-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-0934-16T1 A-0935-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … both children. The court initially rejected DCPP's plan for termination of Nancy's and Roger's parental rights, and … and are bound by his factual findings provided they are supported by sufficient credible evidence. N.J. Div. of …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1672-18T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … which the judge found all four statutory prongs favored termination was not clear or convincing. He also claims he … the children's situation over such a lengthy period of time supported the judge's conclusion on these two prongs. …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1672-18T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … which the judge found all four statutory prongs favored termination was not clear or convincing. He also claims he … the children's situation over such a lengthy period of time supported the judge's conclusion on these two prongs. …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1597-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … removed D.U.O. from defendant's custody based on its determination that defendant failed to supervise and neglected … RIGHTS WHEN IT ADOPTED THE DCPP'S SPECULATIVE AND UNSUPPORTED ARGUMENTS CONCERNING N.J.'S COUSIN, J.P., WITHOUT …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1597-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … removed D.U.O. from defendant's custody based on its determination that defendant failed to supervise and neglected … RIGHTS WHEN IT ADOPTED THE DCPP'S SPECULATIVE AND UNSUPPORTED ARGUMENTS CONCERNING N.J.'S COUSIN, J.P., WITHOUT …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3041-18T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … failed to establish that no reasonable alternative to termination of his parental rights existed, and failed to … their parental fitness." Id. at 562. R.T. cites to R.G. as support for his contention that the Division failed to make …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3041-18T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … failed to establish that no reasonable alternative to termination of his parental rights existed, and failed to … their parental fitness." Id. at 562. R.T. cites to R.G. as support for his contention that the Division failed to make …
default
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2046-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to them. Mindful of that fact, she asks that we reverse the termination of her parental rights but that the boys remain … and second prongs of the best interests standard were not supported by the record. Id. at 35-40. We remanded for …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2046-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to them. Mindful of that fact, she asks that we reverse the termination of her parental rights but that the boys remain … and second prongs of the best interests standard were not supported by the record. Id. at 35-40. We remanded for …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-4972-15T1 A-4973-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of their parental rights. 1 C.I., although … review convinces us the trial judge's findings are amply supported by the trial testimony. Defendants never managed …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-4972-15T1 A-4973-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of their parental rights. 1 C.I., although … review convinces us the trial judge's findings are amply supported by the trial testimony. Defendants never managed …
njcourts.gov
… include: hospital and home-based services like meal support and transportation; camps for children with terminal illness; counseling for families who … principles to utilize in making the fact-sensitive determination as to what constitutes “moral and mental …
-
njcourts.gov
… include: hospital and home-based services like meal support and transportation; camps for children with terminal illness; counseling for families who … principles to utilize in making the fact-sensitive determination as to what constitutes “moral and mental …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-1112-15T1 A-2869-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of parental rights. We derive the following from … to reunify the children with them. Wells testified she supported the termination of parental rights and adoption of …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-1112-15T1 A-2869-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of parental rights. We derive the following from … to reunify the children with them. Wells testified she supported the termination of parental rights and adoption of …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4941-15T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … a guardianship complaint against defendants seeking the termination of their parental rights to their son. Judge … here. Judge Freid's findings and ultimate conclusions are supported by the competent evidence in the record. We …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4941-15T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … a guardianship complaint against defendants seeking the termination of their parental rights to their son. Judge … here. Judge Freid's findings and ultimate conclusions are supported by the competent evidence in the record. We …
default
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2614-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … it first rejected the Division's permanency plan for termination of defendants' parental rights, the trial court … as Dr. Swanson. The Law Guardian called no witnesses but supported the Division's request for KLG. During Rispaldo's …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2614-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … it first rejected the Division's permanency plan for termination of defendants' parental rights, the trial court … as Dr. Swanson. The Law Guardian called no witnesses but supported the Division's request for KLG. During Rispaldo's …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-3076-20 A-3078-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Family Part judge found the Division had not demonstrated support for prong four of the best interests of the child … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and 22 A-3076-20 (4) …