The 200-month FET was arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable. Adopting an analysis similar to the Appellate Division’s analysis in Berta v. State Parole Board, 473 N.J. Super. 284 (App. Div. 2022), the Court holds that, to impose an extended FET beyond the presumptive term, the Parole Board must (1) overcome the presumption by explaining why the presumptive term is clearly inappropriate and (2) explain why the extended FET that the Board imposed is necessary and appropriate. Any extended FET imposed should be no longer than needed to address the likelihood of recidivism, which is the primary concern of the applicable statute and regulations.