Filters
- KIM CHARLES VS. WALTER CHARLES (FM-18-0580-13, SOMERSET COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… in February 2014. Defendant and plaintiff have three children but only the youngest child is unemancipated. The … Ira Ray (Ray). Defendant submitted a certification in support of his motion alleging plaintiff 3 A-2412-20 and Ray … 2A:34-23(n)). We will not disturb the Family Part judge's determination, unless we conclude: (1) the trial court failed …
- A-2412-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… in February 2014. Defendant and plaintiff have three children but only the youngest child is unemancipated. The … Ira Ray (Ray). Defendant submitted a certification in support of his motion alleging plaintiff 3 A-2412-20 and Ray … 2A:34-23(n)). We will not disturb the Family Part judge's determination, unless we conclude: (1) the trial court failed …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2071-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … with Father in the event they were permitted to adopt after termination of his parental rights. After trial, Judge … but on the many obstacles to providing a stable home and support for the children that Father failed to overcome …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2071-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … with Father in the event they were permitted to adopt after termination of his parental rights. After trial, Judge … but on the many obstacles to providing a stable home and support for the children that Father failed to overcome …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3451-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … On October 3, 2023, the court approved a change of goal to termination of parental rights followed by adoption and … "permanent" effects even after they stop using. Dr. Gambone supported a plan 12 A-3451-23 of adoption for Zoe by her …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3451-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … On October 3, 2023, the court approved a change of goal to termination of parental rights followed by adoption and … "permanent" effects even after they stop using. Dr. Gambone supported a plan 12 A-3451-23 of adoption for Zoe by her …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-3322-21 A-3323-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENECY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … four prongs of the best-interests test necessary for the termination of parental rights. 1 We use initials and … court correctly applied the law, and its findings are supported by substantial credible evidence. I. We summarize …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-3322-21 A-3323-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENECY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … four prongs of the best-interests test necessary for the termination of parental rights. 1 We use initials and … court correctly applied the law, and its findings are supported by substantial credible evidence. I. We summarize …
- njcourts.gov… trial, were divorced on January 30, 2012. They have one child. The dual judgment of divorce (DJOD) incorporated … payments are completed. Defendant also pays weekly child support. Under the DJOD, child support increased after the … back. Defendant's motion requested custody of the child, termination of alimony, suspension of child support, and an …
- A-5309-15T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… trial, were divorced on January 30, 2012. They have one child. The dual judgment of divorce (DJOD) incorporated … payments are completed. Defendant also pays weekly child support. Under the DJOD, child support increased after the … back. Defendant's motion requested custody of the child, termination of alimony, suspension of child support, and an …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5609-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … THE TRIAL JUDGE AND THE EVIDENCE ADMITTED AT TRIAL DID NOT SUPPORT A LEGAL CONCLUSION THAT ALL FOUR PRONGS OF THE BEST … C. DCPP DID NOT PROVE BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT TERMINATION WOULD NOT DO MORE HARM THAN GOOD AS REQUIRED BY …
- A-5609-15T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5609-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … THE TRIAL JUDGE AND THE EVIDENCE ADMITTED AT TRIAL DID NOT SUPPORT A LEGAL CONCLUSION THAT ALL FOUR PRONGS OF THE BEST … C. DCPP DID NOT PROVE BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT TERMINATION WOULD NOT DO MORE HARM THAN GOOD AS REQUIRED BY …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3644-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … applicable law, we are satisfied the evidence in the record supports the decision to terminate Theresa's parental rights … the trial court changed the permanency plan from KLG to termination of Theresa's parental rights. A nine-day trial …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3644-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … applicable law, we are satisfied the evidence in the record supports the decision to terminate Theresa's parental rights … the trial court changed the permanency plan from KLG to termination of Theresa's parental rights. A nine-day trial …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3568-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … The Law Guardian did not proffer any witnesses and supported the Division's plan for Skye to adopt Austin. Aaron objected to the termination of his parental rights and testified on his own …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3568-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … The Law Guardian did not proffer any witnesses and supported the Division's plan for Skye to adopt Austin. Aaron objected to the termination of his parental rights and testified on his own …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-1833-20 A-1834-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … three and four. II. The legal framework regarding the termination of parental rights is well- settled. Parents … the record contains substantial and credible evidence to support the decision to terminate parental rights. Id. at …
- A-1833-20/A-1834-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-1833-20 A-1834-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … three and four. II. The legal framework regarding the termination of parental rights is well- settled. Parents … the record contains substantial and credible evidence to support the decision to terminate parental rights. Id. at …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0100-19T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … did not offer any documentary or testimonial evidence but supported the Division's application for termination of J.E.'s parental rights. Ms. Mata testified …
- A-0100-19T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0100-19T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … did not offer any documentary or testimonial evidence but supported the Division's application for termination of J.E.'s parental rights. Ms. Mata testified …