njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3568-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … The Law Guardian did not proffer any witnesses and supported the Division's plan for Skye to adopt Austin. Aaron objected to the termination of his parental rights and testified on his own …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3568-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … The Law Guardian did not proffer any witnesses and supported the Division's plan for Skye to adopt Austin. Aaron objected to the termination of his parental rights and testified on his own …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0100-19T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … did not offer any documentary or testimonial evidence but supported the Division's application for termination of J.E.'s parental rights. Ms. Mata testified …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0100-19T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … did not offer any documentary or testimonial evidence but supported the Division's application for termination of J.E.'s parental rights. Ms. Mata testified …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5609-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … THE TRIAL JUDGE AND THE EVIDENCE ADMITTED AT TRIAL DID NOT SUPPORT A LEGAL CONCLUSION THAT ALL FOUR PRONGS OF THE BEST … C. DCPP DID NOT PROVE BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT TERMINATION WOULD NOT DO MORE HARM THAN GOOD AS REQUIRED BY …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5609-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … THE TRIAL JUDGE AND THE EVIDENCE ADMITTED AT TRIAL DID NOT SUPPORT A LEGAL CONCLUSION THAT ALL FOUR PRONGS OF THE BEST … C. DCPP DID NOT PROVE BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT TERMINATION WOULD NOT DO MORE HARM THAN GOOD AS REQUIRED BY …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3644-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … applicable law, we are satisfied the evidence in the record supports the decision to terminate Theresa's parental rights … the trial court changed the permanency plan from KLG to termination of Theresa's parental rights. A nine-day trial …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3644-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … applicable law, we are satisfied the evidence in the record supports the decision to terminate Theresa's parental rights … the trial court changed the permanency plan from KLG to termination of Theresa's parental rights. A nine-day trial …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-1833-20 A-1834-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … three and four. II. The legal framework regarding the termination of parental rights is well- settled. Parents … the record contains substantial and credible evidence to support the decision to terminate parental rights. Id. at …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-1833-20 A-1834-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … three and four. II. The legal framework regarding the termination of parental rights is well- settled. Parents … the record contains substantial and credible evidence to support the decision to terminate parental rights. Id. at …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4767-15T3 A-4768-15T3 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … this action and, after a four- day trial, secured the termination of Steven and Anna's parental rights to all … parental rights to Paul. Anna argues the evidence failed to support the judge's findings on all four statutory prongs. …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4767-15T3 A-4768-15T3 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … this action and, after a four- day trial, secured the termination of Steven and Anna's parental rights to all … parental rights to Paul. Anna argues the evidence failed to support the judge's findings on all four statutory prongs. …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3983-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … all four prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and ordered termination of the mother's parental rights to Alice.2 2 … decision to terminate the mother's parental rights is amply supported by the evidence. When terminating parental rights, …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3983-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … all four prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and ordered termination of the mother's parental rights to Alice.2 2 … decision to terminate the mother's parental rights is amply supported by the evidence. When terminating parental rights, …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1157-19T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Fam. Servs. v. G.L., 191 N.J. 596, 605 3 To secure parental termination, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) requires the Division to … written opinion. Arguing against the proofs that support the first prong, Ed contends he did not harm Alan. …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1157-19T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Fam. Servs. v. G.L., 191 N.J. 596, 605 3 To secure parental termination, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) requires the Division to … written opinion. Arguing against the proofs that support the first prong, Ed contends he did not harm Alan. …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2437-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of … are not disturbed unless they are "so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2437-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of … are not disturbed unless they are "so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5644-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … that the Division did not consider "alternatives to termination of parental rights" because it failed to … N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4).2 All of the judge's findings are supported by substantial, credible evidence and, therefore, …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5644-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … that the Division did not consider "alternatives to termination of parental rights" because it failed to … N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4).2 All of the judge's findings are supported by substantial, credible evidence and, therefore, …