Filters
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2701-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … was held on February 16 and March 2, 2023. The law guardian supported termination of parental rights. Because S.L.P.S. became 1 …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2701-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … was held on February 16 and March 2, 2023. The law guardian supported termination of parental rights. Because S.L.P.S. became 1 …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0619-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of her parental rights. The essential facts of … for Human Development Coastal Wellness (RHD), the provider supporting E.S. in the community. RHD reported E.S. …
- A-0619-17T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0619-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of her parental rights. The essential facts of … for Human Development Coastal Wellness (RHD), the provider supporting E.S. in the community. RHD reported E.S. …
- njcourts.gov… PSA to award primary custody of their sixteen- year-old child to Valsalen, with child support payable by Paul.1 The PSA imputed Paul’s annual … familiar principles here, we affirm the trial court's determination, substantially for the sound reasons expressed …
- A-0655-19T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… PSA to award primary custody of their sixteen- year-old child to Valsalen, with child support payable by Paul.1 The PSA imputed Paul’s annual … familiar principles here, we affirm the trial court's determination, substantially for the sound reasons expressed …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4654-15T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in these proceedings. 2 This October 22, 2015 determination became final and appealable as of right after … by failing to provide him with adequate housing "is not supported by the evidence." We disagree. Our review of the …
- A-4654-15T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4654-15T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in these proceedings. 2 This October 22, 2015 determination became final and appealable as of right after … by failing to provide him with adequate housing "is not supported by the evidence." We disagree. Our review of the …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-4735-16T4 A-4736-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Their appeals have been consolidated. The law guardian supports the termination. We affirm substantially for the reasons stated …
- A-4735-16T2/A-4736-16T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-4735-16T4 A-4736-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Their appeals have been consolidated. The law guardian supports the termination. We affirm substantially for the reasons stated …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1658-19T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … contends that the Division should have provided further support for her during her time trying to improve her … 15.1(a), which, in the best interest of the child, permits termination of parental rights. In re Guardianship of …
- A-1658-19T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1658-19T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … contends that the Division should have provided further support for her during her time trying to improve her … 15.1(a), which, in the best interest of the child, permits termination of parental rights. In re Guardianship of …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3706-16T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of … Servs. v. A.W., 103 N.J. 591 (1986), and is more than amply supported by the record. F.M., 211 N.J. at 448-49. We affirm …
- A-3706-16T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3706-16T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of … Servs. v. A.W., 103 N.J. 591 (1986), and is more than amply supported by the record. F.M., 211 N.J. at 448-49. We affirm …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4157-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the father of L.R.J. ("Laurie"), appeals the Family Part's termination of parental rights. The Law Guardian and the … noted that Dr. Lee's "opinions and conclusions were well-supported by facts." Appellant did not testify and he …
- A-4157-18T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4157-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the father of L.R.J. ("Laurie"), appeals the Family Part's termination of parental rights. The Law Guardian and the … noted that Dr. Lee's "opinions and conclusions were well-supported by facts." Appellant did not testify and he …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0748-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … licensed therapist is not the person to be rendering this determination." Later during the conference, the judge … on October 6, 2020. J.K., L.K., and S.K.'s law guardians supported the Division's application to terminate …
- A-0748-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0748-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … licensed therapist is not the person to be rendering this determination." Later during the conference, the judge … on October 6, 2020. J.K., L.K., and S.K.'s law guardians supported the Division's application to terminate …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1480-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and Permanency (Division) and O.M.'s Law Guardian support the judgment. Based on our review of the record, we … and history of the Division's involvement, leading to the termination of defendant's parental rights. We briefly …
- A-1480-17T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1480-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and Permanency (Division) and O.M.'s Law Guardian support the judgment. Based on our review of the record, we … and history of the Division's involvement, leading to the termination of defendant's parental rights. We briefly …