njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-2623-16T4 A-2624-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports termination and urges us to affirm the trial judge's …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-2623-16T4 A-2624-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports termination and urges us to affirm the trial judge's …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-0686-16T4 A-0687-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISON OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … of fact are not disturbed unless they are "so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant … in participating. On prong four, the judge found that termination of the father's parental rights would not do …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-0686-16T4 A-0687-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISON OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … of fact are not disturbed unless they are "so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant … in participating. On prong four, the judge found that termination of the father's parental rights would not do …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2300-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … of these proceedings. R. 1:38-3(d)(12). 3 A-2300-22 supported by substantial, credible evidence in the record. … call any witnesses but joined the Division's request for termination of Casey's parental rights followed by resource …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2300-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … of these proceedings. R. 1:38-3(d)(12). 3 A-2300-22 supported by substantial, credible evidence in the record. … call any witnesses but joined the Division's request for termination of Casey's parental rights followed by resource …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-3876-16T4 A-3877-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … friend, and also failed to consider alternatives to the termination of her parental rights. After reviewing the … by reference the judge's factual findings because they are supported by competent evidence. N.J. Div. of Youth & Family …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-3876-16T4 A-3877-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … friend, and also failed to consider alternatives to the termination of her parental rights. After reviewing the … by reference the judge's factual findings because they are supported by competent evidence. N.J. Div. of Youth & Family …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3424-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … terminate his parental rights. The record and law do not support Joe's arguments. Accordingly, we affirm. 1 We use … sought and obtained court approval for a permanency plan of termination of parental rights followed by adoption. On …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3424-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … terminate his parental rights. The record and law do not support Joe's arguments. Accordingly, we affirm. 1 We use … sought and obtained court approval for a permanency plan of termination of parental rights followed by adoption. On …
njcourts.gov
… A-4799-14T1 A-4769-15T1 A-5090-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … neglected her three children; and the court's June 29, 2016 termination of C.C.'s parental rights and those of … that C.C. neglected the children. The Law Guardian also supports the finding that the Division met its burden under …
-
njcourts.gov
… A-4799-14T1 A-4769-15T1 A-5090-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … neglected her three children; and the court's June 29, 2016 termination of C.C.'s parental rights and those of … that C.C. neglected the children. The Law Guardian also supports the finding that the Division met its burden under …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3194-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … (Division) and Law Guardian urge that we uphold the termination. We reject Cynthia's contentions that the … of fact are not disturbed unless they are "so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3194-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … (Division) and Law Guardian urge that we uphold the termination. We reject Cynthia's contentions that the … of fact are not disturbed unless they are "so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3261-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … The judge relied upon Gary's failure to "nurture, care, and support" Jane and Greg through the loss of their mother, and … evaluation, notwithstanding that he was facing the possible termination of his parental rights." The judge found notable …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3261-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … The judge relied upon Gary's failure to "nurture, care, and support" Jane and Greg through the loss of their mother, and … evaluation, notwithstanding that he was facing the possible termination of his parental rights." The judge found notable …
njcourts.gov
… used to protect the identity of the minor) . R.G., the child’s mother, is also the mother of K.G., a son fathered … in with R.G. and K.G., who was two years old. Appellant supported R.G. and K.G. and, according to him, loved K.G. as … free, it offered a new permanency plan consisting of termination of R.G.’s parental rights to Tara and K.G. and …
-
njcourts.gov
… used to protect the identity of the minor) . R.G., the child’s mother, is also the mother of K.G., a son fathered … in with R.G. and K.G., who was two years old. Appellant supported R.G. and K.G. and, according to him, loved K.G. as … free, it offered a new permanency plan consisting of termination of R.G.’s parental rights to Tara and K.G. and …
njcourts.gov
… a claim for failure to contract with parents of a disabled child. Deciding each issue in the negative, the Law Division … trade name of Chesterbrook Academy. These facilities admit children from the age of six weeks through six years in a … 113 (App. Div. 2011). The Director argues that two bases support his filing of this claim in Superior Court. One is …
-
njcourts.gov
… may not summarize all portions of the opinion. Division of Child Protection and Permanency v. D.C.A. (A-44-22) (087604) … prong of the best interests test, but not in the court’s determination of the other prongs of the test. Ultimately, the … interests of Ignacio, Josefina, Antonia, and Ian are amply supported by substantial and credible evidence. The court’s …