
Filters
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-4892-16T4 A-4893-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … He also conceded he and Teresa were homeless and lacked a support system. Robert claimed he had not spoken to Pamela … changed Teresa's permanency goal from reunification to termination of parental rights followed by adoption, and …
- A-4892-16T4/A-4893-16T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-4892-16T4 A-4893-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … He also conceded he and Teresa were homeless and lacked a support system. Robert claimed he had not spoken to Pamela … changed Teresa's permanency goal from reunification to termination of parental rights followed by adoption, and …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4452-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … begin our discussion with the legal framework regarding the termination of parental rights. Parents have a … harm to them. The father did not provide paternal care or support for the children. Indeed, even though he was allowed …
- A-4452-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4452-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … begin our discussion with the legal framework regarding the termination of parental rights. Parents have a … harm to them. The father did not provide paternal care or support for the children. Indeed, even though he was allowed …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4777-15T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … were terminated in other proceedings. We affirmed those terminations. See N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v. … trial in 2012 involved Jill, Gary and Carrie. The record supported the trial court's finding that "T.M.T. has chronic …
- A-4777-15T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4777-15T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … were terminated in other proceedings. We affirmed those terminations. See N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v. … trial in 2012 involved Jill, Gary and Carrie. The record supported the trial court's finding that "T.M.T. has chronic …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-0446-17T4 A-0449-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Law Guardian, that there is substantial credible evidence supporting the court's determination that termination of defendants' parental rights …
- A-0446-17T4/A-0449-17T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-0446-17T4 A-0449-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Law Guardian, that there is substantial credible evidence supporting the court's determination that termination of defendants' parental rights …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3513-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to A.S. and failed to consider reasonable alternatives to termination. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3513-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to A.S. and failed to consider reasonable alternatives to termination. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2487-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Prong Three. (4) The Trial Court Erred When It Found That Termination Of Parental Rights Was In The Child's Best … & Fam. Servs. v. F.M., 211 N.J. 420, 451 (2012). Evidence supporting the first prong may also support the second prong …
- A-2487-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2487-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Prong Three. (4) The Trial Court Erred When It Found That Termination Of Parental Rights Was In The Child's Best … & Fam. Servs. v. F.M., 211 N.J. 420, 451 (2012). Evidence supporting the first prong may also support the second prong …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-1321-21 A-1588-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Appellant/ … 4 A-1321-21 Division asked N.D. to identify any relative supports and referred her for another psychiatric screening, … and convincing evidence that prong one and prong two of the termination statute, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1, were met as J.D.'s …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-1321-21 A-1588-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Appellant/ … 4 A-1321-21 Division asked N.D. to identify any relative supports and referred her for another psychiatric screening, … and convincing evidence that prong one and prong two of the termination statute, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1, were met as J.D.'s …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2912-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … its position again, which the court approved, seeking termination of parental rights followed by adoption. During … of fact are not disturbed unless they are "so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant …
- A-2912-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2912-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … its position again, which the court approved, seeking termination of parental rights followed by adoption. During … of fact are not disturbed unless they are "so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant …
- A-39-15 Opinionnjcourts.gov… have been summarized.) In the Matter of the Adoption of a Child by J.E.V. and D.G.V. (A-39-15) (076767) Argued April … of first impression: whether an indigent parent who faces termination of her parental rights in a contested private … to have counsel assigned without cost.”). Drawing support from Rodriguez, and relying on due process grounds, …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3365-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the father contends that the judge erred in concluding that termination of his parental rights was in the best interests … Super. 81, 87 (App. Div. 2006). The factual findings that support such a judgment "should not be disturbed unless …
- A-3365-18T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3365-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the father contends that the judge erred in concluding that termination of his parental rights was in the best interests … Super. 81, 87 (App. Div. 2006). The factual findings that support such a judgment "should not be disturbed unless …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-2015-17T1 A-2016-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … each defendant claims that the judge's conclusions were not supported by clear and convincing evidence. We have … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of …