-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1157-19T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Fam. Servs. v. G.L., 191 N.J. 596, 605 3 To secure parental termination, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) requires the Division to … written opinion. Arguing against the proofs that support the first prong, Ed contends he did not harm Alan. …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3983-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … all four prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and ordered termination of the mother's parental rights to Alice.2 2 … decision to terminate the mother's parental rights is amply supported by the evidence. When terminating parental rights, …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3983-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … all four prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and ordered termination of the mother's parental rights to Alice.2 2 … decision to terminate the mother's parental rights is amply supported by the evidence. When terminating parental rights, …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5644-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … that the Division did not consider "alternatives to termination of parental rights" because it failed to … N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4).2 All of the judge's findings are supported by substantial, credible evidence and, therefore, …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5644-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … that the Division did not consider "alternatives to termination of parental rights" because it failed to … N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4).2 All of the judge's findings are supported by substantial, credible evidence and, therefore, …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2437-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of … are not disturbed unless they are "so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2437-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of … are not disturbed unless they are "so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant …
njcourts.gov
… (Count Two); and second-degree endangering the welfare of a child in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4a (Count Three). The … physician pursuant to N.J.R.E. 803(c)(4). The two-year-old child did not make any statements to the physician. The … of the relationship here, that of mother and daughter, supports the reliability of the statements. A parent 11 …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4943-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … for them, and said he lacked income because he paid support for six children. Defendant did not know how he … that [he’d] always envisioned." The court concluded that termination of defendant's parental rights would not do more …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4943-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … for them, and said he lacked income because he paid support for six children. Defendant did not know how he … that [he’d] always envisioned." The court concluded that termination of defendant's parental rights would not do more …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5268-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to make adequate findings of fact and conclusions of law supporting its decision. The Law Guardians for Eddie and … should be reversed. Earl did not appeal from the court's termination order and has not participated in this appeal. …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5268-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to make adequate findings of fact and conclusions of law supporting its decision. The Law Guardians for Eddie and … should be reversed. Earl did not appeal from the court's termination order and has not participated in this appeal. …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1742-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … A.H. left on a windowsill, the cousin received no financial support from A.H. to care for the child. The cousin reported … held a permanency hearing and approved DCPP's plan for termination of A.H.'s parental rights. A trial was held in …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1742-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … A.H. left on a windowsill, the cousin received no financial support from A.H. to care for the child. The cousin reported … held a permanency hearing and approved DCPP's plan for termination of A.H.'s parental rights. A trial was held in …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-5165-14T2 A-5169-14T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … J.A. said he would not be able to attend because he has to support the family. The Division then changed its permanency plan to termination of parental rights followed by adoption. In …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2140-15T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … offender3 and batterer,4 led to the removal and ultimate termination of her parental rights to these children by … of the family court in terminating parental rights is supported by substantial and credible evidence on the …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2140-15T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … offender3 and batterer,4 led to the removal and ultimate termination of her parental rights to these children by … of the family court in terminating parental rights is supported by substantial and credible evidence on the …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2518-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … of review, we must uphold the trial court's findings if "supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence." … Servs. v. G.L., 191 N.J. 596, 605 (2007)). "The focus of a termination-of-parental-rights hearing is the best interests …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2518-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … of review, we must uphold the trial court's findings if "supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence." … Servs. v. G.L., 191 N.J. 596, 605 (2007)). "The focus of a termination-of-parental-rights hearing is the best interests …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3538-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … that defendant was "cognitively delayed" and has "limited support." Several days later, the Division received a report … June 12, 2019. The court approved the Division's plan for termination of M.F. and J.C.'s parental rights, followed by …