Find Supreme Court appeal cases here. The most recent cases are listed first. You can also use the search tool to find a specific case.
APPEALS ADDED IN THE NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT LISTED NEWEST TO OLDEST
The following statements of issues on appeal are prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. They have been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of brevity, some issues may not have been summarized.
Beginning on July 16, 2010, each appeal summary posted on this website includes its "posted" date, which is necessary for calculating certain due dates for filing briefs and motions under revised Rule 1:13-9, "Amicus Curiae."
In addition, website addresses cited in the Court's opinions may change or disappear over time. An attempt has been made to capture the material cited in an opinion and to provide links to those sources, when available.
|
A-62-16 William J. Brennan v. Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office (078074) Does the Open Public Records Act (OPRA), N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1 to -13, or the common law, compel the disclosure of documents containing the names and addresses of persons who successfully bid at an auction of public property?
Watch the
|
|
A-61-16 State v. Isaac Young (078862) Did defendant commit the offense of encouraging the release of a confidential child abuse record (N.J.S.A. 9:6-8.10b), where he received the confidential records in an anonymous letter?
Watch the
|
|
A-60-16 State v. S. N. (079320) Did the trial court err in granting the State’s motion for pretrial detention, pursuant to the Criminal Justice Reform Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:162-15 to -26; and, if so, did the appellate panel properly establish conditions for defendant’s release in reversing that order? [Note: This appeal is scheduled for oral argument for the session of September 11-12, 2017. Should any entity wish to file a motion to participate as amicus curiae, the motion and any proposed brief must be served and filed on or before 6/19/17. The State and the defendant may file answers to any such amicus motion, together with a proposed response brief to the amicus brief, on or before 7/19/17. No further submissions, beyond the parties’ supplemental briefs as authorized by the Court’s order, shall be accepted unless requested by the Court.]
Watch the
|
|
A-59-16 Saint Peter’s University Hospital, Inc. v. Horizon Healthcare Services, Inc. (079097) In this action concerning defendant’s implementation of the OMNIA two-tiered provider network, did the trial court err in ordering the production of certain discovery, which defendant contends was inconsistent with the Appellate Division’s judgment now on review before the Supreme Court in Capital Health System, Inc. v. Horizon Healthcare Services, Inc.; Saint Peter’s University Hospital v. Horizon Healthcare Services, Inc. (A-29/30-16)? [Note: This appeal has been accelerated by order of the Court dated 4/13/17. Any motion for leave to appear amicus curiae shall be served and filed with the proposed amicus brief on or before 5/5/17, and any answer shall be served and filed with the proposed brief in response on or before 5/19/17. The matter shall be scheduled for argument on June 20, 2017, and argued back-to-back with A-29/30-16.]
Watch the
|
|
A-58-16 State v. Eileen Cassidy (078390) What impact, if any, does a failure to test the simulator solutions with the NIST-traceable digital thermometer before calibrating an Alcotest machine have on the results of a breath test performed on that machine? [Note: This matter is remanded to a special master, Judge Joseph F. Lisa, J.A.D. , currently serving on recall, to consider and decide the following question, along with any other questions that Judge Lisa, in his discretion, deems relevant: “Does the failure to test the simulator solutions with the NIST-traceable digital thermometer before calibrating an Alcotest machine undermine or call into question the scientific reliability of breath tests subsequently performed on the Alcotest machine?” All motions to participate in the remand must be served and filed with the Special Master on or before May 8, 2017.]
Watch the
|
|
Is a consumer who receives a contract that does not comply with the Delivery of Household Furniture and Furnishings Regulations (Furniture Delivery Regulations), N.J.A.C. 13:45A-5, but has not suffered any adverse consequences from the noncompliance, an “aggrieved consumer” under the Truth-in-Consumer Contract Warranty and Notice Act (TCCWNA), N.J.S.A. 56:12-17; and, does a violation of the Furniture Delivery Regulations alone constitute a violation of a clearly established right or responsibility of the seller under the TCCWNA and thus provide a basis for relief under the TCCWNA?
Watch the
|
|
A-56-16 State v. Amed Ingram (079079) At a pretrial detention hearing pursuant to New Jersey’s Bail Reform Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:162-15 to -26, may the State establish probable cause by proffer, rather than producing live testimony from a witness with first-hand knowledge of the offense? [Note: This appeal has been accelerated by order of the Court and will be calendared for oral argument on a peremptory date to be scheduled by the Clerk’s Office.Should any entity wish to file a motion to participate as amicus curiae, the motion and any proposed brief must be served and filed on or before 04-05-2017.The State and the defendant may file answers to any such amicus motion, together with a proposed response brief to the amicus brief, on or before 04-12-2017.Amicus briefs and responses shall not exceed 20 pages in length.No further submissions, beyond the parties’ supplemental briefs as authorized by the Court’s order, shall be accepted unless requested by the Court.]
Watch the
|
|
A-55-16 Mark R. Krzykalski v. David T. Tindall (078744) In this action alleging that defendant Tindall and a fictitious defendant (John Doe) negligently caused an accident that injured plaintiff, did the trial court err in allowing the jury to apportion liability between defendant and the fictitious defendant?
Watch the
|
|
A-54-16 State v. Todd Dorn (078399) Did the trial court err in admitting into evidence a map identifying areas within 500 feet of public parks and buildings; and was defendant’s right to a grand jury indictment violated when the trial court permitted the prosecutor to amend the indictment to expose defendant to greater criminal liability?
Watch the
|
|
A-53-16 State v. Donnell Jones (078793) Was defendant denied his right to allocute and present mitigating information at sentencing, when the trial court denied defendant’s request to re-address the court after the prosecutor began her statement?
Watch the
|
|
A-52-16 State v. Dorian Pressley a/k/a Justin Belton (078747) Was the undercover officer’s identification of defendant impermissibly suggestive, such that defendant was entitled to a Wade hearing, where the officer identified defendant from a single photograph within one hour of the undercover transaction?
Watch the
|
|
A-51-16 State v. Gary Twiggs (077686) When addressing the statute of limitations in a criminal matter, is N.J.S.A. 2C:1-6’s tolling provision – which applies when "the actor" is identified by means of DNA evidence – triggered where the DNA analyzed belongs to a third party, rather than the defendant?
Watch the
|
|
A-50-16 State v. J.L.G. a/k/a J.L.J. (078718) Was defendant entitled to a new trial because of the admission of expert testimony regarding the child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome? [Note: This appeal is remanded summarily to the trial court for a hearing, pursuant to N.J.R.E. 104, to determine whether CSAAS evidence meets the reliability standard of N.J.R.E. 702, in light of recent scientific evidence. Any party seeking to appear as amicus curiae and to participate in the development of the record may move before the trial court within 30 days of 3/17/17. The trial court shall determine the extent of such participation. Jurisdiction of the appeal is otherwise retained.]
Watch the
|
|
A-49-16 State v. Allen Alexander a/k/a Karon Keenan (078515) In this trial on charges of robbery and conspiracy to commit robbery, did the trial court commit plain error by failing to charge the jury on the crime of second-degree aggravated assault as a lesser-included offense?
Watch the
|
|
A-48-16 Mary Harz v. Borough of Spring Lake (078711) Could plaintiff maintain a cause of action against defendants under the Civil Rights Act for defendants’ failure to properly review her complaints about alleged zoning violations?
Watch the
|
|
A-47-16 Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO v. Civil Service Commission (078742) Among other issues, what is the appropriate standard of review applicable when a court reviews the Legislature’s invocation of its veto power, pursuant to the Legislative Review Clause (N.J. Const. art. V, § 4, ¶ 6)?
Watch the
|
|
A-43/44/45/46-16 Agriculture Development Committee v. Quaker Valley Farms, LLC (078517) Did defendants’ earth-moving activities on their farm violate the terms of the development easement granted by their predecessors in title under the Agriculture Retention and Development Act?
Watch the
|
|
A-42-16 State v. Aharon Atwood and Shalom Mizrahi (078804) Was the seized evidence properly suppressed based on defendant’s challenge to police conduct occurring prior to the issuance of a warrant?
Watch the
|
|
A-41-16 State v. Shayna Zalcberg (078308) In this DWI matter, is defendant entitled to the suppression of blood evidence obtained without a warrant?
Watch the
|
|
A-40-16 State v. Habeeb Robinson (078900) What is the scope of the discovery that the State must produce prior to a pretrial detention hearing held under the Bail Reform Act (Act), N.J.S.A. 2A:162-15 to -26? [Note: This appeal has been accelerated by order of the Court and will be calendared for oral argument on a peremptory date to be scheduled by the Clerk’s Office. Should any entity wish to file a motion to participate as amicus curiae, the motion and any proposed brief must be served and filed on or before noon on 2/27/17. The State and the defendant may file answers to any such amicus motion, together with a proposed response brief to the amicus brief, on or before noon on 3/7/17. No further submissions shall be accepted unless requested by the Court.]
Watch the
|