Filters
- A-5026-18T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5026-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … THE MOTHER'S PARENTAL RIGHTS BECAUSE ALTERNATIVES TO TERMINATION AND 3 A-5026-18T25026-18T2 ADOPTION WERE NOT … Super. 81, 87 (App. Div. 2006). The factual findings that support such a judgment "should not be disturbed unless …
- A-2593-17T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-2593-17T4 IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF A CHILD BY C.J. _______________________ Submitted March 18, … time every other weekend.2 And although early child support orders are not included, we deduce from the other … opinion, review of the [Division] records does not support termination of [Gloria's] parental rights to her daughter, …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3098-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … from her care. Defendant appeals from the subsequent termination of her parental rights as to her two youngest 3 … create "challenges" in placing him and he would "need a supportive family who's committed to meeting his needs." …
- A-3098-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3098-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … from her care. Defendant appeals from the subsequent termination of her parental rights as to her two youngest 3 … create "challenges" in placing him and he would "need a supportive family who's committed to meeting his needs." …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1596-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … indicates defendant C.C. defaulted and did not oppose the termination of his parental rights because his biological … by clear and convincing evidence. The law guardian supported termination before the trial court and, on appeal, …
- A-1596-16T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1596-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … indicates defendant C.C. defaulted and did not oppose the termination of his parental rights because his biological … by clear and convincing evidence. The law guardian supported termination before the trial court and, on appeal, …
- njcourts.gov… (Count Two); and second-degree endangering the welfare of a child in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4a (Count Three). The … physician pursuant to N.J.R.E. 803(c)(4). The two-year-old child did not make any statements to the physician. The … of the relationship here, that of mother and daughter, supports the reliability of the statements. A parent 11 …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3136-15T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … custody of Robert, it located defendant through child support records. At the time, defendant lived in a halfway … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of …
- A-3136-15T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3136-15T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … custody of Robert, it located defendant through child support records. At the time, defendant lived in a halfway … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-2728-20 A-2729-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … we dismiss J.T.'s appeal as moot.2 Because the record supports the trial court's decision with respect to C.J., we … Division had established the statutory elements justifying termination of J.T.'s and C.J.'s parental rights. The court …
- A-2728-20/A-2729-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-2728-20 A-2729-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … we dismiss J.T.'s appeal as moot.2 Because the record supports the trial court's decision with respect to C.J., we … Division had established the statutory elements justifying termination of J.T.'s and C.J.'s parental rights. The court …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4266-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … (Division) proved by clear and convincing evidence that termination of defendant's parental rights is in June's best … "had no import . . . [or] significance" to the findings supporting the guardianship judgment because his …
- A-4266-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4266-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … (Division) proved by clear and convincing evidence that termination of defendant's parental rights is in June's best … "had no import . . . [or] significance" to the findings supporting the guardianship judgment because his …
- DAWN O'CONNELL VS. GERARD O'CONNELL (FM-14-1541-13, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… series of post-judgment orders regarding the suspension and termination of alimony due from her ex-husband, defendant … were married in 1994 and divorced in 2014. Their two children were sixteen and eighteen when the divorce judgment … further responsible to pay $200 a month in child support, the parties having agreed to a downward …
- A-1689-17T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… series of post-judgment orders regarding the suspension and termination of alimony due from her ex-husband, defendant … were married in 1994 and divorced in 2014. Their two children were sixteen and eighteen when the divorce judgment … further responsible to pay $200 a month in child support, the parties having agreed to a downward …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-4072-16T3 A-4073-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … of the judge's findings could have been more detailed and supported with specific references to the facts on which the … D.W. v. R.W., 212 N.J. 232, 245 (2012). When considering termination of parental rights, the court focuses on the …
- A-4072-16T3/A-4073-16T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-4072-16T3 A-4073-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … of the judge's findings could have been more detailed and supported with specific references to the facts on which the … D.W. v. R.W., 212 N.J. 232, 245 (2012). When considering termination of parental rights, the court focuses on the …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3241-16T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … arguments, including that the court should not order a termination of her parental rights absent proof beyond 11 … parent. E.W. did not call witnesses. B.W.'s law guardian supported termination of E.W.'s parental rights. Dr. Wells …
- A-3241-16T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3241-16T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … arguments, including that the court should not order a termination of her parental rights absent proof beyond 11 … parent. E.W. did not call witnesses. B.W.'s law guardian supported termination of E.W.'s parental rights. Dr. Wells …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-4892-16T4 A-4893-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … He also conceded he and Teresa were homeless and lacked a support system. Robert claimed he had not spoken to Pamela … changed Teresa's permanency goal from reunification to termination of parental rights followed by adoption, and …