njcourts.gov
… subsequently filed a motion for summary judgment. In support of the motion, plaintiff presented a statement of … the light most favorable to plaintiff, there was evidence supporting plaintiff's claim defendants signed the … the issue depended upon a weighing of the evidence and a determination of the credibility of the parties' respective …
njcourts.gov
… household member Someone with whom the victim has had a child or is expecting a child Someone whom the victim is dating or has dated … Who …
DePuy ASR Hip Implant
Multi County Litigation
njcourts.gov
". EMILY D. VAlL"ROBERTO BENITES JQNI\~J. BART1 ,2.3 CHERYL E. CONNORS DAVID T. WlLENTZ (1919-1988) HESSER G. McBRIDE, JR. G. GEORGE GOLllMAN(1922-1959) ERIC JOHN MARCY CHAD B. SIMON' ."ROBERT c. KAUTZ 2,_ YVONNE MARCUSE WARRENW. WlLENTZ (1949-2010) VIOlA …
njcourts.gov
… by defendant Go Ahead and Jump 3, LLC. Tongol told the children's parents that she had reserved time for a group of … "De novo review applies when appellate courts review determinations about the enforceability of contracts, … (Second) of Agency § 267 (Am. Law Inst. 1958), for support in discussing the doctrine of apparent authority. …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0284-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to C.P.V., Jr. (the child). She challenges only whether termination will not do more harm than good. We affirm. I. … rights was in the best interests of the child and was supported by each prong of the four-prong test outlined in …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0284-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to C.P.V., Jr. (the child). She challenges only whether termination will not do more harm than good. We affirm. I. … rights was in the best interests of the child and was supported by each prong of the four-prong test outlined in …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5526-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the trial court approved the Division's permanency plan of termination of L.R.P.'s parental rights, followed by … and of J.A.T.-P. and the resource parent. Dr. Katz supported the Division's permanency plan for the termination …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5526-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the trial court approved the Division's permanency plan of termination of L.R.P.'s parental rights, followed by … and of J.A.T.-P. and the resource parent. Dr. Katz supported the Division's permanency plan for the termination …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-3266-21 A-3268-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the Division proved by clear and convincing evidence termination of Kara's parental rights to Nancy and Kate, and … The judge's written opinion also included detailed findings supporting his decision terminating Carl's parental rights …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-3266-21 A-3268-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the Division proved by clear and convincing evidence termination of Kara's parental rights to Nancy and Kate, and … The judge's written opinion also included detailed findings supporting his decision terminating Carl's parental rights …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-1773-18T1 A-1774-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … The Law Guardian did not present any evidence and supported the Division's application for guardianship. … with the well-settled legal framework regarding the termination of parental rights. Parents have a …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-1773-18T1 A-1774-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … The Law Guardian did not present any evidence and supported the Division's application for guardianship. … with the well-settled legal framework regarding the termination of parental rights. Parents have a …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-4914-18T2 A-4968-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … [JUDGE] ALSO FAILED TO PROPERLY CONSIDER ALTERNATIVES TO TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS. A. [The Division] Failed To … Super. 81, 87 (App. Div. 2006). The factual findings that support such a judgment "should not be disturbed unless …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-4914-18T2 A-4968-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … [JUDGE] ALSO FAILED TO PROPERLY CONSIDER ALTERNATIVES TO TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS. A. [The Division] Failed To … Super. 81, 87 (App. Div. 2006). The factual findings that support such a judgment "should not be disturbed unless …
njcourts.gov
… the circumstances presented, the LAD protects a female child victim from sexual harassment stemming from child sex … any new evidence. She continued to adhere to her original determination for the same reasons expressed in her May 12, … her sex." Ibid. The Court also observed harassing conduct supporting a sexual harassment claim "need not be sexual in …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-5272-17T2 A-5275-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … permanency plan, which had changed from reunification to termination of parental rights and adoption. The court noted … courts must defer to a trial judge's findings of fact if supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence in …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-5272-17T2 A-5275-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … permanency plan, which had changed from reunification to termination of parental rights and adoption. The court noted … courts must defer to a trial judge's findings of fact if supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence in …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-1643-15T4 A-1644-15T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … L. 2012, c. 16, effective June 29, 2012. 4 A-1643-15T4 termination of parental rights followed by foster home … their parental rights. They maintain the record does not support the judge's findings that the Division established …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-1643-15T4 A-1644-15T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … L. 2012, c. 16, effective June 29, 2012. 4 A-1643-15T4 termination of parental rights followed by foster home … their parental rights. They maintain the record does not support the judge's findings that the Division established …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3820-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANANCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … CIRCUMSTANCES AND THE COURT DID NOT EXPLORE ALTERNATIVES TO TERMINATION. A. DCPP'S CARELESS APPROACH, RATHER THAN … findings by a Family Part judge are "binding on appeal when supported by adequate, substantial, and 9 A-3820-19 credible …