njcourts.gov
… Bd., 414 N.J. Super. 8 A-0619-22 563 (App. Div. 2010) to support his contentions the Board purposely delayed the … . . . to be compelling. The trial court affirmed the determination of the Board, finding it "acted appropriately … REVIEW OF BOTH THE PLANNING BOARD'S AND THE TRIAL COURT'S DETERMINATIONS OF LAW. Having reviewed these contentions and …
njcourts.gov
… findings of fact unless the "findings are 'manifestly unsupported' 4 Plaintiff also contends "[n]o witness … bank statement, the record contains sufficient evidence to support the judge's findings. A comparison of the copies of … to prove or disprove any fact of consequence to the determination of the action." See also Rodriguez v. Wal- Mart …
njcourts.gov
… Although the judge granted the State's motion, he made no determination on whether defendant would be sentenced in the … and mitigating factors. The judge stressed the determination that defendant "[met] the statutory … and the existence of credible evidence in the record to support the court's finding of aggravating and mitigating …
njcourts.gov
… Our review on appeal is limited to the trial court's determination that the arbitration provision in the Service … apply a de novo standard when reviewing a trial court's determination of the enforceability of a contract. Goffe v. … clause. Defendants also fail to offer any specific facts to support the theory that they are intended third-party …
njcourts.gov
… we will 'not engage in a strained construction to support the imposition of liability or write a better policy …
njcourts.gov
… to alter concurrent findings of facts and credibility determinations made by two lower courts absent a very obvious … Judge Romanyshyn's factual and credibility findings were supported by "sufficient credible evidence present in the …
njcourts.gov
… trial court also concluded that "there is no case law which supports a finding that the McCoy 8 A-1060-21 holding was to …
njcourts.gov
… capricious, or unreasonable, or that it lacks fair support in the record." In re Herrmann, 192 N.J 19, 27-28 … Our "[i]ntervention is warranted when the action is unsupported or unaccompanied by reasonable explanation." Ibid. …
njcourts.gov
… duty to plaintiff, the court concluded plaintiff could not support its claims, requiring dismissal of the complaint. 9 …
njcourts.gov
… Marc J. Gross argued the cause for appellants (Fox Rothschild LLP, attorneys; Marc J. Gross and Jordan B. Kaplan, on … The court further found the factual allegations that support the claims for malicious use and abuse of process …
njcourts.gov
… based on the Dispute Resolution clause of the Agreement. In support of her motion, Vella submitted a certification in … 244 N.J. 30, 46 (2020) (reviewing de novo trial court's determination that the plaintiff's claims were subject to …
njcourts.gov
… applied as a March payment. Defendants' contentions are unsupported. The record demonstrates defendants received … A-0418-23 February payment." We concur with the judge's determination that there was no "misapplication of th[e] … premodification payment. Again, the record does not support defendants' contention that the correct judgment …
njcourts.gov
… In 1997 Bonnie married Joseph Kremer. The couple had three children, who were born between 2003 and 2005. The record … 22 order, arguing the trial court erred by reaching an unsupported legal conclusion that decedent's will was revoked, … discern no abuse of discretion in the Chancery Division's determination that defendant failed to overcome the …
njcourts.gov
… for both economic and noneconomic injuries." Second, it supports the statutory "policy of cost containment by … time." Ibid. A car owner's intent is not relevant to this determination. Id. at 28 (holding a plaintiff's stated intent … at issue." Id. at 602. We are unconvinced by plaintiff's unsupported assertion "he would have a valid New Jersey policy …
njcourts.gov
… Court considers petitioner James Meyers’ challenge to the determination of the State Health Benefits Commission (SHBC) … 2011. The Court also agrees with the Appellate Division’s determination that it was not necessary to reach the issue of … No explicit or implicit reference in N.J.S.A. 53:5A-6.1 supports that interpretation. Chapter 87 did not expand the …
njcourts.gov
… "Nonetheless, the factual findings underlying the waiver determination are entitled to deference and are subject to … did. That's clear as day. An analysis of the Cole factors supports the trial court's order finding defendant waived …
njcourts.gov
… Bd. of Tp. of Union, 352 N.J. Super. 544 (App. Div. 2002) supports their argument that the ex parte communications …
njcourts.gov
… filed a petition for PCR. In a certification submitted in support of his petition, defendant asserted that: (1) he was … asserted before the PCR court. We affirm the PCR court's determinations substantially for the reasons set forth in its …
njcourts.gov
… 1, following R. 3:28 at 1289 (2018).2 Thus, a PTI determination requires an "individualized assessment of the … his steady employment as reasons for admission into PTI. In support of factor five, defendant explained, "[he] is a …
njcourts.gov
… by Locurto, 157 N.J. at 470-71, we defer to the factual determination of the trial court that Stevens asked defendant … view. Accordingly, we discern no error in the judge's determination. We reject defendant's argument that the State … that under the circumstances of this case, the record supports the conclusion here. Defendant's other arguments …