Filters
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2582-23 IDELISA PEREZ, … replaced approximately twenty-five years ago. Defendants have owned this residential property since 1972. Years … stand on different footing than commercial owners who have the ability to spread the cost of the risk through the …
- njcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0244-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … L.B. Before he opened the door, he heard L.B. say: "I don't have anything," and "stay away from me[.]" He then heard … argue at the suppression hearing that his statement should have been barred. The first PCR judge denied defendant's …
- A-1589-15T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1589-15T3 JEFFREY S. FELD, ESQ., … He claims he was deprived of procedural due process, should have received an adverse inference in his favor based on … member did not support the Resolution because he did not have the opportunity to review the information. Another …
- A-3155-16T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3155-16T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … of aggravated sexual assault relating to acts alleged to have occurred in Passaic, but convicted him of sexual … with defendant and I.C., the two of them appeared to have an affectionate relationship and she did not appear to …
- A-0360-17T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0360-17T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … requirements for 'special probation,' the applicant must have committed a 5 A-0360-17T4 crime that is subject to a … Court judge began his oral decision by stating, "The courts have recognized that the Prosecutor's Office has discretion …
- A-0208-17T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0208-17T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … because the victim "made it clear he does not want to have to go through a trial on this," the judge replied: Then … other than doing his job.[2] So believe me that I wouldn't have had a hesitation for a New York minute or any …
- A-3354-16T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3354-16T4 STACY MUNI, n/k/a FERNER, … lump sum payments and/or monthly payments set forth 1 We have not been provided with the FJOD. 3 A-3354-16T4 above, … on the [d]efendant. In addition, the [p]laintiff shall have the right to file a further application seeking …
- A-0058-16T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0058-16T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … findings are "so wide of the mark that a mistake must have been made[,]" they should not be disturbed, even if we would not have made the same decision if we had heard the case in the …
- A-3252-16T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3252-16T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … the records, did not think they were important, and would have done nothing different at trial had she had the … obtained the records before trial, the trial court would have had the benefit of considering the "substantial amount …
- A-3011-17T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3011-17T2 CARON ROMANS, Appellant, v. … in denying his admission into the program. I. As we have already noted, Romans's application was initially … 63, 70 (App. Div. 2009). Furthermore, an inmate does not have a constitutionally protected liberty interest in his or …
- A-0143-16T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0143-16T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Scott and defendant to point out that defendant could have been easily misidentified. 6 A-0143-16T1 In an oral … performance was all "a matter of strategy" and would not have "changed anything" to meet "the second prong of …
- A-2208-16T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2208-16T1 SEAN TURANICZA, deceased by … at 2:00 [a.m.] or at 11:00 [a.m.], [Sean] could certainly have been resuscitated. It is well known in the state of New … Unfortunately, [Sean] was never given the chance to have Narcan administered to him. Thus, the failure to …
- A-0370-17T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0370-17T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … GRAND JURY. 4 A-0370-17T2 POINT II THE TRIAL COURT SHOULD HAVE GRANTED THE MOTION TO SUPPRESS BECAUSE THE WARRANT … recognizes that some of the testimony of the robberies will have to be presented during Defendant Velasquez's trial in …
- A-1593-18T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1593-18T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … that he was transporting drugs. Defendant stated, "I have stuff in the car," and offered to get the drugs for the detectives. Hambrecht advised defendant that he did not have to consent to a search, could terminate the search at …
- A-2369-17T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2369-17T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … a judgment of conviction by raising issues that could not have been raised on direct appeal and, therefore, ensures … probability that, but for counsel's errors, he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to …
- A-5559-17T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5559-17T2 A. M., Plaintiff-Respondent, … several years and lived together for a period of time. They have two children, who now live with plaintiff but visit … issuance of a FRO was warranted. Id. at 128. As our courts have repeatedly cautioned, "[v]ulgar name-calling alone is …
- A-4268-17T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4268-17T3 J.M., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … asserted that CarePoint and its personnel knew or should have known that the roommate posed a danger to plaintiff and … that is, CarePoint and its personnel knew or should have known that the roommate was dangerous and that she …
- A-0388-19T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0388-19T3 TWO DAUGHTERS, LLC, … the Harbour Bay property at issue. With structures that have been on the property since the 1960s, the Harbour Bay … of the adverse impact plaintiff claims this project will have on neighboring properties. In fact, only three members …
- A-1029-18T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1029-18T3 OSHEA CLARKE, Appellant, v. … the two inmates did not engage in a fight, as Clarke could have fled after striking Porter. The hearing officer … a court must uphold an agency's findings, even if it would have reached a different result, so long as sufficient …
- A-4231-14T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4231-14T2 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL … In addition, J.Z. argues that the trial court should have dismissed the civil commitment order without prejudice. … the Attorney General may initiate a court proceeding to have the individual involuntarily committed . . . "by the …