In this appeal, the court was asked to consider whether plaintiff, a municipal court administrator, is an employee of the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC), thereby allowing her to assert a claim against the AOC under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to -49. Following the court's review of various statutes and court rules, it concluded that if the Legislature had intended municipal court administrators to be considered employees of the AOC, it could have expressly done so. Instead, the Legislature enacted N.J.S.A. 2B:12-10(a), specifically establishing that municipalities "shall provide for an administrator" of municipal courts and pay "their compensation." Moreover, N.J.S.A. 2B:12-1(a) provides "[e]very municipality shall establish a municipal court," not the AOC. Although the AOC provides certain oversight and supervision of municipal courts, that does not equate with the AOC establishing an employer-employee relationship with plaintiff.