Filters
- A-4731-15T4/A-4732-15T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-4731-15T4 A-4732-15T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … We affirm because the findings of abuse or neglect are supported by substantial credible evidence. I. Cathy is the … the Family judge's factual findings and credibility determinations if they are supported by substantial credible …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3701-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the Robin's Nest agency, along with therapeutic and family support services. Defendants regularly attended visitation, … In May 2015, the Family Part approved a permanency plan of termination of parental rights followed by relative …
- A-3701-15T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3701-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the Robin's Nest agency, along with therapeutic and family support services. Defendants regularly attended visitation, … In May 2015, the Family Part approved a permanency plan of termination of parental rights followed by relative …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3544-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … rights. See N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The Law Guardian supports the termination. After reviewing the record and considering the …
- A-3544-18T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3544-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … rights. See N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The Law Guardian supports the termination. After reviewing the record and considering the …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1054-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and four of the best-interests test necessary for the termination of parental rights. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The … of Dr. Lee, and noted that the doctor's testimony was supported by the various psychological evaluations of Kelly …
- A-1054-18T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1054-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and four of the best-interests test necessary for the termination of parental rights. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The … of Dr. Lee, and noted that the doctor's testimony was supported by the various psychological evaluations of Kelly …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1720-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … prongs of the best-interests standard necessary for the termination of parental rights. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The … of Judge Axelrad's findings concerning the four prongs is supported by substantial, credible evidence. See N.J. Div. …
- A-1720-18T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1720-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … prongs of the best-interests standard necessary for the termination of parental rights. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The … of Judge Axelrad's findings concerning the four prongs is supported by substantial, credible evidence. See N.J. Div. …
- A-3227-18T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3227-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Protection and Permanency (Division) presented its case for termination of defendants' parental rights to Andrea over a … not present clear and convincing evidence A-3227-18T3 4 to support the trial judge's findings that termination of her …
- Appleby, Melanie D. - 2013-037 ACJC Casenjcourts.gov… had never been paying for the educational expenses of his children. However, it is admitted that the letter related to child support. 4. Respondent admits that she spoke about the Child … May 3, 2012 from Donohue wherein he requested 7. voluntary termination of his child support obligations ("Child Support …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1561-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Teresa of her right to an administrative review of that determination, but the record does not indicate she requested … Kirschner that he planned to get a steady job so he could support her and afford a home of his own to live with her on …
- A-1561-16T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1561-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Teresa of her right to an administrative review of that determination, but the record does not indicate she requested … Kirschner that he planned to get a steady job so he could support her and afford a home of his own to live with her on …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2158-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … of Child Protection and Permanency's (Division) parental termination plan because there was no permanent placement … v. Silva, 394 N.J. Super. 270, 275 (2007) (noting case law supports the "proposition that facts that can be reasonably …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0804-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the Division requested approval of a permanency plan of termination of parental rights followed by adoption. The … adoption of the child by the paternal aunt was clinically supported and in the child's best interests. Defendant …
- A-0804-17T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0804-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the Division requested approval of a permanency plan of termination of parental rights followed by adoption. The … adoption of the child by the paternal aunt was clinically supported and in the child's best interests. Defendant …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-4060-17T3 A-4061-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of their parental rights to Gina. Defendants … we are convinced that Judge Axelrad's findings are amply supported by the trial testimony. Defendants never managed …
- A-4060-17T3/A-4061-17T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-4060-17T3 A-4061-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of their parental rights to Gina. Defendants … we are convinced that Judge Axelrad's findings are amply supported by the trial testimony. Defendants never managed …
- DEANA CALLAHAM VS. EDWARD CALLAHAM (FM-02-1444-11, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… 8, 2018 Family Part order, denying his motion to reduce his support NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE … of the former marital residence (FMR), and $690 per week in child support for the parties' three minor children until … and imputed an income to him of $72,000. That determination cannot be disturbed absent a showing of changed …
- A-5990-17T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… 8, 2018 Family Part order, denying his motion to reduce his support NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE … of the former marital residence (FMR), and $690 per week in child support for the parties' three minor children until … and imputed an income to him of $72,000. That determination cannot be disturbed absent a showing of changed …