Filters
- A-0388-19T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0388-19T3 TWO DAUGHTERS, LLC, … the Harbour Bay property at issue. With structures that have been on the property since the 1960s, the Harbour Bay … of the adverse impact plaintiff claims this project will have on neighboring properties. In fact, only three members …
- A-1029-18T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1029-18T3 OSHEA CLARKE, Appellant, v. … the two inmates did not engage in a fight, as Clarke could have fled after striking Porter. The hearing officer … a court must uphold an agency's findings, even if it would have reached a different result, so long as sufficient …
- A-4231-14T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4231-14T2 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL … In addition, J.Z. argues that the trial court should have dismissed the civil commitment order without prejudice. … the Attorney General may initiate a court proceeding to have the individual involuntarily committed . . . "by the …
- A-4350-13T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4350-13T4 MOTORWORLD, INC., … – the right to pursue any claim the debtor could also have commenced but for the bankruptcy filing. The trustee … no explanation for so quantifying the award and appears to have merely accepted the calculations provided by the …
- A-1668-16T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1668-16T3 CCM PROPERTIES, LLC, and … forth causes of action against both defendants and should have been permitted. We thus derive the facts largely from … to identify critical environmental conditions which would have governed [p]laintiff[s'] decision to proceed" — …
- A-0610-16T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0610-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … by [Alfred], which [Katie] alleges did occur, I don't have to find that occurred. Because I find that just by … (App. Div. 1963)). 7 A-0610-16T3 Alfred argues he could not have committed abuse or neglect of Adam because it was not …
- A-3915-15T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3915-15T1 MICHAEL F. EVERS, … appealing the actions of a zoning officer when it should have applied the time limits for appealing the actions of a … run from the date the interested party "knew or should have known of a building permit's issuance." Trenkamp v. …
- A-6014-17T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-6014-17T1 L.M., Petitioner-Appellant, v. … FAULT OF HER OWN; THEREFORE, THE TRANSFERRED ASSETS SHOULD HAVE BEEN EXCLUDED FROM L.M.'S MEDICAID ELIGIBILITY … own judgment for the agency's even though the court might have reached a different result." Greenwood v. State Police …
- A-3133-15T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3133-15T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … to his home, offered her money for sex, and attempted to have sex with her before she was able to escape. During … Essex County Jail. Judge Sules found trial counsel could have reasonably chosen not to pursue an intoxication defense …
- njcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0283-21 IN THE MATTER OF REGISTRANT F.R. … obligations under N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2(f), PSL, and ordered to have no contact with the victim. The underlying offense … parole. In 2008[,] he claimed he did not know he could not have social media, yet only created more social media …
- A-0595-21 – C.L.D. VS. L.R.L. (FV-03-0296-22, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0595-21 C.L.D.,1 Plaintiff-Respondent, … testified defendant became upset because plaintiff did not have time to take the parties' child to the park, yet had … not credible. She noted defendant 5 A-0595-21 seems to have incredible recollection of their history. An incredible …
- A-0848-21 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ANGELO SILLETTI (97-02-0215, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0848-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … PCR application on October 19, 2019, claiming he would not have pleaded guilty had he known he was not a citizen and … to the passage of time, the plea and sentencing transcripts have been destroyed. 4 A-0848-21 proffered by Sileletti to …
- njcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1579-20 LOUIS WATLEY, … pursuant to Rule 4:6-2(e). The court held that it did not have jurisdiction to interfere with the attorney … 281 (quoting Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 198 (1962)). We have carefully reviewed the record and conclude that the …
- A-2405-21 – ANDREW RICHMOND VS. DEREK KHOROZIAN, ET AL. (L-5044-19, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2405-21 ANDREW RICHMOND, … facts emerged which were different from those believed to have been true at the time Dr. Geron executed the AOM, and … WITH SUFFICIENT TIME TO FIND NEW COUNSEL A. Our courts have uniformly held that under circumstances where an expert …
- A-2692-21 - SILVESTER AND YONGJIE TUOHY VS. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION (TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY) Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2692-21 SYLVESTER and YONGJIE TUOHY, … affirmed the agency's holding, reasoning alimony should not have been included in the numerator in the calculation of … of plaintiffs' miscalculated GIT return, and plaintiffs' have failed to produce any evidence or legal authority to …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3267-21 BUKURIE LLUGANI, … Perceiving no abuse of discretion, we affirm. The parties have a child who was born in 2016. Defendant's weekly child- … of the business. There's, certainly, no accounts that have been, you know, hidden or there's no money that …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0227-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … not given notice allowing him to cure the violations. We have considered defendant's contentions in light of the … line and Estate Point Road because the Board did not have the power to approve the improvements that were …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0493-22 IN RE APPLICATION OF A.J.J. FOR … A search for records revealed petitioner did not have a record of admission, commitment, or treatment for any … on it. It's incredible. You know, it shows that you don't have, have like, respect for the law. You keep violating it, …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3554-21 BONNIE ELLMAN, … time, ensuring that plaintiffs with meritorious claims will have their day in court." Ferreira, 178 N.J. at 150 (quoting … of possible precautions which the defendant might have taken to avoid injury to the plaintiff." Sanzari v. …
- A-3731-21 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. OSBORNE S. MALONEY (05-11-1492, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3731-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … NEGLECT PURSUANT TO R. 3:22-12, THE PCR COURT SHOULD NOT HAVE FOUND DEFENDANT’S OUT-OF-TIME PCR PETITION TO BE … because he cannot show a motion to suppress would have been successful. Defendant also argues counsel erred by …