-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-0217-23 A-0607-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to the Family Court's factual findings, as long as they are supported by substantial credible evidence in the record. … realm of [s]trict [l]iability." They contend the court's determination that L.M. missing one hundred days of school was …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3821-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the judge's twenty-three-page fact-finding decision was supported by sufficient credible evidence and is consistent … 17, 32 (2011) (quoting N.J.S.A. 9:6-8.46(b)). In making a determination of abuse and neglect, the trial court should …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3821-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the judge's twenty-three-page fact-finding decision was supported by sufficient credible evidence and is consistent … 17, 32 (2011) (quoting N.J.S.A. 9:6-8.46(b)). In making a determination of abuse and neglect, the trial court should …
njcourts.gov
… principles, we affirm. I. On June 7, 2013, the Division of Child Protection and Permanency (DCPP) investigated the home … an evidentiary hearing, we review its legal and factual determinations de novo. State v. Aburoumi, 464 N.J. Super. … a PCR petition only if they establish a prima facie case in support of PCR, material issues of disputed fact cannot be …
-
njcourts.gov
… principles, we affirm. I. On June 7, 2013, the Division of Child Protection and Permanency (DCPP) investigated the home … an evidentiary hearing, we review its legal and factual determinations de novo. State v. Aburoumi, 464 N.J. Super. … a PCR petition only if they establish a prima facie case in support of PCR, material issues of disputed fact cannot be …
njcourts.gov
… in 2008 with third-degree endangering the welfare of a child (non-parent), contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:24- 4(a). The … rights and admitted to police that he had touched the child in an inappropriate manner. He faced a five-year … the evidence presented at the PCR evidentiary hearing supports the PCR judge's finding that "defendant was aware …
-
njcourts.gov
… in 2008 with third-degree endangering the welfare of a child (non-parent), contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:24- 4(a). The … rights and admitted to police that he had touched the child in an inappropriate manner. He faced a five-year … the evidence presented at the PCR evidentiary hearing supports the PCR judge's finding that "defendant was aware …
njcourts.gov
… marriage, defendant stayed home, raising the couple's three children, born in 2003, 2005, and 2008. Upon separating, … children and plaintiff moved to a townhouse. There was no support agreement during the time period the parties lived … the MSA stated "either party [could] file for a determination by the [c]ourt or participate in binding …
-
njcourts.gov
… marriage, defendant stayed home, raising the couple's three children, born in 2003, 2005, and 2008. Upon separating, … children and plaintiff moved to a townhouse. There was no support agreement during the time period the parties lived … the MSA stated "either party [could] file for a determination by the [c]ourt or participate in binding …
Standard Grand Jury Charge
Administrative Directives
njcourts.gov › attorneys › administrative directives
… USE OF WARRANTS AND INCARCERATION IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT ORDERS DATE: AUGUST 29, 2006 This Directive, … 1:10-3 hearings. At a R. 1:10-3 hearing, there must be a determination of the obligor’s non-compliance with the child …
-
#18-06
Administrative Directives
njcourts.gov
… USE OF WARRANTS AND INCARCERATION IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT ORDERS DATE: AUGUST 29, 2006 This Directive, … 1:10-3 hearings. At a R. 1:10-3 hearing, there must be a determination of the obligor’s non-compliance with the child …
njcourts.gov
… on the brief). 1 To protect the identities of the parties' children, we refer to the parties by their initials and to … argues that the order for joint legal custody is not supported by the judge's findings. We agree. Accordingly, we … comments to the children about plaintiff or risk termination of joint legal custody. The judge also appointed …
-
njcourts.gov
… on the brief). 1 To protect the identities of the parties' children, we refer to the parties by their initials and to … argues that the order for joint legal custody is not supported by the judge's findings. We agree. Accordingly, we … comments to the children about plaintiff or risk termination of joint legal custody. The judge also appointed …
njcourts.gov
… parties were married in May 1988 and thereafter adopted a child, who we refer to as A.C. Plaintiff filed a complaint … of $10,000 per month; required defendant to pay child support of $500 per month, provide health insurance 3 … We are convinced the record supports the court's determination that dissipation did not occur until after 27 …
-
njcourts.gov
… parties were married in May 1988 and thereafter adopted a child, who we refer to as A.C. Plaintiff filed a complaint … of $10,000 per month; required defendant to pay child support of $500 per month, provide health insurance 3 … We are convinced the record supports the court's determination that dissipation did not occur until after 27 …
njcourts.gov
… were married in 2013 and divorced in 2021. They have three children. As set forth in the FJOD, plaintiff is the parent … required defendant to pay plaintiff $234 per week in child support and $750 per month in limited duration alimony. … to court for an explanation of his noncompliance and a determination of his future ability to comply. Therefore, we …
-
njcourts.gov
… were married in 2013 and divorced in 2021. They have three children. As set forth in the FJOD, plaintiff is the parent … required defendant to pay plaintiff $234 per week in child support and $750 per month in limited duration alimony. … to court for an explanation of his noncompliance and a determination of his future ability to comply. Therefore, we …
njcourts.gov
… the parties agreed to $400 because plaintiff did not seek child support. The PSA contained the following relevant provision: … Family Part judges have broad discretion to make alimony determinations. Martindell v. Martindell, 21 N.J. 341, 355 …
-
njcourts.gov
… the parties agreed to $400 because plaintiff did not seek child support. The PSA contained the following relevant provision: … Family Part judges have broad discretion to make alimony determinations. Martindell v. Martindell, 21 N.J. 341, 355 …
njcourts.gov
… with” CSL, and J.K. declined the opportunity to further support his application by providing the information sought … with Rule 2:5-4(a) -- readily concludes that that determination was not arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable. … and Poland, where he was born and lived until moving as a child to New Jersey. In 2015, he petitioned the New Jersey …