Filters
- A-3041-18T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3041-18T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … failed to establish that no reasonable alternative to termination of his parental rights existed, and failed to … their parental fitness." Id. at 562. R.T. cites to R.G. as support for his contention that the Division failed to make …
- CLAUDIA C. OSIS VS. TEOBALDO M. OSIS (FM-16-1242-18, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… affirm. I. The parties married in April 2012 and have two children together: a daughter, born in December 2011, and a … in alimony for three years. As to the potential for earlier termination of alimony payments, the MSA provided: [A]limony … MSA specified the parties agreed to deviate from the Child Support Guidelines, and neither party would pay the other …
- A-1999-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… affirm. I. The parties married in April 2012 and have two children together: a daughter, born in December 2011, and a … in alimony for three years. As to the potential for earlier termination of alimony payments, the MSA provided: [A]limony … MSA specified the parties agreed to deviate from the Child Support Guidelines, and neither party would pay the other …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4064-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … A-4064-16T3 clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4456-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PRTOECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. …
- A-4064-16T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4064-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … A-4064-16T3 clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. …
- A-4456-16T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4456-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PRTOECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2046-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to them. Mindful of that fact, she asks that we reverse the termination of her parental rights but that the boys remain … and second prongs of the best interests standard were not supported by the record. Id. at 35-40. We remanded for …
- A-2046-17T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2046-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to them. Mindful of that fact, she asks that we reverse the termination of her parental rights but that the boys remain … and second prongs of the best interests standard were not supported by the record. Id. at 35-40. We remanded for …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2614-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … it first rejected the Division's permanency plan for termination of defendants' parental rights, the trial court … as Dr. Swanson. The Law Guardian called no witnesses but supported the Division's request for KLG. During Rispaldo's …
- A-2614-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2614-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … it first rejected the Division's permanency plan for termination of defendants' parental rights, the trial court … as Dr. Swanson. The Law Guardian called no witnesses but supported the Division's request for KLG. During Rispaldo's …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0981-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … breathing. Additionally, the worker noticed Y.S. did not support Flynn's head while he was nursing. Still, the … at which time it approved the Division's permanent plan of termination of parental rights, followed by adoption. The …
- A-0981-18T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0981-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … breathing. Additionally, the worker noticed Y.S. did not support Flynn's head while he was nursing. Still, the … at which time it approved the Division's permanent plan of termination of parental rights, followed by adoption. The …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-1112-15T1 A-2869-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of parental rights. We derive the following from … to reunify the children with them. Wells testified she supported the termination of parental rights and adoption of …
- A-1112-15T1/A-2869-15T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-1112-15T1 A-2869-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of parental rights. We derive the following from … to reunify the children with them. Wells testified she supported the termination of parental rights and adoption of …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1881-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … strengthening positive attachment to his caregivers and termination of Kerri's parental rights would not do more … we are bound by his factual findings so long as they are supported by sufficient credible evidence. N.J. Div. of …
- A-1881-17T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1881-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … strengthening positive attachment to his caregivers and termination of Kerri's parental rights would not do more … we are bound by his factual findings so long as they are supported by sufficient credible evidence. N.J. Div. of …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-3076-20 A-3078-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Family Part judge found the Division had not demonstrated support for prong four of the best interests of the child … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and 22 A-3076-20 (4) …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-3076-20 A-3078-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Family Part judge found the Division had not demonstrated support for prong four of the best interests of the child … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and 22 A-3076-20 (4) …
- njcourts.gov… or Substitution, as guided by R.P.C. 1:16, Declining or Terminating Representation. … My client and I disagree on …