njcourts.gov
… was delivered by KOBLITZ, P.J.A.D. Because the welfare of children is paramount whether the parents are married, … about the disruption in her son's life caused by this determination without an application from the parties. The …
njcourts.gov
… County from July 2014 to the present involving her three children with plaintiff Jeffrey Andersen: Justin, Jason, and … custody, parenting time, equitable distribution, child support, and alimony dated March 21, 2011, was incorporated … and thereafter." 11 A-3631-20 "The UCCJEA governs the determination of subject matter jurisdiction in interstate, as …
-
njcourts.gov
… County from July 2014 to the present involving her three children with plaintiff Jeffrey Andersen: Justin, Jason, and … custody, parenting time, equitable distribution, child support, and alimony dated March 21, 2011, was incorporated … and thereafter." 11 A-3631-20 "The UCCJEA governs the determination of subject matter jurisdiction in interstate, as …
njcourts.gov
… defendant Bruce W. Hoffman were married in 1981; had four children, the youngest of whom was emancipated in 2016; NOT … and required." 3 A-1363-17T2 Defendant stopped making his support payments approximately eleven months after the … also indicated his disagreement with prior court determinations that plaintiff did not commit a fraud or …
-
njcourts.gov
… defendant Bruce W. Hoffman were married in 1981; had four children, the youngest of whom was emancipated in 2016; NOT … and required." 3 A-1363-17T2 Defendant stopped making his support payments approximately eleven months after the … also indicated his disagreement with prior court determinations that plaintiff did not commit a fraud or …
njcourts.gov
… Family Part order denying his motion to reduce his unpaid child support balance by making a modification of NOT FOR … produced] was a motion for discharge or elimination, termination of the child support obligation . . . ." In …
-
njcourts.gov
… Family Part order denying his motion to reduce his unpaid child support balance by making a modification of NOT FOR … produced] was a motion for discharge or elimination, termination of the child support obligation . . . ." In …
njcourts.gov
… father, M.P., for weekly lunches, and for not having the child treated by an approved provider. L.P. also challenges the trial court's award of child support which the court entered without considering … must articulate reasons for custody and parenting time determinations and refer specifically to the pertinent …
-
njcourts.gov
… father, M.P., for weekly lunches, and for not having the child treated by an approved provider. L.P. also challenges the trial court's award of child support which the court entered without considering … must articulate reasons for custody and parenting time determinations and refer specifically to the pertinent …
njcourts.gov
… client’s individual needs while offering opportunities and support that will help them avoid criminal behavior. … establish plans to meet their conditions of probation and support the successful completion of goals. … Adult …
A-0571-09
Business Opinions
njcourts.gov › l--0999-06, l-1147-06, l-1019-06
… March 11, 2011 … Business Opinion Issue Types … Wrongful Termination … Publication Status … Unpublished … Judge … Per …
njcourts.gov
… writing for the Court. The Court considers whether the “Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome” (CSAAS) has a … sexual contact; second-degree endangering the welfare of a child; and third-degree witness tampering. Defendant’s … N.J.R.E. 702. HELD: The Court finds continued scientific support for only one aspect of CSAAS -- delayed disclosure …
default › notices to the bar
… trial court proceedings are closed (e.g., adoptions or terminations of parental rights, in which the doors to the … in the trial courts Family Division FA – Adoption FC – Child Placement Review FD – Non-Dissolution (Only Hearings …
njcourts.gov
… and defendant married in 1996. The parties have two adult children: Matthew and Tyler, born in 1999. Defendant and the … for divorce. He also filed a motion for pendente lite support. Defendant cross-moved for pendente lite support. In … only if the judge's "findings were mistaken," the "determination could not reasonably have been reached on …
-
njcourts.gov
… and defendant married in 1996. The parties have two adult children: Matthew and Tyler, born in 1999. Defendant and the … for divorce. He also filed a motion for pendente lite support. Defendant cross-moved for pendente lite support. In … only if the judge's "findings were mistaken," the "determination could not reasonably have been reached on …
njcourts.gov
… The parties were married in 1986, have two now-emancipated children, separated in 2001, and divorced in 2004. A January … that alimony may be terminated or modified when the supported spouse remarries, N.J.S.A. 2A:34-25, or cohabits … of this opinion. Law and public policy favor a permanent termination of alimony when the supported spouse remarries, …
njcourts.gov
… April 3, 2023 orders, which enforced his obligation to pay child support arrears to plaintiff D.W.A. We affirm. Defendant is … appeal from a child support hearing officer (CSHO) determination regarding defendant's obligation to pay the …
-
njcourts.gov
… April 3, 2023 orders, which enforced his obligation to pay child support arrears to plaintiff D.W.A. We affirm. Defendant is … appeal from a child support hearing officer (CSHO) determination regarding defendant's obligation to pay the …
Taxotere/Docetaxel
Multi County Litigation
njcourts.gov
… shall apply by formal notice of motion or by consent with supporting affidavit and proposed form of order, in … until further notice. County Middlesex Judges and Staff 1 child 1 Bruce J. Kaplan , Civil Judges - Middlesex - Judge Bruce J. Kaplan , Phone 1 child 1 Dolores Taylor , MCL - Middlesex - Dolores Taylor , …
njcourts.gov
… gender bias influenced her employer’s decision to terminate her, in violation of the Law Against … Livingston Township for eleven years, from 2005 until her termination in 2016 by Resolution of the Township Council. … regarding the Chief’s performance likely sufficient to support disciplinary 2 charges, but not termination, and …