njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2912-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … its position again, which the court approved, seeking termination of parental rights followed by adoption. During … of fact are not disturbed unless they are "so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2912-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … its position again, which the court approved, seeking termination of parental rights followed by adoption. During … of fact are not disturbed unless they are "so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0545-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Katz and Velarde. The Law Guardian called no witnesses but supported the Division's plan for termination of parental rights, followed by adoption. At the …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0545-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Katz and Velarde. The Law Guardian called no witnesses but supported the Division's plan for termination of parental rights, followed by adoption. At the …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3365-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the father contends that the judge erred in concluding that termination of his parental rights was in the best interests … Super. 81, 87 (App. Div. 2006). The factual findings that support such a judgment "should not be disturbed unless …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3365-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the father contends that the judge erred in concluding that termination of his parental rights was in the best interests … Super. 81, 87 (App. Div. 2006). The factual findings that support such a judgment "should not be disturbed unless …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2191-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANANCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the four prongs of the best interests test warranting termination of her parental rights under N.J.S.A. … applied the law, and substantial credible evidence supports its findings. I. We summarize the pertinent facts …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2191-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANANCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the four prongs of the best interests test warranting termination of her parental rights under N.J.S.A. … applied the law, and substantial credible evidence supports its findings. I. We summarize the pertinent facts …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4701-16T1 NEW JERSEY OF DIVISON OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … brief). PER CURIAM Defendant, W.I.L (Wendy), appeals the termination of her parental rights to her youngest two … cross appeal and to realign her as a respondent as she now supports the trial court's termination of Wendy's parental …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4701-16T1 NEW JERSEY OF DIVISON OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … brief). PER CURIAM Defendant, W.I.L (Wendy), appeals the termination of her parental rights to her youngest two … cross appeal and to realign her as a respondent as she now supports the trial court's termination of Wendy's parental …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1594-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. 1 We …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1594-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. 1 We …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-5048-17T4 A-5049-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and remand to the trial court to consider alternatives to termination because the court did not allow Julissa to … 596, 605 (2007). We must determine whether the decision is supported by substantial and credible evidence. N.J. Div. of …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-5048-17T4 A-5049-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and remand to the trial court to consider alternatives to termination because the court did not allow Julissa to … 596, 605 (2007). We must determine whether the decision is supported by substantial and credible evidence. N.J. Div. of …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-2015-17T1 A-2016-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … each defendant claims that the judge's conclusions were not supported by clear and convincing evidence. We have … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-2015-17T1 A-2016-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … each defendant claims that the judge's conclusions were not supported by clear and convincing evidence. We have … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3688-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … governing legal principles, we affirm the trial court's determination that the Division of Child Protection and … visitation. Finally, the court found that prong four also supported termination, concluding that termination would not …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3688-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … governing legal principles, we affirm the trial court's determination that the Division of Child Protection and … visitation. Finally, the court found that prong four also supported termination, concluding that termination would not …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1590-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supported termination before the trial court and, on appeal, joins the …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1590-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supported termination before the trial court and, on appeal, joins the …