Filters
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2161-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. 1 We …
- A-2161-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2161-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. 1 We …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2883-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. …
- A-2883-18T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2883-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4303-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of … by clear and convincing evidence, that all four prongs supported termination of defendant's parental rights by …
- A-4303-16T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4303-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of … by clear and convincing evidence, that all four prongs supported termination of defendant's parental rights by …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4823-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of … of fact are not disturbed unless they are "so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant …
- A-4823-17T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4823-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of … of fact are not disturbed unless they are "so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-4008-22 A-4012-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … as to the second part of prong three, alternatives to termination of parental rights, we were not satisfied that … U.G., "undermined the sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court's legal conclusion" that …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-4008-22 A-4012-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … as to the second part of prong three, alternatives to termination of parental rights, we were not satisfied that … U.G., "undermined the sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court's legal conclusion" that …
- A-1774-19/A-1857-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-1774-19 A-1857-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … characterize as their recreational use of marijuana. To support this argument, the parents refer to the public … proof the four statutory prongs necessary to enable the termination of their rights. Apart from the marijuana issue, …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2656-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 2016.2 On appeal, defendant challenges the trial judge's determination that respondent New Jersey Division of Child … the interested relative's ability to provide care and support for the child. Ibid. Here, the Division was unable …
- A-2656-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2656-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 2016.2 On appeal, defendant challenges the trial judge's determination that respondent New Jersey Division of Child … the interested relative's ability to provide care and support for the child. Ibid. Here, the Division was unable …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3212-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … OF R[ONALD] 4 A-3212-16T3 AND INSTEAD RENDERED AID AND SUPPORT TO PLAINTIFF BY ABANDONING ANY NOTION OF PARTISAN … inconsistent with another state's custody or visitation determination. The record is clear that no other state has …
- A-3212-16T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3212-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … OF R[ONALD] 4 A-3212-16T3 AND INSTEAD RENDERED AID AND SUPPORT TO PLAINTIFF BY ABANDONING ANY NOTION OF PARTISAN … inconsistent with another state's custody or visitation determination. The record is clear that no other state has …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1621-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … evidence all of the criteria in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) for termination of his parental rights. For the reasons that … courts must defer to a trial judge's findings of fact if supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence in …
- A-1621-16T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1621-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … evidence all of the criteria in N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) for termination of his parental rights. For the reasons that … courts must defer to a trial judge's findings of fact if supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence in …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1945-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … because the court did not consider alternatives to the termination of parental rights, such as her … and are bound by her factual findings so long as they are supported by sufficient, credible evidence. N.J. Div. of …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1945-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … because the court did not consider alternatives to the termination of parental rights, such as her … and are bound by her factual findings so long as they are supported by sufficient, credible evidence. N.J. Div. of …
- PAUL ROSENBERG VS. REESA ROSENBERG (FM-03-0463-11, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… residence for their son. Defendant is required to pay child support to plaintiff of $111 per week. This was calculated … these facts were a change in circumstances warranting termination of alimony. Plaintiff certified their son was …