Filters
- A-85-11 Opinionnjcourts.gov1 SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of …
- A-71-11 Opinionnjcourts.govSYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of …
- A-67-11 Opinionnjcourts.govSYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of …
- A-31-11 Opinionnjcourts.gov1 SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of …
- A-22-09 Opinionnjcourts.gov… a_22_09.pdf … A-22-09 Discover a variety of judicial programs, informational resources, and volunteer opportunities offered by the New Jersey Courts, including mediation, supervised visitation, and name …
- D-10-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov1 SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may …
- njcourts.gov1 SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may …
- njcourts.gov1 SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion …
- njcourts.gov!' ; \ i ICr l'T f)F' ~;r-:; StPSi'.Y STATE or NE:W J!i'HSEV t Plaintiff .. Respondent, v. tJ'•f'E:i,L/.'!T tit V lf-ll !C.ti ,\ .. e,o .. s2 T4 FILED APPfltATE DWJSION Defendant-Appellant. MAY ti - &~•~"''--. - Cillllll ► ,:.r.._' Argued May 2, 1984. …
- State v. Gilmore, 103 N.J. 508 (1986) (reprinted from Westlaw with permission of Thomson Reuters) Documentnjcourts.gov1150 N.J. 511 ATLANTIC REPORTER, 2d SERIES 103 N.J. 508 STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Curtis GILMORE, Jr., Defendant-Respondent. Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued Feb. 19, 1986. Decided July 16, 1986. Defendant was convicted in the …
- njcourts.govVoir Dire in New Jersey November 10 and 12, 2021 New Jersey Judiciary • Composition of Jury Pools • Pre-Reporting Process • Panel Size Calculations • Examination of Jurors During Voir Dire Overview Voir Dire in New Jersey New Jersey Judiciary • The …
- Voir Dire in New Jersey - Part 2. Attorney Conducted Voir Dire. (Public Defender Joseph E. Krakora) Documentnjcourts.govAttorney Conducted Voir Dire Presented by Joseph Krakora New Jersey Office of the Public Defender Defined What it is… • Panel voir dire • Opportunity for all parties to probe juror beliefs • Allowing attorneys to pose questions directly to jurors What it …
- njcourts.govJURY DIVERSITY New Jersey Judicial Conference on Jury Selection Nina Chernoff * CUNY School of Law peremptory strikes implicit bias explicit racism STAGES OF THE JURY SELECTION PROCESS VISIBLE INVISIBLE select source lists update addresses send summons …
- njcourts.govJury Participation Patterns in New Jersey Courts: Results of a Court Self-Study Mary R. Rose, Ph.D. Department of Sociology University of Texas I I ll UN IVI RS ll Y 0 1 TEXAS WHAT STARTS HERE CHANGES THE WORLD - Af AUSTIN - Questions of Focus • (1) How …
- Peremptory Challenges and the Right of Civic Engagement. Part 1. (Howard Berchtold. Will Snowden.) Documentnjcourts.govPeremptory Challenges & the Right of Civic Engagement November 10 and 12, 2021 New Jersey Judiciary Moderator: Howard Berchtold, Jr., Trial Court Administrator Panelists: William Snowden, The Juror Project Gregg L. Zeff, NAACP-New Jersey Presenters …
- njcourts.govOverview ● Racial Bias in Jury Selection ● Importance of Minority Representation on Juries ● Unequal Jury Representation and Its Consequences ● Call To Action • Racial bias in jury selection is illegal • Juries are supposed to represent communities and …
- njcourts.govSupporting Juror Impartiality November 10 and 12, 2021 New Jersey Judiciary As part of this Judicial Conference, the Court welcomes feedback on the use of the Juror Impartiality Video, as well as the new voir dire questions and enhancements to the model …
- Juror Records & Demographic Data Documentnjcourts.govJuror Records & Demographic Data November 10 and 12, 2021 New Jersey Judiciary • State v. Dangcil, 248 N.J. 114 (2021) • Voluntary Demographic Questions • Demographic Reports: New York and Connecticut Models • Timeframe for Implementation • Questions and …
- Anderson Peremptory Challenges Documentnjcourts.govPEREMPTORY CHALLENGES AT THE TURN OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY: DEVELOPMENT OF MODERN JURY SELECTION STRATEGIES AS SEEN IN PRACTITIONERS' TRIAL MANUALS April J. Anderson* Peremptory challenges based on race, national origin, religion, and class are …
- Nina W. Chernoff, No Records; Documentnjcourts.govA1_CHERNOFF (DO NOT DELETE) 7/4/2016 4:20 PM 1719 No Records, No Right: Discovery & the Fair Cross-Section Guarantee Nina W. Chernoff ABSTRACT: Every criminal defendant has the right to a jury selected from a “fair cross-section” of the community—a pool …