njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0587-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … rights of the biological father, J.J. (Father). The termination of his rights is not at issue in this appeal. 3 … (2002). Our task is to determine whether the decision "is supported by '"substantial and credible evidence" on the …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0587-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … rights of the biological father, J.J. (Father). The termination of his rights is not at issue in this appeal. 3 … (2002). Our task is to determine whether the decision "is supported by '"substantial and credible evidence" on the …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1687-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … lifetime. Defendant has not provided [K.M.K.] with child support. 8. Defendant is remarkably inconsistent in his … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1687-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … lifetime. Defendant has not provided [K.M.K.] with child support. 8. Defendant is remarkably inconsistent in his … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4514-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 2 S.D. (Sam), George's father, did not appeal the termination of his parental rights. 3 A-4514-19 I. Defendant … to parent at a minimal level of capacity without Sam. He supported reunification with defendant even if that took …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4514-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 2 S.D. (Sam), George's father, did not appeal the termination of his parental rights. 3 A-4514-19 I. Defendant … to parent at a minimal level of capacity without Sam. He supported reunification with defendant even if that took …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1299-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and Law Guardian there is substantial credible evidence supporting the court's determination that termination of Sarah's parental rights is …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1299-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and Law Guardian there is substantial credible evidence supporting the court's determination that termination of Sarah's parental rights is …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5167-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … assistance, preferring to rely on her boyfriend J.W. to support her, even though J.W. would regularly kick J.A.R. … those efforts. With respect to prong four, the judge found termination would not do more harm than good. Dr. Lee found …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5167-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … assistance, preferring to rely on her boyfriend J.W. to support her, even though J.W. would regularly kick J.A.R. … those efforts. With respect to prong four, the judge found termination would not do more harm than good. Dr. Lee found …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3446-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination of parental rights. We affirm, substantially for …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3446-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination of parental rights. We affirm, substantially for …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-1820-18T2 A-1821-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … emphasizing the Division failed to consider alternatives to termination. John's law guardian joins the Division in … the evidence in favor of the guardianship petition supports the termination of defendants' parental rights. See …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-1820-18T2 A-1821-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … emphasizing the Division failed to consider alternatives to termination. John's law guardian joins the Division in … the evidence in favor of the guardianship petition supports the termination of defendants' parental rights. See …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-3282-20 A-3284-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the home and the [judge] has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of … findings 'should not be disturbed unless they are wholly unsupportable as to result in a denial of justice.'" In re …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-3282-20 A-3284-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the home and the [judge] has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of … findings 'should not be disturbed unless they are wholly unsupportable as to result in a denial of justice.'" In re …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-3684-15T1 A-3711-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … §§ 1901-1963 (ICWA). Part I and II of this opinion address termination. Part III addresses the ICWA. I. A.B.G. (Anna) … 189 N.J. 261, 278-79 (2007). Factual findings that are supported by adequate, substantial and credible evidence …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-3684-15T1 A-3711-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … §§ 1901-1963 (ICWA). Part I and II of this opinion address termination. Part III addresses the ICWA. I. A.B.G. (Anna) … 189 N.J. 261, 278-79 (2007). Factual findings that are supported by adequate, substantial and credible evidence …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-2186-18T3 A-2188-18T31 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … were explored. The children were the subject of an earlier termination of parental rights case. In July 2013, a … for reunification. No realistic plan. There was ample support in the record for all these conclusions. A …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-2186-18T3 A-2188-18T31 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … were explored. The children were the subject of an earlier termination of parental rights case. In July 2013, a … for reunification. No realistic plan. There was ample support in the record for all these conclusions. A …