njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3318-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the Division met its burden to consider alternatives to termination, citing the Division's initial plan of … court's termination of parental rights so long as they are "supported by 'substantial and credible evidence' on the …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3318-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the Division met its burden to consider alternatives to termination, citing the Division's initial plan of … court's termination of parental rights so long as they are "supported by 'substantial and credible evidence' on the …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-4736-15T2 A-4739-15T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … only consider the arguments raised by defendants as to the termination of their parental rights to Kathy. In addition … her arguments regarding the insufficiency of the evidence supporting termination. She also contends that the remand …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-4736-15T2 A-4739-15T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … only consider the arguments raised by defendants as to the termination of their parental rights to Kathy. In addition … her arguments regarding the insufficiency of the evidence supporting termination. She also contends that the remand …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0796-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … there is substantial credible evidence in the record to support the court's findings." E.P., 196 N.J. at 104. We … "owe no special deference to the trial [court's] legal determinations." Slawinski v. Nicholas, 448 N.J. Super. 25, 32 …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0796-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … there is substantial credible evidence in the record to support the court's findings." E.P., 196 N.J. at 104. We … "owe no special deference to the trial [court's] legal determinations." Slawinski v. Nicholas, 448 N.J. Super. 25, 32 …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0796-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … there is substantial credible evidence in the record to support the court's findings." E.P., 196 N.J. at 104. We … "owe no special deference to the trial [court's] legal determinations." Slawinski v. Nicholas, 448 N.J. Super. 25, 32 …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2289-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … discounted her father, L.B. (Lee), as a placement option or supportive resource. 4 A-2289-23 Based upon our review of … opinion thoroughly addressed all four statutory factors for termination and need not be repeated in detail here. …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2289-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … discounted her father, L.B. (Lee), as a placement option or supportive resource. 4 A-2289-23 Based upon our review of … opinion thoroughly addressed all four statutory factors for termination and need not be repeated in detail here. …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-4590-18T1 A-4591-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … issues, the court found that the Division proved that termination of parental rights was in the best interests of … suggest a poor prognosis for reunification." Dr. Freedman supported termination of parental rights. Defense …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-4590-18T1 A-4591-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … issues, the court found that the Division proved that termination of parental rights was in the best interests of … suggest a poor prognosis for reunification." Dr. Freedman supported termination of parental rights. Defense …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3950-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANANCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … a twenty-five page written decision. The Law Guardian supported termination. Defendant 1 We use initials and pseudonyms to …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3950-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANANCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … a twenty-five page written decision. The Law Guardian supported termination. Defendant 1 We use initials and pseudonyms to …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4386-18T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and the grandparents. Burr ultimately concluded that the termination of the parents' parental rights and adoption by … In addition, up through the time of trial, the Division supported visitation between the parents and the children …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4386-18T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and the grandparents. Burr ultimately concluded that the termination of the parents' parental rights and adoption by … In addition, up through the time of trial, the Division supported visitation between the parents and the children …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0764-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0764-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3886-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … four prongs of the best-interests test necessary for the termination of parental rights. See N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). … Division and Mason's Law Guardian contend the judgment is supported by clear and convincing evidence in the record. …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3886-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … four prongs of the best-interests test necessary for the termination of parental rights. See N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). … Division and Mason's Law Guardian contend the judgment is supported by clear and convincing evidence in the record. …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4097-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … his GED and had completed both a parenting and child support program. The guardianship trial took place between … the placement of the child," and exploring "alternatives to termination" under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(3). Trent also …