Filters
- njcourts.gov… motion judge, claiming our precedent – including Berlin – supports his position that no AOM was required to establish … under a multi-year contract, and who was subject to termination based only on cause as defined in the agreement, … the trial court's award of $260,026.88 in damages was supported by sufficient credible evidence and made in …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-5105-17T3 A-5107-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … child test set forth in N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1(a), justifying termination of defendants' parental rights. We affirm. Judge … relative. The resource parent has provided a stable and supportive home for the children. They have been attending …
- A-5105-17T3/A-5107-17T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-5105-17T3 A-5107-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … child test set forth in N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1(a), justifying termination of defendants' parental rights. We affirm. Judge … relative. The resource parent has provided a stable and supportive home for the children. They have been attending …
- CLAUDIA C. OSIS VS. TEOBALDO M. OSIS (FM-16-1242-18, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… affirm. I. The parties married in April 2012 and have two children together: a daughter, born in December 2011, and a … in alimony for three years. As to the potential for earlier termination of alimony payments, the MSA provided: [A]limony … MSA specified the parties agreed to deviate from the Child Support Guidelines, and neither party would pay the other …
- A-1999-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… affirm. I. The parties married in April 2012 and have two children together: a daughter, born in December 2011, and a … in alimony for three years. As to the potential for earlier termination of alimony payments, the MSA provided: [A]limony … MSA specified the parties agreed to deviate from the Child Support Guidelines, and neither party would pay the other …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2614-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … it first rejected the Division's permanency plan for termination of defendants' parental rights, the trial court … as Dr. Swanson. The Law Guardian called no witnesses but supported the Division's request for KLG. During Rispaldo's …
- A-2614-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2614-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … it first rejected the Division's permanency plan for termination of defendants' parental rights, the trial court … as Dr. Swanson. The Law Guardian called no witnesses but supported the Division's request for KLG. During Rispaldo's …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4064-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … A-4064-16T3 clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4456-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PRTOECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. …
- A-4064-16T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4064-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … A-4064-16T3 clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. …
- A-4456-16T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4456-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PRTOECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-1112-15T1 A-2869-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of parental rights. We derive the following from … to reunify the children with them. Wells testified she supported the termination of parental rights and adoption of …
- A-1112-15T1/A-2869-15T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-1112-15T1 A-2869-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of parental rights. We derive the following from … to reunify the children with them. Wells testified she supported the termination of parental rights and adoption of …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0981-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … breathing. Additionally, the worker noticed Y.S. did not support Flynn's head while he was nursing. Still, the … at which time it approved the Division's permanent plan of termination of parental rights, followed by adoption. The …
- A-0981-18T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0981-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … breathing. Additionally, the worker noticed Y.S. did not support Flynn's head while he was nursing. Still, the … at which time it approved the Division's permanent plan of termination of parental rights, followed by adoption. The …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ISAAC A. YOUNG (13-09-0524, SALEM COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Published Opinionsnjcourts.gov… defendant came into possession of documents the Division of Child Protection and Permanency (DCPP) had sent to the city police chief, regarding allegations of child abuse against Charles Washington, a city councilman … in prejudice. Defendant presented an expert report to support his contentions. After hearing oral argument, the …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-3076-20 A-3078-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Family Part judge found the Division had not demonstrated support for prong four of the best interests of the child … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and 22 A-3076-20 (4) …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-3076-20 A-3078-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Family Part judge found the Division had not demonstrated support for prong four of the best interests of the child … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and 22 A-3076-20 (4) …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4941-15T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … a guardianship complaint against defendants seeking the termination of their parental rights to their son. Judge … here. Judge Freid's findings and ultimate conclusions are supported by the competent evidence in the record. We …
- A-4941-15T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4941-15T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … a guardianship complaint against defendants seeking the termination of their parental rights to their son. Judge … here. Judge Freid's findings and ultimate conclusions are supported by the competent evidence in the record. We …