njcourts.gov › attorneys › rules of court
… actions in which the court finds that either the custody of children or parenting time issues, or both, are a genuine … the financial ability of the party to pay alimony or support or both, and the parties' homes, which shall be limited to a factual description of the home where the child will reside or visit, appropriate child safety …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-5099-15T3 A-5390-15T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … she would need to separate from John and would need massive support. Dr. Mack recommended ongoing psychiatric … 2015, the court approved the Division's permanency plan for termination of parental rights followed by adoption. On …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-5099-15T3 A-5390-15T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … she would need to separate from John and would need massive support. Dr. Mack recommended ongoing psychiatric … 2015, the court approved the Division's permanency plan for termination of parental rights followed by adoption. On …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3988-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to -15.1(a)(4) requires the Division to petition for termination of parental rights on the grounds of the "best … guardianship trial. We only recite the judge's key findings supporting her decision. Preliminarily, the judge found Dr. …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3988-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to -15.1(a)(4) requires the Division to petition for termination of parental rights on the grounds of the "best … guardianship trial. We only recite the judge's key findings supporting her decision. Preliminarily, the judge found Dr. …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1860-19T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in the underlying litigation and is not appealing the termination. S.C. and defendant, who were never married, … reversal of the judgment." She asserts "the record does not support the [judge's] conclusion." The Law Guardian …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1860-19T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in the underlying litigation and is not appealing the termination. S.C. and defendant, who were never married, … reversal of the judgment." She asserts "the record does not support the [judge's] conclusion." The Law Guardian …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5238-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … AS THE RECORD LACKS SUBSTANTIAL, CREDIBLE EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE TRIAL COURT'S FINDINGS UNDER PRONGS ONE THROUGH … HAD PROVEN BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT THE TERMINATION OF THE FATHER'S PARENTAL RIGHTS WOULD NOT DO …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5238-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … AS THE RECORD LACKS SUBSTANTIAL, CREDIBLE EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE TRIAL COURT'S FINDINGS UNDER PRONGS ONE THROUGH … HAD PROVEN BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT THE TERMINATION OF THE FATHER'S PARENTAL RIGHTS WOULD NOT DO …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1728-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … of the Division of Child Protection and Permanency to seek termination; the sufficiency of the evidence; and the … and because of "the lack of independent factual findings supported by particularized evidence"; and (3) the judge's …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1728-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … of the Division of Child Protection and Permanency to seek termination; the sufficiency of the evidence; and the … and because of "the lack of independent factual findings supported by particularized evidence"; and (3) the judge's …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-2210-21 A-2223-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to terminate parental rights was clearly and convincingly supported by the voluminous evidentiary record and affirm. … May trial date, explaining going to trial on a permanency determination without counsel would be a "mistake." After an …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-2210-21 A-2223-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to terminate parental rights was clearly and convincingly supported by the voluminous evidentiary record and affirm. … May trial date, explaining going to trial on a permanency determination without counsel would be a "mistake." After an …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-5219-17T2 A-5230-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … failing to object. The Law Guardian joins the Division in supporting the judgment. We affirm substantially for the … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-5219-17T2 A-5230-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … failing to object. The Law Guardian joins the Division in supporting the judgment. We affirm substantially for the … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0609-16T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Decision to Terminate Defendant's Parental Rights was Not Supported by Sufficient Credible Evidence. Prongs One & Two: … Efforts", Including an Inquiry Into Alternatives to Termination. Prong Four: The Trial Court Erred in Finding …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0609-16T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Decision to Terminate Defendant's Parental Rights was Not Supported by Sufficient Credible Evidence. Prongs One & Two: … Efforts", Including an Inquiry Into Alternatives to Termination. Prong Four: The Trial Court Erred in Finding …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2629-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … op. at 16.] This court held Judge De Castro's findings were supported by a preponderance of the competent, credible … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2629-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … op. at 16.] This court held Judge De Castro's findings were supported by a preponderance of the competent, credible … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3437-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. …