njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5609-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … THE TRIAL JUDGE AND THE EVIDENCE ADMITTED AT TRIAL DID NOT SUPPORT A LEGAL CONCLUSION THAT ALL FOUR PRONGS OF THE BEST … C. DCPP DID NOT PROVE BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT TERMINATION WOULD NOT DO MORE HARM THAN GOOD AS REQUIRED BY …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5609-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … THE TRIAL JUDGE AND THE EVIDENCE ADMITTED AT TRIAL DID NOT SUPPORT A LEGAL CONCLUSION THAT ALL FOUR PRONGS OF THE BEST … C. DCPP DID NOT PROVE BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT TERMINATION WOULD NOT DO MORE HARM THAN GOOD AS REQUIRED BY …
njcourts.gov
… trial, were divorced on January 30, 2012. They have one child. The dual judgment of divorce (DJOD) incorporated … payments are completed. Defendant also pays weekly child support. Under the DJOD, child support increased after the … back. Defendant's motion requested custody of the child, termination of alimony, suspension of child support, and an …
-
njcourts.gov
… trial, were divorced on January 30, 2012. They have one child. The dual judgment of divorce (DJOD) incorporated … payments are completed. Defendant also pays weekly child support. Under the DJOD, child support increased after the … back. Defendant's motion requested custody of the child, termination of alimony, suspension of child support, and an …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1157-19T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Fam. Servs. v. G.L., 191 N.J. 596, 605 3 To secure parental termination, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) requires the Division to … written opinion. Arguing against the proofs that support the first prong, Ed contends he did not harm Alan. …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1157-19T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Fam. Servs. v. G.L., 191 N.J. 596, 605 3 To secure parental termination, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) requires the Division to … written opinion. Arguing against the proofs that support the first prong, Ed contends he did not harm Alan. …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-3506-21 A-3508-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of their parental rights. I. The facts are fully … visitation for both Tom and Fara and referred them to support services for mental health, parenting classes, and …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-3506-21 A-3508-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of their parental rights. I. The facts are fully … visitation for both Tom and Fara and referred them to support services for mental health, parenting classes, and …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5644-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … that the Division did not consider "alternatives to termination of parental rights" because it failed to … N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4).2 All of the judge's findings are supported by substantial, credible evidence and, therefore, …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5644-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … that the Division did not consider "alternatives to termination of parental rights" because it failed to … N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4).2 All of the judge's findings are supported by substantial, credible evidence and, therefore, …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1950-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … proven the fourth prong of the best interest test—whether termination of parental rights would not do more harm than … Tamara contends there was insufficient credible evidence to support the trial court's findings under any of the four …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1950-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … proven the fourth prong of the best interest test—whether termination of parental rights would not do more harm than … Tamara contends there was insufficient credible evidence to support the trial court's findings under any of the four …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3538-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … that defendant was "cognitively delayed" and has "limited support." Several days later, the Division received a report … June 12, 2019. The court approved the Division's plan for termination of M.F. and J.C.'s parental rights, followed by …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3538-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … that defendant was "cognitively delayed" and has "limited support." Several days later, the Division received a report … June 12, 2019. The court approved the Division's plan for termination of M.F. and J.C.'s parental rights, followed by …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1742-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … A.H. left on a windowsill, the cousin received no financial support from A.H. to care for the child. The cousin reported … held a permanency hearing and approved DCPP's plan for termination of A.H.'s parental rights. A trial was held in …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1742-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … A.H. left on a windowsill, the cousin received no financial support from A.H. to care for the child. The cousin reported … held a permanency hearing and approved DCPP's plan for termination of A.H.'s parental rights. A trial was held in …
njcourts.gov › attorneys › rules of court
… without filing an answer, be heard on issues of custody of children, parenting time or visitation, alimony, child support, equitable distribution, counsel fees and other …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5268-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to make adequate findings of fact and conclusions of law supporting its decision. The Law Guardians for Eddie and … should be reversed. Earl did not appeal from the court's termination order and has not participated in this appeal. …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5268-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to make adequate findings of fact and conclusions of law supporting its decision. The Law Guardians for Eddie and … should be reversed. Earl did not appeal from the court's termination order and has not participated in this appeal. …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4390-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … daughter, K.N., born in 2002. Defendant only appeals the termination of his parental rights to S.N. All three … was assessed and properly ruled out, and expert testimony supported the Division's plan for select home adoption. …