-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3565-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Gambone opined Bea would not experience emotional harm from termination of Ann's parental rights because their limited … The trial court concluded efforts to provide services and support have failed, and "there is no realistic likelihood …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3440-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … parents committed to adopting him—a plan his half-sister supported—and the court ultimately vacated the identified … Further, the Division considered alternatives to the termination of parental rights. The judge listed the …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3440-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … parents committed to adopting him—a plan his half-sister supported—and the court ultimately vacated the identified … Further, the Division considered alternatives to the termination of parental rights. The judge listed the …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1779-19T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … MOTHER], THE [JUDGE'S] FINDINGS UNDER PRONG II [WERE] NOT SUPPORTED BY THE CREDIBLE AND SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE. We … to make legal decisions for the client before a judicial determination on her mental capacity"). Under Rule …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1779-19T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … MOTHER], THE [JUDGE'S] FINDINGS UNDER PRONG II [WERE] NOT SUPPORTED BY THE CREDIBLE AND SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE. We … to make legal decisions for the client before a judicial determination on her mental capacity"). Under Rule …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1923-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … judgment terminating his parental rights. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. 1 We …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1923-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … judgment terminating his parental rights. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. 1 We …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-2237-18T1 A-2238-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Mother argues: POINT I THE TRIAL JUDGE FAILED TO MAKE A DETERMINATION SUPPORTED BY THE RECORD THAT [THE DIVISION] CONSIDERED …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-2237-18T1 A-2238-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Mother argues: POINT I THE TRIAL JUDGE FAILED TO MAKE A DETERMINATION SUPPORTED BY THE RECORD THAT [THE DIVISION] CONSIDERED …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4390-16T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … evidence under the applicable law sufficient to warrant termination of his parental rights. We disagree and affirm … relevant to the first prong dovetailed with his findings supporting the second prong, a common occurrence resulting …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4390-16T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … evidence under the applicable law sufficient to warrant termination of his parental rights. We disagree and affirm … relevant to the first prong dovetailed with his findings supporting the second prong, a common occurrence resulting …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0735-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … NEITHER THE "TOXIC RELATIONSHIP" RELIED ON BY THE COURT TO SUPPORT PRONG ONE, NOR DR. LEE'S NET OPINION THAT DIVINA … THE TEMPORARY CAREGIVERS AS A BASIS FOR CONCLUDING THAT TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS WOULD NOT DO MORE HARM THAN …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1619-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and 4 A-1619-16T4 (4) … of clear and convincing evidence, that all four prongs supported termination of defendant's parental rights. …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1619-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and 4 A-1619-16T4 (4) … of clear and convincing evidence, that all four prongs supported termination of defendant's parental rights. …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5093-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and the judge approved the Division's plan to proceed with termination of P.G.'s parental rights. On April 18, 2015, … court's fact finding should be generally undisturbed "when supported by adequate, substantial, credible evidence." …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5093-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and the judge approved the Division's plan to proceed with termination of P.G.'s parental rights. On April 18, 2015, … court's fact finding should be generally undisturbed "when supported by adequate, substantial, credible evidence." …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0321-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … relative and, as to the fourth prong, erred in finding that termination would not do more harm than good because the … we find substantial credible evidence in the record to support the judge's determination. The facts as developed at …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0321-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … relative and, as to the fourth prong, erred in finding that termination would not do more harm than good because the … we find substantial credible evidence in the record to support the judge's determination. The facts as developed at …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2325-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … S.S.M. has not filed a notice of appeal from that determination and, therefore, she is not a party to this … in favor of the guardianship petition overwhelmingly supports the decision to terminate defendant's parental …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2325-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … S.S.M. has not filed a notice of appeal from that determination and, therefore, she is not a party to this … in favor of the guardianship petition overwhelmingly supports the decision to terminate defendant's parental …