Find Supreme Court appeal cases here. The most recent cases are listed first. You can also use the search tool to find a specific case.
APPEALS ADDED IN THE NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT LISTED NEWEST TO OLDEST
The following statements of issues on appeal are prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. They have been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of brevity, some issues may not have been summarized.
Beginning on July 16, 2010, each appeal summary posted on this website includes its "posted" date, which is necessary for calculating certain due dates for filing briefs and motions under revised Rule 1:13-9, "Amicus Curiae."
In addition, website addresses cited in the Court's opinions may change or disappear over time. An attempt has been made to capture the material cited in an opinion and to provide links to those sources, when available.
|
A-67-13 Citizens United Reciprocal Exchange v. Sabrina A. Perez (073384) Where a basic automobile insurance policy is voided based on a fraudulent application, must the issuer of the voided policy pay liability claims of innocent third parties, and, if so, must those payments comport with the mandatory minimum liability insurance coverage provisions of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3?
Watch the
|
|
A-65/66-13 Joel S. Lippman, M.D. v. Ethicon, Inc (073324) Can employees who are responsible for monitoring and reporting on employer compliance with relevant laws and regulations – so-called “watchdog employees" – seek whistleblower protection under the Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA), N.J.S.A. 34:19-1 et seq., and, if so, under what circumstances?
Watch the
|
|
A-64-13 State v. Ricky Wright (073137) Did the third-party intervention doctrine apply under these circumstances to allow police to search this private residence without a warrant?
Watch the
|
|
A-63-13 388 Route 22 Readington Realty v. Twp. of Readington (073322) Did the defendant Township have adequate standards to guide it in determining whether to exercise its discretion to reallocate unused sewer rights?
Watch the
|
|
A-62-13 State v. Julius Smith (073059) Should the trial court have granted defendant’s motion for a mistrial or, alternatively, granted a continuance to allow defendant to investigate the newly discovered evidence revealed during trial?
Watch the
|
|
A-61-13 State v. Darien Weston (073032) Was defendant’s right to a fair trial violated when the jury was allowed unrestricted access to the videotaped statements of two eyewitnesses during deliberations?
Watch the
|
|
A-60-13 Terry Kuchera v. Jersey Shore Family Health Center (073483) Does this non-profit community outreach clinic have a charitable or educational purpose entitling it to absolute immunity under N.J.S.A. 2A:53A-7, or is it organized exclusively for hospital purposes and therefore subject to a $250,000 limit on its liability pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:53A-8?
Watch the
|
|
A-59-13 L.A. and The Horace Mann Ins. Co. v. Bd. of Edu. of the City of Trenton (073401) Was there sufficient evidence presented that this employee’s inappropriate contact with a student was not undertaken in the course of his employment such that the Board of Education was not obligated to indemnify the employee for his costs in defending a civil action pursuant to N.J.S.A. 18A:2016-6?
Watch the
|
|
A-58-13 Joseph Vanderslice v. Harold Stewart (073362) Under the circumstances presented, should the time period for filing a demand for a trial de novo following a non-binding arbitration be relaxed to permit a late filing by the County?
Watch the
|
|
A-57-13 Kimba Medical Supply v. Allstate Insurance Co. of N.J. (073158) Under the New Jersey Alternative Procedure for Dispute Resolution Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:23A-1 thru -19, and associated personal injury protection (“PIP") regulations, does the trial court have the authority to remand unresolved factual questions to a dispute resolution professional after that court has vacated or modified the professional’s decision?
|
|
A-56-13 State v. Terrell Hubbard (073539) Was it appropriate under the circumstances for the Appellate Division to rely on its independent review of the video recording of defendant’s statement to reverse the trial court’s order suppressing that statement?
Watch the
|
|
A-55-13 Griepenburg v. Twp. of Ocean (073290) Was the municipality’s rezoning of plaintiffs’ property to an environmentally sensitive land use designation that required minimum lot sizes of 20 acres for residential development arbitrary and capricious?
Watch the
|
|
Was plaintiffs’ action challenging the municipal redevelopment ordinance time barred and, if not, was the ordinance invalid because of the municipality’s failure to submit an application for approval of the issuance of bonds to the Local Finance Board in the Department of Community Affairs?
Watch the
|
|
A-53-13 Grabowsky v. Twp. of Montclair (07320142) Were these municipal officials disqualified from voting on this redevelopment ordinance because of their membership in a church located on property that is next to the site to be redeveloped?
Watch the
|
|
A-52-13 Gnall v. Gnall (073321) Was it appropriate for the Appellate Division to reverse the trial court’s award of limited duration alimony and to remand for consideration of permanent alimony under the circumstances of this case, which included a marriage of fifteen years?
Watch the
|
|
A-51-13 Gaskill v. CITI Mortgage, Inc. (071804) Where a judgment creditor does not receive actual notice of the debtor’s bankruptcy petition or discharge in bankruptcy, may equitable principles be applied to toll the provisions of N.J.S.A. 2A:2016-49.1, which allows the debtor to cancel a lien after one year has elapsed since the date of the discharge in bankruptcy?
Watch the
|
|
A-50-13 Maida v. Kuskin (073429) Is a request that a guilty plea entered in municipal court not be evidential in any civil proceeding required to be made in open court at the time of the entry of the plea?
Watch the
|
|
A-49-13 State v. Edwin Urbina (073209) In pleading guilty to the crime of aggravated manslaughter, did defendant’s assertion of facts implying that he acted in self-defense render the factual basis inadequate?
Watch the
|
|
A-47/48-13 State v. State v. James Grate; State v. Fuquan Cromwell (072750) Does the “knowingly" mens rea requirement of N.J.S.A. 2C:39-5(e)(1), third-degree unlawful possession of a weapon at an education institution, apply to both the possession of the firearm and the presence at an educational institution; and did the trial court err in sentencing defendants to mandatory minimum terms?
Watch the
|
|
A-46-13 State v. John Tate (072754) Did defendant’s admission during his plea allocution to cursing and using off-color language in such a way as to debauch a child’s morals provide an adequate factual basis to establish child neglect under N.J.S.A. 9:6-3?
Watch the
|