Search | NJ Courts

Notice of Motion - Order - Taxotere/Docetaxel Litigation CN: 12311
Notice of Motion - Order - Zostavax Litigation CN: 12312
Notice of Motion - Order - Fosamax Litigation CN: 12216
Order to Extend Deadlines – Schedule A
3:23-8-Hearing on Appeal 3:23-8, Hearing on Record; Correction or Supplementation of Record; Remand; Transcript for Indigents; Assignment of Counsel., If a verbatim record or sound recording was made pursuant to R. 7:8-8 in the court from which the appeal is taken, the original transcript thereof duly certified as correct shall be filed by the clerk of the court below with the criminal division manager's office, and a certified copy served on the prosecuting attorney by the clerk of the court below within 20 days after the filing of the notice of appeal or within such extension of time as the court permits. If it appears that the record is partially unintelligible, the court to which the appeal is taken may supplement the record or may remand the matter to the municipal court to reconstruct the portion of the record that is defective. If the record below is substantially unintelligible, the matter shall be remanded to the municipal court to reconstruct the entire record or, if the record cannot be reconstructed, for a new trial or hearing. The court to which the appeal has been taken may reverse and remand for a new trial or may conduct a trial de novo on the record below. The court shall provide the municipal court and the parties with reasons for a reversal and the remand. If the court to which the appeal is taken decides the matter de novo on the record, the court may permit the record to be supplemented for the limited purpose of correcting a legal error in the proceedings below. If the appellant, upon application to the court appealed to, is found to be indigent, the court may order the transcript of the proceedings below furnished at the county's expense if the appeal involves violation of a statute and at the municipality's expense if the appeal involves violation of an ordinance. All persons convicted of non-indictable offenses who desire to appeal their conviction and who assert they are indigent shall complete and file, without fee, with the criminal division manager’s office the appropriate form prescribed by the Administrative Director of the Courts. If the court is satisfied that the person is indigent, an attorney shall be assigned (i) if the sentence imposed constitutes a consequence of magnitude as set forth in the “Guidelines for Determining a Consequence of Magnitude” in Appendix 2 to Part VII of the Rules of Court, or (ii) if the person is constitutionally or otherwise entitled by law to counsel. If the sentence imposed does not constitute a consequence of magnitude, the court hearing the appeal may, in its discretion, determine whether to assign counsel for purposes of the appeal, irrespective of whether counsel was previously assigned in the case. , Briefs., Briefs shall be required only if questions of law are involved on the appeal or if ordered by the court and shall be filed and served prior to the date fixed for hearing or such other date as the court fixes. , Waiver; Exception., The appeal shall operate as a waiver of all defects in the record including any defect in, or the absence of, any process or charge laid in the complaint, and as a consent that the court may, during or before the hearing of the appeal, amend the complaint by making the charge more specific, definite or certain, or in any other manner, including the substitution of any charge growing out of the act or acts complained of or the surrounding circumstances of which the court from whose judgment or sentence the appeal is taken had jurisdiction, except that if the appeal is from a conviction for an indictable offense, the appeal shall not operate as a consent that the complaint may be amended so as to charge such an offense or a new or different indictable offense, unless the defendant agrees to such amendment. , Defenses Which Must Be Raised Before Trial., The defenses of double jeopardy, lack of jurisdiction in the court, failure of the complaint to charge an offense, the unconstitutionality of the statute, regulation promulgated pursuant to statute or ordinance under which the complaint is made and all other defenses and objections based on defects in the institution of the prosecution or in the complaint must be raised by motion and determined in accordance with R. 3:10. , Disposition by Superior Court, Law Division., If the defendant is convicted, the court shall impose sentence as provided by law. If the defendant is acquitted, the court shall order the defendant discharged, the conviction in the court below set aside, and the return of all fines and costs paid by the defendant. An appropriate judgment shall be entered and a copy thereof transmitted to the court below. , Appearance by Prosecuting Attorney., The prosecuting attorney shall appear and act on behalf of the respondent at the hearing. Note: Source -- R.R. 3:10-10(a)(b)(c)(d)(e), 3:10-12. Paragraph (a) amended July 14, 1972 to be effective September 5, 1972; paragraph (a) amended June 29, 1973 to be effective September 10, 1973; paragraph (a) amended July 29, 1977 to be effective September 6, 1977; paragraphs (a), (b) and (e) amended November 22, 1978 to be effective December 7, 1978; paragraphs (a), (b) and (e) amended July 11, 1979 to be effective September 10, 1979; paragraph (a) amended February 17, 1983 to be effective immediately; paragraph (a) amended January 5, 1998 to be effective February 1, 1998; paragraph (a) amended July 5, 2000 to be effective September 5, 2000; paragraph (a) amended July 16, 2009 to be effective September 1, 2009; paragraph (a) caption and text amended July 9, 2013 to be effective September 1, 2013; paragraph (a) caption and text amended July 22, 2014 to be effective September 1, 2014. Part 3
Gun Violence Reduction Initiative CN: 13234
Notice of Settlement & Request to Stay – Schedule A
3:24-Appeals From Orders In Courts Of Limited Criminal Jurisdiction 3:24 Either the prosecuting attorney or the defendant may seek leave to appeal to the Superior Court, Law Division from an interlocutory order entered before trial by a court of limited criminal jurisdiction. The prosecuting attorney may appeal, as of right, a pre-trial or post-trial judgment dismissing a complaint and, notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a), an order suppressing evidence entered in a court of limited criminal jurisdiction. Appeals pursuant to this rule shall be taken within 20 days after the entry of such order by filing with the Superior Court, Law Division in the county of venue a notice of motion for leave to appeal under paragraph (a) or the notice of appeal under paragraph (b), except that an appeal from the grant of a motion to suppress shall be taken within 30 days after the entry of the order. A copy of the notice shall be filed with the clerk of the court below, and a copy thereof shall be served on the prosecuting attorney as defined by R. 3:23-9 or on the defendant or defendant's attorney, as appropriate, at least 10 days prior to the return date fixed therein. The original filed with the court and the copy served shall have annexed thereto copies of all papers of record and any affidavits essential to the determination of the motion and shall be accompanied by a brief. The respondent shall file and serve any answering brief and other papers in opposition at least 3 days before the hearing. With respect to interlocutory applications, the court may grant or deny leave to appeal on terms and may elect simultaneously to grant the motion and decide the appeal on the merits on the papers before it, or it may direct the filing of additional briefs or make such other order as it deems appropriate for the expeditious disposition of the matter. A copy of any order or judgment entered by it shall be promptly transmitted to the clerk of the court below. On appeal by the State from the grant of a motion to suppress the matter shall be tried de novo on the record. In cases in which the Attorney General or county prosecutor did not appear in the municipal court, the State shall be permitted to supplement the record and to present any evidence or testimony concerning the legality of the contested search and seizure. The defendant shall be permitted to offer related evidence in opposition to the supplementary evidence offered by the State. Note: Adopted February 25, 1969 to be effective September 8, 1969. Caption amended, paragraph designation added, former rule amended and designated as paragraphs (a) and (c), and new paragraph (b) adopted July 16, 1979 to be effective September 10, 1979; paragraphs (b) and (c) amended, paragraph (d) added June 9, 1989 to be effective June 19, 1989; paragraph (c) amended July 10, 1998 to be effective September 1, 1998. Part 3
3:25-2-Order for Trial 3:25-2 A defendant who has remained in custody awaiting trial on an indictment for at least 90 consecutive days after the return of that indictment may move for a trial date. The motion shall be on notice to the prosecutor and shall be accompanied by a certification that the defense is ready to proceed to trial. The court shall, after affording the prosecutor an opportunity to be heard, fix a date for trial. In the event the prosecutor is unable to proceed on the trial date, the court shall take such action and enter such orders as the interest of justice requires, which may include pretrial release. Note: Source -- R.R. 3:11-3(b); amended July 17, 1975 to be effective September 8, 1975; former Rule redesignated paragraph (a) and paragraph (b) adopted November 2, 1987 to be effective January 1, 1988; paragraph (a) deleted, paragraph (b) amended and paragraph designation removed July 13, 1994 to be effective January 1, 1995; amended July 28, 2017 to be effective September 1, 2017. Part 3
3:25-3-Dismissal for Delay 3:25-3 If there is an unreasonable delay in presenting the charge to a grand jury or in filing an accusation against a defendant who has been held to answer upon a complaint, the Assignment Judge, or the Assignment Judge's designee, may dismiss the matter sua sponte or on motion of the defendant. If there is unreasonable delay in the disposition of an indictment or accusation, the judge to whom the case has been assigned may dismiss the matter sua sponte or on motion of the defendant. Note: Source -- R.R. 3:11-3(c); amended July 17, 1975 to be effective September 8, 1975; amended July 13, 1994 to be effective January 1, 1995; amended July 12, 2002 to be effective September 3, 2002. Part 3
3:23-6-Transmittal of Recognizance or Cash Deposit 3:23-6 The judge or clerk of the court below shall transmit to the finance division manager's office any recognizance taken in accordance herewith or cash deposited in lieu of such recognizance. Note: Source--R.R. 3:10-7. Amended July 13, 1994 to be effective September 1, 1994; amended July 5, 2000 to be effective September 5, 2000; corrective amendment adopted October 10, 2000 to be effective immediately. Part 3
3:23-7-Dismissal of Appeal 3:23-7 If the appeal shall be dismissed for failure to comply with the requirements of R. 3:23-2 or 3:23-8(a) or (b) or for failure to prosecute, the matter and the record therein shall forthwith be remanded to the court from which the appeal was taken for execution of the judgment therein. Note: Source--R.R. 3:10-9. Part 3
How to Appeal a Trial Court, Tax Court or State Agency Decision CN: 10837
Municipal Job Information, Job Title: Deputy Court Administrator Vicinage: Burlington Municipal Court: Mansfield/Springfield/Southampton Municipal Court Closing: Sept. 10, 2025 Posted: Aug. 19, 2025
Press Release, News Release, STUART RABNER Chief Justice of the New Jersey Supreme Court PETER McALEER MARYANN SPOTO Office of Communications 609-815-2910 RICHARD J. HUGHES JUSTICE COMPLEX • P.O. BOX 037 • TRENTON, NJ 08625-0984 RELEASE DATE: Aug. 19, 2025, ACJC Answer – In the Matter of Britt J. Simon, Judge of the Municipal Court, An answer has been filed in response to a complaint in In the Matter of Britt J. Simon, Judge of the Municipal Court . A formal complaint was filed in the matter by the Advisory Committee on Judicial conduct on July 28. A hearing will be held in accordance with the “Rules Governing the State of New Jersey, Rule 2:15 Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct,” available at njcourts.gov . ###
Deputy Court Administrator - Mansfield/Springfield/Southampton
This Directive is to clarify the filing requirements for complaints filed in the Superior Court for parties seeking a “predicate” order for Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJS). Federal immigration law affords protections for abused, neglected, or abandoned children who wish to apply for lawful, permanent resident status in the United States. These children may be eligible for classification as a “special immigrant juvenile,” which permits them to remain legally in the United States. The two-step SIJS process involves both state and federal systems. It begins with an application in a state court requesting the entry of a “predicate” order, which requires the court to make the following findings: 1The juvenile is under the age of 21 at the time the complaint is filed and is unmarried; The juvenile is dependent on the court or has been placed under the custody of an agency or an individual appointed by the court; The court has jurisdiction under State law to make judicial determinations about the custody and care of the juvenile; Reunification with one or both juvenile’s parents is not viable due to abuse, neglect, or abandonment or a similar basis under State law; and It is not in the "best interest" of the juvenile to be returned to the parent's previous country of nationality or country of last habitual residence. The state's predicate order is not an immigration determination. It is a prerequisite that must be fulfilled prior to the second step of the process, which is the submission of a SIJS application to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) in the form of an 1-360 petition. The predicate order is to be included with the SIJS application. If the USCIS approves the 1-360 petition, the juvenile is granted SIJS. Requests for the SIJS predicate order should be filed in the Superior Court, Family Part. The form, “Verified Complaint for Special Immigrant Juvenile Status Predicate Order” (CN 13321) was created for self-represented litigants and is available online at Verified Complaint for Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SJIS) Predicate Order Forms/13321 . The form when completed sets forth the minimum statutorily required information that must be submitted as part of the complaint for a SIJS predicate order. The court, in its discretion, may require additional information it deems necessary to make the predicate SIJS findings. A complaint for a SIJS predicate order may be filed by any of the following: The parent or guardian of the minor child. A law guardian or the Division of Child Protection & Permanency (DCPP) if there is an open FN or FG case. The child, if they are 18 years of age or older. The child, if they are under the age of 18 and do not have a parent or guardian., Superior Court Filing Requirements, Generally, requests for a SIJS predicate order shall be filed in the non-dissolution (FD) docket except as set forth below (based on any existing Family case). For complaints filed in the FD docket, a separate complaint shall be filed for each child. If there is more than one child seeking SIJS under an active/open FN, FG or FM matter, a separate predicate order for each child shall be entered., Existing Family Case, Filing Docket, None Non-Dissolution (FD) Active/Open Child Protection (FN) FN Closed FN FD Active/Open Termination of Parental Rights (FG) FG Closed FG FD Active/Open Kinship Legal Guardianship (FL) FL Closed FL FD Active/Open or Closed Child Placement (FC) FD Active/Open Adoption (FA) FA Closed FA FD Active/Open or Closed Juvenile Delinquency (FJ) FD Active/Open or Closed Family Crisis (FF) FD Active/Open Dissolution (FM) FM - Filing party is the plaintiff or defendant in FM case. FD - Filing party is not the plaintiff or defendant in FM case. Closed FM FD Active/Open or Closed Domestic Violence (FV) FD Active/Open or Closed Family - Other (FO) FD, Confidentiality, SIJS predicate orders shall contain language permitting limited release of information for SIJS purposes, such as the following sample text: This Order is a confidential document. Nevertheless, the court authorizes its disclosure to federal immigration officials in connection with the child’s application for immigration relief. Questions regarding Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJS) Filing Requirements may be directed to the , Family Practice Division, at 609-815-2900 ext. 55350 . Document Date: Aug. 13, 2025 Publish Date: Aug. 19, 2025 Download Notice
File Directive #04-25 - Family - Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJS) Filing Requirements
Berryman vs Ethicon – Order to Dismiss w/o Prejudice
3:25-4-Speedy Trial for Certain Defendants 3:25-4, Eligible Defendant., For purposes of this rule, the term "defendant" or "eligible defendant" shall mean a person for whom a complaint-warrant or warrant on indictment was issued for an initial charge involving an indictable offense or a disorderly persons offense and who: (1) is detained pursuant to R. 3:4A or R. 3:26-2(d)(1), or (2) is detained in jail or a juvenile detention facility due to an inability to post monetary bail pursuant to R. 3:26. A defendant who is the subject of a warrant on indictment is an eligible defendant pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:162-15 et seq. This rule only applies to an eligible defendant who is arrested on or after January 1, 2017, regardless of whether the crime or offense related to the arrest was allegedly committed before, on, or after January 1, 2017. For defendants who are detained only for a disorderly persons offense, the limits on pretrial incarceration are governed by R. 7:8-11. , On Failure to Indict., , Time Period., Except as provided in paragraph (d), prior to the return of an indictment, an eligible defendant shall not remain detained in jail for more than 90 days following the date of the defendant’s commitment to the county jail pursuant to R. 3:4-1(a)(2) or (b) or R. 3:26-2(d)(1) not counting excludable time as set forth in paragraph (i) of this rule. For a defendant who has been detained following waiver of jurisdiction by the Family Part, the time shall commence from the date following the issuance of a complaint-warrant after waiver has been ordered. , Motion by the Prosecutor to Extend Time for Failure to Indict., If the eligible defendant is not indicted within the time frame calculated pursuant to subparagraph (b)(1) of this rule, the eligible defendant shall be released from jail or a juvenile detention facility unless on motion of the prosecutor, the court finds that a substantial and unjustifiable risk to the safety of any other person or the community or the obstruction of the criminal justice process would result from the defendant’s release from custody, so that no appropriate conditions for the defendant’s release could reasonably address that risk, and also finds that the failure to indict the defendant in accordance with the time requirement set forth in this rule was not due to unreasonable delay by the prosecutor. The prosecutor must file a notice of motion accompanied by a brief with an explanation of the reasons for the delay that justify the extension of time for return of the indictment. The motion to extend the time to return an indictment shall be filed with the court and served upon the defendant and defense counsel by the prosecutor no later than 15 calendar days prior to the expiration of the 90 day time frame, adjusted for excludable time, calculated pursuant to paragraph (b)(1) of this rule. Upon good cause shown this deadline may be relaxed. , Objection by Defendant., Within 5 calendar days of the receipt of the prosecutor’s motion to extend the time to return an indictment, the defendant may file an objection to the prosecutor’s motion and request oral argument. If the court decides to hold oral argument the argument must be held within 5 calendar days of the defendant’s request. , Court Determination., The court shall consider and render a decision on the prosecutor’s motion to extend the time to return an indictment and any objections filed by the defendant within 5 calendar days of the prosecutor’s motion, defendant’s objection, or oral argument, whichever is later. The court may, in its discretion, render a decision on the papers without the need for oral argument. Upon consideration of the motion, if the court finds that a substantial and unjustifiable risk to the safety of any other person or the community or the obstruction of the criminal justice process would result, and also finds that the failure to indict the eligible defendant in accordance with the time requirement calculated pursuant to paragraph (b)(1) of this rule was not due to unreasonable delay by the prosecutor, the court may allocate an additional period of time, not to exceed 45 days, in which the return of an indictment shall occur. If the court orders an eligible defendant detained pursuant to R. 3:4A or R. 3:26-2(d)(1) and the maximum period of detention is reached or if the court currently does not find a substantial and unjustifiable risk or finds unreasonable delay by the prosecutor as described in this rule, the court shall establish conditions of pretrial release, pursuant to R. 3:26, and release the defendant. , On Failure to Commence Trial., , Time Period., Except as provided in paragraph (d), an eligible defendant who has been indicted shall not remain detained in jail or a juvenile detention facility for more than 180 days on that charge following the return or unsealing of the indictment or the detention of the eligible defendant pursuant to R. 3:26-2(d)(1), whichever is later, not counting excludable time as set forth in paragraph (i) of this rule, before commencement of the trial. For an eligible defendant whose most serious charge is a disorderly persons offense, the time period shall begin with the defendant’s initial detention. See R. 7:8-11. , Motion by the Prosecutor., If the trial does not commence within the time frame calculated pursuant to paragraph (c)(1) of this rule, the eligible defendant shall be released from jail or a juvenile detention facility unless, on motion of the prosecutor, the court finds that a substantial and unjustifiable risk to the safety of any other person or the community or the obstruction of the criminal justice process would result from the defendant’s release from custody, so that no appropriate conditions for the defendant’s release could reasonably address that risk, and also finds that the failure to commence trial in accordance with the time requirement set forth in this rule was not due to unreasonable delay by the prosecutor. The prosecutor must file a notice of motion accompanied by a brief explaining the reasons for the delay that justify the extension of time to commence trial. The motion to extend time to commence trial shall be filed with the court and served upon the defendant and defense counsel by the prosecutor no later than 15 calendar days prior to the date of the expiration of the 180 day time frame, adjusted for excludable time, calculated pursuant to subparagraph (c)(1) of this rule. Upon good cause shown this deadline may be relaxed. , Objection by Defendant., Within 5 calendar days of the receipt of the prosecutor’s motion to extend the time to commence trial, the defendant may file an objection to the prosecutor’s motion and request oral argument. If the court decides to hold oral argument the argument must be held within 5 calendar days of the defendant’s request. , Court Determination., The court shall consider and render a decision on the prosecutor’s motion to extend the time to commence trial and any objection filed by the defendant within 5 calendar days of the prosecutor’s motion, the defendant’s objection, or oral argument, whichever is later. The court may, in its discretion, render a decision on the papers without the need for oral argument. Upon consideration of the motion, if the court finds that a substantial and unjustifiable risk to the safety of any other person or the community or the obstruction of the criminal justice process would result, and also finds that the failure to commence trial in accordance with the time requirement calculated pursuant to paragraph (c)(1) of this rule was not due to unreasonable delay by the prosecutor, the court may allocate an additional period of time of no more than 60 days in which the defendant’s trial shall commence. If exceptional circumstances are shown, the court may allocate an additional reasonable period of time to commence trial. If the court allocates any additional time, the court should specify its reasons for granting the extension and set forth a specific date for the trial. If the court orders an eligible defendant detained pursuant to R. 3:4A or R. 3:26-2(d)(1) and the maximum period of detention is reached, or if the court currently does not find a substantial and unjustifiable risk or finds unreasonable delay by the prosecutor as described in this rule, the court shall establish conditions of pretrial release, pursuant to R. 3:26, and release the defendant. , Period to Readiness of Prosecutor for Trial., An eligible defendant shall be released from jail or a juvenile detention facility upon conditions set by the court, after a release hearing if, excluding any delays attributable to the defendant, two years after the court’s issuance of the pretrial detention order pursuant to R. 3:4A or R. 3:26-2(d)(1) for the eligible defendant or after the detention of the eligible defendant in jail due to an inability to post monetary bail as a condition of release, the prosecutor is not ready to proceed to voir dire or to opening argument, or to proceed to the hearing of any motions that had been reserved for the time of trial. In the case of an eligible defendant whose most serious charge is a fourth-degree offense, the maximum time period for the defendant’s incarceration shall be 18 months. In the case of an eligible defendant whose most serious charge is a disorderly persons offense, the maximum time period for the defendant’s incarceration shall be six months. See R. 7:8-11. A delay shall be considered attributable to the defendant if the delay constitutes excluded time pursuant to: subparagraph (1) of paragraph (i) of this rule, but only if the defendant maintains that he or she is not competent to stand trial or is incapacitated; subparagraph (2) of paragraph (i) of this rule; subparagraph (3) of paragraph (i) of this rule, but only if the defendant filed the motion unless the motion was filed in response to unreasonable actions of the prosecutor; subparagraph (4) of paragraph (i) of this rule, but only if the request for the continuance was made by the defendant unless the request was made in response to unreasonable actions by the prosecutor; subparagraph (5) of paragraph (i) of this rule, but only if the defendant left the jurisdiction after receiving notice of a charge or charges in this jurisdiction; subparagraph (9) of paragraph (i) of this rule; subparagraph (11) of paragraph (i) of this rule; or (H) subparagraph (12) of paragraph (i) of this rule, but only if the delay resulted from unreasonable acts or omissions of the defendant. An eligible defendant shall not be released from jail or a juvenile detention facility pursuant to subparagraph (1) of this paragraph if, on or before the expiration of the applicable period of detention, the prosecutor has represented that the State is ready to proceed to voir dire or to opening arguments, or to proceed to the hearing of any motions that had been reserved for trial. The prosecutor’s statement of readiness shall be made on the record in open court or in writing. , Commencement of Trial., For the purposes of this rule, a trial is considered to have commenced when the court determines that the parties are present and directs them to proceed to voir dire or to opening argument, or to the hearing of any motions that had been reserved for the time of trial. , Subsequent and Superseding Indictments., For purposes of calculating the time period pursuant to paragraph (c)(1) of this rule, the return of a superseding indictment against the defendant shall extend the time for the trial to commence. The court shall schedule the trial to commence as soon as reasonably practicable taking into consideration the nature and extent of differences between the superseded and superseding indictments, including the degree to which the superseding indictment is based on information that was available at the time of the original indictment or that could have been obtained through reasonably diligent efforts at the time of the original indictment. If an indictment is dismissed without prejudice upon motion of the defendant for any reason, and a subsequent indictment is returned, the time for trial shall begin running from the date of the return of the subsequent indictment. , New Trial., A trial ordered after a mistrial or upon a motion for a new trial, pursuant to R. 3:20-1, shall commence within 120 days of the entry of the order of the court. A trial ordered upon the reversal of a judgment by any appellate court shall commence within 120 days of the service of that court’s trial mandate. , Charge or Indictment in Another Matter., If the defendant is charged or indicted in another matter that results in the defendant’s pretrial detention, the time calculations set forth in this rule shall run independently for each matter. , Excludable Time Criteria., The following periods shall be excluded in computing the time in which a case shall be indicted or tried: The time resulting from an examination and hearing on competency and the period during which the defendant is incompetent to stand trial or incapacitated. Excluded time shall begin tolling once the judge signs an order for the examination of the defendant for competency pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:4-5, or once the defense serves the court with a report from its own expert stating that the defendant is not competent to proceed; The time from the filing to the disposition of a defendant’s application for supervisory treatment pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:36A-1 or N.J.S.A. 2C:43-12 et seq., special probation pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:35-14, drug or alcohol treatment as a condition of probation pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:45-1, or other pretrial treatment or supervisory program; The time resulting from the filing of a motion by either the prosecution or defendant subject to the following: If briefing, argument, and any evidentiary hearings required to complete the record are not complete within 60 days of the filing of the notice of motion, or within any longer period of time authorized pursuant to R. 3:10-2(f), any additional time shall not be excluded. Unless the court reserves its decision until the time of trial, if the court does not decide the motion within 30 days after the record is complete, any additional time during which the motion is under advisement by the court shall not be excluded unless the court finds there are extraordinary circumstances affecting the court’s ability to decide the motion, in which case no more than an additional 30 days shall be excluded. If the court reserves its decision on a motion until the time of trial, the time from the reservation to disposition of that motion shall not be excluded. When the court reserves a motion for the time of trial, the court will be obligated to proceed directly to voir dire or to opening statements after the disposition of the motion. The time resulting from a continuance granted at the defendant’s request or at the request of both the defendant and the prosecutor; such request must specify the amount of time for which the continuance is sought; The time resulting from the detention of the defendant in another jurisdiction, provided the prosecutor has been diligent and has made reasonable efforts to obtain the defendant’s presence; The time resulting from exceptional circumstances including, but not limited to, a natural disaster, the unavoidable unavailability of the defendant, material witness or other evidence, when there is a reasonable expectation that the defendant, witness or evidence will become available in the near future; On motion of the prosecutor, the delay resulting when the court finds that the case is complex due to the number of defendants or the nature of the prosecution subject to the following: the prosecutor shall include in the motion the specific factual basis justifying the delay and the length of the delay sought; the defendant may file an objection within five calendar days of receipt of the prosecutor's motion; and the court may decide the motion without oral argument; the court shall grant the motion only if (i) the prosecutor establishes that due to the complexity of the case it is unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings or the trial itself within the time periods set forth in this Rule and (ii) the court finds that the interests of justice served by granting the delay outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial; the court ordinarily should grant the motion only when the case involves more than two defendants, novel questions of fact or law, numerous witnesses who may be difficult to locate or produce, or voluminous or complicated evidence; if the court grants the motion, the court shall specify the period of delay and shall set forth on the record, either orally or in writing, its findings as required under subparagraph (7)(B)(ii); and the court may grant the motion only with the approval of the criminal presiding judge. The time resulting from a severance of codefendants when that severance permits only one trial to commence within the time period for trial set forth in this Rule, subject to the following: except as provided in subparagraph (8)(B), the subsequent trial shall commence within 60 days of the conclusion of the previous trial; the court may extend the date for the commencement of the subsequent trial upon the request of the defendant, the defendant’s consent to a request by the prosecutor, or a finding by the court upon motion of the prosecutor that there is good cause for the extension; and if the subsequent trial does not commence within 60 days or, if applicable, within the extended period, any additional time shall not be excluded. The time resulting from a defendant’s failure to appear for a court proceeding; The time resulting from a disqualification or recusal of a judge, provided that the amount of excluded time under this subparagraph shall not exceed 30 days; The time resulting from a failure by the defendant to provide timely and complete discovery; The time for other periods of delay not specifically enumerated if the court finds good cause for the delay, provided that this provision shall be narrowly construed; and Any other time otherwise required by statute. The failure by the prosecutor to provide timely and complete discovery shall not be considered excludable time unless the discovery only became available after the time established for discovery., Excludable Time Calculations., The court shall keep track of each and every instance of excludable time calculated pursuant to this rule, including the number of days excluded as determined by the judge, and ensure that all excludable time is accurately reflected in an appropriate judiciary case management system. The court shall provide notice to the defendant and prosecutor of the impending release date for the defendant at least 20 days prior to that release date. Counsel shall also keep track of excludable time and the pending release dates for an eligible defendant. Note: Adopted August 30, 2016 to be effective January 1, 2017; paragraphs (a), (c)(1), and (d)(1) amended November 14, 2016 to be effective January 1, 2017; paragraphs (a), (b)(4)(C), (c)(1), (c)(4)(C), and (d)(1) amended December 13, 2016 to be effective January 1, 2017; paragraph (a) amended July 28, 2017 to be effective September 1, 2017; paragraph (a) and subparagraphs (b)(1), (b)(2), (c)(1), (c)(2), (d)(1), and (d)(3) amended July 27, 2018 to be effective September 1, 2018. Part 3