Filters
- KVPR, LLC VS. 30-38 OAK STREET, LLC, ET AL. (L-7147-16, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.govSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1213-22 KVPR, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Respondent, v. 30-38 OAK STREET, LLC, Defendant-Respondent/ Cross-Appellant, and ONYX EQUITIES, LLC, Defendant-Respondent. …
- Englewood Hospital & Medical Center v. State (089696) (Mercer County and Statewide) - Published Opinionsnjcourts.gov1 SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. …
- njcourts.govThe estate of Leonor R. Dizon disputed a Medicaid lien on all its assets. The court ruled the lien valid, covering any survivorship awards, affirming the trial court's decision.
- Union County Reporting Information Jury Reporting Messagesnjcourts.govInformation for Union County jurors: Thank you for your civic duty. Health and safety measures in place. Optional demographic questions. ADA accommodations available. Free parking and mass transit info provided. Dress code and employment protection policies in effect. Failure to report may result in penalties. Email instructions will be sent one day prior to service. If sick, contact jury management to reschedule. Trial judge will give specific instructions. Daily fee for jurors. Smoking not allowed in courthouse. Petit jurors serve for 2 days or 1 trial. Must check website or call night before reporting.
- Notice – Attorneys Reinstated from the 2024 CLE Ineligible List Notices to the Barnjcourts.gov › notices to the bar1 NOTICE TO THE BAR ATTORNEYS REINSTATED FROM THE 2024 CLE INELIGIBLE LIST The Board on Continuing Legal Education declares that the following New Jersey attorneys have complied with the requirements of R. 1:42-1 and therefore are hereby removed from the …
- njcourts.govPress Release … News Release … STUART RABNER Chief Justice of the New Jersey Supreme Court PETER McALEER MARYANN SPOTO Office of Communications 609-815-2910 RICHARD J. HUGHES JUSTICE COMPLEX • P.O. BOX 037 • TRENTON, NJ 08625-0984 RELEASE DATE: July 17, …
- Lazarus v. Tawil - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov1 NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION MONMOUTH COUNTY DOCKET NO. F-4497-23 JOSEPH LAZARUS and RENAH LAZARUS, Plaintiffs, v. HABIB TAWIL and LILLY TAWIL, husband and wife, …
- Notice – Attorneys Removed from the 2024 IOLTA Ineligible List Notices to the Barnjcourts.gov › notices to the barNOTICE TO THE BAR ATTORNEYS REMOVED FROM THE 2024 IOLTA INELIGIBLE LIST The IOLTA Fund of the Bar of New Jersey declares that the following attorneys have satisfied the requirement of R 1:28A:2(a) and their names are hereby removed from the Order of the …
- njcourts.govRECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0372-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ROGER DAVILA-IZAGUIRRE, a/k/a ROGER A. DAVILA, ROGER DAVILAIZAGYRRIE, ROGER A. IZAGUIRRE, and ROGER DAVILLA- IZAGUIRRE, …
- njcourts.govRECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2040-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. M.M., Defendant-Respondent, and E.M., JR., Defendant-Appellant. …
- TATYANA GOLBIN VS. MIKHAIL GOLBIN (FM-12-2457-14, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.govSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0066-24 TATYANA GOLBIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MIKHAIL GOLBIN, Defendant-Appellant. __________________________ Submitted June 3, 2025 – Decided July 17, 2025 Before Judges Smith and Chase. On …
- njcourts.govRECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0802-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. WEAPONS SEIZED FROM W.T., Defendant-Appellant. __________________________ Submitted April 7, 2025 – Decided July 17, 2025 …
- ZAKEE MARTIN VS. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD (NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.govSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2081-23 ZAKEE MARTIN, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, Respondent. ___________________ Argued March 18, 2025 – Decided July 17, 2025 Before Judges Bishop-Thompson and Augostini. On …
- njcourts.govSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0527-24 REMAQ CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VIP KITCHEN AND GRANITE, INC., Defendant-Respondent. ____________________________ Submitted July 8, 2025 – Decided July 17, 2025 Before Judges …
- njcourts.govSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0914-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RAMON VEGA, a/k/a TONY RAMON, Defendant-Appellant. Submitted May 7, 2025 – Decided July 17, 2025 Before Judges Marczyk and …
- njcourts.govSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3013-23 991, LLC, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SSOMM, LLC, and MAHMOUD ABDELWAHAB, Defendants-Appellants. __________________________ Submitted July 8, 2025 – Decided July 17, 2025 Before Judges …
- njcourts.gov › notices to the barThe Office of Attorney Ethics report for the third quarter of 2024 includes 28 final disciplinary actions, 7 temporary suspensions, and 5 attorney reinstatements.
- njcourts.govNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2455-23 LINDSAY PALMISANO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS and MUNICIPAL …
- njcourts.govRECORD IMPOUNDED 00 SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3007-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JUAN A. VILLATORO, a/k/a JUAN A. VILLATOROVALLE, and JUAN A. VALLE, Defendant-Appellant. ___________________________ …
- njcourts.govRECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1571-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. M.J., Defendant-Appellant, and H.J., Defendant. ___________________________ IN THE …