njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3041-18T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … failed to establish that no reasonable alternative to termination of his parental rights existed, and failed to … their parental fitness." Id. at 562. R.T. cites to R.G. as support for his contention that the Division failed to make …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3041-18T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … failed to establish that no reasonable alternative to termination of his parental rights existed, and failed to … their parental fitness." Id. at 562. R.T. cites to R.G. as support for his contention that the Division failed to make …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2046-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to them. Mindful of that fact, she asks that we reverse the termination of her parental rights but that the boys remain … and second prongs of the best interests standard were not supported by the record. Id. at 35-40. We remanded for …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2046-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to them. Mindful of that fact, she asks that we reverse the termination of her parental rights but that the boys remain … and second prongs of the best interests standard were not supported by the record. Id. at 35-40. We remanded for …
njcourts.gov
… (Count Two); and second-degree endangering the welfare of a child in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4a (Count Three). The … physician pursuant to N.J.R.E. 803(c)(4). The two-year-old child did not make any statements to the physician. The … of the relationship here, that of mother and daughter, supports the reliability of the statements. A parent 11 …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-5105-17T3 A-5107-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … child test set forth in N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1(a), justifying termination of defendants' parental rights. We affirm. Judge … relative. The resource parent has provided a stable and supportive home for the children. They have been attending …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-5105-17T3 A-5107-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … child test set forth in N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1(a), justifying termination of defendants' parental rights. We affirm. Judge … relative. The resource parent has provided a stable and supportive home for the children. They have been attending …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2614-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … it first rejected the Division's permanency plan for termination of defendants' parental rights, the trial court … as Dr. Swanson. The Law Guardian called no witnesses but supported the Division's request for KLG. During Rispaldo's …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2614-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … it first rejected the Division's permanency plan for termination of defendants' parental rights, the trial court … as Dr. Swanson. The Law Guardian called no witnesses but supported the Division's request for KLG. During Rispaldo's …
njcourts.gov
… affirm. I. The parties married in April 2012 and have two children together: a daughter, born in December 2011, and a … in alimony for three years. As to the potential for earlier termination of alimony payments, the MSA provided: [A]limony … MSA specified the parties agreed to deviate from the Child Support Guidelines, and neither party would pay the other …
-
njcourts.gov
… affirm. I. The parties married in April 2012 and have two children together: a daughter, born in December 2011, and a … in alimony for three years. As to the potential for earlier termination of alimony payments, the MSA provided: [A]limony … MSA specified the parties agreed to deviate from the Child Support Guidelines, and neither party would pay the other …
njcourts.gov › attorneys › rules of court
… 5:13-7-Court Determination Following Board Review 5:13-7 … Copies of Board … finds that to do so would not be in the interests of the child, the court upon receipt of the report from the board … which may include the temporary caretaker. … Court Determination. … The court shall provide written notice of its …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4064-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … A-4064-16T3 clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4456-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PRTOECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4456-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PRTOECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4064-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … A-4064-16T3 clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-1112-15T1 A-2869-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of parental rights. We derive the following from … to reunify the children with them. Wells testified she supported the termination of parental rights and adoption of …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-1112-15T1 A-2869-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of parental rights. We derive the following from … to reunify the children with them. Wells testified she supported the termination of parental rights and adoption of …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-3076-20 A-3078-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Family Part judge found the Division had not demonstrated support for prong four of the best interests of the child … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and 22 A-3076-20 (4) …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-3076-20 A-3078-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Family Part judge found the Division had not demonstrated support for prong four of the best interests of the child … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and 22 A-3076-20 (4) …