njcourts.gov
… NOS. A-1787-21 A-1788-21 A-2673-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. M. … She planned to get a part-time job and rely on Jeff for support as well, including having him watch the children. … 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence, and termination of Morgan and Jeff's parental rights was in …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOS. A-1787-21 A-1788-21 A-2673-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. M. … She planned to get a part-time job and rely on Jeff for support as well, including having him watch the children. … 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence, and termination of Morgan and Jeff's parental rights was in …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3330-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … him. Nonetheless, the trial court rejected the Division's termination plan in February 2019, giving Kevin fresh … the record contains substantial and credible evidence to support the decision to terminate parental rights. Id. at …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3330-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … him. Nonetheless, the trial court rejected the Division's termination plan in February 2019, giving Kevin fresh … the record contains substantial and credible evidence to support the decision to terminate parental rights. Id. at …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2850-15T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and Permanency (Division) and J.R.'s Law Guardian argue in support of the judgment. Defendant's brief raises the … IN FINDING THAT DCPP HAD PROVED ALL FOUR PRONGS OF THE TERMINATION STATUTE BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE. (1) …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2850-15T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and Permanency (Division) and J.R.'s Law Guardian argue in support of the judgment. Defendant's brief raises the … IN FINDING THAT DCPP HAD PROVED ALL FOUR PRONGS OF THE TERMINATION STATUTE BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE. (1) …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4778-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … statements by children does not extend to Title 30 termination cases. Id. at 230. Because the Family Part in … there is not adequate substantial and credible evidence to support the trial court's post- remand decision as to prongs …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4778-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … statements by children does not extend to Title 30 termination cases. Id. at 230. Because the Family Part in … there is not adequate substantial and credible evidence to support the trial court's post- remand decision as to prongs …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-3205-15T4 A-3206-15T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, V. … Following our review of the trial record, we find no support for defendants' claims of trial court error. … a long history with the Division, including the May 2012 termination of her parental rights to her then four-year-old …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-3205-15T4 A-3206-15T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, V. … Following our review of the trial record, we find no support for defendants' claims of trial court error. … a long history with the Division, including the May 2012 termination of her parental rights to her then four-year-old …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-5191-17T4 A-5192-17T41 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … protect Hope. Tanya and Malcolm testified in opposition to termination of their parental rights. The trial court's judgment terminating parental rights was supported by substantial credible evidence and satisfied …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-5191-17T4 A-5192-17T41 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … protect Hope. Tanya and Malcolm testified in opposition to termination of their parental rights. The trial court's judgment terminating parental rights was supported by substantial credible evidence and satisfied …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3440-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … parents committed to adopting him—a plan his half-sister supported—and the court ultimately vacated the identified … Further, the Division considered alternatives to the termination of parental rights. The judge listed the …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3440-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … parents committed to adopting him—a plan his half-sister supported—and the court ultimately vacated the identified … Further, the Division considered alternatives to the termination of parental rights. The judge listed the …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4390-16T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … evidence under the applicable law sufficient to warrant termination of his parental rights. We disagree and affirm … relevant to the first prong dovetailed with his findings supporting the second prong, a common occurrence resulting …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4390-16T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … evidence under the applicable law sufficient to warrant termination of his parental rights. We disagree and affirm … relevant to the first prong dovetailed with his findings supporting the second prong, a common occurrence resulting …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1779-19T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … MOTHER], THE [JUDGE'S] FINDINGS UNDER PRONG II [WERE] NOT SUPPORTED BY THE CREDIBLE AND SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE. We … to make legal decisions for the client before a judicial determination on her mental capacity"). Under Rule …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1779-19T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … MOTHER], THE [JUDGE'S] FINDINGS UNDER PRONG II [WERE] NOT SUPPORTED BY THE CREDIBLE AND SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE. We … to make legal decisions for the client before a judicial determination on her mental capacity"). Under Rule …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-2237-18T1 A-2238-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Mother argues: POINT I THE TRIAL JUDGE FAILED TO MAKE A DETERMINATION SUPPORTED BY THE RECORD THAT [THE DIVISION] CONSIDERED …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-2237-18T1 A-2238-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Mother argues: POINT I THE TRIAL JUDGE FAILED TO MAKE A DETERMINATION SUPPORTED BY THE RECORD THAT [THE DIVISION] CONSIDERED …