
Filters
- A-1831-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… must accept when "adequate, substantial, credible evidence" supports them. Seidman v. Clifton Sav. Bank, S.L.A., 205 … Based on those omissions, the court's evidentiary determination does not command our deference. See E & H Steel … judge who initially decided this matter made credibility determinations, we are constrained to direct that the remand …
- A-2126-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… unless [it is] convinced that they are so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant … 574 (1985) (noting the trial court's "major role is the determination of fact"); Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors … (1974). We only review de novo the trial court's legal determinations. 30 River Court E. Urban Renewal Co. v. …
- A-2511-19T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Ass'n, 132 N.J. 330, 334 (1993)). "The trial court's determination . . . warrants substantial deference, and should … abuse of discretion. The court's factual findings are fully supported by the record, and its legal conclusions are …
- A-1831-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… to withdraw a plea where the defendant proffers evidence in support of the Slater factors. Additionally, the State …
- A-0416-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… v. Westover, 241 N.J. 289, 301 (2020). The record supports the judge's finding that plaintiff did not …
- A-0083-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… on her attendance, and her belief to the contrary was unsupported. Because petitioner was not within the course of … and legal conclusions "unless they are 'manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with competent, relevant[,] and … a non- exclusive list of factors relevant to the determination: [1] whether the employer directly solicits the …
- A-3204-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… those funds in trust and disperse them evenly to the three children after the mother died. However, Basem used 1 For … contexts, we will not set aside the judge's 6 A-3204-19 determination unless it is shown to be arbitrary or capricious … should be remanded due to the first judge's failure to support his March 29, 2017 order with a statement of reasons …
- A-1453-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… omitted). Thus, we will reverse the trial court's determination of whether to allow a defendant to withdraw a … in granting defendant's motion as her decision is fully supported by her factual findings. This is a close call …
- A-3625-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… was also a prospective customer. Specifically, and in support of this "theory," the petitioner stated that "any" …
- A-2694-19/A-2699-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… that allegation has been addressed ad nauseam. The record supports Judge Pugliese's factual findings. In 2015, Judge …
- A-1987-17T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… even assuming plaintiff mailed the notice of motion and supporting papers on July 20, 2017, defendants were not …
- A-2471-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… "unless we are convinced that they are so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant … considered the proffered evidence, and made credibility determinations. The court noted the issuance of two TROs, … under N.J.S.A. 2C:58-3(c). The forfeiture ruling was supported by sufficient credible evidence. Affirmed. … …
- A-2088-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… parents' arguments, but we add the following comments. "[D]eterminations about the applicability of OPRA and its … such requests. The parents cite no legal authority to support their position, acknowledging they raise a question …
- A-2143-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… as administrator at the time the complaint was filed. For support, defendant relies upon the first clause of the …
- A-2549-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Rodriquez, 593 N.E.2d 268 (N.Y. 1992) should apply here in support of the principle that a separate "confirmatory … III. We deferentially review a trial court's sentencing determination and do not substitute our judgment for that of …
- A-1339-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… We deferentially review a trial court's sentencing determination and do not substitute our judgment for that of … criminal history. These details in the record amply supported his findings on the aggravating and mitigating …
- A-2414-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… 22, 38 (2014); see also DepoLink Ct. Reporting & Litig. Support Servs. v. Rochman, 430 N.J. Super. 325, 333 5 …
- A-3423-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… the Judge Dominguez's findings of fact given they were supported by sufficient credible evidence in the record and …
- A-3678-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… hearing and the judge articulated his reasons 10 A-3678-19 supporting his decision in each instance, we are satisfied …
- A-5304-18 Opinionnjcourts.gov… of evidence." The judge concluded that these claims were unsupported, rendering them "bald assertions." Finally, the … the supposed contradictions asserted by defendant are not supported in the record. Defendant has failed to show …