This page provides summaries of Supreme Court appeals, along with certain procedural information, due dates, and publicly filed briefs. The most recent cases are listed first. You can also use the search tool to find a specific case.
APPEALS ADDED IN THE NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT LISTED NEWEST TO OLDEST
Summaries for Informational Purposes Only: The following statements of issues on appeal are prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. They have been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of brevity, some issues may not have been summarized.
Party Briefing and Case Documents: Briefing on appeals before the Supreme Court is governed by Court Rule. The Court’s order taking the appeal typically will include the due dates for the parties’ merits briefs and for amicus motions and briefs. The order is included in the “Case Document(s)” for each appeal. If the appeal is not sealed, the parties’ briefs also will be included in the “Case Document(s).”
Amicus Motions: Beginning on Feb. 10, 2026, motions for leave to appear as amicus curiae and proposed amicus briefs in Supreme Court appeals are due ten (10) days after the respondent files its merits brief, and motions to extend or relax the time for filing an amicus motion and brief will not be accepted. See R. 1:13-9(e).
|
A-94-11 George C. Riley v. State Parole Board (069327) Is the retroactive application of the Sex Offender Monitoring Act, N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.89 to -123.95, to persons who committed offenses before its enactment unconstitutional?
Watch the
|
|
A-85-11 State v. Angelina Nicole Carlucci (069183) Were defendant's statements about her recent drug use, which were made before being informed of her Miranda rights in response to questioning by an investigating officer about drugs found at the defendant's place of employment, admissible?
Watch the
|
|
A-71-11 James P. Renner v. AT&T (068744) Does the record support this workers' compensation claim under N.J.S.A. 34:2015-7.2, which sets the standard of proof governing claims based on injury or death from cardiovascular causes?
Watch the
|
|
A-67-11 State v. Jarrett Parker (068966) Did the prosecutor's references to defendant's prior use of aliases to impeach his credibility deprive defendant of a fair trial?
Watch the
|
|
A-31-11 Amratlal C. Bhagat v. Bharat A. Bhagat (068213) In these circumstances involving a transfer of stock in a family business from father to son, was the standard for summary judgment properly applied to determine that, due to the high burden of proof needed to overcome the presumption that such a transfer is a gift, no rational factfinder could find that this was a conditional transfer instead of a gift?
Watch the
|
|
Is the defendant, the live-in boyfriend of the child-victim's mother, a "person legally charged with the care and custody" of the child and therefore guilty of first-degree endangering in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4b(3)?
|