njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2996-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 30:4C-15.1(a). The Law Guardian joins the Division in supporting the judgment. In a cogent oral decision, the … test by clear and convincing evidence and held that termination was in Ethan's best interests. See In re …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2996-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 30:4C-15.1(a). The Law Guardian joins the Division in supporting the judgment. In a cogent oral decision, the … test by clear and convincing evidence and held that termination was in Ethan's best interests. See In re …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0980-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … A.H.G. (Adam), the children's father, does not appeal the termination of his parental rights. Teresa argues that the … of the children under her care. The Division continued to support Teresa as she explored various job and housing …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0980-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … A.H.G. (Adam), the children's father, does not appeal the termination of his parental rights. Teresa argues that the … of the children under her care. The Division continued to support Teresa as she explored various job and housing …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0980-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … A.H.G. (Adam), the children's father, does not appeal the termination of his parental rights. Teresa argues that the … of the children under her care. The Division continued to support Teresa as she explored various job and housing …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3116-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … issued a permanency order approving the Division's plan for termination of Y.K. and R.W.'s parental rights to C.W. Two … the record contains substantial and credible evidence to support the decision to terminate parental rights. Ibid. …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3116-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … issued a permanency order approving the Division's plan for termination of Y.K. and R.W.'s parental rights to C.W. Two … the record contains substantial and credible evidence to support the decision to terminate parental rights. Ibid. …
-
njcourts.gov
… before the Court on , 20 , and in the presence of: the child ☐ appearing / ☐ not appearing, ☐ spoken language … stated on the record and in the best interest of the minor child; … It is on this … day of … , 20 … , Ordered that: … ☐ … or unwilling to perform the expected functions of care and support of child as follows: . b. Each parent's …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1190-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of … of review, we must uphold the trial court's findings if "supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence." …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1190-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of … of review, we must uphold the trial court's findings if "supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence." …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1365-24 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 3 A-1365-24 Permanency (Division) and the Law Guardian support termination. Based on our review of the record and the …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1365-24 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 3 A-1365-24 Permanency (Division) and the Law Guardian support termination. Based on our review of the record and the …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3266-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … L.L., her youngest child and the sole subject of this termination proceeding, was born in May 2009. In May 2014, … task is to determine whether the decision "is 4 A-3266-15T1 supported by '"substantial and credible evidence" [i]n the …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3266-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … L.L., her youngest child and the sole subject of this termination proceeding, was born in May 2009. In May 2014, … task is to determine whether the decision "is 4 A-3266-15T1 supported by '"substantial and credible evidence" [i]n the …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2620-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … her with effective legal assistance. The Law Guardian supports the determinations on appeal as it did before the trial court. 1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2620-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … her with effective legal assistance. The Law Guardian supports the determinations on appeal as it did before the trial court. 1 …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4065-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … brief submitted by defendant in November 2016 in further support of her appeal. 3 A-4065-15T1 multiple occasions … to pursue a kinship legal guardianship (KLG), as opposed to termination of defendant's parental rights. Dr. Brown …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4065-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … brief submitted by defendant in November 2016 in further support of her appeal. 3 A-4065-15T1 multiple occasions … to pursue a kinship legal guardianship (KLG), as opposed to termination of defendant's parental rights. Dr. Brown …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3657-18T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … ON HIS OWN. POINT II THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN DECIDING THAT TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS WOULD NOT DO MORE HARM THAN … Super. 81, 87 (App. Div. 2006). The factual findings that support such a judgment "should not be disturbed unless …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3657-18T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … ON HIS OWN. POINT II THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN DECIDING THAT TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS WOULD NOT DO MORE HARM THAN … Super. 81, 87 (App. Div. 2006). The factual findings that support such a judgment "should not be disturbed unless …