2025  Friday February 28, 2025  Friday March 14, 2025  Friday March 28, 2025  Friday April 11, 2025  Friday April 25, 2025  Friday May 9, 2025  Friday May 23, 2025  Friday June 6, 2025  Thursday June 19, 2025  Dated: July 5, 2023
  • Court Holidays and Recesses 2024-2025, SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, It is ORDERED that the schedule of legal holidays and court recesses for the trial division of the Superior Court and for the Tax Court for the court year commencing July I, 2024 and ending June 30, 2025, is as follows: Monday, July 1, 2024  First Day of 2024-2025 Court Year  Thursday, July 4, 2024  Legal Holiday (Emergent Matters Only)  Monday, September 2, 2024  Legal Holiday (Emergent Matters Only)  Monday, October 14, 2024  Legal Holiday (Emergent Matters Only)  Tuesday, November 5, 2024  Legal Holiday (Emergent Matters Only)  Monday, November 11, 2024  Legal Holiday (Emergent Matters Only)  Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday,  November 25, 26, and 27, 2024 Statewide Judicial College  (Emergent Matters Only)  Thursday, November 28, 2024 Legal Holiday (Emergent Matters Only)  Wednesday, December 25, 2024 Legal Holiday (Emergent Matters Only)  Thursday, December 26, 2024 through Tuesday, December 31, 2024  Court Recess (Emergent Matters Only) Wednesday, January 1, 2025  Legal Holiday (Emergent Matters Only)  Monday, January 20, 2025 Legal Holiday (Emergent Matters Only)  Monday, February 17, 2025  Legal Holiday (Emergent Matters Only)  Friday, April 18, 2025 Legal Holiday (Emergent Matters Only)  Monday, May 26, 2025  Legal Holiday (Emergent Matters Only)  Friday, June 20, 2025  Legal Holiday (Emergent Matters Only)  Tuesday, July 1, 2025 First Day of2025-2026 Court Year Dated: July 5, 2023
  • Millville Municipal Court Report, On This Page, Body Millville Municipal Court Report Report of Investigation into Millville Municipal Court Allegations, Supreme Court Orders, Appx 1. , Notice and Order – Continuation of Remote Court Proceedings; Public Access; Sentencing April 20, 2020 Supreme Court Order (consent required for certain matters to proceed virtually), Appx 2.,   Notice and Order – COVID-19 – Second Omnibus Order on Court Operations and Legal Practice – More Operations To Be Conducted Remotely; Limited Discovery Extensions and Tolling Periods April 24, 2020 Supreme Court Second COVID-19 Omnibus Order (resumption of Municipal Court sessions in virtual format), Appx 3, . Notice and Order – COVID-19 – When Matters Can Proceed Remotely Feb. 22, 2021 Supreme Court Order (refinement of consent requirement for matters to proceed virtually), Appx 4., Notice and Order – Future of Court Operations – Continuation of Both In-Person and Virtual Court Events Nov. 18, 2021 Supreme Court Order (Future of Court Operations), Appx 5., Notice and Order - The Future of Court Operations - Updates to In-Person and Virtual Court Events Oct. 27, 2022 Supreme Court Order (Future of Court Operations 2.0), Court Session Transcripts, Appx 6, .  Jason November 7, 2022 Nov. 7, 2022, Appx 7.,   Jason December 05, 2022 Dec. 5, 2022, Interview Transcripts, Appx 8.,   Interview Transcripts-Benjamin Telsey Hon. Benjamin Telsey, Assignment Judge, Vicinage 15, Appx 9. , Interview Transcripts - Jason Witcher Hon. Jason D. Witcher , Municipal Court Judge, Certifications & Signed Statements, Appx 10.,   Ashley Angel, Clerk 1, Millville Municipal Court Ashley Angel, Clerk 1, Millville Municipal Court, Appx 11.,  Amber Gandy (1), Keyboarding Clerk, Millville Municipal Court    Amber Gandy (1), Keyboarding Clerk, Millville Municipal Court Amber Gandy (1), Keyboarding Clerk, Millville Municipal Court , Appx 12., Amber Gandy (2), Keyboarding Clerk, Millville Municipal Court  Amber Gandy (2), Keyboarding Clerk, Millville Municipal Court , Appx 13.,   Hon. Teri Giordano, Municipal Court Judge Hon. Teri Giordano, Municipal Court Judge, Appx 14., Kimberly Hamlyn, Certified Municipal Court Administrator, Millville Municipal Court Kimberly Hamlyn, Certified Municipal Court Administrator, Millville Municipal Court, Appx 15., Marie Keith, Certified Municipal Court Administrator, Bridgeton Municipal Court Marie Keith, Certified Municipal Court Administrator, Bridgeton Municipal Court, Appx 16., Thomas North, Municipal Court Presiding Judge Hon. Thomas North, Municipal Court Presiding Judge, Appx 17., Amber Oliver, Deputy Municipal Court Administrator, Millville Municipal Court Amber Oliver, Deputy Municipal Court Administrator, Millville Municipal Court, Appx 18., Itzel Torres Velazquez, Bilingual Clerk 2, Millville Municipal Court Itzel Torres Velazquez, Bilingual Clerk 2, Millville Municipal Court, Appx 19., Ashley Wolk, Vicinage 15 Municipal Division Manager Ashley Wolk, Vicinage 15 Municipal Division Manager, Appx 20., Luz M. Esteban Zamora, Bilingual Clerk 2, Millville Municipal Court Luz M. Esteban Zamora, Bilingual Clerk 2, Millville Municipal Court, Court Session Data & Analysis, Appx 21., Analysis of December 5, 2022 Millville Municipal Court Session Analysis of Dec.5, 2022 Millville Municipal Court Session, Appx 22. , Analysis of October 5 – December 14, 2022 Court Dockets Analysis of Oct. 5 – Dec. 14, 2022 Court Dockets, Appx 23., Combined Docket Summary Docket Summaries Oct.5 – Dec. 14, 2022 (combined), Appx 24., Court Calendars - Municipal Millville Municipal Court Dockets Oct. 5 – Dec. 14, 2022 (combined), Judiciary Resources, Appx 25.,  Judiciary Language Access Plan, Directive #11-22  Judiciary Language Access Plan, Directive #10-22 (September 2022), Appx 26., Municipal Court Opening Statement - Millville Municipal Court Opening Statement (updated February 2023), Appx 27.,  Court-Issued Municipal Court Notices (updated February 2023) Municipal Court, Notice, Millville, Appx 28, .  1983 Municipal Court Procedures, Chapter IX 1983 Municipal Court Procedures, Chapter IX, Appx 29.,   PowerPoint Presentation on Supreme Court’s Oct. 27, 2022 Order PowerPoint Presentation on Supreme Court’s Oct. 27, 2022 Order
  • Student Resources, The Supreme Court - Students & Families United States Supreme Court offer students, families, and teachers activities focused on the history and knowledge of the government. The activities vary from booklets to games and puzzles. Founded in 2009 by Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, iCivics - Student Games iCivics is a non-profit civic education seeking higher learning in young students. Teachers will find innovative ways to engage students in civic democracy through games and other educational resources. Ben's Guide - GPO Ben’s Guide is an online learning tool about the Federal and U.S. Government. Created by the Government Publishing Office, there are different learning levels and games designed for varying age brackets. For instance, preschoolers learn about apprenticeship while 14-aged-plus students join the Master's Level Learning Page - 14+ Students master level learning adventures .  Law for Kids - Arizona Law for Kids was created by the Arizona Bar Foundation. It combines law games and classroom education in a friendly way to help young students be more aware of their lawful rights. Parents can also be active in their children’s law education by Law for Kids - Parent Page creating an account .  Law Facts for Kids Law Facts for Kids provides definitions and breakdowns of laws in simple terms for younger kids to understand. Kids in the House Kids in the House is an educational website provided by the U.S. Clerk’s Office of the House of Representatives. It supplies information about the U.S. Government legislative branch to all students.  New Jersey Statehouse - Main Page NJ Statehouse assists students in physical and virtual tour guides and sessions around the State House and other capitol buildings. New Jersey Statehouse - Tours Check the site for more information on session dates and times.
  • All Docketed Tax Court Cases, Local Property Tax Cases Docketed Lists, Local Property Tax Cases Docketed Local Property Tax Cases Docketed PDF - Nov. 2, 2025 Local Property Tax Cases Docketed XLSX - Nov. 2, 2025 Open Local Property Tax Cases Open Local Property Tax Cases PDF - Nov. 2, 2025 Open Local Property Tax Cases XLSX - Nov. 2, 2025, State Tax Cases Docketed Lists, State Tax Cases Docketed State Tax Cases Docketed PDF - Nov. 2, 2025 State Tax Cases Docketed XLSX - Nov. 2, 2025 Open State Tax Cases Open State Tax Cases PDF - Nov. 2, 2025 Open State Tax Cases XLSX - Nov. 2, 2025, Tax Docket Years, Category List of Local Property Tax Judgments Archived Local Property Tax Cases Docket Lists Years All 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 Apply Filters List Local Property Tax Judgements September 2025 Local Property Tax Judgements September 2025 (xlsx version) Local Property Tax Judgements August 2025 Local Property Tax Judgements August 2025 (xlsx version) Local Property Tax Judgements July 2025 Local Property Tax Judgements July 2025 (xlsx version) Local Property Tax Judgements June 2025 Local Property Tax Judgements June 2025 (xlsx version) Local Property Tax Judgements May 2025 (xlsx version) Local Property Tax Judgements May 2025 Local Property Tax Judgments April 2025 Local Property Tax Judgments April 2025 (xlsx version) Local Property Tax Judgments March 2025 Local Property Tax Judgments March 2025 (xlsx version) Local Property Tax Judgments February 2025 Local Property Tax Judgments February 2025 (xlsx version) Local Property Tax Judgments January 2025 Local Property Tax Judgments January 2025 (xlsx version) Local Property Tax Judgments December 2024 (xlsx version) Local Property Tax Judgments December 2024 Pagination 1 Go to page 2 2 Go to page 3 3 Go to last page 11 Last page Go to next page > Next page Showing 1 to 20 of 218 items
  • Complex Business Litigation Program, Start End Issue - Any - Additional Insured Arbitration Attorney Fees Auto Breach of Contract Breach of Duty of Loyalty Breach of Fiduciary Duty Breach of Warranty Business Judgment Rule Buyout Cancellation CEPA Civil Conspiracy Collateral Source Rule Commercial General Liability Commercial Litigation Computer/Software Related Issues Condominium Act Conflict of Interest Conflict/Choice of Law Construction Consumer Fraud Contract Interpretation Conversion Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Covenants (Restrictive, not to Compete/Solicit) Custodial/Statutory Receiver Damages Discovery Issues/Motions Dissolution Economic Loss Doctrine Employment Contract Employment Status Environmental Experts Fair Dealing Foreclosure Forum Issues Fraud Fraudulent Inducement Indemnification Insurance Jurisdictional Issues LAD Lemon Law Merger Negligent Misrepresentation Patents Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Piercing the Corporate Veil Private Employment Agency Act Products Liability Professional Negligence/Malpractice Promissory Estoppel Quantum Meruit Quasi-Contract Racketeering Racketeering Real Estate Real Estate Reformation Rescission Sealing of Court Records Securities Shareholder Issues Specific Performance Statute of Limitations Statute of Repose Statutory Interpretation Subpoenas Subrogation Successor Liability Suspicious Activity Report Privilege Tortious Interference Trade Secrets Trademark UCC Unfair Competition Unjust Enrichment Valuation Waiver WARN Act Witnesses Workers Compensation Wrongful Termination All Search Apply Filters ESX-L-6114-18 - Xela 1, LLC v. ACCU Reference Medical Lab, LLC, Business Opinion Category, Complex Business Litigation Program, Decided Date,   Sept. 17, 2025, Business Opinion Issue Types, Breach of Contract Contract Interpretation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Lynott, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, ESX-L-6114-18 MON-L-888-20 - Tag Realty, LLC, et al. v. Firestone Building Products Company, LLC, et al., Business Opinion Category, Complex Business Litigation Program, Decided Date,   Sept. 4, 2025, Business Opinion Issue Types, Attorney Fees Consumer Fraud, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Cagan, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, MON-L-888-20 ATL-L-1584-22 - Wiser v. My1Agent, et al., Business Opinion Category, Complex Business Litigation Program, Decided Date,   Aug. 29, 2025, Business Opinion Issue Types, Discovery Issues/Motions, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Johnson, J.S.C, Referenced Opinion ID, ATL-L-1584-22 L-001136/11 - Sae Power v. Avaya, Business Opinion Category, Complex Business Litigation Program, Decided Date,   Aug. 1, 2025, Business Opinion Issue Types, Trade Secrets, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Lynott, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, L-001136/11 HUD-L-2750-18 - Rialto-Capitol Condominuim Ass'n v. First Mercury Ins. Co., Business Opinion Category, Complex Business Litigation Program, Decided Date,   July 25, 2025, Business Opinion Issue Types, Insurance, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, D’elia, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, HUD-L-2750-18 MRS-L-1947-22 - Alfieri v. Frank, Business Opinion Category, Complex Business Litigation Program, Decided Date,   July 1, 2025, Business Opinion Issue Types, Breach of Duty of Loyalty Breach of Fiduciary Duty Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Shareholder Issues, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, DeAngelis, P.J.Ch., Referenced Opinion ID, MRS-L-1947-22 ESX-L-7647-24 - Lowenstein Sandler v. Harmony Found. of N.J., Business Opinion Category, Complex Business Litigation Program, Decided Date,   May 12, 2025, Business Opinion Issue Types, Attorney Fees Discovery Issues/Motions, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Lynott, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, ESX-L-7647-24 CAM-L-2500-21 - D’elia v. Martinez, Business Opinion Category, Complex Business Litigation Program, Decided Date,   May 2, 2025, Business Opinion Issue Types, Breach of Contract Fraud Conversion Unjust Enrichment Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Tortious Interference, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Polansky, P.J.Cv., Referenced Opinion ID, CAM-L-2500-21 MRS-L-1627-23 - Holder v. Mroue, Business Opinion Category, Complex Business Litigation Program, Decided Date,   April 1, 2025, Business Opinion Issue Types, Breach of Contract Fraud, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, DeAngelis, P.J. Ch., Referenced Opinion ID, MRS-L-1627-23 SSX-L-469-24 - Franek v. Twp. of Wantage, Business Opinion Category, Complex Business Litigation Program, Decided Date,   March 28, 2025, Business Opinion Issue Types, Discovery Issues/Motions, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, DeAngelis, P.J. Ch., Referenced Opinion ID, SSX-L-469-24 MRS-L-700-24 - First Environment Inc. v. Delta Environmental Services, Business Opinion Category, Complex Business Litigation Program, Decided Date,   March 25, 2025, Business Opinion Issue Types, CEPA Tortious Interference Unfair Competition, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, DeAngelis, P.J. Ch., Referenced Opinion ID, MRS-L-700-24 BER-L-1241-23 - 145 B.A. Realty, LLC v. RLF Acquisitions, LLC, Business Opinion Category, Complex Business Litigation Program, Decided Date,   Feb. 26, 2025, Business Opinion Issue Types, Contract Interpretation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Soukas, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER-L-1241-23 PAS-L-2441-22 - Wiggins Plastic, Inc. v. Cty. of Passaic, Business Opinion Category, Complex Business Litigation Program, Decided Date,   Feb. 6, 2025, Business Opinion Issue Types, Discovery Issues/Motions, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Del Sardo, P.J. Cv., Referenced Opinion ID, PAS-L-2441-22 CAM-L-2934-20 - Shah v. Shroff, et al., Business Opinion Category, Complex Business Litigation Program, Decided Date,   Jan. 21, 2025, Business Opinion Issue Types, Discovery Issues/Motions, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Polansky, P.J. Cv., Referenced Opinion ID, CAM-L-2934-20 ESX-L-7647-24 - Lowenstein Sandler v. Harmony Found. of N.J., Business Opinion Category, Complex Business Litigation Program, Decided Date,   Jan. 16, 2025, Business Opinion Issue Types, Attorney Fees Discovery Issues/Motions, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Lynott, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, ESX-L-7647-24 MON-L-002754-20 - Ranga Bhoomi, LLC v. Sequoia Training and Nutrition Consultants, Business Opinion Category, Complex Business Litigation Program, Decided Date,   Jan. 13, 2025, Business Opinion Issue Types, Breach of Contract Conversion Fraud Promissory Estoppel Unjust Enrichment, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Cagan, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, MON-L-002754-20 PAS-L-000712-24 - Patterson Bd. of Ed. v. Dimartino, Business Opinion Category, Complex Business Litigation Program, Decided Date,   Jan. 10, 2025, Business Opinion Issue Types, Civil Conspiracy, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Del Sardo, P.J. Cv., Referenced Opinion ID, PAS-L-000712-24 ATL-L-1584-22 - Wiser Insurance Co. v. My1Agent, Inc., Business Opinion Category, Complex Business Litigation Program, Decided Date,   Jan. 8, 2025, Business Opinion Issue Types, Conversion Tortious Interference, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Johnson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, ATL-L-1584-22 OCN-L-002491-17 - River Pointe v. Pulte Homes, Business Opinion Category, Complex Business Litigation Program, Decided Date,   Jan. 6, 2025, Business Opinion Issue Types, Piercing the Corporate Veil, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Wellerson, P.J. Cv, Referenced Opinion ID, OCN-L-002491-17 MID-L-3563-19 - Atlanta Int'l Ins. Co. v. Johnson and Johnson, Business Opinion Category, Complex Business Litigation Program, Decided Date,   Dec. 18, 2024, Business Opinion Issue Types, Insurance, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Wolinetz, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, MID-L-3563-19 Pagination 1 Go to page 2 2 Go to page 3 3 Go to last page 9 Last page Go to next page > Next page Showing 1 to 20 of 166 items
  • Business Disputes, Start End Issue - Any - Additional Insured Arbitration Attorney Fees Auto Breach of Contract Breach of Duty of Loyalty Breach of Fiduciary Duty Breach of Warranty Business Judgment Rule Buyout Cancellation CEPA Civil Conspiracy Collateral Source Rule Commercial General Liability Commercial Litigation Computer/Software Related Issues Condominium Act Conflict of Interest Conflict/Choice of Law Construction Consumer Fraud Contract Interpretation Conversion Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Covenants (Restrictive, not to Compete/Solicit) Custodial/Statutory Receiver Damages Discovery Issues/Motions Dissolution Economic Loss Doctrine Employment Contract Employment Status Environmental Experts Fair Dealing Foreclosure Forum Issues Fraud Fraudulent Inducement Indemnification Insurance Jurisdictional Issues LAD Lemon Law Merger Negligent Misrepresentation Patents Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Piercing the Corporate Veil Private Employment Agency Act Products Liability Professional Negligence/Malpractice Promissory Estoppel Quantum Meruit Quasi-Contract Racketeering Racketeering Real Estate Real Estate Reformation Rescission Sealing of Court Records Securities Shareholder Issues Specific Performance Statute of Limitations Statute of Repose Statutory Interpretation Subpoenas Subrogation Successor Liability Suspicious Activity Report Privilege Tortious Interference Trade Secrets Trademark UCC Unfair Competition Unjust Enrichment Valuation Waiver WARN Act Witnesses Workers Compensation Wrongful Termination All Search Apply Filters C-5-20 - Hassan v. Theophile, Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   March 31, 2023, Business Opinion Issue Types, Breach of Contract Fraudulent Inducement Negligent Misrepresentation Real Estate, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Mega, P.J.Ch., Referenced Opinion ID, C-5-20 UNN-C-95-20 - Platkin v. Kizito, Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   Aug. 17, 2022, Business Opinion Issue Types, Securities Fraud, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Mega, P.J.Ch., Referenced Opinion ID, UNN-C-95-20 BER-L-1643-21 - Extech Building v. E&N Construction, Inc. - Motion to Dismiss, Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   Dec. 1, 2021, Business Opinion Issue Types, Breach of Contract Fraud, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Robert C. Wilson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER-L-1643-21 C-148-19 - Millburn Mall Holding, LLC v. Walgreens Eastern Co., Inc., Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   June 10, 2020, Business Opinion Issue Types, Breach of Contract Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Mega, P.J.Ch., Referenced Opinion ID, C-148-19 BER-L-7752-17 - MEL Realty LLC v. Bayonne Oval, LLC et. al., Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   April 26, 2019, Business Opinion Issue Types, Civil Conspiracy Fraudulent Inducement Negligent Misrepresentation Real Estate, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Wilson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER-L-7752-17 BER L-4341-17 - Booth Movers Ltd v. Sleepable Sofas, Ltd., et als., Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   Feb. 6, 2019, Business Opinion Issue Types, Breach of Contract Consumer Fraud Conversion Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Discovery Issues/Motions Indemnification Successor Liability Unjust Enrichment, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Wilson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER L-4341-17 A-0241-17T1 - RICHARD W. TULLY, JR. VS. PETER MIRZ (L-5951-16, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE), Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   Nov. 28, 2018, Business Opinion Issue Types, Breach of Contract Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Shareholder Issues, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Geiger, J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-0241-17T1 A-0275-17T4 - METRO COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., ET AL. VS. NANCY VAN ISTENDAL (C-000036-16, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE), Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   Nov. 19, 2018, Business Opinion Issue Types, Employment Status Shareholder Issues, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Firko, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned to Appellate Division), Referenced Opinion ID, A-0275-17T4 C-28-16 - Magnolia Beef Company v. Hrissikos, et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   June 7, 2018, Business Opinion Issue Types, Civil Conspiracy Commercial Litigation Fraud Breach of Contract, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Dupuis, P.J.Ch., Referenced Opinion ID, C-28-16 C-104-16 - Marzetta, et al. v. Tassev, et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   March 14, 2018, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation Jurisdictional Issues Rescission, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Natali, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, C-104-16 UNN-C-108-13 - Parker v. Parker, Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   Dec. 22, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Shareholder Issues Commercial Litigation Breach of Contract Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Commercial Litigation Unjust Enrichment, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Judge Dupuis, P.J.Ch., Referenced Opinion ID, UNN-C-108-13 C-151-15 - Pearson v. DMH2, Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   Aug. 16, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Covenants (Restrictive, not to Compete/Solicit), Publication Status, Published, Judge, Moore, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, C-151-15 BER-L-5000-12 - APR LLC v. John Lomans, Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   Jan. 27, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Covenants (Restrictive, not to Compete/Solicit), Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Robert C. Wilson, J.S.C.,, Referenced Opinion ID, BER-L-5000-12 A-3777-17T3 - Samsung Electronic America, Inc. v. Westpark Electronics, Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   Dec. 4, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Unfair Competition Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-3777-17T3 A-3172-13T4 - Swarna Allam et al. v. Deepak Verma et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   Oct. 22, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-3172-13T4 A-93-13 - Kaye v. Rosefielde, Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   Sept. 22, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Breach of Duty of Loyalty, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Referenced Opinion ID, A-93-13 HUD-L-3796-11 - Tullett Prebon PLC v. BGC Partners, Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   March 31, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Unfair Competition Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Referenced Opinion ID, HUD-L-3796-11 A-1899-13 - Spencer Savings Bank SLA v. McGrover et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   March 5, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Unfair Competition Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-1899-13 A-6019-12 - Karl Jones v. Belwood Aromatics, Inc., Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   Nov. 26, 2014, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-6019-12 A-1340-13 - Gateway Care Center v. John Sung, Business Opinion Category, Business Disputes, Decided Date,   Nov. 6, 2014, Business Opinion Issue Types, Unfair Competition Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-1340-13 Pagination 1 Go to page 2 2 Go to next page > Next page Showing 1 to 20 of 35 items
  • Business Governance, Start End Issue - Any - Additional Insured Arbitration Attorney Fees Auto Breach of Contract Breach of Duty of Loyalty Breach of Fiduciary Duty Breach of Warranty Business Judgment Rule Buyout Cancellation CEPA Civil Conspiracy Collateral Source Rule Commercial General Liability Commercial Litigation Computer/Software Related Issues Condominium Act Conflict of Interest Conflict/Choice of Law Construction Consumer Fraud Contract Interpretation Conversion Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Covenants (Restrictive, not to Compete/Solicit) Custodial/Statutory Receiver Damages Discovery Issues/Motions Dissolution Economic Loss Doctrine Employment Contract Employment Status Environmental Experts Fair Dealing Foreclosure Forum Issues Fraud Fraudulent Inducement Indemnification Insurance Jurisdictional Issues LAD Lemon Law Merger Negligent Misrepresentation Patents Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Piercing the Corporate Veil Private Employment Agency Act Products Liability Professional Negligence/Malpractice Promissory Estoppel Quantum Meruit Quasi-Contract Racketeering Racketeering Real Estate Real Estate Reformation Rescission Sealing of Court Records Securities Shareholder Issues Specific Performance Statute of Limitations Statute of Repose Statutory Interpretation Subpoenas Subrogation Successor Liability Suspicious Activity Report Privilege Tortious Interference Trade Secrets Trademark UCC Unfair Competition Unjust Enrichment Valuation Waiver WARN Act Witnesses Workers Compensation Wrongful Termination All Search Apply Filters A-0922-16T3 - JERRY ALLOCO, ET AL. VS. OCEAN BEACH AND BAY CLUB, ET AL. (C-000015-14, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE), Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Aug. 22, 2018, Business Opinion Issue Types, Business Judgment Rule, Publication Status, Published, Judge, ; Leone, J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-0922-16T3 A-1362-14T3 - Sally A. Roberts, DO v. Anson Moise, M.D. et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Feb. 8, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-1362-14T3 A-2650-13T3 - Patricia Wisniewski v. Francis Walsh, Jr., Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Dec. 24, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Buyout Valuation Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-2650-13T3 A-0781-14T2 - Richard Ross v. Paul La Regina and Body Shop Fitness, LLC, Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Dec. 17, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Buyout Valuation Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-0781-14T2 A-3836-12 - Seidman v. Spencer Savings Bank S.L.A., Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   April 30, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-3836-12 ESX-C-122-13 - Coty US LLC v. 680 S. 17th Street LLC, Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Feb. 26, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Custodial/Statutory Receiver Environmental Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Katz, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, ESX-C-122-13 A-6220-12 - Toni Castro v. Angelo Giacchi, Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Dec. 5, 2014, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-6220-12 A-3933-12 - Joseph P. Virzi et al. v. Air Cargo Global Corp. et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   June 6, 2014, Business Opinion Issue Types, Dissolution, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-3933-12 A-3459-12 - Robert Passero v. The North Jersey Country Club, Inc., Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   June 4, 2014, Business Opinion Issue Types, Business Judgment Rule Contract Interpretation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-3459-12 A-1119-12 - The Holder Group, Inc. v. John Bierman, Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   May 23, 2014, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-1119-12 A-2013-12 - New Jersey Realty Concepts v. John Mavroudis, Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   March 14, 2014, Business Opinion Issue Types, Custodial/Statutory Receiver, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Leone, J.S.C., t/a, Referenced Opinion ID, A-2013-12 A-4198-11 - Surgem, LLC et al. v. Achievmed, Inc., et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Oct. 16, 2013, Business Opinion Issue Types, Valuation Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Lihotz, J.A.D, Referenced Opinion ID, A-4198-11 A-0310-11 - Fayed v. Melendez, et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Aug. 7, 2013, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-0310-11 A-2921-11 - 701 Penham Avenue Associates, Inc v. J. Fanok Holdings, LLC, et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Feb. 28, 2013, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-2921-11 A-5924-09 - Mizrack, et al. v. Fairmount Chemical Co., Inc., et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Jan. 25, 2013, Business Opinion Issue Types, Shareholder Issues Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-5924-09 A-5427-10 - Warshauer Electric Supply Company v. Munroe Electric, et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Jan. 10, 2013, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-5427-10 A-4028-10 - Antonucci, M.D. v. Morris County Cardiology Consultants, P.A., et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Jan. 10, 2013, Business Opinion Issue Types, Shareholder Issues Commercial Litigation Buyout, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-4028-10 A-2628-09 - All Saints University of Medicine Aruba, et al. v. Chilana, et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Dec. 24, 2012, Business Opinion Issue Types, Dissolution Shareholder Issues Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-2628-09 A-3161-11 - Gatta v. Gatta, et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Oct. 26, 2012, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation Arbitration, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-3161-11 A-5741-10 - Acquaviva v. Estate of Frank DiMisa, et al., Business Opinion Category, Business Governance, Decided Date,   Oct. 18, 2012, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-5741-10 Pagination 1 Go to page 2 2 Go to page 3 3 Go to next page > Next page Showing 1 to 20 of 43 items
  • Contract Disputes, Start End Issue - Any - Additional Insured Arbitration Attorney Fees Auto Breach of Contract Breach of Duty of Loyalty Breach of Fiduciary Duty Breach of Warranty Business Judgment Rule Buyout Cancellation CEPA Civil Conspiracy Collateral Source Rule Commercial General Liability Commercial Litigation Computer/Software Related Issues Condominium Act Conflict of Interest Conflict/Choice of Law Construction Consumer Fraud Contract Interpretation Conversion Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Covenants (Restrictive, not to Compete/Solicit) Custodial/Statutory Receiver Damages Discovery Issues/Motions Dissolution Economic Loss Doctrine Employment Contract Employment Status Environmental Experts Fair Dealing Foreclosure Forum Issues Fraud Fraudulent Inducement Indemnification Insurance Jurisdictional Issues LAD Lemon Law Merger Negligent Misrepresentation Patents Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Piercing the Corporate Veil Private Employment Agency Act Products Liability Professional Negligence/Malpractice Promissory Estoppel Quantum Meruit Quasi-Contract Racketeering Racketeering Real Estate Real Estate Reformation Rescission Sealing of Court Records Securities Shareholder Issues Specific Performance Statute of Limitations Statute of Repose Statutory Interpretation Subpoenas Subrogation Successor Liability Suspicious Activity Report Privilege Tortious Interference Trade Secrets Trademark UCC Unfair Competition Unjust Enrichment Valuation Waiver WARN Act Witnesses Workers Compensation Wrongful Termination All Search Apply Filters BER-L-6794-16 - Comprehensive Neurosurgical, P.C. v. The Valley Hospital, Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Nov. 15, 2018, Business Opinion Issue Types, Breach of Contract Tortious Interference, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Robert C. Wilson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER-L-6794-16 ESX-L-1882-18 - The Becker Organization LLC v. Sharp Office Holdings, LLC, et al., Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Sept. 21, 2018, Business Opinion Issue Types, Breach of Contract Statutory Interpretation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Lynott, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, ESX-L-1882-18 BER-L-7441-13 - Village Square Madison Avenue LLC v. TD Bank, Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Feb. 5, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Robert C. Wilson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER-L-7441-13 A-4693-13 - Best Bergen Homes, Inc. v. Franklin Nunez et al., Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Feb. 4, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-4693-13 BER-L-2387-1 - Stonewall of Saddle River, L.P. v. Northeast Linen Supply Corp., Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Feb. 3, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Robert C. Wilson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER-L-2387-1 A-0991-14T2 - Joseph Grayzel, M.D. v. Boston Scientific Corp., Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Jan. 11, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-0991-14T2 A-1090-14T1 - Cortlandt Street Associates v. Elementis Specialties, Inc., Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Dec. 23, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-1090-14T1 A-0668-14T2 - Trend Investments, LLC v. Mirza Baig., Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Dec. 22, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-0668-14T2 A-2119-14T4 - Charles Bressman v. J&J Specialized, LLC., Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Dec. 4, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-2119-14T4 A-0249-14T4 - Court Plaza Associates v. Wausau Tile, Inc., Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Dec. 4, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-0249-14T4 A-4137-13T2 - John Barbero v. Alexy John et al., Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Dec. 2, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-4137-13T2 A-2355-12T3 - Sherry Clemente v. New Jersey Transit et al., Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Nov. 12, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Indemnification, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-2355-12T3 HUD-L-5225-13 - East Newark Towne Center LLC v. Borough of East Newark, Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Oct. 29, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Sarkisian, J.S.C.,, Referenced Opinion ID, HUD-L-5225-13 A-0884-13T2 - Princeton Amoco, Inc. v. Princeton Shopping Center Company, Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Aug. 26, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-0884-13T2 A-2198-13T2 - Margate Towers, Inc. v. Jim Plamantouras, Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Aug. 13, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-2198-13T2 A-0235-12T2 - National Fireproofing and Insulation Company v. Skanska USA Building, Inc., Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Aug. 11, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-0235-12T2 BER-C-117-15 - Zeytinia Xanadu LLC v. Triple Five Group, Ltd. et al., Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   Aug. 3, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, BER-C-117-15 A-2266-13T1 - Trico Development Associates L.P. v. O.C.E.A.N., Inc., Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   July 30, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Cancellation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-2266-13T1 A-1972-13T1 - Waters & Bugbee, Inc. v. B.W. Electrical Services, L.L.C.,, Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   July 22, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Breach of Contract, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-1972-13T1 A-4430 - Larry Bennett Stucco & Construction v. Sheldon Himber,, Business Opinion Category, Contract Disputes, Decided Date,   July 10, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial Litigation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-4430 Pagination 1 Go to page 2 2 Go to page 3 3 Go to last page 6 Last page Go to next page > Next page Showing 1 to 20 of 120 items
  • Employment Disputes, Start End Issue - Any - Additional Insured Arbitration Attorney Fees Auto Breach of Contract Breach of Duty of Loyalty Breach of Fiduciary Duty Breach of Warranty Business Judgment Rule Buyout Cancellation CEPA Civil Conspiracy Collateral Source Rule Commercial General Liability Commercial Litigation Computer/Software Related Issues Condominium Act Conflict of Interest Conflict/Choice of Law Construction Consumer Fraud Contract Interpretation Conversion Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Covenants (Restrictive, not to Compete/Solicit) Custodial/Statutory Receiver Damages Discovery Issues/Motions Dissolution Economic Loss Doctrine Employment Contract Employment Status Environmental Experts Fair Dealing Foreclosure Forum Issues Fraud Fraudulent Inducement Indemnification Insurance Jurisdictional Issues LAD Lemon Law Merger Negligent Misrepresentation Patents Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Piercing the Corporate Veil Private Employment Agency Act Products Liability Professional Negligence/Malpractice Promissory Estoppel Quantum Meruit Quasi-Contract Racketeering Racketeering Real Estate Real Estate Reformation Rescission Sealing of Court Records Securities Shareholder Issues Specific Performance Statute of Limitations Statute of Repose Statutory Interpretation Subpoenas Subrogation Successor Liability Suspicious Activity Report Privilege Tortious Interference Trade Secrets Trademark UCC Unfair Competition Unjust Enrichment Valuation Waiver WARN Act Witnesses Workers Compensation Wrongful Termination All Search Apply Filters A-20-16 - Philip Vitale v. Schering-Plough Corporation (078294) (Middlesex County and Statewide), Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Dec. 11, 2017, Business Opinion Issue Types, Employment Contract Workers Compensation, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Patterson, J., Referenced Opinion ID, A-20-16 A-0354-15T1 - JEFFREY SAUTER VS. COLTS NECK VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY NO. 2 (L-2637-13, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE), Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Sept. 13, 2017, Business Opinion Issue Types, CEPA, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Accurso, Referenced Opinion ID, A-0354-15T1 A-67-15 - Maryanne Grande v. Saint Clare’s Health System (076606) (Morris County and Statewide), Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   July 12, 2017, Business Opinion Issue Types, LAD, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Referenced Opinion ID, A-67-15 A-1726-14T4 - GINA MARIE MILLER VS. SHORE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, ET AL., Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Nov. 28, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, CEPA, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-1726-14T4 A-1270-15T2 - Antony Carchia vs. Director Kenneth C. Green, et al.,, Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Oct. 6, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, CEPA, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-1270-15T2 A-38-14 - Salvatore Puglia v. Elk Pipeline, Inc., Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Aug. 16, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, CEPA, Publication Status, Published, Judge, LaVecchia, J., J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, A-38-14 A-3200-13T1 - Kirk Lory v. Concord Equity Group Advisors, LLC, Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Feb. 11, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Employment Contract, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-3200-13T1 A-1111-14T2 - Samantha Ishage v. PNC Bank Corp. et al., Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Feb. 8, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, CEPA, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-1111-14T2 A-2830-14T2 - Grant W. Morgan v. Raymours Furniture Company, Inc., Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Jan. 7, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Employment Contract, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Fisher, P.J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-2830-14T2 A-3694-13T4 - Stratus Technology Services, Inc. v. Alexandra Paciello, Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Nov. 17, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Employment Contract, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Sumners, Jr., J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-3694-13T4 BER-L-703-15 - Mark Sheridan v. Mondelez Global LLC., Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Oct. 13, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, CEPA, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Polifroni, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER-L-703-15 A-0359-14T4 - Rhonda Hobson v. MSO Issac Tremmel, et al., Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Sept. 30, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, LAD, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-0359-14T4 A-0686-13T1 - Maryanna Grande, R.N. v. Saint Clares Health System., Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Aug. 28, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, LAD, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-0686-13T1 A-4644-13T2 - Ama Armah et al. v. Education Affiliates, Inc. et al., Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Aug. 26, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, CEPA, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-4644-13T2 A-0069-14T1 - Gary Tilton v. Nathanial Goodall et al., Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Aug. 25, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Employment Status, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-0069-14T1 A-3480-12T2 - Steven DAgostino v. Musical Heritage Society, Jeffrey Nissim, and Steven Cilento., Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Aug. 20, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Breach of Contract Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Employment Contract LAD Tortious Interference Wrongful Termination, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-3480-12T2 A-1688-13T1 - Deborah Stroli, R.N. Bergen Community Blood Services, Inc., Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Aug. 4, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Employment Contract, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-1688-13T1 A-2314-13T1 - Anita Jones v. Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, et al., Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   Aug. 3, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, LAD, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-2314-13T1 A-5259-13T2 - Paul Jaworski et al. v. Ernst & Young US LLP, Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   July 26, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Arbitration, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, St. John, J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-5259-13T2 A-65/66-13 - Joel S. Lippman, M.D. v. Ethicon, Inc, Business Opinion Category, Employment Disputes, Decided Date,   July 15, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, CEPA, Publication Status, Published, Judge, LaVecchia, J., J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, A-65/66-13 Pagination 1 Go to page 2 2 Go to page 3 3 Go to last page 4 Last page Go to next page > Next page Showing 1 to 20 of 80 items
  • Insurance Coverage, Start End Issue - Any - Additional Insured Arbitration Attorney Fees Auto Breach of Contract Breach of Duty of Loyalty Breach of Fiduciary Duty Breach of Warranty Business Judgment Rule Buyout Cancellation CEPA Civil Conspiracy Collateral Source Rule Commercial General Liability Commercial Litigation Computer/Software Related Issues Condominium Act Conflict of Interest Conflict/Choice of Law Construction Consumer Fraud Contract Interpretation Conversion Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Covenants (Restrictive, not to Compete/Solicit) Custodial/Statutory Receiver Damages Discovery Issues/Motions Dissolution Economic Loss Doctrine Employment Contract Employment Status Environmental Experts Fair Dealing Foreclosure Forum Issues Fraud Fraudulent Inducement Indemnification Insurance Jurisdictional Issues LAD Lemon Law Merger Negligent Misrepresentation Patents Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Piercing the Corporate Veil Private Employment Agency Act Products Liability Professional Negligence/Malpractice Promissory Estoppel Quantum Meruit Quasi-Contract Racketeering Racketeering Real Estate Real Estate Reformation Rescission Sealing of Court Records Securities Shareholder Issues Specific Performance Statute of Limitations Statute of Repose Statutory Interpretation Subpoenas Subrogation Successor Liability Suspicious Activity Report Privilege Tortious Interference Trade Secrets Trademark UCC Unfair Competition Unjust Enrichment Valuation Waiver WARN Act Witnesses Workers Compensation Wrongful Termination All Search Apply Filters A-5624-17T3 - LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. VS. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING, CO., ET AL. (L-3377-17, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE), Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   May 23, 2019, Business Opinion Issue Types, Arbitration Personal Injury Protection (PIP), Publication Status, Published, Judge, Gilson, J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-5624-17T3 OCN-L-2960-14 - Doerfler v. Chubb Insurance Co, Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   April 17, 2019, Business Opinion Issue Types, Contract Interpretation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Wellerson, P.J. Civ., Referenced Opinion ID, OCN-L-2960-14 A-3551-17T1 - HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY VS. MEGA SECURITY CORPORATION, ET AL. (L-0378-17, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE), Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   April 8, 2019, Business Opinion Issue Types, Contract Interpretation Indemnification, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-3551-17T1 L-3684-14 - Atlantic Casualty Ins. Co. v. Remtek Services, Inc., et al., Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   Jan. 28, 2019, Business Opinion Issue Types, Conflict/Choice of Law Fraud, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Lynott, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, L-3684-14 A-5526-15T1/A-0033-16T1 - THERESA WEAR, ET AL. VS. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY WOODBURY MEDICAL CENTER ASSOCIATES, LLP VS. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY (L-1583-13, GLOUCESTER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)(CONSOLIDATED), Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   July 20, 2018, Business Opinion Issue Types, Contract Interpretation Indemnification, Publication Status, Published, Judge, ; Manahan, J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-5526-15T1/A-0033-16T1 A-21-16 - Continental Insurance Company v. Honeywell International, Inc. (078152) (Morris County and Statewide), Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   June 27, 2018, Business Opinion Issue Types, Conflict/Choice of Law, Publication Status, Published, Judge, LaVecchia, J., Referenced Opinion ID, A-21-16 A-3434-14T1 - MICHAEL ABBOUD VS. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA(L-680-14, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE), Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   June 21, 2017, Business Opinion Issue Types, Contract Interpretation Indemnification, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Ostrer,Leone and Vernoia., Referenced Opinion ID, A-3434-14T1 A-5503-14T4, A-0727-15T2 - Haines v. Taft, et al.; Little vs. Nishimura (Consolidated), Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   June 1, 2017, Business Opinion Issue Types, Personal Injury Protection (PIP), Publication Status, Published, Judge, O’Connor, J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-5503-14T4, A-0727-15T2 A-1911-15T3 - KATHLEEN LEGGETTE VS. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCECOMPANY (GEICO), ET AL.(L-1585-14, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE), Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   May 30, 2017, Business Opinion Issue Types, Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Auto, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Lihotz, P.J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-1911-15T3 A-2109-15T3 - RSI BANK VS. THE PROVIDENT MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY VS. DR. GEORGE LIKAKIS, Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   Feb. 23, 2017, Business Opinion Issue Types, Indemnification, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-2109-15T3 A-0846-15T3 - S.M. ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. VS. TORCON, INC., ET AL. TORCON, INC. VS. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, ET AL., Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   Oct. 19, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Contract Interpretation Indemnification, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-0846-15T3 A-1649-14T1 - Glenn Foerster, et al. vs. Meckel Enterprises, LLC, et al., Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   Oct. 12, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Contract Interpretation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Espinosa, J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-1649-14T1 A-4287-14T4 - Mauricio Mendoza vs. Jack DiPiazza, et al., Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   Oct. 11, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Employment Status Workers Compensation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Higbee, J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-4287-14T4 L-3752-14 - Avalon Bay Communities, Inc. v. Utica Insurance, et al., Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   Aug. 5, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Additional Insured Contract Interpretation Indemnification, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Stephanie A. Mitterhoff, Referenced Opinion ID, L-3752-14 A-3436-13 - NEW JERSEY-AMERICAN WATER CO INC. v. WATCHUNG SQUARE ASSOCIATES, LLC, Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   July 15, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Commercial General Liability Breach of Contract Contract Interpretation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-3436-13 A-5589-13 - Phibro v. National Union opinion, Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   July 14, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Contract Interpretation, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Referenced Opinion ID, A-5589-13 L-3753-15 - Mid-Century Insurance Company v. John Freeman and New Jersey Indemnity, et al., Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   May 16, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Subrogation Collateral Source Rule, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Arnold L. Natali, Jr., J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, L-3753-15 A-2472-14 - NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION v. STAR INSURANCE COMPANY and MEADOWBROOK, INC, Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   March 8, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Indemnification Additional Insured Breach of Contract Contract Interpretation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-2472-14 A-2355-12 - SHERRY CLEMENTE individually and as Administratrix of the ESTATE OF ANTHONY CLEMENTE v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT, et.al., Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   Dec. 12, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Auto Commercial General Liability Breach of Contract Contract Interpretation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-2355-12 A-1523-12 - HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIAM BURNETT, et. al., Business Opinion Category, Insurance Coverage, Decided Date,   July 21, 2014, Business Opinion Issue Types, Workers Compensation Contract Interpretation, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-1523-12 Pagination 1 Go to page 2 2 Go to next page > Next page Showing 1 to 20 of 21 items
  • Intellectual Property and Technology, Start End Issue - Any - Additional Insured Arbitration Attorney Fees Auto Breach of Contract Breach of Duty of Loyalty Breach of Fiduciary Duty Breach of Warranty Business Judgment Rule Buyout Cancellation CEPA Civil Conspiracy Collateral Source Rule Commercial General Liability Commercial Litigation Computer/Software Related Issues Condominium Act Conflict of Interest Conflict/Choice of Law Construction Consumer Fraud Contract Interpretation Conversion Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Covenants (Restrictive, not to Compete/Solicit) Custodial/Statutory Receiver Damages Discovery Issues/Motions Dissolution Economic Loss Doctrine Employment Contract Employment Status Environmental Experts Fair Dealing Foreclosure Forum Issues Fraud Fraudulent Inducement Indemnification Insurance Jurisdictional Issues LAD Lemon Law Merger Negligent Misrepresentation Patents Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Piercing the Corporate Veil Private Employment Agency Act Products Liability Professional Negligence/Malpractice Promissory Estoppel Quantum Meruit Quasi-Contract Racketeering Racketeering Real Estate Real Estate Reformation Rescission Sealing of Court Records Securities Shareholder Issues Specific Performance Statute of Limitations Statute of Repose Statutory Interpretation Subpoenas Subrogation Successor Liability Suspicious Activity Report Privilege Tortious Interference Trade Secrets Trademark UCC Unfair Competition Unjust Enrichment Valuation Waiver WARN Act Witnesses Workers Compensation Wrongful Termination All Search Apply Filters BER-C-29-16 - Kristin Deer, Inc. dba K-DEER, Inc. v. Kate Cornish Booth, Business Opinion Category, Intellectual Property and Technology, Decided Date,   July 28, 2017, Business Opinion Issue Types, Trade Secrets Computer/Software Related Issues Breach of Contract Fraud Unjust Enrichment Quantum Meruit, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Wilson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER-C-29-16 BER-L-7542-15 - Silla Jewelry v. Sunico, et al., Business Opinion Category, Intellectual Property and Technology, Decided Date,   Feb. 1, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Trademark, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Robert C. Wilson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER-L-7542-15 A-1978-13T3 - Hackensack University Medical Center v. Beyond Organic Spa, Inc.,, Business Opinion Category, Intellectual Property and Technology, Decided Date,   Sept. 4, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Trademark, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-1978-13T3 SOM-C-12013-15 - Life Cell Corp. v. Tela Bio, Inc., Business Opinion Category, Intellectual Property and Technology, Decided Date,   May 12, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Trade Secrets, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Coleman, P.J. Ch, Referenced Opinion ID, SOM-C-12013-15 BER-L-5446-14 - Samsung Electronics America Inc. v. Westpark Electronics, LLC, Business Opinion Category, Intellectual Property and Technology, Decided Date,   Feb. 26, 2015, Business Opinion Issue Types, Trade Secrets, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Wilson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER-L-5446-14 BER-C-268-12 - SCS Healthcare Marketing, LLC v. Allergan USA, Inc., et al., Business Opinion Category, Intellectual Property and Technology, Decided Date,   Dec. 7, 2012, Business Opinion Issue Types, Trade Secrets, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Carroll, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER-C-268-12 A-3845-10 - Apotex Inc., et al. v. Sanofi-Aventis, et al., Business Opinion Category, Intellectual Property and Technology, Decided Date,   Nov. 15, 2012, Business Opinion Issue Types, Patents, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-3845-10
  • Miscellaneous Actions, Start End Issue - Any - Additional Insured Arbitration Attorney Fees Auto Breach of Contract Breach of Duty of Loyalty Breach of Fiduciary Duty Breach of Warranty Business Judgment Rule Buyout Cancellation CEPA Civil Conspiracy Collateral Source Rule Commercial General Liability Commercial Litigation Computer/Software Related Issues Condominium Act Conflict of Interest Conflict/Choice of Law Construction Consumer Fraud Contract Interpretation Conversion Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Covenants (Restrictive, not to Compete/Solicit) Custodial/Statutory Receiver Damages Discovery Issues/Motions Dissolution Economic Loss Doctrine Employment Contract Employment Status Environmental Experts Fair Dealing Foreclosure Forum Issues Fraud Fraudulent Inducement Indemnification Insurance Jurisdictional Issues LAD Lemon Law Merger Negligent Misrepresentation Patents Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Piercing the Corporate Veil Private Employment Agency Act Products Liability Professional Negligence/Malpractice Promissory Estoppel Quantum Meruit Quasi-Contract Racketeering Racketeering Real Estate Real Estate Reformation Rescission Sealing of Court Records Securities Shareholder Issues Specific Performance Statute of Limitations Statute of Repose Statutory Interpretation Subpoenas Subrogation Successor Liability Suspicious Activity Report Privilege Tortious Interference Trade Secrets Trademark UCC Unfair Competition Unjust Enrichment Valuation Waiver WARN Act Witnesses Workers Compensation Wrongful Termination All Search Apply Filters DOCKET NO. BER-L-8246-19 - Navigator’s Specialty Ins. Co v. Blade Contracting, Inc., et al., Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   June 10, 2020, Business Opinion Issue Types, Arbitration, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Wilson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, DOCKET NO. BER-L-8246-19 BER-L-2262-18 - Samuel S. Raia, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Cohnreznick LLP, et al., Defendants., Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Sept. 23, 2019, Business Opinion Issue Types, Arbitration, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Wilson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER-L-2262-18 BER-L-6325-18 - Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha, et. al., Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   March 29, 2019, Business Opinion Issue Types, Conflict/Choice of Law Jurisdictional Issues Statute of Limitations, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Wilson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER-L-6325-18 BER L-3443-17 - Brereton, et al. v. Malone, et al., Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   March 5, 2019, Business Opinion Issue Types, Business Judgment Rule Statute of Limitations, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Wilson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER L-3443-17 BER L-4477-18 - Vela Townhomes Condominium Association v. Rosen Partners, LLC, Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Jan. 23, 2019, Business Opinion Issue Types, Construction Statute of Repose Statute of Limitations, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Wilson, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, BER L-4477-18 A-3027-17T4 - AMY SKUSE VS. PFIZER, INC., ET ALS. (L-2374-17, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE), Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Jan. 16, 2019, Business Opinion Issue Types, Arbitration, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Sabatino, P.J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-3027-17T4 A-0711-17T3 - OASIS THERAPEUTIC LIFE CENTERS, INC. VS. PETER G. WADE, ET AL. (L-1287-17, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE), Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Dec. 10, 2018, Business Opinion Issue Types, LAD, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Fisher, P.J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-0711-17T3 L-1508-14 - Babulal, et al. v. Dynamic Metals Processing, Inc., et al., Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Aug. 22, 2018, Business Opinion Issue Types, Products Liability Successor Liability, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, ; Vignuolo, J.S.C., Referenced Opinion ID, L-1508-14 A-9-17 - Josh Willner v. Vertical Reality, Inc. (079626) (Monmouth County and Statewide), Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Aug. 15, 2018, Business Opinion Issue Types, Attorney Fees Products Liability, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Referenced Opinion ID, A-9-17 A-101/102/103/104-15 - The Palisades at Fort Lee Condominium Association, Inc. v. 100 Old Palisades, LLC, Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Sept. 14, 2017, Business Opinion Issue Types, Construction Statute of Limitations Statute of Repose, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Albin, J., Referenced Opinion ID, A-101/102/103/104-15 A-1400-14T1 - ANDRE DE GARMEAUX, ET AL. VS. DNV CONCEPTS, INC. T/A THE BRIGHT ACRE, ET AL., Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Dec. 20, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Consumer Fraud, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Manahan, J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-1400-14T1 A-2001-14T1 - Jade Apparel, Inc., et al. vs. United Assurance, Inc., et al., Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Oct. 13, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Arbitration, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Sumners , Jr., J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-2001-14T1 A-0850-14T3 - Midland Funding LLC A/P/O Webbank vs. Roberta Bordeaux, Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Sept. 29, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Arbitration, Publication Status, Published, Judge, Fuentes, P.J.A.D., Referenced Opinion ID, A-0850-14T3 A-5135-13T3 - Rajiv Hazaray et al. v. The Estates at Bordens Crossing, LLC, Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Feb. 4, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Consumer Fraud, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-5135-13T3 A-2448-14T2 - John S. Patterson v. Ladenburg Thalmann & Co., Inc, Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Feb. 4, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Arbitration, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-2448-14T2 A-4292-13T3 - The Palisades at Fort Lee Condominium Association, Inc. v. 100 Old Palisade, LLC et al., Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Feb. 1, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Construction Statute of Limitations Statute of Repose, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-4292-13T3 A-1157-14T1 - Barry M. Epstein, Esq. and Barbara G. Quackenbos v. Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Jan. 22, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Arbitration, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-1157-14T1 A-0749-14T4 - Tahisha Roach and Emilia Jackson v. BM Motoring LLC, Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Jan. 20, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Arbitration, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-0749-14T4 A-4726-13T3 - New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. Navillus Group, et al., Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Jan. 14, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Environmental, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Nugent, J.A.D, Referenced Opinion ID, A-4726-13T3 A-1281-14T1 - TJR Construction Co. Inc. et al. v. Selective Insurance Company of America, Business Opinion Category, Miscellaneous Actions, Decided Date,   Jan. 14, 2016, Business Opinion Issue Types, Forum Issues, Publication Status, Unpublished, Judge, Per Curiam, Referenced Opinion ID, A-1281-14T1 Pagination 1 Go to page 2 2 Go to page 3 3 Go to last page 14 Last page Go to next page > Next page Showing 1 to 20 of 262 items