
Filters
- njcourts.gov… tax assessment. Based on this presumption the appealing taxpayer has the burden of 7 proving that the assessment is … case-in-chief, the burden of proof remain[s] on the taxpayer throughout the entire case . . . .” Id. at 314-15 … methods utilized to predict what a willing buyer would pay a willing seller on a given date, applicable to …
- njcourts.gov… "Exceptions" within the policy to refuse coverage for the payment of most of the plaintiffs claim. Id The policy at … insurance companies anticipated that they would not have to pay for flood damage under their all-risk policies, … Chubb policy and their NFIP policies. Plaintiffs recovered payments under those NFIP policies for the same damage for …
- njcourts.gov… injured parties from recovering medical deductibles and copayments from a tortfeasor. 135 N.J. at 513, 515. In … injured parties from recovering medical deductibles and copayments from a tortfeasor. 135 N.J. at 513, 515. In … 135 N.J. at 510). Ultimately, the panel reasoned that “copayments and deductibles are insufficiently analogous to the …
- njcourts.gov… owed it $93,811.95 in fees for legal services and that payment had been demanded and not made. Dimitrakopoulos, … Dimitrakopoulos agreed to fully cooperate with the firm and pay all bills. The Borrus firm agreed to provide … owed it $93,811.95 in fees for legal services and that payment had been demanded and not made. The Borrus firm …
- njcourts.gov… from the time of acquisition of the certificate, is a ‘taxpayer’ under N.J.S.A. 54:3-21 and has standing to prosecute … (Tax 1998). “Based on this presumption, the appealing taxpayer has the burden of proving that the assessment is … 316 N.J. Super. 271, 285-86 (App. Div. 1998). A taxpayer can only rebut the presumption by introducing “cogent …
- njcourts.gov… be given to that price which a hypothetical buyer would pay a hypothetical seller, neither of which are constrained … methods utilized to predict what a willing buyer would pay a willing seller on a given date, applicable to …
- njcourts.gov… (Tax 1998). “Based on this presumption, the appealing taxpayer has the burden of 9 Testimony was adduced from Mr. … 316 N.J. Super. 271, 285-86 (App. Div. 1998). A taxpayer can only rebut the presumption by introducing “cogent … be given to that price which a hypothetical buyer would pay a hypothetical seller, neither of which are constrained …
- njcourts.gov… Until 1973, Bendix’s largest center of operations and payroll was in New Jersey. Honeywell is the corporate … its insurers have spent more than $1 billion on indemnity payments. Certain matters are undisputed. The friction … Until 1973, Bendix’s largest center of operations and payroll was in New Jersey. Bendix had a variety of …
- njcourts.gov… (Tax 1998). “Based on this presumption, the appealing taxpayer has the burden of proving that the assessment is … 316 N.J. Super. 271, 285-86 (App. Div. 1998). A taxpayer can only rebut the presumption by introducing “cogent … case-in-chief, the burden of proof remain[s] on the taxpayer . . . to demonstrate that the judgment [or local …
- njcourts.gov… (Tax 1998). “Based on this presumption, the appealing taxpayer has the burden of proving that the assessment is … 316 N.J. Super. 271, 285-86 (App. Div. 1998). A taxpayer can only rebut the presumption by introducing “cogent … adjacent properties. As a general rule, dismissal of a taxpayer’s complaints is warranted when a valuation expert has …
- JW v. WW - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… in Hoefers v. Jones, the court mandated a father to pay for his children's school tuition at a Christian school although he claimed that he was agnostic and that paying for his children's attendance not only constituted an …
- njcourts.gov… any statutory or regulatory violation, they agreed to pay a civil penalty of $1,500,000 for Bayway and $1,350,000 … Anzaldi also denied the DEP's motion for interlocutory payment of approximately $1 million in natural resource … appeal decision affirming Judge Anzaldi's denial of the payment motion. N.J. Dep't of Envtl. Prot. v. Exxon Mobil …
- Philip Vitale v. Schering-Plough Corporation (078294) (Middlesex County and Statewide) - Published Opinionsnjcourts.gov… insurance carrier to seek reimbursement of benefits it pays when a third party caused the employee’s injury. The … of the several parties concerned in compensation payments where, in the course of his employment, injury or … insurance carrier to seek reimbursement of benefits it pays when a third[ ]party, other than the employer, caused …
- njcourts.gov… the job. Lewis told Williams that defendant was going to pay Williams for the car. Lewis did not tell Williams who … if he did not participate. Also, Lewis never asked him to pay Williams for a stolen car. Defendant explained that …
- MICHAEL J. MANDELBAUM VS. JACK ARSENEAULT (L-0927-15, SOMERSET COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… which Debra agreed to dismiss the TRO and Michael agreed to pay her $25,000 per month plus household and transportation … that in early 2014, Michael asserted that Debra failed to pay certain expenses that were her responsibility under the … Michael proposed that he reduce his next $25,000 monthly payment accordingly. In a December 14, 2014 letter, Debra's …
- njcourts.gov… after deducting credits based on plaintiffs' receipt of payments from their insurance carrier and monies from other … exceeded the policy limits. GNY paid plaintiffs the full payment of the coverage limits under the policy, together … limit, and suffers a $10,000 loss, the insurance company pays the insured only $7500 because $120,000 is only …
- Hermanns v. Hermanns - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… a benefit, (ii) that retention of that benefit without payment would be unjust, (iii) that the plaintiff expected … Ibid. Furthermore, no litigant would expect to have to pay for his adversary’s attorneys’ fees and expenses because … was Plaintiff to purchase his father’s interest? Was he to pay valuable consideration for Bill’s shares? If so, how …
- njcourts.gov… N.J.S.A. 54:3-21 prescribes the procedure for a “taxpayer” or a “taxing district” to institute a challenge to … N.J.S.A. 54:3-21, provides, in relevant part, that: [a] taxpayer feeling aggrieved by the assessed valuation of the taxpayer’s property, or feeling discriminated against by the …
- njcourts.gov… directed most of her attention to [Andy and Ann], while paying significantly less attention to [Tyler and Tara]. … if parents in similar circumstances generally need to pay more attention to 9 As explained in note 7 supra, Dr. …
- njcourts.gov… (Tax 1998). “Based on this presumption, the appealing taxpayer has the burden of proving that the assessment is … 316 N.J. Super. 271, 285-86 (App. Div. 1998). A taxpayer can only rebut the presumption by introducing “cogent … case-in-chief, the burden of proof remain[s] on the taxpayer. . . to demonstrate that the judgment [or local …