Filters
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4966-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … there on occasion . . . . He was in and out a lot." He supported Carol and the child by buying diapers and food. … 2018, the litigation was dismissed after a complaint for termination of parental rights was filed. 9 A-4966-17T2 …
- A-4966-17T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4966-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … there on occasion . . . . He was in and out a lot." He supported Carol and the child by buying diapers and food. … 2018, the litigation was dismissed after a complaint for termination of parental rights was filed. 9 A-4966-17T2 …
- njcourts.gov… a complaint in the Family Part seeking custody of Ellen and child support from Debbie and Ralph. The Family Part conducted a … The issue Debbie seeks to address - - the alleged termination of her parental rights - - was not expressly …
- A-2552-15T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… a complaint in the Family Part seeking custody of Ellen and child support from Debbie and Ralph. The Family Part conducted a … The issue Debbie seeks to address - - the alleged termination of her parental rights - - was not expressly …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0176-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … WAS "ESTABLISHED" PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 9:6-8-21(c) IS NOT SUPPORTED BY ADMITTED EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY WHICH DID NOT … to participate.6 Thus, the Division again requested termination of the litigation with the restrictions on …
- A-0176-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0176-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … WAS "ESTABLISHED" PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 9:6-8-21(c) IS NOT SUPPORTED BY ADMITTED EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY WHICH DID NOT … to participate.6 Thus, the Division again requested termination of the litigation with the restrictions on …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-4052-18 A-4449-18 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the FN action after approval of the Division's plan for termination of parental rights followed by adoption and … as well as hearsay and inadmissible expert opinion, to support its findings in the present FN action and award …
- A-4052-18/A-4449-18 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-4052-18 A-4449-18 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the FN action after approval of the Division's plan for termination of parental rights followed by adoption and … as well as hearsay and inadmissible expert opinion, to support its findings in the present FN action and award …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-1625-16T4 A-1683-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and her mother. Veronica stated Victor did not pay child support and did not see the children. She indicated he was … September 23, 2015, which approved the Division's plan of termination of parental rights followed by adoption. The …
- A-1625-16T4/A-1683-16T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-1625-16T4 A-1683-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and her mother. Veronica stated Victor did not pay child support and did not see the children. She indicated he was … September 23, 2015, which approved the Division's plan of termination of parental rights followed by adoption. The …
- njcourts.gov… and indicted with third-degree endangering the welfare of a child under N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4(a)(1). Presently before the … defendant's claim of overzealous prosecution is a “bald, unsupported assertion”; (4) defendant's 3 reliance on … under N.J.S.A. 9 reversed and remanded a Law Division determination that a shoplifting prosecution should be subject …
- DONNA BOSKO VS. MICHAEL ROMANELLI (FM-18-0167-18, SOMERSET COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… parties were married in 1992. Their marriage produced two children, born in 1997 and 2000. A final judgment of … This caused the trial court to adjust the pendente lite support Michael was paying plaintiff Donna Bosko to reflect … also required Michael to advise Donna "immediately upon the termination of his temporary disability benefits" and …
- A-3417-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… parties were married in 1992. Their marriage produced two children, born in 1997 and 2000. A final judgment of … This caused the trial court to adjust the pendente lite support Michael was paying plaintiff Donna Bosko to reflect … also required Michael to advise Donna "immediately upon the termination of his temporary disability benefits" and …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2409-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … The order approved the Division's plan for the children for termination of defendant's parental rights and adoption. In … THERE WAS INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE UNDER THE SECOND PRONG TO SUPPORT THE TRIAL COURT'S CONCLUSION THAT THE DIVISION HAD …
- A-2409-17T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2409-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … The order approved the Division's plan for the children for termination of defendant's parental rights and adoption. In … THERE WAS INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE UNDER THE SECOND PRONG TO SUPPORT THE TRIAL COURT'S CONCLUSION THAT THE DIVISION HAD …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2058-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … not to be reunified with her, that the evidence did not support her not being reunified with her child, that the … 30:4C-12. At the end of the litigation, a dispositional determination is required to address the child's placement …
- A-2058-18T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2058-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … not to be reunified with her, that the evidence did not support her not being reunified with her child, that the … 30:4C-12. At the end of the litigation, a dispositional determination is required to address the child's placement …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-1831-22 A-1832-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANANCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 30:4C-15.1(A). The Law Guardian representing the children supports defendants' contention that the Division failed to … who was assigned to the case when the Division recommended termination of parental rights and the case moved to the …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-1831-22 A-1832-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANANCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 30:4C-15.1(A). The Law Guardian representing the children supports defendants' contention that the Division failed to … who was assigned to the case when the Division recommended termination of parental rights and the case moved to the …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-3960-16T1 A-3961-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Youth & Family Servs. v. A.W., 103 N.J. 591 (1986), and is supported by the record. F.M., 211 N.J. at 448-49. We affirm … the record amply supports Judge Fall's conclusion that termination is in the best interests of Elizabeth and Wyatt. …